Early mobilisation and rehabilitation in the PICU: a UK survey

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Implementation and Barriers among Healthcare Providers in France: A Cross-Sectional Study

The implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a challenge for healthcare systems, especially in case of patients undergoing major surgery. Despite a proven significant reduction in postoperative complications and hospital lengths of stay, ERAS protocols are inconsistently used in real-world practice, and barriers have been poorly described in a cohort comprising medical and paramedical professionals. This study aims to assess the proportion of French healthcare providers who practiced ERAS and to identify barriers to its implementation amongst those surveyed. We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study to survey healthcare providers about their practice of ERAS using an online questionnaire. Healthcare providers were contacted through hospital requests, private hospital group requests, professional corporation requests, social networks, and personal contacts. The questionnaire was also designed to explore barriers to ERAS implementation. Identified barriers were allocated by two independent assessors to one of the fourteen domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), which is an integrative framework based on behavior change theories that can be used to identify issues relating to evidence on the implementation of best practice in healthcare settings. One hundred and fifty-three French healthcare providers answered the online questionnaire (76% female, median age 35 years (IQR: 29 to 48)). Physiotherapists, nurses, and dieticians were the most represented professions (31.4%, 24.2%, and, 14.4%, respectively). Amongst those surveyed, thirty-one practiced ERAS (20.3%, 95%CI: 13.9 to 26.63). Major barriers to ERAS practice were related to the "Environmental context and resources" domain (57.6%, 95%CI: 49.5-65.4), e.g., lack of professionals, funding, and coordination, and the "Knowledge" domain (52.8%, 95%CI: 44.7-60.8), e.g., ERAS unawareness. ERAS in major surgery is seldom practiced in France due to the unfavorable environment (i.e., logistics issues, and lack of professionals and funding) and a low rate of procedure awareness. Future studies should focus on devising and assessing strategies (e.g., education and training, collaboration, institutional support, the development of healthcare networks, and leveraging telehealth and technology) to overcome these barriers, thereby promoting the wider implementation of ERAS.

Functional outcomes at PICU discharge in hemato-oncology children at a tertiary oncology center in Hong Kong

BACKGROUND

Advancements in cancer treatment have resulted in longer survival but often at the expense of new therapy-associated morbidities. The aim of this study is to evaluate functional outcomes of hemato-oncology patients at PICU discharge, and to identify associated risk factors.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective observational study. All children (< 19 years) with a hemato-oncology diagnosis admitted to the Hong Kong Children's Hospital PICU over a 2-year period were included. Functional status upon admission and discharge were compared. Univariable and multi-variable analyses were employed to identify risk factors associated with new morbidities.

RESULTS

Out of 288 PICU admissions, there were 277 live discharges (mortality 4%), of which 52 (18.8%) developed new morbidities. Emergency admission, severity of illness at admission, organ dysfunction and support were associated with new morbidities (OR 1.08-11.96; p < 0.05). Adjusting for confounding factors, higher Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction 2 score at admission was significantly associated with development of new morbidities (OR 1.34; 95% CI 1.18-1.54; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Critically ill children with hemato-oncological diseases had a higher rate of developing new morbidities (18.8%) compared with the general PICU population (4-8%). This was associated with severity of illness at admission. Further work is warranted to understand the lasting effects of these new morbidities and mitigating interventions.

Barriers and perceived benefits of early mobilisation programmes in Dutch paediatric intensive care units

BACKGROUND

Early mobilisation of critically ill adults has been proven effective and is safe and feasible for critically ill children. However, barriers and perceived benefits of paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) staff involvement in mobilising critically ill children are largely unknown. In this study, we explored the barriers and perceived benefits regarding early mobilisation of critically ill children as perceived by PICU staff.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey study among staff from seven PICUs in the Netherlands has been carried out.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifteen of the 641 health care professionals (33.5%) who were invited to complete a questionnaire responded, of whom 159 (75%) were nurses, 40 (19%) physicians, and 14 (6%) physical therapists. Respondents considered early mobilisation potentially beneficial to shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation (86%), improve wake/sleep rhythm (86%) and shorten the length of stay in the PICU (85%). However, staff were reluctant to mobilize patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (63%), and patients with traumatic brain injury (49%). Perceived barriers to early mobilisation were hemodynamic instability (78%), risk of dislocation of lines/tubes (74%), and level of sedation (62%). In total, 40.3% of PICU nurses stated that physical therapists provided enough support in their PICU, but 84.6% of the physical therapists believed support was sufficient.

CONCLUSION

Participating PICU staff considered early mobilisation as potentially beneficial in improving patient outcomes, although barriers were noted in certain patient groups.

RELEVANCE TO PRACTICE

We identified barriers to early mobilisation which should be addressed in implementation research projects in order to make early mobilisation in critically ill children work.