Improving the accuracy of digital templating: achieving success through stakeholder management

Preoperative Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Method for Calibrating Digital Radiographs Using Patient Demographics and Anthropometric Measurements

Background Preoperative templating aids the surgeon in estimating implant size and placement. Calibration markers are used to set the correct magnification of digital images before templating. Improper marker placement or complete absence can lead to inaccuracy or an inability to calibrate images altogether. Aims This study describes a method for calibrating images using a patient's femoral head size (FHS) predicted using demographics and anthropometric data. Materials and methods A formula predicting the FHS was derived from a cohort of 507 patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for an intracapsular fractured neck of the femur through multivariate regression analysis. A separate validation cohort (n=50) who had undergone total hip arthroplasty (THA) had postoperative radiographs calibrated using the predicted FHS and the native contralateral hip as a surrogate calibration marker. The THA femoral head implant size was subsequently measured and compared with the actual implant size selected intraoperatively. Measurements were performed by two independent assessors to determine intra- and interobserver reliability. Results Multivariate regression analyses showed four variables significantly correlated with the size of the femoral head: gender (p < 0.001), height (p < 0.001), weight (p < 0.001), and race (Asian) (p = 0.01). Using these, a regression model to predict the FHS was obtained with an R2 value of 0.65 and a standard error of 2.18 mm. The validation cohort showed that THA head implant size could be accurately measured with an average root-mean-squared error (RMSE) of 1.41 mm (SD = 0.97 mm; %RMSE = 4.7%). The implant head size was measured to be within 5%, 10%, and 15% RMSE in 57.5%, 93.0%, and 100.0% of cases, respectively. There was excellent intraobserver (R2 = 0.94 and 0.95) and interobserver (R2 = 0.94) reliability. Conclusions The novel method proposed and validated in this study, using a predicted FHS to calibrate digital images, provides an alternative means of templating THA for fractured neck of the femur patients, in whom external calibration markers are often absent.

A retrospective evaluation of supine pelvic radiography image quality using centring points and anatomical axial rotation, including reliability of measurements (ARLEX-P STUDY)

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic radiographs are commonly used for the investigation of a variety of conditions. Comparison between examinations requires a consistent radiographic technique but variations in image quality and radiographic centring points are frequently reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to establish the amount of variation in the radiographic centring point (RCP) and pelvic axial rotation (PAR), with a secondary aim of reporting the reliability of such measures.

METHODS

Using a previously acquired imaging archive, 633 adult pelvis/hip radiographs were identified on a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS). Radiographs with bilateral prostheses, evidence of acute pelvic trauma, projections acquired on a stretcher/trolley and those demonstrating large discontinuity between the detector and X-ray field centre were excluded. To determine centring point variation (+ values denote superior variations) and axial rotation multiple measurements were obtained from each radiograph. A video was used to train five observers and each of these reviewed ten random cases to determine inter- and intra-rater reliability. One of the five observers then performed the measurements on all remaining radiographs.

RESULTS

Following exclusions 380 radiographs were evaluated. The median (IQR) RCP deviation from the inter-acetabular line was +22 (+2 to +43) mm where both iliac crests were present and -29 (-45 to -12) mm where they were not. Eleven (3%) cases demonstrate RCP variation from the midline of greater than 25 mm (no bias towards the left or right side). The median (IQR) PAR was 0.0 (-1.5 to 1.4) degrees with greater variance in PAR for male participants (p = 0.004). Almost 60% of inter-rater ICC measurements were categorised as excellent, good or moderate.

CONCLUSION

Variations in RCP and PAR exist when evaluating a sample of routinely acquired pelvis radiographs. Some initial factors, such as sex and sub-examination type (full pelvis [XPEL] or low centred pelvis [XHIPB]) have been identified as having a statistical affect on variability. Further research and methods to standardise radiographic techniques is required and must be multidimensional in nature.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Selection of radiographic technique, including RCP, appears to influence components of the pelvis radiograph. Given the increasing clinical requirements for pelvic radiography further standardisation alongside individual optimisation is warranted.

Preoperative templating in orthopaedic fracture surgery: The past, present and future

Preoperative planning in orthopaedic fracture surgery corroborates with the goal of establishing the best possible surgical result and ensuring a functioning limb for the patient. From placing sketches on overhead projector paper and measuring lengths from anatomical landmarks, ways of preoperative planning have evolved rapidly over the last 100 years. Today, preoperative planning includes methods such as advanced 3-Dimensional (3D) printed models and software programs incorporating entire libraries of osteosynthesis materials that can be shaped and rotated to fit a patient's specific anatomy. Relevant literature was evaluated to review the development of preoperative templating from the past and present, in order to assess its impact on the future of osteosynthesis.We identified studies on 3D-imaging, computer-assisted systems, and 3D-printed fractured bones and drill guides. The use of some of these systems resulted in a reduction in operation time, blood loss, perioperative fluoroscopy and hospital stay, as well as better placement of osteosynthesis material. Only few studies have identified differences in patient morbidity and mortality. Future techniques of preoperative templating are on the rise and the potential is vast. The cost-effectiveness and usefulness of certain methods need to be evaluated further, but the benefit of preoperative templating has the potential of being revolutionary, with the possibility of radical advances within orthopaedic surgery.