1
|
Naqvi M, Hannah J, Lawrence A, Myall K, West A, Chaudhuri N. Antifibrotic therapy in progressive pulmonary fibrosis: a review of recent advances. Expert Rev Respir Med 2024:1-11. [PMID: 39039699 DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2024.2375420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) is a manifestation of a heterogenous group of underlying interstitial lung disease (ILD) diagnoses, defined as non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) progressive fibrotic ILD meeting at least two of the following criteria in the previous 12 months: worsening respiratory symptoms, absolute decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) more than or equal to 5% and/or absolute decline in diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) more than or equal to 10% and/or radiological progression. AREAS COVERED The authors subjectively reviewed a synthesis of literature from PubMed to identify recent advances in the diagnosis and characterisation of PPF, treatment recommendations, and management challenges. This review provides a comprehensive summary of recent advances and highlights future directions for the diagnosis, management, and treatment of PPF. EXPERT OPINION Recent advances in defining the criteria for PPF diagnosis and licensing of treatment are likely to support further characterisation of the PPF patient population and improve our understanding of prevalence. The diagnosis of PPF remains challenging with the need for a specialised ILD multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. The evidence base supports the use of immunomodulatory therapy to treat inflammatory ILDs and antifibrotic therapy where PPF develops. Treatment needs to be tailored to the specific underlying disease and determined on a case-by-case basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marium Naqvi
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jennifer Hannah
- Department of Rheumatology, Kings' College Hospitals NHS Trust, Orpington Hospital, Orpington, UK
| | | | - Katherine Myall
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Alex West
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Nazia Chaudhuri
- Department of Health and Life Sciences, School of Medicine, Ulster University, Derry-Londonderry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holland AE, Spathis A, Marsaa K, Bausewein C, Ahmadi Z, Burge AT, Pascoe A, Gadowski AM, Collis P, Jelen T, Reilly CC, Reinke LF, Romero L, Russell AM, Saggu R, Solheim J, Vagheggini G, Vandendungen C, Wijsenbeek M, Tonia T, Smallwood N, Ekström M. European Respiratory Society clinical practice guideline on symptom management for adults with serious respiratory illness. Eur Respir J 2024; 63:2400335. [PMID: 38719772 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00335-2024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Respiratory symptoms are ubiquitous and impair health-related quality of life in people with respiratory disease. This European Respiratory Society (ERS) task force aimed to provide recommendations for symptomatic treatment in people with serious respiratory illness. The ERS task force comprised 16 members, including representatives of people with serious respiratory illness and informal caregivers. Seven questions were formulated, six in the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format, which were addressed with full systematic reviews and evidence assessed using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). One question was addressed narratively. An "evidence-to-decision" framework was used to formulate recommendations. To treat symptoms in people with serious respiratory illness, the task force suggests the use of graded exercise therapy (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence); and suggests the use of a multicomponent services, handheld fan and breathing techniques (conditional recommendations, very low certainty of evidence). The task force suggests not to use opioids (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence); and suggests either administering or not administering supplemental oxygen therapy (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). The task force suggests that needs assessment tools may be used as part of a comprehensive needs assessment, but do not replace patient-centred care and shared decision making (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence). The low certainty of evidence, modest impact of interventions on patient-centred outcomes, and absence of effective strategies to ameliorate cough highlight the need for new approaches to reduce symptoms and enhance wellbeing for individuals who live with serious respiratory illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne E Holland
- Departments of Physiotherapy and Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anna Spathis
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kristoffer Marsaa
- Department of Multidisease, North Zealand Hospital, Copenhagen University, Hilleroed, Denmark
| | - Claudia Bausewein
- Department of Palliative Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Zainab Ahmadi
- Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Palliative Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Angela T Burge
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Amy Pascoe
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Adelle M Gadowski
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Phil Collis
- CPROR Birmingham University, Birmingham, UK
- Patient Advisory Group, European Lung Foundation, Sheffield, UK
| | - Tessa Jelen
- Patient Advisory Group, European Lung Foundation, Sheffield, UK
| | - Charles C Reilly
- Department of Physiotherapy, King's College Hospital, London, UK
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Lynn F Reinke
- College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lorena Romero
- The Ian Potter Library, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anne-Marie Russell
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Regional NHS Interstitial Lung Disease and Occupational Lung Disease Service, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ravijyot Saggu
- Pharmacy Medicines Management Team, Central London Community Healthcare Trust, London, UK
| | - John Solheim
- EU-PFF - European Pulmonary Fibrosis Federation, Overijse, Belgium
- LHL-IPF, Jessheim, Norway
| | - Guido Vagheggini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, Respiratory Failure Pathway, Azienda USL Toscana Nordovest, Pisa, Italy
- Fondazione Volterra Ricerche ONLUS, Volterra, Italy
| | - Chantal Vandendungen
- EU-PFF - European Pulmonary Fibrosis Federation, Overijse, Belgium
- ABFFP - Association Belge Francophone Contre la Fibrose Pulmonaire, Rebecq, Belgium
| | - Marlies Wijsenbeek
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Center of Excellence for Interstitial Lung Disease, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomy Tonia
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Natasha Smallwood
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Joint last authors
| | - Magnus Ekström
- Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Palliative Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Joint last authors
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prihartadi AS, Impelliziere Licastro G, Pearson M, Johnson MJ, Luckett T, Swan F. Non-medical devices for chronic breathlessness: use, barriers and facilitators for patients, carers and clinicians - a scoping review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023; 13:e244-e253. [PMID: 34215567 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-002962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-medical devices such as the handheld fan (fan), mobility aids (wheeled walkers with seats) and inspiratory muscle training (IMT) devices offer benefits for patient management of chronic breathlessness. We examined the published evidence regarding patient, carer and clinician use of the fan, mobility aids and IMT devices for chronic breathlessness management, and the potential barriers and facilitators to day-to-day use in a range of settings. METHODS MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, EBSCO and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched. Papers were imported into EndNote and Rayyan for review against a priori eligibility criteria. Outcome data relevant to use were extracted and categorised as potential barriers and facilitators, and a narrative synthesis exploring reasons for similarities and differences conducted. RESULTS Seven studies met the inclusion criteria (n=5 fan, n=2 mobility aids and n=0 IMT devices). All of the studies presented patient use of non-medical devices only. Patients found the fan easy to use at home. Mobility aids were used mainly for outdoor activities. Outdoor use for both devices were associated with embarrassment. Key barriers included: appearance; credibility; self-stigma; technical specifications. Common facilitators were ease of use, clinical benefit and feeling safe with the device. CONCLUSION The efforts of patients, carers and clinicians to adopt and use non-medical devices for the management of chronic breathlessness is impeded by lack of implementation research. Future research should improve knowledge of the barriers and facilitators to use. This would enhance understanding of how decision-making in patient-carer-clinician triads impacts on non-medical devices use for breathlessness management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mark Pearson
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Miriam J Johnson
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Tim Luckett
- Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Flavia Swan
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Brew A, O'Beirne S, Johnson MJ, Ramsenthaler C, Watson PJ, Rubini PA, Fagan MJ, Swan F, Simpson A. Airflow rates and breathlessness recovery from submaximal exercise in healthy adults: prospective, randomised, cross-over study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2023:spcare-2023-004309. [PMID: 37669853 DOI: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Facial airflow from a hand-held fan may reduce breathlessness severity and hasten postexertion recovery. Data from randomised controlled trials are limited and the optimal airflow speed remains unknown. We aimed to determine the effect of different airflow speeds on recovery from exercise-induced breathlessness. METHODS A prospective, randomised, cross-over design. Ten healthy participants (seven male; mean age 29±4 years; height 175±9 cm; body mass 76.9±14.1 kg) completed six bouts of 4 min of exercise. During the first 5 min of a 20 min recovery phase, participants received one of five airflow speeds by holding a fan ~15 cm from their face, or no fan control, administered in random order. Fan A had an internal blade, and fan B had an external blade. Breathlessness was measured using a numerical rating scale (NRS) at minute intervals for the first 10 min, and facial skin temperature was recorded using a thermal imaging camera (immediately postexertion and 5 min recovery). RESULTS Nine participants completed the trial. A significant main effect for airflow speed (p=0.016, ηp2=0.285) and interaction effect for airflow speed over time (p=0.008, ηp2=0.167) suggest that the airflow speed modifies breathlessness during recovery from exercise. Fan speeds of 1.7 m/s or greater increased the speed of recovery from breathlessness compared with control (p<0.05) with the highest airflow speeds (2.5 m/s and 3.3 m/s) giving greatest facial cooling. CONCLUSION Higher airflow rates (1.7 m/s or greater) reduced self-reported recovery times from exercise-induced breathlessness and reduced facial temperature .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Brew
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Sarah O'Beirne
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Miriam J Johnson
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Christina Ramsenthaler
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
- School of Health Professions, Institute of Health Sciences, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Zurich, Switzerland
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Flavia Swan
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| | - Andrew Simpson
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rajan SK, Cottin V, Dhar R, Danoff S, Flaherty KR, Brown KK, Mohan A, Renzoni E, Mohan M, Udwadia Z, Shenoy P, Currow D, Devraj A, Jankharia B, Kulshrestha R, Jones S, Ravaglia C, Quadrelli S, Iyer R, Dhooria S, Kolb M, Wells AU. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis: an expert group consensus statement. Eur Respir J 2023; 61:2103187. [PMID: 36517177 PMCID: PMC10060665 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.03187-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
This expert group consensus statement emphasises the need for standardising the definition of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (F-ILDs), with an accurate initial diagnosis being of paramount importance in ensuring appropriate initial management. Equally, case-by-case decisions on monitoring and management are essential, given the varying presentations of F-ILDs and the varying rates of progression. The value of diagnostic tests in risk stratification at presentation and, separately, the importance of a logical monitoring strategy, tailored to manage the risk of progression, are also stressed. The term "progressive pulmonary fibrosis" (PPF) exactly describes the entity that clinicians often face in practice. The importance of using antifibrotic therapy early in PPF (once initial management has failed to prevent progression) is increasingly supported by evidence. Artificial intelligence software for high-resolution computed tomography analysis, although an exciting tool for the future, awaits validation. Guidance is provided on pulmonary rehabilitation, oxygen and the use of non-invasive ventilation focused specifically on the needs of ILD patients with progressive disease. PPF should be differentiated from acute deterioration due to drug-induced lung toxicity or other forms of acute exacerbations. Referral criteria for a lung transplant are discussed and applied to patient needs in severe diseases where transplantation is not realistic, either due to access limitations or transplantation contraindications. In conclusion, expert group consensus guidance is provided on the diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of F-ILDs with specific focus on the recognition of PPF and the management of pulmonary fibrosis progressing despite initial management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sujeet K Rajan
- Bombay Hospital Institute of Medical Sciences and Bhatia Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Vincent Cottin
- National French Reference Coordinating Center for Rare Pulmonary Diseases, Louis Pradel Hospital Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INRAE, Member of ERN-LUNG, Lyon, France
| | | | - Sonye Danoff
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Kevin K Brown
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Anant Mohan
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | | | | | | | - Padmanabha Shenoy
- Department of Rheumatology, Centre for Arthritis and Rheumatism Excellence, Kochi, India
| | | | - Anand Devraj
- Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Ritu Kulshrestha
- Department of Pathology, Vallabhbhai Patel Chest Institute, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
| | - Steve Jones
- European Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Federation (EU-IPFF), Peterborough, UK
| | - Claudia Ravaglia
- Pulmonology Unit, GB Morgagni Hospital/University of Bologna, Forlì, Italy
| | | | - Rajam Iyer
- Bhatia Hospital and PD Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Sahajal Dhooria
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Martin Kolb
- Firestone Institute for Respiratory Heath, St Joseph's Healthcare and McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Co-senior authors
| | - Athol U Wells
- Interstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Co-senior authors
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Luckett T, Roberts M, Smith T, Garcia M, Dunn S, Swan F, Ferguson C, Kochovska S, Phillips JL, Pearson M, Currow DC, Johnson MJ. Implementing the battery-operated hand-held fan as an evidence-based, non-pharmacological intervention for chronic breathlessness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): a qualitative study of the views of specialist respiratory clinicians. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22:129. [PMID: 35387636 PMCID: PMC8985391 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-01925-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The battery-operated hand-held fan (‘fan’) is an inexpensive and portable non-pharmacological intervention for chronic breathlessness. Evidence from randomised controlled trials suggests the fan reduces breathlessness intensity and improves physical activity in patients with a range of advanced chronic conditions. Qualitative data from these trials suggests the fan may also reduce anxiety and improve daily functioning for many patients. This study aimed to explore barriers and facilitators to the fan’s implementation in specialist respiratory care as a non-pharmacological intervention for chronic breathlessness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods A qualitative approach was taken, using focus groups. Participants were clinicians from any discipline working in specialist respiratory care at two hospitals. Questions asked about current fan-related practice and perceptions regarding benefits, harms and mechanisms, and factors influencing its implementation. Analysis used a mixed inductive/deductive approach. Results Forty-nine participants from nursing (n = 30), medical (n = 13) and allied health (n = 6) disciplines participated across 9 focus groups. The most influential facilitator was a belief that the fan’s benefits outweighed disadvantages. Clinicians’ beliefs about the fan’s mechanisms determined which patient sub-groups they targeted, for example anxious or palliative/end-stage patients. Barriers to implementation included a lack of clarity about whose role it was to implement the fan, what advice to provide patients, and limited access to fans in hospitals. Few clinicians implemented the fan for acute-on-chronic breathlessness or in combination with other interventions. Conclusion Implementation of the fan in specialist respiratory care may require service- and clinician-level interventions to ensure it is routinely recommended as a first-line intervention for chronic breathlessness in patients for whom this symptom is of concern, regardless of COPD stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Luckett
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Building 10, Level 3, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.
| | - Mary Roberts
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Ludwig Engel Centre for Respiratory Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tracy Smith
- Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Maja Garcia
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Building 10, Level 3, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Sarah Dunn
- Respiratory Medicine Clinic, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Flavia Swan
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, Yorkshire, UK
| | - Caleb Ferguson
- Western Sydney Nursing & Midwifery Research Centre, Blacktown Clinical & Research School, Western Sydney Local Health District, Western Sydney University, Blacktown Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Slavica Kochovska
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Building 10, Level 3, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia
| | - Jane L Phillips
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Building 10, Level 3, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.,School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark Pearson
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, Yorkshire, UK
| | - David C Currow
- IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care Through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Building 10, Level 3, 235 Jones St, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia.,Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, Yorkshire, UK
| | - Miriam J Johnson
- Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Kingston Upon Hull, Yorkshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Whitehall L, Rush R, Górska S, Forsyth K. The General Self-Efficacy of Older Adults Receiving Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2021; 61:e302-e317. [PMID: 32373938 PMCID: PMC8361502 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnaa036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives General self-efficacy (GSE) encourages health-promoting behaviors in older adults. It is unsurprising then that older adults receiving health care services are reported to have a greater risk of low GSE than older adults who are not. Despite this, there is currently limited evidence investigating whether the effect differs based on the environment in which care is received. This review aims to determine whether the GSE of older adults is affected by the receipt of health care services and whether GSE varies based on the setting in which care is received. Research Design and Methods In accordance with PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration number CRD42018092191), a systematic search was undertaken across 7 databases. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and mean General Self-Efficacy Scale scores, with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were pooled for meta-analysis. Results A total of 40 studies were identified, they consisted of 33 population cohorts that were included in the meta-analysis. Older adults receiving health care services were found to be at greater risk of having lower GSE than those who do not (SMD = −0.62; 95% CI: −0.96 to −0.27, p < .0001). Following identification of sources of heterogeneity, older adults receiving acute inpatient care were more likely to have lower GSE than those receiving care in other health care settings. Discussion and Implications Older adults receiving inpatient care have a greater risk of lower GSE, and consequently, poorer health-promoting behaviors. Further research is recommended that focuses on the GSE of older adults and health outcomes following discharge from inpatient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Whitehall
- School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert Rush
- School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sylwia Górska
- School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Kirsty Forsyth
- School of Health Sciences, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kochovska S, Ferreira DH, Garcia MV, Phillips JL, Currow DC. Perspectives on palliative oxygen for breathlessness: systematic review and meta-synthesis. Eur Respir J 2021; 58:13993003.04613-2020. [PMID: 33653807 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.04613-2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Oxygen therapy is frequently prescribed for the palliation of breathlessness, despite lack of evidence for its effectiveness in people who are not hypoxaemic. This study aimed to compare and contrast patients', caregivers' and clinicians' experiences of palliative oxygen use for the relief of chronic breathlessness in people with advanced life-limiting illnesses, and how this shapes prescribing.A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data was conducted. MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched for peer-reviewed studies in English (2000-April 2019) reporting perspectives on palliative oxygen use for reducing breathlessness in people with advanced illnesses in any healthcare setting. After data extraction, thematic synthesis used line-by-line coding of raw data (quotes) to generate descriptive and analytical themes.Of 457 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria by reporting perspectives of patients (n=337), caregivers (n=91) or clinicians (n=616). Themes common to these perspectives were: 1) benefits and burdens of palliative oxygen use, 2) knowledge and perceptions of palliative oxygen use beyond the guidelines, and 3) longitudinal trajectories of palliative oxygen use.There are differing perceptions regarding the benefits and burdens of using palliative oxygen. Clinicians should be aware that oxygen use may generate differing goals of therapy for patients and caregivers. These perceptions should be taken into consideration when prescribing oxygen for the symptomatic relief of chronic breathlessness in patients who do not quality for long-term oxygen therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Slavica Kochovska
- IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,These authors are joint first authors
| | - Diana H Ferreira
- Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.,These authors are joint first authors
| | - Maja V Garcia
- IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jane L Phillips
- IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - David C Currow
- IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia .,Wolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, University of Hull, Hull, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sobanski PZ, Krajnik M, Goodlin SJ. Palliative Care for People Living With Heart Disease-Does Sex Make a Difference? Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:629752. [PMID: 33634172 PMCID: PMC7901984 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.629752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The distribution of individual heart disease differs among women and men and, parallel to this, among particular age groups. Women are usually affected by cardiovascular disease at an older age than men, and as the prevalence of comorbidities (like diabetes or chronic pain syndromes) grows with age, women suffer from a higher number of symptoms (such as pain and breathlessness) than men. Women live longer, and after a husband or partner's death, they suffer from a stronger sense of loneliness, are more dependent on institutionalized care and have more unaddressed needs than men. Heart failure (HF) is a common end-stage pathway of many cardiovascular diseases and causes substantial symptom burden and suffering despite optimal cardiologic treatment. Modern, personalized medicine makes every effort, including close cooperation between disciplines, to alleviate them as efficiently as possible. Palliative Care (PC) interventions include symptom management, psychosocial and spiritual support. In complex situations they are provided by a specialized multiprofessional team, but usually the application of PC principles by the healthcare team responsible for the person is sufficient. PC should be involved in usual care to improve the quality of life of patients and their relatives as soon as appropriate needs emerge. Even at less advanced stages of disease, PC is an additional layer of support added to disease modifying management, not only at the end-of-life. The relatively scarce data suggest sex-specific differences in symptom pathophysiology, distribution and the requisite management needed for their successful alleviation. This paper summarizes the sex-related differences in PC needs and in the wide range of interventions (from medical treatment to spiritual support) that can be considered to optimally address them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piotr Z Sobanski
- Palliative Care Unit and Competence Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Spital Schwyz, Schwyz, Switzerland
| | - Malgorzata Krajnik
- Department of Palliative Care, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Sarah J Goodlin
- Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University, Patient-Centered Education and Research, Portland, OR, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Burge AT, Cox NS, Abramson MJ, Holland AE. Interventions for promoting physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 4:CD012626. [PMID: 32297320 PMCID: PMC7160071 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012626.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Escalating awareness of the magnitude of the challenge posed by low levels of physical activity in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) highlights the need for interventions to increase physical activity participation. The widely-accepted benefits of physical activity, coupled with the increasing availability of wearable monitoring devices to objectively measure participation, has led to a dramatic rise in the number and variety of studies that aimed to improve the physical activity of people with COPD. However, little was known about the relative efficacy of interventions tested so far. OBJECTIVES In people with COPD, which interventions are effective at improving objectively-assessed physical activity? SEARCH METHODS We identified trials from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register Register, which contains records identified from bibliographic databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, AMED, and PsycINFO. We also searched PEDro, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform portal and the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (from inception to June 2019). We checked reference lists of all primary studies and review articles for additional references, as well as respiratory journals and respiratory meeting abstracts, to identify relevant studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials of interventions that used objective measures for the assessment of physical activity in people with COPD. Trials compared an intervention with no intervention or a sham/placebo intervention, an intervention in addition to another standard intervention common to both groups, or two different interventions. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methods recommended by Cochrane. Subgroup analyses were possible for supervised compared to unsupervised pulmonary rehabilitation programmes in clinically-stable COPD for a range of physical activity outcomes. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, exercise capacity, adverse events and adherence. Insufficient data were available to perform prespecified subgroup analyses by duration of intervention or disease severity. We undertook sensitivity analyses by removing studies that were at high or unclear risk of bias for the domains of blinding and incomplete outcome data. MAIN RESULTS We included 76 studies with 8018 participants. Most studies were funded by government bodies, although some were sponsored by equipment or drug manufacturers. Only 38 studies had physical activity as a primary outcome. A diverse range of interventions have been assessed, primarily in single studies, but improvements have not been systematically demonstrated following any particular interventions. Where improvements were demonstrated, results were confined to single studies, or data for maintained improvement were not provided. Step count was the most frequently reported outcome, but it was commonly assessed using devices with documented inaccuracy for this variable. Compared to no intervention, the mean difference (MD) in time in moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA) following pulmonary rehabilitation was four minutes per day (95% confidence interval (CI) -2 to 9; 3 studies, 190 participants; low-certainty evidence). An improvement was demonstrated following high-intensity interval exercise training (6 minutes per day, 95% CI 4 to 8; 2 studies, 275 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). One study demonstrated an improvement following six months of physical activity counselling (MD 11 minutes per day, 95% CI 7 to 15; 1 study, 280 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but we found mixed results for the addition of physical activity counselling to pulmonary rehabilitation. There was an improvement following three to four weeks of pharmacological treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting beta2-agonist (LAMA/LABA) compared to placebo (MD 10 minutes per day, 95% CI 4 to 15; 2 studies, 423 participants; high-certainty evidence). These interventions also demonstrated improvements in other measures of physical activity. Other interventions included self-management strategies, nutritional supplementation, supplemental oxygen, endobronchial valve surgery, non-invasive ventilation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation and inspiratory muscle training. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS A diverse range of interventions have been assessed, primarily in single studies. Improvements in physical activity have not been systematically demonstrated following any particular intervention. There was limited evidence for improvement in physical activity with strategies including exercise training, physical activity counselling and pharmacological management. The optimal timing, components, duration and models for interventions are still unclear. Assessment of quality was limited by a lack of methodological detail. There was scant evidence for a continued effect over time following completion of interventions, a likely requirement for meaningful health benefits for people with COPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela T Burge
- La Trobe UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and SportMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Institute for Breathing and SleepMelbourneAustralia
- Alfred HealthPhysiotherapyPO Box 315MelbourneAustraliaPrahran VIC 3181
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Respiratory MedicineMelbourneAustralia
| | - Narelle S Cox
- Institute for Breathing and SleepMelbourneAustralia
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Respiratory MedicineMelbourneAustralia
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Prosthetics and OrthoticsMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3004
| | - Michael J Abramson
- Monash UniversitySchool of Public Health & Preventive MedicineMelbourneVictoriaAustralia3004
| | - Anne E Holland
- La Trobe UniversityDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry and Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and SportMelbourneVictoriaAustralia
- Institute for Breathing and SleepMelbourneAustralia
- Alfred HealthPhysiotherapyPO Box 315MelbourneAustraliaPrahran VIC 3181
- Monash UniversityDepartment of Allergy, Clinical Immunology and Respiratory MedicineMelbourneAustralia
| | | |
Collapse
|