Teams and continuity of end-of-life care in hospitals: managing differences of opinion

Predicting End-of-Life in a Hospital Setting

Background

The ability to predict the prognosis of a disease and anticipate death is valuable for patients and families especially in an acute care setting for chronically ill patient. Multiple scoring systems are used to measure disease progression and predict hospital mortality in patients with life-threatening illnesses, taking into account acute conditions, catastrophic events, and slow decline.

Aim

Our primary aim is to assess palliative performance score (PPS), early warning score (EWS) and local rumah sakit Dr Hasan Sadikin (RSHS) score to predict 14 days in-hospital mortality.

Methods

This was a single-center prospective cohort study from November 2022 to April 2023. Patients with World Health Organization category of terminal illnesses were scored using PPS, EWS and RSHS score and were followed up for 14 days in hospital. Multivariate analysis were conducted and The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were used.

Results

A multivariable model was calculated using Cox regression. The final model results indicate that EWS (HR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.1-7.7) and a decrease in consciousness (HR: 3.6, 95% CI: 1.2-10.22) were statistically significant in predicting mortality.

Discussions

Most patient in the cohort that died had cancer and were admitted in the previous 6 months. Relying solely on single prediction may not provide enough accuracy, within a 14-day timeframe. Therefore, the results of multivariate analysis were not statistically significant due to Several factors contribute to the complexity of this prediction challenge. As a multifaceted disease with varying stages, treatments, and outcomes, cancer presents a diverse landscape of patient experiences.

Conclusion

EWS and decreased consciousness are significant predictors of in-hospital mortality. It is crucial in clinical setting to use multiple indicators to predict death and improve patient care.

Organizational structures influencing timely recognition and acknowledgment of end-of-life in hospitals - A qualitative study of nurses' and doctors' experiences

PURPOSE

Healthcare personnel's timely recognition and acknowledgment of end-of-life (EOL) is fundamental for reducing futile treatment, enabling informed decisions regarding the last days or weeks of life, and focusing on high-quality palliative care. The aim of this study is to explore and describe nurses' and doctors' experiences of how organizational structures in hospitals influence timely recognition and acknowledgment of EOL.

METHODS

A qualitative explorative design was applied, with data collected through 12 individual in-depth interviews using a semi-structured interview guide. A total of 6 nurses and 6 doctors were strategically recruited from medical and surgical wards in a Norwegian hospital. Qualitative content analysis was used.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed the theme The importance of hospital organizational structures in timely recognition and acknowledgment of EOL and a subtheme comprising three areas of organizational structures influencing timely recognition and acknowledgment of EOL; Challenges to and demands of continuity, collaboration, and time.

CONCLUSIONS

The study's results show challenges in identifying when cancer patients approach the last weeks and days of life within hospital wards. For nurses and doctors to be able to recognize and acknowledge EOL, continuity of care, collaboration, and time is needed. A fragmented healthcare system, with a predominant focus on treatment and cure, may prevent cancer patients from receiving timely palliative, care causing unnecessary suffering.

A qualitative study exploring challenges and solutions to negotiating goals of care at the end of life in hospital settings

BACKGROUND

Negotiating goals of care (GoC) with patients is an essential skill for all health-care professionals (HCPs) in hospitals. End-of-Life Essentials (EOLE) is a Commonwealth-funded project that delivers free, peer-reviewed, evidence-based, online education and practice change resources. To date, around 26 000 doctors, nurses and allied health professionals have registered to access the education. 'Planning End-of-Life Care-Goals of Care' features in the suite of EOLE modules and includes education around negotiating GoC with patients and families.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to explore the views of module learners (HCPs) on challenges they have faced when negotiating GoC at the EOL with patients and families.

METHODS

Participants were learners (HCPs) who registered to the EOLE website and engaged with the GoC module. Learners' responses to the question posed at the end of the module 'What are the hardest or most challenging things about negotiating GoC with patients and families?' were extracted for a 12-month period. Qualitative data were analysed thematically in NVivo V.12, guided by the theoretical framework of pragmatism. An open, inductive approach was used to code the data, with axial coding used to refine and organize themes and subthemes.

RESULTS

A total of 451 learner statements were analysed. Five themes emerged from the data: (i) differing views and opinions; (ii) challenges to understanding; (iii) managing emotions; (iv) initiating the EOL conversation and (v) lack of professional knowledge or capacity. Five subthemes were also organized under the theme 'differing views and opinions'.

CONCLUSION

Planning EOL care demands high-level, compassionately skilful and sensitive care and services, which are in line with the patient's and family's wishes. In practice, however, there are many challenges to this, such as ensuring that patients, families, and HCPs are aware of different expectations regarding future health-care possibilities, and that HCPs are prepared for negotiating GoC to achieve quality and safe EOL care in hospitals.