1
|
Yeşil Y, Dönmez A. Evaluation of contraceptive intentions among pregnant women in the third trimester: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e36902. [PMID: 38215126 PMCID: PMC10783408 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000036902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aims to determine contraceptive intentions of pregnant women in the third trimester. This cross-sectional study was conducted at a training and research hospital in Mardin province between March 2023 and May 2023. In total, 253 pregnant women who had the ability to communicate in Turkish and agreed to participate were included in the study. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a survey and the Contraceptive Intent Questionnaire (CIQ). The average age of the participants was 28.87 ± 5.35 with 30.8% of them holding a secondary school degree. It was found that there was a statistically significant difference in terms of CIQ score between categories of the following descriptive variables: education level, husband's/partner's education level, fertility plan, receiving family planning counseling during pregnancy, and paying for the contraceptive methods used (P = .046, P = .013, P < .001, P = .008, and P < .001 respectively). It was determined that pregnant women who had not received family planning counseling during pregnancy and paid for the contraceptive method had higher contraception intention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeşim Yeşil
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin, Turkey
| | - Ayşegül Dönmez
- Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Sciences, İzmir Tinaztepe University, İzmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Freeman-Spratt GJ, Botfield JR, Lee GS, Rajiv P, Black KI. Understanding women's views of and preferences for accessing postpartum contraception: a qualitative evidence synthesis. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2023; 49:129-141. [PMID: 36635069 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nearly half of women experience unintended pregnancies. These are associated with increased risk of poor maternal physical and psychosocial health outcomes. Many pregnancies in the first year postpartum are unintended, further increasing risks of poor outcomes and complications. We undertook a qualitative evidence synthesis to evaluate qualitative research on women's views and preferences for accessing postpartum contraception, and identify evidence gaps and opportunities for postpartum contraception provision. METHODS Five databases were searched to identify relevant qualitative studies. Included studies focused on views of, and preferences for, accessing postpartum contraception for women of reproductive age in high-income countries. RESULTS Of 1854 studies identified, 28 full texts were assessed and 19 studies included. These were critically appraised using Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) and analysed using thematic synthesis. Included studies indicated the majority of women desire postpartum contraception, but face a range of financial, health system and personal barriers. Women felt unclear about the ideal interpregnancy interval (IPI) and the rationale for this. Women preferred contraceptive counselling at varying times both antenatally and postnatally, and commonly preferred to receive contraception in the immediate postpartum period before hospital discharge. Women commonly saw their obstetrician or general practitioner for contraceptive counselling, but welcomed midwifery involvement. CONCLUSIONS Most women were interested in postpartum contraception and pregnancy spacing, but felt unclear about the optimal IPI, highlighting the need for further education and support around this issue. Contraceptive counselling was viewed as valuable antenatally and postnatally, and by varying maternal health providers, as was the provision of immediate postpartum contraception.
Collapse
|
3
|
Davenport A, Morello L, Arora KS. Decision-making regarding immediate vs. interval postpartum levonorgestrel intrauterine device insertion timing. Contracept Reprod Med 2023; 8:24. [PMID: 36935510 PMCID: PMC10025049 DOI: 10.1186/s40834-023-00221-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding decision-making for contraception initiation timing postpartum may help guide patients in selecting a contraceptive method most aligned with their reproductive goals. The objective of this study was to explore the decision-making process in patients who chose immediate postplacental (IPP) levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG IUD) insertion versus interval insertion at the postpartum follow-up visit. METHODS We recruited English-speaking, reproductive-aged adult postpartum participants who received either an IPP or interval postpartum LNG IUD from September to December 2017 at MetroHealth Medical Center. We conducted interviews over the phone utilizing a pilot-tested, semi-structured interview guide. Interview topics included past experiences with contraception, provider counseling, intrapartum factors, and current experiences after IUD insertion. RESULTS We interviewed 20 participants (12 IPP and eight interval IUD recipients). Participants receiving an IPP IUD described convenience, desire for immediate contraception, pain control and availability of alternative contraception options as influential for their decision. Patients who received an interval IUD performed outside research, focused on the events surrounding delivery, and generally favored additional recovery time before obtaining an IUD. Patients who received interval IUDs were often not aware that IPP IUDs were available. Early, frequent, and comprehensive counseling was viewed favorably when compared to counseling upon arrival to the laboring unit. While overall there was congruence of participant expectations and experiences, unexpected expulsion affected desire for future IUD use in some participants. CONCLUSION Providers should be mindful that prior experience and knowledge as well as delivery room considerations affect insertion timing decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Davenport
- Section of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
| | - Laura Morello
- Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Kavita Shah Arora
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cooper M, Cameron S. Improving Access to and Quality of Postpartum Contraception Provision. Semin Reprod Med 2022; 40:235-239. [PMID: 36626916 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Sexual activity and fertility can resume shortly after childbirth, but there are barriers to contraceptive access in the postpartum period. Unintended pregnancy and short interpregnancy intervals (of less than one year) can increase the risk of obstetric and neonatal complications. The antenatal period presents an opportunity to discuss contraceptive options, many of which can be safely initiated immediately after childbirth. Successful delivery of a postpartum contraception program requires an adequate number of maternity staff trained to provide the full range of methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Cooper
- Department of Gynaecologist, Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian/University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Sharon Cameron
- Department of Gynaecologist, Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian/University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bathgate G, Sharp C, Yates E, Curnock P, Protti O, Mann S. Postnatal contraception provision in an inpatient perinatal mental health unit. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2022; 49:bmjsrh-2022-201578. [PMID: 35853726 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Bathgate
- Sexual Health, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Chelsea Sharp
- Sexual Health, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Emma Yates
- Perinatal Psychiatry, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Pauline Curnock
- Sexual Health, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Olivia Protti
- Perinatal Psychiatry, East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sue Mann
- Sexual Health, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Narayanan N, Reynolds-Wright JJ, Cameron ST. Views of clinicians towards providing contraceptive advice and contraception to women following early pregnancy loss: a qualitative study. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2022; 48:bmjsrh-2022-201480. [PMID: 35523535 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2022-201480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION National guidelines advise that clinicians caring for women post-pregnancy should give women opportunities to discuss contraception, regardless of pregnancy outcome, and provide contraception to women who choose to take up a method. This study aimed to explore knowledge, views and needs of Early Pregnancy Unit (EPU) clinicians around discussing and offering contraception and discussing pregnancy intendedness with women after early pregnancy loss using a qualitative approach. METHODS Semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews with 11 clinicians from a single regional EPU in Edinburgh, Scotland. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. RESULTS Clinicians were reluctant to discuss contraception as they believed women would find the topic overwhelming and distressing. Thoughts on discussing pregnancy intendedness were polarised; some considered it insensitive, and others essential. Barriers to discussing contraception and providing it were numerous and included time pressure, and inadequate knowledge and training on contraception. Participants suggested training on contraception, closer working with sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services, and availability of information on contraception specifically aimed at women who have experienced an early pregnancy loss could facilitate discussions and method provision. CONCLUSIONS EPU clinicians require ongoing training and support to be effective at discussing pregnancy intendedness and discussing and providing post-pregnancy contraception. This will require close working with SRH services and development of sensitive information around contraception for women experiencing an early pregnancy loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nandaja Narayanan
- Edinburgh Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Sharon T Cameron
- Chalmers Centre for Sexual and Reproductive Health, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Boydell N, Cooper M, Cameron ST, Glasier A, Coutts S, McGuire F, Harden J. Perspectives of obstetricians and midwives on the provision of immediate postpartum intrauterine devices: a qualitative service evaluation. BMJ SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2022; 48:85-92. [PMID: 34187901 DOI: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immediate postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) insertion is safe and effective but largely unavailable in Europe. Data on maternity staff views on the provision and implementation of PPIUD services are limited. The objective of this qualitative evaluation was to explore the views and experiences of obstetricians and midwives providing PPIUD within a UK maternity setting, in order to identify areas for improvement and inform service provision in other areas. METHODS Qualitative health services research within two public maternity hospitals in Lothian (Edinburgh and surrounding region), UK. Interviews with 30 maternity staff (obstetricians n=8; midwives n=22) involved in PPIUD provision. Data were analysed thematically. RESULTS Maternity staff were positive about the benefits of PPIUD for women. Midwives reported initial concerns about PPIUD safety, and the impact on workload; these views shifted following training, and as PPIUD was embedded into practice. Having a large pool of PPIUD-trained staff was identified as an important factor in successful service implementation. Having PPIUD 'champions' was important to address staff concerns, encourage training uptake, and advocate for the service to ensure continued resourcing. CONCLUSIONS PPIUD in maternity services can help address unmet need for effective contraception in the immediate postpartum period. We emphasise the importance of widespread engagement around PPIUD among all healthcare professionals involved in the care of women, to ensure staff are informed and supported. Clinical champions and leaders play a key role in amplifying the benefits of PPIUD, and advancing organisational learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Boydell
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Sharon T Cameron
- Chalmers Centre, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anna Glasier
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shiona Coutts
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Frances McGuire
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Jeni Harden
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Walker SH, Hooks C, Blake D. The views of postnatal women and midwives on midwives providing contraceptive advice and methods: a mixed method concurrent study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:411. [PMID: 34078302 PMCID: PMC8170056 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03895-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Provision of contraception to women in the immediate postnatal period has been endorsed by professional bodies, to reduce the incidence of short inter-pregnancy intervals. This study examined the views of postnatal women and practising midwives regarding provision of contraceptive advice and contraceptive methods by midwives, in a region of the United Kingdom. METHODS A mixed-method approach using qualitative interviews with midwives, and a postnatal survey followed by qualitative interviews with postnatal women, in five hospitals in the East of England. Twenty-one practising midwives and ten women were interviewed. Two hundred and twenty-seven women returned a survey. Survey data was analysed descriptively, augmented by Student's t-tests and Chi-squared tests to examine associations within the data. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed guided by the phases of thematic analysis. RESULTS Midwives and women supported the concept of increased midwifery provision of contraceptive advice, and provision of contraceptive methods in the postnatal period. Convenience and an established trusting relationship were reasons for preferring midwifery provision over visiting a doctor for contraception. The best time for detailed discussion was reported to be antenatal and community visits. The Progesterone-only-pill (POP) was the method, in which women indicated most interest postnatally. Concerns for midwives included the need for increased education on contraceptive methods and training in supplying these. Structural barriers to such provision were time pressures, low prioritisation of contraceptive training and disputes over funding. CONCLUSIONS Women reported interest in midwives supplying contraceptive methods and expressed the view that this would be convenient and highly acceptable. Midwives are supportive of the concept of providing enhanced contraceptive advice and methods to women in their care, and believe that it would be advantageous for women. Institutional support is required to overcome structural barriers such as poor access to continuous professional development, and to allow contraceptive provision to be fully recognised as integral to the midwifery role, rather than a marginalised addition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan H. Walker
- Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ UK
| | - Claire Hooks
- Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ UK
| | - Diane Blake
- Anglia Ruskin University, Bishop Hall Lane, Chelmsford, CM1 1SQ UK
- Present address: School of Health & Social Care, London South Bank University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Boydell N, Cooper M, Cameron ST, Glasier A, Coutts S, McGuire F, Harden J. Women’s experiences of accessing postpartum intrauterine contraception in a public maternity setting: a qualitative service evaluation. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2020; 25:465-473. [DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1815006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michelle Cooper
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Sharon T. Cameron
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Anna Glasier
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shiona Coutts
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Jeni Harden
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|