1
|
Lim SM, Law BP. Food allergy knowledge, attitude and management among preschool personnel in Malaysia. J Hum Nutr Diet 2023; 36:2073-2084. [PMID: 37475527 DOI: 10.1111/jhn.13213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Revised: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children are vulnerable, and they may experience their first serious food allergy reaction at school, where they spend much of their time. The present study aims to determine the level of food allergy knowledge, attitude and management (KAM) among preschool personnel in Klang Valley, Malaysia. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted with 292 personnel working in Klang Valley preschools. The participants completed an online questionnaire asking about sociodemographic information and food allergy KAM. Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests were used to compare the KAM level between public and private preschool personnel and examine the association of KAM of food allergy with various sociodemographic factors, respectively. RESULTS Some 86.3% of the participants demonstrated a low level of food allergy knowledge, 64.7% showed a negative food allergy attitude and 57.9% indicated fair food allergy management. The total mean score for food allergy knowledge was higher (p < 0.01) among the private preschool personnel compared to the public group, although there was no significant difference in attitude (p = 0.244) or practice (p = 0.171). Age group (p < 0.01) and monthly income (p < 0.05) were significantly associated with the level of attitude, whereas no sociodemographic factor was associated with knowledge and management of food allergy. CONCLUSIONS Most preschool personnel in Klang Valley have a low level of food allergy knowledge, negative attitudes and a fair level of ability to manage food allergy reactions. The findings of the present study may guide future studies to improve the food allergy KAM of preschool personnel and provide a safer environment for children with food allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- See Meng Lim
- Nutritional Sciences Programme & Centre for Community Health Studies (ReaCH), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Bee Pek Law
- Nutritional Sciences Programme & Centre for Community Health Studies (ReaCH), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gallione C, Barisone M, Molon A, Pavani M, Torgano C, Bassi E, Dal Molin A. Extrinsic and intrinsic factors acting as barriers or facilitators in nurses' implementation of clinical practice guidelines: a mixed-method systematic review. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2022; 93:e2022252. [PMID: 35775756 PMCID: PMC9335442 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.12942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK Greater evaluations are needed to identify barriers or facilitators in nurses' guidelines adherence. The current review aims to explore extrinsic and intrinsic factors impacting nurses' compliance. METHODS Mixed-method systematic review with a convergent approach, following the PRISMA checklist and the JBI Mixed Methods Review Methodological Guidance was conducted. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL were systematically searched, to find studies published between 2010 and 2021, including qualitative, quantitative or mixed-methods articles. RESULTS Sixty studies were included, and the major findings were analysed by aggregating them in two main themes: intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The intrinsic factors were: a) knowledge and skills; b) attitudes of health personnel; c) sense of belonging towards guidelines. The extrinsic factors were: a) organizational and environmental factors; b) workload; c) guidelines structure; d) patients and caregivers' attitude. CONCLUSIONS The included studies report lack of resources, among environmental factors, as the main barrier perceived. Nurses, who are at the forefront in addressing the direct application of knowledge and skills to ensure patient safety, have a higher perception of this kind of barriers than other healthcare personnel. Potential facilitators emerged in the review are positive feedback and reinforcements at the workplace, either from the members of the team or from the leaders. Moreover, the level of active participation of the patient and caregiver could have a positive impact on nurses' guidelines adherence. Guidelines implementation remains a complex process, resulting in a strong recommendation to support health policymakers and nursing leaders in implementing continuing education programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Gallione
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Michela Barisone
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Moreno Pavani
- Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Erika Bassi
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Alberto Dal Molin
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Waserman S, Cruickshank H, Hildebrand KJ, Mack D, Bantock L, Bingemann T, Chu DK, Cuello-Garcia C, Ebisawa M, Fahmy D, Fleischer DM, Galloway L, Gartrell G, Greenhawt M, Hamilton N, Hourihane J, Langlois M, Loh R, Muraro A, Rosenfield L, Schoessler S, Tang MLK, Weitzner B, Wang J, Brozek JL. Prevention and management of allergic reactions to food in child care centers and schools: Practice guidelines. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2021; 147:1561-1578. [PMID: 33965093 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.01.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Food allergy management in child care centers and schools is a controversial topic, for which evidence-based guidance is needed. Following the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, we conducted systematic literature reviews of the anticipated health effects of selected interventions for managing food allergy in child care centers and schools; we compiled data about the costs, feasibility, acceptability, and effects on health equity of the selected interventions; and we developed the following conditional recommendations: we suggest that child care centers and schools implement allergy training and action plans; we suggest that they use epinephrine (adrenaline) to treat suspected anaphylaxis; we suggest that they stock unassigned epinephrine autoinjectors, instead of requiring students to supply their own personal autoinjectors to be stored on site for designated at-school use; and we suggest that they do not implement site-wide food prohibitions (eg, "nut-free" schools) or allergen-restricted zones (eg, "milk-free" tables), except in the special circumstances identified in this document. The recommendations are labeled "conditional" due to the low quality of available evidence. More research is needed to determine with greater certainty which interventions are likely to be the most beneficial. Policymakers might need to adapt the recommendations to fit local circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Waserman
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Heather Cruickshank
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kyla J Hildebrand
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Douglas Mack
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Bantock
- Department of Primary Medical Services, Sun Peaks Community Health Centre, Sun Peaks, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Theresa Bingemann
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NY; Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY
| | - Derek K Chu
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carlos Cuello-Garcia
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Quality in Health Care Residency Program, Tecnologico de Monterrey School of Medicine, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - David Fahmy
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David M Fleischer
- Department of Pediatrics-Allergy/Immunology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colo
| | - Lisa Galloway
- School District No. 73, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Greg Gartrell
- School District No. 73, Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, Colo
| | - Nicola Hamilton
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Hourihane
- Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Department of Paediatrics, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Langlois
- District School Board of Niagara, St Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Richard Loh
- Department of Immunology, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Subiaco, Australia
| | | | - Lana Rosenfield
- Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Mimi L K Tang
- Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Brenda Weitzner
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Jan L Brozek
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Miles LM, Ratnarajah K, Gabrielli S, Abrams EM, Protudjer JLP, Bégin P, Chan ES, Upton J, Waserman S, Watson W, Gerdts J, Ben-Shoshan M. Community Use of Epinephrine for the Treatment of Anaphylaxis: A Review and Meta-Analysis. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:2321-2333. [PMID: 33549844 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community use of epinephrine for the treatment of anaphylaxis is low. Knowledge of rates of epinephrine use in the pre-hospital setting along with identification of barriers to its use will contribute to the development of policies and guidelines. OBJECTIVES A search was conducted on PubMed and Embase in April 2020. Our systematic review focused on 4 domains: (1) epinephrine use in the pre-hospital setting; (2) barriers to epinephrine use in the pre-hospital setting; (3) cost evaluation and cost-effectiveness of epinephrine use; and (4) programs and strategies to improve epinephrine use during anaphylaxis. METHODS Two meta-analyses with logit transformation were conducted to: (1) calculate the pooled estimate of the rate of epinephrine use in the pre-hospital setting among cases of anaphylaxis and (2) calculate the pooled estimate of the rate of biphasic reactions among all cases of anaphylaxis. RESULTS Epinephrine use in the pre-hospital setting was significantly higher for children compared with adults (20.98% [95% confidence interval (CI): 16.38%, 26.46%] vs 7.17% [95% CI: 2.71%, 17.63%], respectively, P = .0027). The pooled estimate of biphasic reactions among all anaphylaxis cases was 3.92% (95% CI: 2.88%, 5.32%). Our main findings indicate that pre-hospital use of epinephrine in anaphylaxis remains suboptimal. Major barriers to the use of epinephrine were identified as low prescription rates of epinephrine autoinjectors and lack of stock epinephrine in schools, which was determined to be cost-effective. Finally, in reviewing programs and strategies, numerous studies have engineered effective methods to promote adequate and timely use of epinephrine. CONCLUSION The main findings of our study demonstrated that across the globe, prompt epinephrine use in cases of anaphylaxis remains suboptimal. For practical recommendations, we would suggest considering stock epinephrine in schools and food courts to increase the use of epinephrine in the community. We recommend use of pamphlets in public areas (ie, malls, food courts, etc.) to assist in recognizing anaphylaxis and after that with prompt epinephrine administration, to avoid the rare risk of fatality in anaphylaxis cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura May Miles
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
| | - Kayadri Ratnarajah
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sofianne Gabrielli
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Elissa M Abrams
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Jennifer L P Protudjer
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Children's Hospital Research Institute of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Philippe Bégin
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Edmond S Chan
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Julia Upton
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Susan Waserman
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Wade Watson
- Division of Allergy, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Jennifer Gerdts
- Executive Director, Food Allergy Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Moshe Ben-Shoshan
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|