1
|
Gruber G. Escalation and De-Escalation of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: Strategies for Risk-Adapted Optimization. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2946. [PMID: 39272804 PMCID: PMC11394564 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 08/20/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is recommended after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy (with risk factors). Consideration of pros and cons, including potential side effects, demands the optimization of adjuvant RT and a risk-adapted approach. There is clear de-escalation in fractionation-hypofractionation should be considered standard. For selected low-risk situations, PBI only or even the omission of RT might be appropriate. In contrast, tendencies toward escalating RT are obvious. Preoperative RT seems attractive for patients in whom breast reconstruction is planned or for defining the tumor location more precisely with the potential of giving ablative doses. Dose escalation by a (simultaneous integrated) boost or the combination with new compounds/systemic treatments may increase antitumor efficacy but also toxicity. Despite low evidence, RT for oligometastatic disease is becoming increasingly popular. The omission of axillary dissection in node-positive disease led to an escalation of regional RT. Studies are ongoing to test if any axillary treatment can be omitted and which oligometastatic patients do really benefit from RT. Besides technical improvements, the incorporation of molecular risk profiles and also the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy have the potential to optimize the decision-making concerning if and how local and/or regional RT should be administered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guenther Gruber
- Institute for Radiotherapy, Klinik Hirslanden, Witellikerstrasse 40, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
- Medical School, University of Nicosia, CY-1700 Nicosia, Cyprus
- Medical Faculty, University of Berne, CH-3000 Berne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alkner S, Wieslander E, Lundstedt D, Berg M, Kristensen I, Andersson Y, Bergkvist L, Frisell J, Olofsson Bagge R, Sund M, Christiansen P, Davide Gentilini O, Kontos M, Kühn T, Reimer T, Rydén L, Filtenborg Tvedskov T, Vrou Offersen B, Dahl Nissen H, de Boniface J. Quality assessment of radiotherapy in the prospective randomized SENOMAC trial. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110372. [PMID: 38866204 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Recommendations for regional radiotherapy (RT) of sentinel lymph node (SLN)-positive breast cancer are debated. We here report a RT quality assessment of the SENOMAC trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS The SENOMAC trial randomized clinically node-negative breast cancer patients with 1-2 SLN macrometastases to completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) or SLN biopsy only between 2015-2021. Adjuvant RT followed national guidelines. RT plans for patients included in Sweden and Denmark until June 2019 were collected (N = 1176) and compared to case report forms (CRF). Dose to level I (N = 270) and the humeral head (N = 321) was analyzed in detail. RESULTS CRF-data and RT plans agreed in 99.3 % (breast/chest wall) and in 96.6 % of patients (regional RT). Congruence for whether level I was an intended RT target was lower (78 %). In accordance with Danish national guidelines, level I was more often an intended target in the SLN biopsy only arm (N = 334/611, 55 %,) than in the cALND arm (N = 174/565, 31 %,). When an intended target, level I received prescribed dose to 100 % (IQR 98-100 %) of the volume. However, even when not an intended target, full dose was delivered to > 80 % of level I (IQR 75-90 %). The intentional inclusion of level I in the target volume more than doubled the dose received by ≥ 50 % of the humeral head. CONCLUSION Congruence between CRF data and RT plans was excellent. Level I received a high dose coverage even when not intentionally included in the target. Including level I in target significantly increased dose to the humeral head.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Alkner
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Skåne University Hospital Lund, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Elinore Wieslander
- Skåne University Hospital Lund, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Dan Lundstedt
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Gothenburg University, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Oncology at Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Martin Berg
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Kristensen
- Skåne University Hospital Lund, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden
| | - Yvette Andersson
- Department of Surgery, Vastmanland Hospital Vasteras, Vasteras, Sweden; Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University and Region Vastmanland, Vastmanland Hospital Vasteras, Sweden
| | - Leif Bergkvist
- Centre for Clinical Research, Uppsala University and Region Vastmanland, Vastmanland Hospital Vasteras, Sweden
| | - Jan Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Breast Center Karolinska, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Sahlgrenska Center for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Malin Sund
- Department of Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Finland; Department of Diagnostics and Intervention/ Surgery, Umeå University, Sweden
| | - Peer Christiansen
- Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Oreste Davide Gentilini
- Breast Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano, Italy
| | - Michalis Kontos
- 1st Department of Surgery, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Thorsten Kühn
- Die Filderklinik, Breast Center, Filderstadt, Germany; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Ulm, Germany
| | - Toralf Reimer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Lisa Rydén
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden; Skåne University Hospital , Department of Gastroenterology and Surgery, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Breast Surgery, Gentofte Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Vrou Offersen
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Henrik Dahl Nissen
- Department of Oncology, Vejle Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Surgery, Capio St. Goran's Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cardoso MJ, Poortmans P, Senkus E, Gentilini OD, Houssami N. Breast cancer highlights from 2023: Knowledge to guide practice and future research. Breast 2024; 74:103674. [PMID: 38340683 PMCID: PMC10869942 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 12/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
This narrative work highlights a selection of published work from 2023 with potential implications for breast cancer practice. We feature publications that have provided new knowledge immediately relevant to patient care or for future research. We also highlight guidelines that have reported evidence-based or consensus recommendations to support practice and evaluation in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment. The scope of selected highlights represents various domains and disciplines in cancer control, from prevention to treatment of early and advanced breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria-Joao Cardoso
- Champalimaud Foundation Breast Unit, Lisbon, Portugal; University of Lisbon, Faculty of Medicine, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Netwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Elżbieta Senkus
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Oreste D Gentilini
- Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milano, Italy; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Nehmat Houssami
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, A Joint Venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Wiser Healthcare, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|