Simó Alari F, Gutierrez I. Intrauterine device extraction through laparoscopic hysterotomy.
EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2021;
26:261-263. [PMID:
33460339 DOI:
10.1080/13625187.2020.1862080]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
CASE REPORT
A 52-year-old woman with an intrauterine device placed more than 10 years before consulted our department after a failed attempt to its removal in the outpatient area. While performing the colposcopy a completely fibrosed cervical canal permitted no access to the uterine cavity. The IUD was confirmed to still be placed intrauterine by pelvix x-ray and an endovaginal sonography. Due the risk for future infections, a device extraction was recommended, although the patient categorically refused a hysteroscopic approach as an hysterectomy. After discussing all available options the patient agreed on a laparoscopic approach with uterine conservation. It was performed through a vertical hysterotomy with the electrocautery hook and the incision closed using intracorporeal vycril stitches. The patient was dismissed 48 h after surgery. A sonographic control was carried 6 months later revealing no evidence of scar complication.
DISCUSSION
Hysteroscopy with or without sonographic intraoperative control to avoid uterine perforation, remains the recommended treatment in case of retained IUD. Difficult cases with a fibrotic cervix can be dilated with a scalpel under general anaesthesia before hysteroscopy to retrieve the coil. Laparoscopic approach is usually being used as a minimally invasive procedure for the extraction of IUD that are misplaced or migrate to the peritoneal cavity. In very seleted cases, laparoscopy can be a useful tool in case other approaches are ineffective or rejected by the patient.
Collapse