Time to surgery following chronic subdural hematoma: post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study

A prospective randomized controlled trial of the effect of the number of burr hole on chronic subdural hematoma recurrence: An institutional experience

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of single burr hole (SBH) versus double burr hole (DBH) drainage on the recurrence rate of chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH).

METHOD

Forty-four patients undergoing burr hole craniostomy (BHC) between July 2022 and December 2022 were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing SBH to DBH surgeries. The primary endpoint of this study was the recurrence rate of CSDH. Radiological characteristics such as midline shift, thickness, volume, density, type of hematoma, brain atrophy and so on were secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients participated in this study. Twenty-two hematomas underwent SBH craniostomy, and the other 22 had DBH craniostomy. The mean age in the SBH and DBH groups were 68.59 ± 7.94 and 69.54 ± 10.58, respectively. In each group, the proportion of males (SBH=16; DBH=15) was higher than that of females (SBH=6; DBH=7). The mean surgery time in the SBH group was significantly less than in the DBH group (p = 0.001). However, the two groups had no statistically significant difference in the CSDH recurrence rate (p = 0.312).

CONCLUSION

Our findings showed that SBH craniostomy is equally effective as DBH craniostomy at draining hematomas and does not increase the recurrence rate. Contrarily, the SBH craniostomy had a shorter surgical duration than the DBH craniostomy. As a result, we recommend SBH surgeries for all patients, with emphasis on the elderly and those with severe comorbidities, as well as in situations with few surgical facilities and a high patient admission rate.

Challenges and opportunities in the care of chronic subdural haematoma: perspectives from a multi-disciplinary working group on the need for change

INTRODUCTION

A chronic subdural haematoma (cSDH) is a collection of altered blood products between the dura and brain resulting in a slowly evolving neurological deficit. It is increasingly common and, in high income countries, affects an older, multimorbid population. With changing demographics improving the care of this cohort is of increasing importance.

METHODS

We convened a cross-disciplinary working group (the 'Improving Care in Elderly Neurosurgery Initiative') in October 2020. This comprised experts in neurosurgical care and a range of perioperative stakeholders. An Implementation Science framework was used to structure discussions around the challenges of cSDH care within the United Kingdom. The outcomes of these discussions were recorded and summarised, before being circulated to all attendees for comment and refinement.

RESULTS

The working group identified four key requirements for improving cSDH care: (1) data, audit, and natural history; (2) evidence-based guidelines and pathways; (3) shared decision-making; and (4) an overarching quality improvement strategy. Frequent transfers between care providers were identified as impacting on both perioperative care and presenting a barrier to effective data collection and teamworking. Improvement initiatives must be cognizant of the complex, system-wide nature of the problem, and may require a combination of targeted trials at points of clinical equipoise (such as anesthetic technique or anticoagulant management), evidence-based guideline development, and a cycle of knowledge acquisition and implementation.

CONCLUSION

The care of cSDH is a growing clinical problem. Lessons may be learned from the standardised pathways of care such as those as used in hip fracture and stroke. A defined care pathway for cSDH, encompassing perioperative care and rehabilitation, could plausibly improve patient outcomes but work remains to tailor such a pathway to cSDH care. The development of such a pathway at a national level should be a priority, and the focus of future work.

Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Scoping Review

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical entities, especially in the elderly population. Diagnosis is usually established via a head computed tomography, while an increasing number of studies are investigating biomarkers to predict the natural history of cSDH, including progression and recurrence. Surgical evacuation remains the mainstay of treatment in the overwhelming majority of cases. Nevertheless, many controversies are associated with the nuances of surgical treatment. We performed a systematic review of the literature between 2010 and 2022, aiming to identify and address the issues in cSDH surgical management where consensus is lacking. The results show ambiguous data in regard to indication, the timing and type of surgery, the duration of drainage, concomitant membranectomy and the need for embolization of the middle meningeal artery. Other aspects of surgical treatment-such as the use of drainage and its location and number of burr holes-seem to have been adequately clarified: the drainage of hematoma is strongly recommended and the outcome is considered as independent of drainage location or the number of burr holes.