An embedded checklist in the Anesthesia Information Management System improves pre-anaesthetic induction setup: a randomised controlled trial in a simulation setting

Persisting high rates of omissions during anesthesia induction are decreased by utilization of a pre- & post-induction checklist

INTRODUCTION

Although Checklists (CL) for routine anesthesia cases have demonstrated their values in various studies, they have found little traction so far. While several reports have shown the benefit of CL preventing omissions prior to anesthesia induction, no investigation yet has scrutinized omissions during the post-induction phase immediately after intubation. This study evaluated the rate of omissions prior to and following the induction of non-emergent general anesthesia, as well as the impact of checklists on omission prevention.

METHODS

We performed a monocentric, prospective, observational study during induction of general anesthesia cases. We evaluated the omission rate made for the pre- as well as the immediate post-induction phase and determined the impact of pre-and post-induction CL on the rate of omission corrections. The CL used were introduced two years prior to the study. The observed providers were limited to those familiar with the institutional CL. Usage of CL was not mandated.

RESULTS

237 general anesthesia inductions were included in the observation. At least one omission in 32% of all cases in the pre-induction setup was found and in 40% within the immediate post-induction phases. CL significantly reduced omission rates (relative risk = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.45-0.92, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Omission rates during the pre- and post-induction phases of routine general anesthesia procedures remain high. Pre- and post-induction CL have the potential to increase patient safety and should be considered for routine anesthesia with appropriate training provided.

Role of perioperative nursing in anesthesia: a national overview

Abstract Objectives: To assess the actions performed by the operating room nurse during anesthesia and their behavior for patient safety regarding the reporting on adverse events, and to analyze their knowledge about anesthetic practices. Method: This is a cross-sectional study carried out using an electronic questionnaire consisting of socio-demographic, professional practice, knowledge in anesthesia, patient safety, and professional practice questions, conducted from January to March 2019 with operating room nurses. Results: One hundred nurses participated, 89 (89%) being women, with a mean age of 41.09 years (SD = 9.36), time of undergraduate completion of 14.33 years (SD = 8.34). The average attendance was 4.69 operating rooms (SD = 2.07) per nurse, with an emphasis on action before induction (49; 49%). Professionals reported performance of simultaneous activities (72; 72%) and insufficient number of employees (57; 57%) as difficulties of their daily practice. Among the participants, 77 (77%) correctly cited the periods of general anesthesia and 80.4% always reported the occurrence of an adverse event. Conclusion: Nurses identified their role in anesthesia, with limitations for assistance from multiple activities and lack of professionals.

Human errors and their prevention in healthcare

Human errors form a significant portion of preventable mishaps in healthcare. Even the most competent clinicians are not immune to it. Errors in the perioperative period can often have grave consequences, and hence, perioperative clinicians need to be aware of the impact of human errors and how to minimize them. Errors are broadly classified into two kinds: latent and active errors. While active errors need to be addressed at the individual level, latent errors indicate organizational inadequacies. This review describes common errors in perioperative settings, the impact of such errors on healthcare, and preventive strategies to minimize such errors in daily patient care.

A desktop systems analysis of critical incidents within a university hospital department of anaesthesia

INTRODUCTION

Medical error is frequently the result of latent systems factors. Incident reporting systems face many challenges including inability of the system to process reports adequately, inadequate feedback mechanisms and lack of staff engagement especially from doctors. This paper describes a pragmatic physician-led desktop approach to a systems analysis of anaesthesia-related critical incidents which could be used to enhance incident reporting processing within the existing national incident reporting system.

METHODS

Anaesthesiologists within a university teaching hospital were encouraged to report incidents anonymously during the 6-month study period from July 2019 to January 2020. Information was collected on incident details, outcome and preventability. A desktop systems analysis was performed to categorise incidents and to determine contributory factors. Latent errors were considered according to the level of the organisational hierarchy at which they occurred and solutions directed accordingly.

RESULTS

Seventy cases were included giving a reporting rate of 1.76%. Airway/breathing circuit problems (34%) were most frequently cited incidents, followed by other equipment (27%), medication errors (20%) and airway events (19%). The vast majority of events were considered preventable. Most incidents were near misses or of negligible adverse effect with only 6% requiring more than minor treatment. Organisational and strategic contributory factors were identified in 83% of cases, 93% of which were addressable within the department.

CONCLUSION

Implementing local incident reporting systems can be used to complement existing systems at the macro and mesolevel and can be used to improve system processing, create a phased response to latent errors and enhance engagement.

A novel checklist for anesthesia in neurosurgical cases

Throughout their training, anesthesiology residents are exposed to a variety of surgical subspecialties, many of which have specific anesthetic considerations. According to the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements, each anesthesiology resident must provide anesthesia for at least twenty intracerebral cases. There are several studies that demonstrate that checklists may reduce deficiencies in pre-induction room setup. We are introducing a novel checklist for neuroanesthesia, which we believe to be helpful for residents during their neuroanesthesiology rotations. Our checklist provides a quick and succinct review of neuroanesthetic challenges prior to case setup by junior residents, covering noteworthy aspects of equipment setup, airway management, induction period, intraoperative concerns, and postoperative considerations. We recommend displaying this checklist on the operating room wall for quick reference.

Evaluation of Nursing Actions in Anesthesia Guided by the Patient Safety Checklist: Nursing in Anesthetic Procedure (PSC/NAP): A Cross-Sectional Study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of nursing actions in anesthesia guided by the Patient Safety Checklist: Nursing Anesthetic Procedure and the difficulties in performing patient care.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Nursing actions were evaluated in 282 anesthetic procedures of adult patients undergoing general anesthesia in three periods of anesthesia in a private hospital operating room in Brazil, from January to July 2018. The evaluated outcomes were the number of items performed by nurses during anesthesia periods and limitations for applying the Patient Safety Checklist: Nursing Anesthetic Procedure instrument.

FINDINGS

Execution of the nursing actions presented a mean percentage of 85.6, highlighting the anesthetic induction stage and differences between the periods before induction and reversal. The main items not performed in evaluating the nursing care in anesthesia were as follows: the anesthesia equipment test (84; 29.78%) in the preinduction period; the evaluation of adequate ventilation (132; 46.81%) in the induction period; and the tracheal aspiration assistance (62; 21.98%) during reversal. Receiving a call from another room with care interruption was highlighted among the nurses' justifications for not performing the activities and difficulty in continuing care because of shift change.

CONCLUSIONS

The execution of nursing care actions in anesthesia mainly occurred during the period related to induction, with limitations because of dimensioning of operating rooms and simultaneous procedures.

Assessment of anesthesia machine redesign on cleaning of the anesthesia machine using surface disinfection wipes

BACKGROUND

The use of surface disinfection wipes after induction of anesthesia improves anesthesia machine cleaning. We assessed whether anesthesia machine surface redesign improves disinfection wipe cleaning by anesthesia residents.

METHODS

Sixteen anesthesia residents were assigned to 2 cases in series. The first case was randomly assigned to regional knee or hip surgery, a brief or detailed checklist, and the Perseus A500 (redesigned) or GE Aespire 7900 (conventional) machine. The second case was assigned to the opposite for each condition. Setup checklists included cleaning instructions. Eight machine sites representing redesign were contaminated with fluorescent gel prior to setup and reassessed after setup to assess cleaning efficacy. Cleaning was compared by fluorescence quantification of before and after setup images. Our primary hypothesis was that, overall, more sites would be cleaned on the Perseus machine. Our secondary hypothesis was that redesign would affect some sites.

RESULTS

Overall, the number of sites cleaned did not differ between machines (median 0.74 more sites out of 8 for the Perseus A500; 25th and 75th percentiles, -0.34 and 1.04; P = .093). However, greater cleaning was observed for the work surface and manual bag arm/hose of the Perseus machine (0.58 more sites out of 2; 25th and 75th percentiles, 0.35 and 1.05; P = .0004).

CONCLUSIONS

The number of sites cleaned overall did not differ between the conventional and redesigned Perseus A500 machines. However, the redesigned work surface and smooth manual bag arm features improved resident cleaning with surface disinfection wipes.

Aviation-Style Computerized Surgical Safety Checklist Displayed on a Large Screen and Operated by the Anesthesia Provider Improves Checklist Performance

BACKGROUND

Many hospitals have implemented surgical safety checklists based on the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist, which was associated with improved outcomes. However, the execution of the checklists is frequently incomplete. We reasoned that aviation-style computerized checklist displayed onto large, centrally located screen and operated by the anesthesia provider would improve the performance of surgical safety checklist.

METHODS

We performed a prospective before and after observational study to evaluate the effect of a computerized surgical safety checklist system on checklist performance. We created checklist software and translated our 4-part surgical safety checklist from wall poster into an aviation-style computerized format displayed onto a large, centrally located screen and operated by the anesthesia provider. Direct observers recorded performance of the first part of the surgical safety checklist that was initiated before anesthetic induction, including completion of each checklist item, provider participation and distraction level, resistance to use of the checklist, and the time required for checklist completion before and after checklist system implementation. We compared trends of the proportions of cases with 100% surgical safety checklist completion over time between pre- and postintervention periods and assessed for a jump at the start of intervention using segmented logistic regression model while controlling for potential confounding variables.

RESULTS

A total of 671 cases were observed before and 547 cases were observed after implementation of the computerized surgical safety checklist system. The proportion of cases in which all of the items of the surgical safety checklist were completed significantly increased from 2.1% to 86.3% after the computerized checklist system implementation (P < .001). Before computerized checklist system implementation, 488 of 671 (72.7%) cases had <75% of checklist items completed, whereas after a computerized checklist system implementation, only 3 of 547 (0.5%) cases had <75% of checklist items completed.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of a computerized surgical safety checklist system resulted in an improvement in checklist performance.

Effect of a Cognitive Aid on Reducing Sugammadex Use and Associated Costs: A Time Series Analysis

BACKGROUND

The authors observed increased pharmaceutical costs after the introduction of sugammadex in our institution. After a request to decrease sugammadex use, the authors implemented a cognitive aid to help choose between reversal agents. The purpose of this study was to determine if sugammadex use changed after cognitive aid implementation. The authors' hypothesis was that sugammadex use and associated costs would decrease.

METHODS

A cognitive aid suggesting reversal agent doses based on train-of-four count was developed. It was included with each dispensed reversal agent set and in medication dispensing cabinet bins containing reversal agents. An interrupted time series analysis was performed using pharmaceutical invoices and anesthesia records. The primary outcome was the number of sugammadex administrations. Secondary outcomes included total pharmaceutical acquisition costs of neuromuscular blocking drugs and reversal agents, adverse respiratory events, emergence duration, and number of neuromuscular blocking drug administrations.

RESULTS

Before cognitive aid implementation, the number of sugammadex administrations was increasing at a monthly rate of 20 per 1,000 general anesthetics (P < 0.001). Afterward, the monthly rate was 4 per 1,000 general anesthetics (P = 0.361). One month after cognitive aid implementation, the number of sugammadex administrations decreased by 281 per 1,000 general anesthetics (95% CI, 228 to 333, P < 0.001). In the final study month, there were 509 fewer sugammadex administrations than predicted per 1,000 general anesthetics (95% CI, 366 to 653; P < 0.0001), and total pharmaceutical acquisition costs per 1,000 general anesthetics were $11,947 less than predicted (95% CI, $4,043 to $19,851; P = 0.003). There was no significant change in adverse respiratory events, emergence duration, or administrations of rocuronium, vecuronium, or atracurium. In the final month, there were 75 more suxamethonium administrations than predicted per 1,000 general anesthetics (95% CI, 32 to 119; P = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive aid implementation to choose between reversal agents was associated with a decrease in sugammadex use and acquisition costs.

Anaesthesia-specific checklists: A systematic review of impact

Checklists are recognised as powerful tools to prevent avoidable errors in high-reliability organisations. In healthcare, the perioperative area has been a leading field in the development of a wide range of checklists. However, clinical literature on this subject is still sparse and heterogeneous, producing results that are sometimes conflicting. This systematic review assesses the current literature on perioperative routine and crisis checklists. Literature searches did not use a date limit and included articles up to March 2019. The methodological heterogeneity precluded combining data from the individual studies into a quantitative meta-analysis. Data are presented by means of a qualitative comparison with the reference groups based on a content analysis approach. Of the 874 identified articles, 25 were included in this review. Most identified studies (23, 92%) have shown that the use of checklists in anaesthesia can decrease human error, improve patient safety and teamwork, and increase quality of care. Beyond the WHO surgical time-out, anaesthesia-specific checklists have been shown to be useful for provider handoffs, emergencies, and routine anaesthesia procedures. However, literature on anaesthesia-specific checklists is still limited and very heterogeneous. More large-scale studies are necessary to identify an ideal anaesthesia checklist and its most appropriate implementation method.

The effects of an aviation-style computerised pre-induction anaesthesia checklist on pre-anaesthetic set-up and non-routine events

This prospective, observational study compared the proportion of cases with missing critical pre-induction items before and after the implementation of an aviation-style computerised pre-induction anaesthesia checklist. Trained observers recorded the availability of critical pre-induction items and evaluated the characteristics of the pre-induction anaesthesia checklist performance including provider participation and distraction level, resistance to the use of the checklist and the time required for completion. Surgical cases that met the criteria for inclusion in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program at a single academic hospital were selected for observation. A total of 853 cases were observed before and 717 after implementation of the checklist. The proportion of cases with failure to perform all pre-induction steps decreased from 10.0% to 6.4% (p = 0.012). There was also a significant decrease in the proportion of cases with non-routine events from 1.2% cases before to none after checklist implementation (p = 0.003). In 17 cases, the checklist alerted the anaesthesia provider to correct a mistake in pre-induction preparation.

Anesthesia information management: clinical decision support

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Perioperative informatics tools continue to be developed at a rapid pace and offer clinicians the potential to greatly enhance clinical decision making. The goal of this review is to bring the reader updates on perioperative information management and discuss future research directions in the field.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical decision support tools become more timely, accurate, and, in some instances, have been shown to improve patient outcomes. When correctly implemented, they are critical tools for optimization of perioperative care.

SUMMARY

Perioperative informaticians continue to test new and innovative ways to enhance the delivery of anesthesia care, improving the safety and efficacy of perioperative management. Future work will continue to refine tools to ensure that perioperative informatics provides clinicians timely and accurate feedback, with demonstrable evidence that a decision support system improves patient outcomes.