Use of a novel suction cervical retractor for intrauterine device insertion: a pilot feasibility trial

Cervical bleeding with cervical stabilization during IUD placement: allis clamp versus single-tooth tenaculum, a randomized control trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the use of an atraumatic Allis clamp will result in less bleeding than the standard single-tooth tenaculum for cervical stabilization during intrauterine device (IUD) placement.

METHODS

A single-blinded randomized controlled trial was conducted during insertions of IUDs between March 2017 and March 2018. University of Kentucky Institutional Review Board (IRB 16-1110-P3K) approval was obtained. Physicians were randomized to use either an Allis clamp or a single-tooth tenaculum for cervical stabilization. A post-procedure questionnaire was used to collect outcome measures as well as demographic and obstetric-related factors.

RESULTS

Of the ninety-five participants, there was no difference in age, self-identified race/ethnicity, or the evaluated obstetric factors between the groups. Bleeding was present after clamp removal in 3 (6.3%) insertions using an Allis clamp and 26 (55.3%) insertions using a single-tooth tenaculum (RR = 0.113, CI = [0.037, 0.3481], p < 0.0001). There was no difference in IUD insertion success rates between the two clamps. There was no difference in the number of interventions needed to obtain hemostasis including indirect pressure, silver nitrate, monsel's solution, or stitch for hemostasis. Pain scores did not differ based on clamp type or age of patient, but were significantly different based on parity (p < 0.001) and IUD type (p < 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Decreased incidence of bleeding from cervical stabilization device, with unchanged insertion success using the Allis clamp can be an alternative to the single tooth tenaculum in the procedure of IUD insertion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The trial was retrospectively registered on 1/11/22 (trial registration number NCT05187078).

Safety and Efficacy of an Atraumatic Uterine Cervical Traction Device: A Pilot Study

Introduction: Alignment of the uterine cervix with the vaginal canal is often required during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). Currently available instruments are traumatic tenacula, which can cause pain and bleeding and represent an obstacle for certain patients to pursue their medical follow-up. A novel investigational cervical vacuum tenaculum, enables atraumatic traction of the cervix using a semi-circular suction pad, designed to conform to the anatomical shape of the external cervical os. Suction is generated by manually pulling out a sliding tube in a vacuum chamber.

Methods: We performed a single arm non-comparative pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the cervical vacuum tenaculum in 13 women receiving an IUD. Data on procedural efficacy, safety, patient-reported pain scores at specific time points during IUD insertion procedure and patient satisfaction were collected prospectively.

Results: Insertion of IUD was successful with use of the study device in 7 of the 13 enrolled patients (54%). No bleeding or only limited ecchymosis were caused by the device. No adverse events were reported. Participants reported very little pain (mean Visual Analog Scale <10) when applying the device. Participants who achieved IUD insertion with the device reported strong overall satisfaction with the procedure.

Conclusions: The suction-based atraumatic tenaculum can be used to manipulate the cervix during IUD insertion with satisfactory efficacy and safety. The results of this pilot study support further studies of this device in larger populations comparing with standard single-tooth tenaculum.

Clinical Trial Registration:ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT 04441333.

Interventions for the prevention of pain associated with the placement of intrauterine contraceptives: An updated review

A 2013 review found no evidence to support the routine use of pain relief for intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) placement; however, fear of pain with placement continues to be a barrier to use for some women. This narrative review set out to identify (1) new evidence that may support routine use of pain management strategies for IUC placement; (2) procedure‐related approaches that may have a positive impact on the pain experience; and (3) factors that may help healthcare professionals identify women at increased risk of pain with IUC placement. A literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane library databases revealed 550 citations, from which we identified 43 new and pertinent studies for review. Thirteen randomized clinical trials, published since 2012, described reductions in placement‐related pain with administration of oral and local analgesia (oral ketorolac, local analgesia with different lidocaine formulations) and cervical priming when compared with placebo or controls. Four studies suggested that ultrasound guidance, balloon dilation, and a modified placement device may help to minimize the pain experienced with IUC placement. Eight publications suggested that previous cesarean delivery, timing of insertion relative to menstruation, dysmenorrhea, expected pain, baseline anxiety, and size of insertion tube may affect the pain experienced with IUC placement. Oral and local analgesia and cervical priming can be effective in minimizing IUC placement‐related pain when compared with placebo, but routine use remains subject for debate. Predictive factors may help healthcare professionals to identify women at risk of experiencing pain. Targeted use of effective strategies in these women may be a useful approach while research continues in this area.