Preoperative virtual reality experience may improve patient satisfaction and reduce anxiety

Virtual Reality for Preoperative Planning in Complex Surgical Oncology: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Virtual reality models (VRM) are three-dimensional (3D) simulations of two-dimensional (2D) images, creating a more accurate mental representation of patient-specific anatomy.

METHODS

Patients were retrospectively identified who underwent complex oncologic resections whose operations differed from preoperative plans between April 2018 and April 2019. Virtual reality modeling was performed based on preoperative 2D images to assess feasibility of use of this technology to create models. Preoperative plans made based upon 2D imaging versus VRM were compared to the final operations performed. Once the use of VRM to create preoperative plans was deemed feasible, individuals undergoing complex oncologic resections whose operative plans were difficult to define preoperatively were enrolled prospectively from July 2019 to December 2021. Preoperative plans made based upon 2D imaging and VRM by both the operating surgeon and a consulting surgeon were compared to the operation performed. Confidence in each operative plan was also measured.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were identified, seven retrospective and 13 prospective, with tumors of the liver, pancreas, retroperitoneum, stomach, and soft tissue. Retrospectively, VRM were unable to be created in one patient due to a poor quality 2D image; the remainder (86%) were successfully able to be created and examined. Virtual reality modeling more clearly defined the extent of resection in 50% of successful cases. Prospectively, all VRM were successfully performed. The concordance of the operative plan with VRM was higher than with 2D imaging (92% versus 54% for the operating surgeon and 69% versus 23% for the consulting surgeon). Confidence in the operative plan after VRM compared to 2D imaging also increased for both surgeons (by 15% and 8% for the operating and consulting surgeons, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual reality modeling is feasible and may improve preoperative planning compared to 2D imaging. Further investigation is warranted.

Virtual Reality-Based Intervention to Reduce Preoperative Anxiety in Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Preoperative anxiety is common among adult patients undergoing elective surgery and is associated with negative outcomes. Virtual reality (VR)-based interventions have been considered simpler, safer, and more effective for reducing anxiety in patients undergoing surgery than conventional care.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of a VR-based intervention with preoperative education in reducing preoperative anxiety among adult patients undergoing elective surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

An assessor-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial was conducted to recruit adult patients aged 18 years or older who were scheduled for their first elective surgery procedure under general anesthesia within the next 2 to 4 weeks at a preanesthesia assessment clinic in Hong Kong from July to December 2022.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (an 8-minute immersive 360° VR video tour in the operating theater via a head-mounted display console) or a control group (standard care).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome of preoperative anxiety was measured using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (range, 6-30; higher scores indicate greater anxiety), and the secondary outcomes (ie, stress, preparedness, and pain) were assessed by Visual Analog Scale at 3 time points: baseline at beginning of clinical session (T0), at the end of the clinical session immediately after the intervention (T1), and before the surgery (T2). Pain, satisfaction levels, and postoperative length of stay were evaluated after the surgery (T3). Simulation sickness was assessed after the intervention by use of the Simulation Sickness Questionnaire. A generalized estimating equations model was applied to compare changes in outcomes over time.

RESULTS

A total of 74 participants (mean [SD] age, 46.34 [14.52] years; 38 men [51.4%] and 36 women [48.6%]) were recruited and randomized to the control group (37 participants) and intervention group (37 participants). Compared with the control group, the VR-based intervention group showed significantly decreased preoperative anxiety at T1 (β, -5.46; 95% CI, -7.60 to -3.32; P < .001) and T2 (β, -5.57; 95% CI, -7.73 to -3.41; P < .001), lower stress at T1 (β, -10.68; 95% CI, -16.00 to -5.36; P < .001) and T2 (β, -5.16; 95% CI, -9.87 to -0.45; P = .03), and higher preparedness at T1 (β, 6.60; 95% CI, 0.97 to 12.19; P = .02). Satisfaction levels were significantly increased in the intervention group vs the control group (mean [SD] score, 81.35 [9.24] vs 65.28 [8.16]; difference, 16.07; 95% CI, 12.00 to 20.15; P < .001). No significant differences in pain and postoperative length of stay were found.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings of this study suggest that a VR-based intervention is a feasible and effective way to reduce preoperative anxiety in adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Given the promising results of this study, further study in the form of large-scale, multicenter, randomized clinical trials with broader implementation is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2100051690.

The effect of virtual reality on mothers' anxiety during children's circumcision: A randomized controlled study

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of use of virtual reality headsets on mothers' anxiety, by distracting their attention, during their child's circumcision procedure.

DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled intervention study.

METHODS

The study used a pretest and posttest design and was carried out between April 15, 2019, and June 30, 2019, with 60 participants (n = 30 intervention and n = 30 control group). The data were collected using a personal information form, the State Anxiety Inventory and Faces Anxiety Scales. In the study, the participants in the intervention group watched videos through a virtual reality headset.

RESULTS

The socio-demographic characteristics of the intervention group and control group were similar in the pretest, except for the educational level. After the intervention, the intervention group's mean scores on the Faces Anxiety Scale, heart rate and respiration rates were significantly lower than those of the control group, but the difference between the mean State Anxiety Inventory scores was insignificant.

CONCLUSION

Distraction using videos produced by virtual reality headsets is effective in reducing mothers' moderate level anxiety. It is recommended that further studies should be conducted in different ambulatory surgery procedures.

Virtual Reality to Improve the Experience of the Mohs Patient-A Prospective Interventional Study

BACKGROUND

Nonmelanoma skin cancer is the most common cancer in the United States with significant quality of life impact.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of a highly immersive virtual reality (VR) experience in the context of outpatient skin cancer surgery as a means to minimize patient-reported feelings of anxiety or pain. The authors also sought to assess the effects on patient-reported overall satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients completed a pre-VR experience survey after completion of their first Mohs surgery layer, followed by a 10-minute VR experience, and a post-VR experience survey. Differences in the pre-VR survey and post-VR survey were compared using the chi-square test. The anxiety scores were compared using a t-test.

RESULTS

In all but 2 questions, there was a trend toward improvement of the anxiety-related sensations after completion of the VR experience. There were statistically significant differences for 4 questions: "Are you currently feeling unable to relax" (p = .0013), "are you currently feeling fear of the worst happening" (p < .0001), "are you currently feeling terrified or afraid" (p = .0046), and "are you currently feeling nervous" (p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Virtual reality experiences during the Mohs surgical day significantly improved measures of anxiety and patient satisfaction.

Incidence and features of preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery

The study was conducted at the Centre of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management of Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos.

Background

Due to its implications on postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction, anxiety evaluation should be incorporated in the preoperative assessment of the patients.

Materials and methods

A series of consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery were included in the study. Preoperative anxiety was evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS), and the Visual Analogue (Face) Scale (VAFS). Qualitative and quantitative analyses were used to describe features of anxiety.

Results

149 patients were included in the study, of whom 40.9% were scheduled for low, 47.7% for intermediate, and 11.4% for high-risk procedures. Based on HADS, 19 patients (12.6%) were positive for anxiety. VAFS revealed that 10.3% of patients experience medium/high intensity of anxiety. Patients were mostly concerned about the success (29.3%) and complications (11.4%) of the surgery APAIS score analysis revealed significantly higher anxiety (p < 0.01) and a need of information (p < 0.01) about surgery compared to anaesthesia. In contrast to age, education, or previous surgery, anxiety was associated with female sex (p < 0.01), surgical risk (p = 0.02), and subjective health evaluation (p < 0.01).Patients tended to choose a conversation with the doctor (45.6%) or a relative (44.8%) as a measure to relieve anxiety, and 18.4% would choose medication. Praying, music therapy, massage, or even sexual intercourse were among the measures suggested by patients.

Conclusions

A significant part of patients experience anxiety before surgery, predominantly about the success of the surgery. According to the patients, conversation is the best option to reduce anxiety.