Clinical evaluation questionnaire in advanced cancer: a psychometric study of a novel measure of healthcare provider interactions

[Patient concerns and palliative psychology interventions within an inpatient palliative care service]

BACKGROUND

Multi-professional inpatient palliative care services are increasingly complementing palliative care in hospitals alongside palliative care units. The present study aims to investigate the nature and frequency of patient concerns and palliative psychological interventions in the context of palliative psychological work, as well as the perceived quality of outcomes in an inpatient palliative service.

METHODS

Palliative psychological interventions for terminally ill patients at the inpatient palliative care service at Leipzig University Hospital were investigated in a prospective follow-up evaluation study. Psychological distress (distress thermometer) as well as the perceived quality of the results of the palliative psychological support (from the therapist`s perspective) were recorded. Patient concerns and psychological conversation topics and interventions were recorded. Descriptive and regression analytic procedures were used.

RESULTS

Over a year, 355 patients in the inpatient palliative care service received psychological support, 304 participated in the study (mean age 63.8 years, 55% male, 89% oncological disease). An average of 3 palliative psychological interviews were conducted; 64% of patients reported high psychological distress (M=6.5). The most common patient concerns and topics within the interviews were dealing with emotions (87%), resources (83%), conflicting care and autonomy issues (77%) and hope (76%); significantly less common were spiritual concerns (2%) or the patient's legacy (9%). The most frequently used palliative psychological interventions included: support in illness processing and acceptance (74%) or in emotional-relieving interventions (98%) as in normalisation (75%), active listening (97%) or emotional containment (95%). Regression analysis showed that an oncological (vs. non-oncological) disease, a high number of palliative psychological interviews and interventions, comprehensive information regarding the palliative dimension of the diagnosis as well as undisturbed contact in the initial interview had a positive effect on the perceived outcome quality.

CONCLUSION

The study results show that palliative psychologists play an important role in inpatient palliative care teams and should be involved as early as possible in the course of the disease. There is a need for improvement, especially in the palliative psychological care of non-oncological patients.