Hypothermia on admission to a neonatal intensive care unit in Oromia, western Ethiopia: a case-control study

Incidence and risk factors of neonatal hypothermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Hypothermia poses a threat to the health and lives of newborns. Therefore, it is essential to identify the factors that influence neonatal hypothermia and provide targeted intervention suggestions for clinical practice to reduce its occurrence.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search to identify factors influencing neonatal hypothermia and performed a meta-analysis to determine the prevalence of neonatal hypothermia and its associated factors. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of cohort and case-control studies, while the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) was used to evaluate the quality of cross-sectional studies.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies involving 44 532 newborns from 13 countries were included. The incidence of neonatal hypothermia was 52.5% (95% CI: 0.37, 0.68). Factors such as no skin-to-skin contact, prematurity, low birth weight, delayed breastfeeding, asphyxiation and resuscitation after birth, low APGAR score, not wearing a cap, and caesarean section were found to affect neonatal hypothermia.

CONCLUSION

Multiple factors influence neonatal hypothermia, and clinicians can utilise these factors to develop targeted intervention measures to prevent and reduce the incidence of neonatal hypothermia.

Clinical detection of 'cold stress' is overlooked: an online survey of healthcare workers to explore the gap in neonatal thermal care in low-resource settings

BACKGROUND

Neonatal hypothermia has been widely regarded as a major contributory factor to neonatal mortality and morbidity in low-resource settings. The high prevalence of potentially preventable hypothermia today urges an investigation into why neonates still become hypothermic despite awareness of the problem and established thermal care guidelines. This study aimed to explore the gaps in knowledge and practices of neonatal thermal care among healthcare workers in low-resource settings.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey was performed online among healthcare workers in low-resource settings. We applied a purposive and snowballing sampling method to recruit participants through a two-round international online survey. Questionnaires were developed using themes of neonatal thermal care extracted from existing neonatal care guidelines.

RESULTS

55 neonatal care professionals participated in the first-round survey and 33 in the second. Almost all participants (n=44-54/55) acknowledged the importance of the WHO's warm chain to keep a neonate warm. However, fewer participants (n=34-46/55) responded to practice them. When asked about cold stress, defined as a condition in which neonates are below optimum environmental temperature and using more oxygen and energy while maintaining normal body temperature, 15 out of 55 participants answered that checking extremity temperatures by hand touch was useless. Some participants reported concern about the extremity temperature's inaccuracy compared with core temperature. Opinions and preferences for rewarming methods differed among participants, and so did the availability of warming equipment at their institutions.

CONCLUSION

An inadequate understanding of cold stress underestimates the potential benefits of extremity temperatures and leads to missed opportunities for the timely prevention of hypothermia. The current thermal care guidelines fail to highlight the importance of monitoring cold stress and intervening before hypothermia occurs. Therefore, we urge introducing the concept of cold stress in any neonatal thermal care guidelines.