1
|
McNamee K, Edelman A, Li RHW, Kaur S, Bateson D. Best Practice Contraception Care for Women with Obesity: A Review of Current Evidence. Semin Reprod Med 2022; 40:246-257. [PMID: 36746158 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1760214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence of obesity among females of reproductive age is increasing globally. Access to the complete range of appropriate contraceptive options is essential for upholding the reproductive rights of this population group. People with obesity can experience stigma and discrimination when seeking healthcare, and despite limited evidence for provider bias in the context of contraception, awareness for its potential at an individual provider and health systems level is essential. While use of some hormonal contraceptives may be restricted due to increased health risks in people with obesity, some methods provide noncontraceptive benefits including a reduced risk of endometrial cancer and a reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding which are more prevalent among individuals with obesity. In addition to examining systems-based approaches which facilitate the provision of inclusive contraceptive care, including long-acting reversible contraceptives which require procedural considerations, this article reviews current evidence on method-specific advantages and disadvantages for people with obesity to guide practice and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alison Edelman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Raymond Hang Wun Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Simranvir Kaur
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Deborah Bateson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Harris ML, Egan N, Forder PM, Bateson D, Sverdlov AL, Murphy VE, Loxton D. Patterns of contraceptive use among young Australian women with chronic disease: findings from a prospective cohort study. Reprod Health 2022; 19:111. [PMID: 35525995 PMCID: PMC9078003 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01413-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given chronic disease is increasing among young women and unintended pregnancies among these women are associated with poor maternal and fetal outcomes, these women would benefit from effective preconception care. However, there is a lack of understanding of how these women use or don't use contraception to inform such interventions. This study examined patterns of contraceptive use among an Australian cohort of young women and investigated the influence of chronic disease on contraceptive use over time. METHODS Using data from 15,244 young women from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health (born 1989-1995), latent transition analysis was performed to identify distinct contraceptive patterns among women who were at risk of an unintended pregnancy. Multinomial mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the relationship between contraceptive combinations and chronic disease. RESULTS Contraceptive use for women with cardiac and autoinflammatory diseases differed to women without chronic disease over the observation period. Compared to women without chronic disease using the pill, women with cardiac disease had double the odds of using 'other' contraception and condoms (OR = 2.20, 95% CI 1.34, 3.59) and a modest increase in the odds of using the combined oral contraceptive pill and condoms (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.03, 1.89). Compared to women without chronic disease who used the pill, women with autoinflammatory disease had increased odds of using LARC and condoms (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.04, 2.41), using 'other' contraception and condoms (OR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.11, 2.57), and using the combined oral contraceptive pill and condoms (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.09, 1.75). No differences in contraceptive patterns over the observation period were found for women with asthma or diabetes when compared to women without chronic disease. CONCLUSION The findings identified a need for effective contraceptive counselling as part of routine chronic disease care and improved communication between health care providers and women with chronic disease to improve young women's contraceptive knowledge and agency in contraceptive choice, particularly for those with cardiac or autoinflammatory conditions. This may be the key to reducing high-risk unintended pregnancies among this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa L Harris
- Centre for Women's Health Research, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
| | - Nicholas Egan
- Centre for Women's Health Research, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Peta M Forder
- Centre for Women's Health Research, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Deborah Bateson
- Family Planning NSW, Ashfield, NSW, Australia
- Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aaron L Sverdlov
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Cardiovascular Department, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Vanessa E Murphy
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Deborah Loxton
- Centre for Women's Health Research, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reid N, Schölin L, Erng MN, Montag A, Hanson J, Smith L. Preconception interventions to reduce the risk of alcohol-exposed pregnancies: A systematic review. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2021; 45:2414-2429. [PMID: 34590331 DOI: 10.1111/acer.14725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The preconception period provides a unique opportunity to optimize the health of women and children. High rates of alcohol use and unintended pregnancies are common across many Western societies, and alcohol-exposed pregnancies (AEPs) are a possible unintended outcome. The aim of the current study was to evaluate preconception interventions for the prevention of AEPs. METHODS A systematic search of four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) was undertaken for relevant peer-reviewed articles published from 1970 onward. Studies were included if they enrolled women and/or their support networks during the preconception period. RESULTS Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The majority of studies (n = 14) evaluated CHOICES-based interventions, which incorporate motivational interviewing approaches to change alcohol and/or contraceptive behavior. The other five interventions included a range of different approaches and modes of delivery. The majority of interventions were successful in reducing AEP risk. Changes in AEP risk were more often driven by changes in contraceptive behavior, although some approaches led to changes in both alcohol and contraceptive behavior. CONCLUSIONS The review indicated that many interventions were efficacious at reducing AEP risk during the preconception period through preventing unplanned pregnancy. The effectiveness estimated from these clinical trials may be greater than that seen in interventions when implemented in practice where there is a lack of blinding and greater attrition of participants during follow-up. Further research investigating the real-world effectiveness of these intervention approaches implemented across a wide range of clinical settings would be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natasha Reid
- Child Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lisa Schölin
- Centre for Pesticide Suicide Prevention, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - May Na Erng
- Child Health Research Centre, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Annika Montag
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Jessica Hanson
- Department of Applied Health Sciences, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lesley Smith
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Clinical Applied Health Research, University of Hull, Hull, Yorkshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Harris ML, Egan N, Forder PM, Coombe J, Loxton D. Contraceptive use among women through their later reproductive years: Findings from an Australian prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0255913. [PMID: 34379661 PMCID: PMC8357106 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Examine patterns of contraceptive use and contraceptive transitions over time among an Australian cohort of women through their later reproductive years. Study design Latent Transition Analysis was performed using data on 8,197 women from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women’s Health’s 1973–78 cohort to identify distinct patterns of contraceptive use across 2006, 2012 and 2018. Women were excluded from the analysis at time points where they were not at risk of an unintended pregnancy. Latent status membership probabilities, item-response probabilities, transitions probabilities and the effect of predictors on latent status membership were estimated and reported. Results Patterns of contraceptive use were relatively consistent over time, particularly for high efficacy contraceptive methods with 71% of women using long-acting reversible contraceptives in 2012 also using long-acting reversible contraceptives in 2018. Multiple contraceptive use was highest in 2006 when women were aged 28–33 years (19.3%) but declined over time to 14.3% in 2018 when women were aged 40–45 years. Overall, contraceptive patterns stabilised as the women moved into their late 30s and early 40s. Conclusions Although fertility declines with age, the stability of contraceptive choice and continued use of short-acting contraception among some women suggests that a contraceptive review may be helpful for women during perimenopause so that they are provided with contraceptive options most appropriate to their specific circumstances.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa L. Harris
- Centre for Women’s Health Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Nicholas Egan
- Centre for Women’s Health Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peta M. Forder
- Centre for Women’s Health Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Coombe
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Deborah Loxton
- Centre for Women’s Health Research, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|