Pharmacotherapeutic management of paediatric heart failure and ACE-I use patterns: a European survey

Strategies to facilitate adolescent access to medicines: Improving regulatory guidance

BACKGROUND

Historically, pediatric medicines are developed after adult trials are completed, even when identical drug targets and disease similarities exist across the populations. This has resulted in significant delays in the authorization of medicines for adolescent use, limiting access to beneficial drugs. This study sought to understand how adolescent inclusion in adult trials is positioned in regulatory guidance documents as they set critical expectations for trial design and regulatory decision-making.

METHODS

This study utilized a qualitative analysis approach. Guidance documents were identified via Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency websites. Utilizing a blinded adjudication process, the documents were classified as permissive, exclusionary, or silent regarding recommendations about adolescent inclusion in adult clinical trials. A post hoc analysis of similarities and differences between the Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency guidance documents was conducted to assess the possible role of regional pediatric research laws on age-inclusive trial methodologies as well as emergent themes by therapeutic area.

RESULTS

In total, 96 Food and Drug Administration (1977 to 2019) and 106 European Medicines Agency (1987 to 2019) guidance documents were identified for analysis. The guidance contained explicit or implicit recommendations supporting adolescent inclusion in adult trials in 32% of Food and Drug Administration and 15% of European Medicines Agency documents, while 14% and 21%, respectively, were found to be exclusionary. A large number of guidance documents were silent regarding the applicability of adolescent-inclusive trial designs (53% and 64%, Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency, respectively). Analysis by therapeutic area revealed the most permissive of adolescent inclusion in Food and Drug Administration guidance for infectious diseases and conditions requiring blood products in European Medicines Agency guidance. A more holistic approach to age-inclusive trial design was identified in disease guidance published by the Food and Drug Administration Oncology Center of Excellence.

DISCUSSION

There are many influences on the development and/or revision of regulatory guidance documents. Substantial scientific knowledge and regulatory precedence for the inclusion of adolescents within adult trials are available to inform research approaches. Our study has identified important opportunities for the enhancement of guidance. For example, contextualization of developmental factors influencing adolescent disease progression provides insights into the role of adolescent inclusion. If addressed, guidance documents can facilitate broader acceptance of age-inclusive trial methodologies and accelerate adolescent access to medicines.

Implementation of a New Electronic Liquid Dispensing System for Individualized Compounding of Hard Capsules

An automated compounding device can be a useful tool for the rapid and accurate production of small batches for personalized medicine as well as for clinical batches. A novel electronic liquid dispensing system (ELDS) was investigated to produce hard capsules with individualized dose strengths. An ethanol-based solvent system containing the antihypertensive enalapril maleate was extruded through a cannula into prefilled capsules. The capsules were prefilled with a powder bed of mesoporous silica (Syloid 244 FP) or synthetic dibasic calcium phosphate anhydrous (Fujicalin). The dosing accuracy as well as content uniformity of ELDS was compared with manual preparation using a Hamilton syringe (HS). Both methods met the pharmacopeia criteria for all formulations with an acceptance value (AV) less than 15. Drug adherence to the capsule shells was also investigated. A recovery rate of 98% of enalapril maleate showed almost no drug loss, but the appropriateness of the new dispensing method.

A word on netting of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy in hypoplastic left heart syndrome following stage-I

NPC-QIC Registry data showed that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were described in almost 38% for patients with single ventricle physiology after stage-I Norwood palliation. However, mortality and ventricular dysfunction or atrioventricular valve insufficiency seems to be not improved by oral application of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The final conclusion was that despite limited evidence of benefit for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, prescription of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors during interstage is still common. Taking into account of the predominant cardiovascular regulation in newborns and young infants by circulating catecholamines, no real improvement is to be expected from angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor monotherapy. The goals of drug therapy after stage-I Norwood palliation in hypoplastic left heart syndrome are prevention of systemic right ventricle failure, balancing pulmonary and systemic blood flow, and reduction of oxygen consumption with regard to limitations of oxygen supply by the single ventricle, furthermore, avoiding harmful effects of endogenous catecholamine production in the long term on somatic and cognitive development. In this light of knowledge, we want to recommend the use of a long-acting and highly specific ß1-adrenoreceptor blocker for almost all patients after stage-I Norwood palliation and a combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors only by indication after exclusion of potential side effects.

Efficacy and safety of propranolol in infants with heart failure due to moderate-to-large ventricular septal defect (VSD-PHF study) - A prospective randomized trial

AIMS

The utility of beta-blocker therapy in infants with heart failure (HF) due to significant left-to-right shunt lesions is not known. The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of propranolol in infants with HF due to moderate-to-large ventricular septal defect (VSD).

METHODS

The prospective randomized trial included 80 infants with HF and moderate-to-large VSD, randomly allocated to receive either conventional therapy alone (n = 40) or propranolol plus conventional therapy (n = 40). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for HF and/or chest infection, and referral for surgery. The secondary clinical outcomes were the individual components of the composite endpoint. In addition, the patients were followed up to detect safety outcomes, for example, bronchospasm, bradyarrhythmia, and worsening HF symptoms.

RESULTS

The addition of propranolol therapy to the conventional medications did not result in significant improvement in the primary composite endpoint (32.50% vs. 52.50%; P = 0.07). There was a trend toward improvement, but the study is underpowered for this important question. However, propranolol therapy significantly decreased the risk of hospitalization (12.50% vs. 32.50%; P = 0.03) and worsening of Ross HF class (5.41% vs. 28.21%; P = 0.01) as compared to conventional therapy (estimated number needed to treat = 5). Propranolol did not result in any significant safety concerns in these infants except bronchospasm in an infant.

CONCLUSIONS

Propranolol therapy in infants with significant left-to-right shunt may prevent worsening in HF symptoms and hospitalization and is well tolerated. However, it does not reduce mortality or need for surgery.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Enalapril and Enalaprilat in Pediatric Patients-A Systematic Review

Purpose: Enalapril has an established safety and efficacy in adults and is used in hypertension, heart failure, and renal failure. In pediatric patients, enalapril is labeled for children with hypertension and used off label in children with heart failure. The systematic literature search aims to assess the current knowledge about enalapril and its active metabolite enalaprilat pharmacokinetics in children as a basis for dose delineation for pediatric patients with heart failure. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed in the PubMed database using relevant keywords. Dose normalization of relevant pharmacokinetic parameters of the identified studies was done for comparison between different diseases and pediatric age groups. Results: The literature search has resulted in three pediatric pharmacokinetic studies of enalapril out of which Wells et al. reported about children with hypertension and Nakamura et al., and Llyod et al. presented data for pediatric heart failure patients. The area under the curve values of enalaprilat in hypertensive pediatric patients increased with respect to the age groups and showed maturation of body functions with increasing age. Dose normalized comparison with the heart failure studies revealed that although the pediatric heart failure patients of > 20 days of age showed the area under the curve a similar to that of hypertensive patients, two pediatric patients of very early age (<20 days) were presented with 5-6-fold higher area under the curve values. Conclusion: Data related to the pharmacokinetics of enalapril and enalaprilat in hypertensive patients and few data for young heart failure children are available. Comparison of dose normalized exposition of the active metabolite enalaprilat indicated similarities between heart failure and hypertensive patients and a potentially high exposition of premature patients but substantially more pharmacokinetic studies are required to have reliable and robust enalapril as well as enalaprilat exposures especially in pediatric patients with heart failure as a basis for any dose delineation.

Pharmacology of enalapril in children: a review

Enalapril is an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor that is used for the treatment of (paediatric) hypertension, heart failure and chronic kidney diseases. Because its disposition, efficacy and safety differs across the paediatric continuum, data from adults cannot be automatically extrapolated to children. This review highlights paediatric enalapril pharmacokinetic data and demonstrates that these are inadequate to support with certainty an age-related effect on enalapril/enalaprilat pharmacokinetics. In addition, our review shows that evidence to support effective and safe prescribing of enalapril in children is limited, especially in young children and heart failure patients; studies in these groups are either absent or show conflicting results. We provide explanations for observed differences between age groups and indications, and describe areas for future research.