Simulation in the medical undergraduate curriculum to promote interprofessional collaboration for acute care: a systematic review

Interprofessional simulation as an enhancement of psychological fidelity: A focus group study of medical and nursing students

Background and Aims

Interprofessional simulation has the potential to enhance the perceived realism of clinical simulation in the education of different healthcare professionals. This study considers how the inclusion of more than one profession in clinical simulation contributes to this psychological fidelity, defined as the subjective perception of the realism of a simulation, and the cues identified by medical and nursing students.

Methods

Eight focus groups were carried out with 27 medical and 18 nursing students in Newcastle and Oxford, UK. These were carried out immediately after students' participation in simulation sessions consisting of three acute scenarios. Focus group discussions encompassed perceptions of the realism of the simulation and of participants' own and other professional groups. Thematic analysis was carried out on transcripts.

Results

The analysis identified features of psychological fidelity that were influenced by the interprofessional element of the simulation. These included overall impressions of realism, and the perceived roles and expectations of doctors and nurses within the simulation. In particular, the presence of the other professional group afforded a more authentic response. Other features varied with the viewpoint of the student groups, in particular the realism of the patient manikin, which held lower psychological fidelity for the nursing students, because it did not allow them to fulfill their perceived role of delivering holistic, relational care.

Conclusion

Recognizing "psychological fidelity" as a subjective response to simulation allows greater consideration of the limitations of fidelity as a designed or engineered property of a simulation. While interprofessional involvement directly enhances psychological fidelity in some ways, potential differences in the views of students from different professional groups should be considered when implementing interprofessional simulation.

Nursing simulation practicum for delivery care: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this scoping review was to explore the state of the current body of knowledge on the use of nursing simulation for maternal nursing practicum with a focus on content and measured outcomes.

DESIGN

This is a scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

The literature search was performed using five databases (CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science).

REVIEW METHOD

The review was conducted on quantitative and reflection/review studies that evaluated or described nursing simulation for delivery care, published between 2000 and 2020 in English and Korean. Two authors independently reviewed the studies and their references for additional literature search. Selected studies were charted to describe the study characteristics, and content and outcome of nursing simulation for delivery care.

RESULTS

Fifteen articles were included in the review, of which twelve were intervention studies and three were reflection/review studies. The duration of the nursing simulations for delivery care ranged from 20 min to 4 h, with two to eight students in each simulation group. All nursing simulations focused on the normal, uncomplicated delivery process, with nine studies engaging in debriefing, but without pre- and/or post-assessments. The most frequently measured outcomes were knowledge, satisfaction, and clinical practice competency.

CONCLUSIONS

Studies investigating nursing simulation pedagogy for delivery care were scarce, with limitations in the study designs and large variations in nursing simulation time across studies. Scenarios for nursing simulation for delivery care were rudimentary, and they usually focused on normal uncomplicated deliveries. The development of scenarios for high-risk deliveries and integration of pre-and/or post-assessments and debriefing into the nursing simulation are recommended to improve learning outcomes.

Effect of a rapid e-learning module and brief interprofessional simulation event on medical and nursing student collaborative attitudes and behaviors

Objectives Undergraduate nursing and first-year medical students participated in a brief, scenario-based, interprofessional event. The experimental group only was provided an innovative, rapid e-learning instructional module focused on interprofessional roles/responsibilities and communication prior to the event. Methods Pre-post attitudes toward physician-nurse collaboration were surveyed, and collaborative behaviors were observed during the event. Results For the experimental group, a statistically significant (p<0.05) attitude improvement was found between pre-post e-learning module scores as well as pre-e-learning module and post-simulation event scores. For the control group, a statistically significant (p=0.001) attitude improvement was found between pre-post simulation event scores. No statistically significant differences in team collaborative behaviors were observed between experimental and control. Conclusions The combination of module and simulation event was not a more effective option than the event alone. As both interventions present unique challenges in regards to technology and facility requirements, having multiple effective intervention options will be of benefit to educational institutions.

Effects of a single interprofessional simulation session on medical and nursing students' attitudes toward interprofessional learning and professional identity: a questionnaire study

BACKGROUND

Participation in simulation-based interprofessional education (sim-IPE) may affect students' attitudes towards interprofessional learning (through gaining experience with others) and their professional identity (by increasing the 'fit' of group membership). We examined this in two questionnaire studies involving students from four universities in two areas of the UK.

METHOD

Questionnaire data were collected before and after students took part in a sim-IPE session consisting of three acute scenarios. Questionnaires included the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) and measures of professional identity derived from the social identity theory literature. In Study 1, only identification with Professional Group (doctor or nurse) was measured, while in Study 2 identification with Student Group (medical or nursing student) and the immediate interprofessional Team worked with in the simulation were also measured. Linear mixed effects regression analysis examined the effect of the simulation session, and differences between medical and nursing students, sites and identity measures.

RESULTS

A total of 194 medical and 266 nursing students completed questionnaires. A five-item subset of RIPLS (RIPLSCore) was used in analysis. In both studies RIPLSCore increased for all groups following participation in sim-IPE, although this was larger for nursing students in Study 1. Nursing students had consistently higher RIPLSCore scores than medical students at one site. Effects of the session on identity varied between sites, and dimensions of identity. Notably, while positive emotions associated with group membership (Ingroup Affect) increased for Student Group, Professional Group and Team, the sense of belonging (Ingroup Ties) and importance (Centrality) of the group increased only for Team. Nursing students had consistently higher identification scores than medical students.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in a sim-IPE session can improve attitudes towards interprofessional learning. It can also enhance professional identity, particularly as related to emotional aspects of group membership, with possible benefits for wellbeing. Changes in identification with the immediate Team suggest positive psychological consequences of ad hoc Team formation in the workplace. Differences between medical and nursing students suggest their differing opportunities to work with other professions during training may change baseline attitudes and identity. However, a single sim-IPE session can still have an additive effect.