Evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of systematic reviews

Improving the Treatment of Neonatal Sepsis in Resource-Limited Settings: Gaps and Recommendations

Neonatal sepsis causes significant global morbidity and mortality, with the highest burden in resource-limited settings where 99% of neonatal deaths occur. There are multiple challenges to achieving successful treatment of neonates in this setting. Firstly, reliable and low-cost strategies for risk identification are urgently needed to facilitate treatment as early as possible. Improved laboratory capacity to allow identification of causative organisms would support antimicrobial stewardship. Antibiotic treatment is still hampered by availability, but also increasingly by antimicrobial resistance - making surveillance of organisms and judicious antibiotic use a priority. Finally, supportive care is key in the management of the neonate with sepsis and has been underrecognized as a priority in resource-limited settings. This includes fluid balance and nutritional support in the acute phase, and follow-up care in order to mitigate complications and optimise long-term outcomes. There is much more work to be done in identifying the holistic needs of neonates and their families to provide effective family-integrated interventions and complete the package of neonatal sepsis management in resource-limited settings.

Breastfeeding practices based on the gestational age and weight at birth in the first six months of life in a population-based cohort of infants from North India

Background

Short and long term benefits of early Initiation of breastfeeding (EIBF) and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in the first six months of life are well established and recommended globally. However, reliable estimates of breastfeeding practices and impact of breastfeeding counselling interventions according to gestational age and weight at birth are not available in low and middle income countries.

Objective

To assess the impact of breastfeeding counselling on EIBF and EBF during the first 6 months of life according to gestational age and weight at birth.

Methods

We analysed the data collected from the Women and Infants Integrated Interventions for Growth Study (WINGS), an individually randomized factorial design trial. Mothers were counselled on EIBF during third trimester of pregnancy. They were supported throughout the first 6 months to continue EBF by early problem identification, frequent home visits and assistance in expressing breastmilk when direct breastfeeding was not possible. Breastfeeding practices were ascertained through 24 h recalls at infant ages 1, 3 and 5 months for both the intervention and control groups by an independent outcome ascertainment team. The World Health Organization (WHO) definitions were used for classification of infant breastfeeding practices. Generalized linear models of the Poisson family with a log-link function were used to estimate the effect of interventions on breastfeeding practices. The relative measures of effect on breastfeeding practices were estimated in term appropriate for gestational age (T-AGA), term small for gestational age (T-SGA), preterm AGA (PT-AGA), preterm SGA (PT-SGA) infants.

Results

Amongst all infants irrespective of gestational age and weight at birth, EIBF was (51.7%) higher amongst the intervention group (IRR 1.38, 95% CI 1.28-1.48) compared with the control group. The proportion of exclusively breastfed infants at ages 1 month (IRR 1.37, 95% CI 1.28-1.48), 3 months (IRR 2.13, 95% CI 1.30-1.44) and 5 months (IRR 2.78, 95% CI 2.58-3.00) were higher in intervention group than control group. We identified significant interaction (p value for interaction <0.05) between intervention and infant size and gestation at birth on exclusive breastfeeding at 3 and 5 months of age. Subgroup analysis showed that the impact of the intervention was greater on exclusive breastfeeding in PT- SGA infants at 3 months (IRR 3.30, 95% CI 2.20-4.96) and 5 months of age (IRR 5.26, 95% CI 2.98-9.28).

Conclusion

This is one of the first studies wherein impact of breastfeeding counselling interventions in the first 6 months of life was assessed according to infant size and gestation at birth wherein gestational age was reliably estimated. The impact of this intervention was higher in preterm and SGA babies compared to other infants. This finding is important as preterm and SGA infants have a higher burden of mortality and morbidity during early infancy. Intensive breastfeeding counselling to these vulnerable infants is likely to improve overall breastfeeding rates and reduce the adverse outcomes.Clinical Trial Registration: [http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?trialid=19339%26EncHid=%26userName=societyforappliedstudies], identifier [#CTRI/2017/06/008908].

A Quality Improvement Project to Reduce Time to Full Enteral Feeds for Very Low Birth Weight Neonates

BACKGROUND

Adherence to standardized feeding guidelines has been proposed as a strategy to limit morbidity in very low birth weight neonates. Fostering adherence limits the variability in medicine that affects the quality of patient care. The aim of this study was to reduce by 20% the time to full enteral feeds in very low birth weight neonates in the NICU within a 12-month period.

METHODS

In a level IV regional perinatal center with low utilization of its feeding protocol, a 12-month quality improvement project was conducted with a key intervention of a feeding schedule calculator based on the unit standardized feeding protocol. Through studied education and implementation cycles, these feeding schedules were used to reduce time to full enteral feeds while monitoring adverse events related to their use.

RESULTS

During the course of this quality improvement project, our time to full enteral feeds of 160 ml/kg/day of feeds reduced from 24.7 days to 17.7 days after process changes with special-cause variation noted on control charts. We also showed a significant reduction in mean central line duration over the course of the project from a baseline of 19 days to 14.5 days.

CONCLUSION

Through a key intervention of a feeding volume calculator, we were able to reduce the time to full enteral feeds in neonates without any increase in adverse events of necrotizing enterocolitis or poor weight gain.

Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

Enteral feeding for very preterm or very low birth weight (VLBW) infants is often delayed for several days after birth due to concern that early introduction of feeding may not be tolerated and may increase the risk of necrotising enterocolitis. Concerns exist, however, that delaying enteral feeding may diminish the functional adaptation of the gastrointestinal tract and prolong the need for parenteral nutrition with its attendant infectious and metabolic risks.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds on the risk of necrotising enterocolitis, mortality and other morbidities in very preterm or VLBW infants.

SEARCH METHODS

Search strategies were developed by an information specialist in consultation with the review authors. The following databases were searched in October 2021 without date or language restrictions: CENTRAL (2021, Issue 10), MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to October 2021), Embase via OVID (1974 to October 2021), Maternity and Infant Care via OVID (1971 to October 2021), CINAHL (1982 to October 2021). We also searched for eligible trials in clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, previous reviews, and reference lists of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials that assessed the effects of delayed (four or more days after birth) versus earlier introduction of progressive enteral feeds on necrotising enterocolitis, mortality and other morbidities in very preterm or VLBW infants.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors separately evaluated trial risk of bias, extracted data, and synthesised effect estimates using risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), and mean difference. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for effects on necrotising enterocolitis, mortality,  feed intolerance, and invasive infection.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 14 trials in which a total of 1551 infants participated. Potential sources of bias were lack of clarity on methods to generate random sequences and conceal allocation in half of the trials, and lack of masking of caregivers or investigators in all of the trials. Trials typically defined delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds as later than four to seven days after birth and early introduction as four days or fewer after birth. Infants in six trials (accounting for about half of all of the participants) had intrauterine growth restriction or circulatory redistribution demonstrated by absent or reversed end-diastolic flow velocities in the fetal aorta or umbilical artery.  Meta-analyses showed that delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds may not reduce the risk of necrotising enterocolitis (RR 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.58 to 1.14; RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.01; 13 trials, 1507 infants; low-certainty evidence due risk of bias and imprecision) nor all-cause mortality before hospital discharge (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.36; RD -0.00, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.03; 12 trials, 1399 infants; low-certainty evidence due risk of bias and imprecision). Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds may slightly reduce the risk of feed intolerance (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.97; RD -0.09, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.02; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome = 11, 95% CI 6 to 50; 6 trials, 581 infants; low-certainty evidence due to risk of bias and imprecision) and probably increases the risk of invasive infection (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.80; RD 0.10, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.15; number needed to treat for a harmful outcome = 10, 95% CI 7 to 25; 7 trials, 872 infants; moderate-certainty evidence due to risk of bias).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Delaying the introduction of progressive enteral feeds beyond four days after birth (compared with earlier introduction) may not reduce the risk of necrotising enterocolitis or death in very preterm or VLBW infants. Delayed introduction may slightly reduce feed intolerance, and probably increases the risk of invasive infection.

Enteral Feeding Practices for Very Preterm and Very Low Birth Weight Infants in Nigeria and Kenya

Background

Optimizing nutrition in very preterm (28-32 weeks gestation) and very low birth weight (VLBW; 1,000 g to <1,500 g) infants has potential to improve their survival, growth, and long-term health outcomes.

Aim

To assess feeding practices in Nigeria and Kenya for very preterm and VLBW newborn infants.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study where convenience sampling was used. A standard questionnaire was sent to doctors working in neonatal units in Nigeria and Kenya.

Results

Of 50 respondents, 37 (74.0%) were from Nigeria and 13 (26.0%) from Kenya. All initiated enteral feeds with breastmilk, with 24 (48.0%) initiating within 24 h. Only 28 (56.0%) used written feeding guidelines. Starting volumes ranged between 10 and 80 ml/kg/day. Median volume advancement of feeds was 20 ml/kg/day (IQR 10-20) with infants reaching full feeds in 8 days (IQR 6-12). 26 (52.0%) of the units fed the infants 2 hourly. Breastmilk fortification was practiced in 7 (14.0%) units, while folate, iron, calcium, and phosphorus were prescribed in 42 (84.0%), 36 (72.0%), 22 (44.0%), 5 (10.0%) of these units, respectively. No unit had access to donor breastmilk, and only 18 (36.0%) had storage facilities for expressed breastmilk. Twelve (24.0%) used wet nurses whilst 30 (60.0%) used formula feeds.

Conclusion

Feeding practices for very preterm and VLBW infants vary widely within Nigeria and Kenya, likely because of lack of locally generated evidence. High quality research that informs the feeding of these infants in the context of limited human resources, technology, and consumables, is urgently needed.

Burden of disease and risk factors for mortality amongst hospitalized newborns in Nigeria and Kenya

OBJECTIVE

To describe the patient population, priority diseases and outcomes in newborns admitted <48 hours old to neonatal units in both Kenya and Nigeria.

STUDY DESIGN

In a network of seven secondary and tertiary level neonatal units in Nigeria and Kenya, we captured anonymised data on all admissions <48 hours of age over a 6-month period.

RESULTS

2280 newborns were admitted. Mean birthweight was 2.3 kg (SD 0.9); 57.0% (1214/2128) infants were low birthweight (LBW; <2.5kg) and 22.6% (480/2128) were very LBW (VLBW; <1.5 kg). Median gestation was 36 weeks (interquartile range 32, 39) and 21.6% (483/2236) infants were very preterm (gestation <32 weeks). The most common morbidities were jaundice (987/2262, 43.6%), suspected sepsis (955/2280, 41.9%), respiratory conditions (817/2280, 35.8%) and birth asphyxia (547/2280, 24.0%). 18.7% (423/2262) newborns died; mortality was very high amongst VLBW (222/472, 47%) and very preterm infants (197/483, 40.8%). Factors independently associated with mortality were gestation <28 weeks (adjusted odds ratio 11.58; 95% confidence interval 4.73-28.39), VLBW (6.92; 4.06-11.79), congenital anomaly (4.93; 2.42-10.05), abdominal condition (2.86; 1.40-5.83), birth asphyxia (2.44; 1.52-3.92), respiratory condition (1.46; 1.08-2.28) and maternal antibiotics within 24 hours before or after birth (1.91; 1.28-2.85). Mortality was reduced if mothers received a partial (0.51; 0.28-0.93) or full treatment course (0.44; 0.21-0.92) of dexamethasone before preterm delivery.

CONCLUSION

Greater efforts are needed to address the very high burden of illnesses and mortality in hospitalized newborns in sub-Saharan Africa. Interventions need to address priority issues during pregnancy and delivery as well as in the newborn.