Pharmacist comprehensive review of treatment compared with STOPP-START criteria to detect potentially inappropriate prescription in older complex patients

Multidisciplinary medication review during older patient hospitalization according to STOPP/START criteria reduces potentially inappropriate prescriptions: MoPIM cohort study

PURPOSE

Multimorbidity and polypharmacy in older adults converts the detection and adequacy of potentially inappropriate drug prescriptions (PIDP) in a healthcare priority. The objectives of this study are to describe the clinical decisions taken after the identification of PIDP by clinical pharmacists, using STOPP/START criteria, and to evaluate the degree of accomplishment of these decisions.

METHODS

Multicenter, prospective, non-comparative cohort study in patients aged 65 and older, hospitalized because of an exacerbation of their chronic conditions. Each possible PIDP was manually identified by the clinical pharmacist at admission and an initial decision was taken by a multidisciplinary clinical committee. At discharge, criteria were re-applied and final decisions recorded.

RESULTS

From all patients (n = 674), 493 (73.1%) presented at least one STOPP criteria at admission, significantly reduced up to 258 (38.3%) at discharge. A similar trend was observed for START criteria (36.7% vs. 15.7%). Regarding the top 10 most prevalent STOPP criteria, the clinical committee initially agreed to withdraw 257 (34.2%) prescriptions and to modify 93 (12.4%) prescriptions. However, the evaluation of final clinical decisions revealed that 503 (67.0%) of those STOPP criteria were ultimately amended. For the top 10 START criteria associated PIDP, the committee decided to initiate 149 (51.7%) prescriptions, while a total of 198 (68.8%) were finally introduced at discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical committee, through a pharmacotherapy review, succeeded in identifying and reducing the degree of prescription inadequacy, for both STOPP and START criteria, in older patients with high degree of multimorbidity and polypharmacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02830425.

[Spanish version of the STOPP/START 3 criteria: Advances in the detection of inappropriate prescribing medication in the older people]

The STOPP/START criteria are explicit physiologic systems-based criteria that summarize evidence on clinically relevant prescribing problems related to the use of potentially inappropriate medications (STOPP criteria) and potential prescribing omissions (START criteria). The two previous versions of the STOPP/START criteria were published in 2008 and 2015, and their Spanish versions in 2009 and 2015. Version3 of these criteria has just been published in 2023. The aim of this article is to present the Spanish translated version, and to review the use and impact that version2 of 2015 has had in our language. A translation from English to Spanish was performed by expert professionals with a high level of English of version3 of the STOPP/START criteria, which incorporates the evidence published from April 2014 to March 2022. In addition, a systematic review of publications that have used the Spanish translation of the previous version (version2 of 2015) of the STOPP/START criteria was performed. The new version, presented in this article, has 190 STOPP/START criteria (133 STOPP criteria and 57 START criteria), which is a 40% increase in the number of criteria compared to the previous version. The review found 37 studies (21 observational, 11 interventional and 5 other) that used the Spanish version instead of the international version. The Spanish version 3 of the STOPP/START criteria is an updated explicit list of potentially inappropriate medications and possible omissions in prescribing that aims to optimize medication and minimize adverse drug reactions during medication review in the elderly, particularly those with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. With this new version, the original criteria are intended to be more widely disseminated within the Spanish-speaking healthcare community. The Spanish version2 of the STOPP/START has been widely used, so we consider that the translation into Spanish has helped to improve pharmacotherapy in older patients with polypharmacy and multimorbidity in our linguistic environment.

Pharmacist comprehensive review of fall-risk-increasing drugs and polypharmacy in elderly Spanish community patients using RStudio®

Objective

The aim of this study is to identify and analyze adults aged ≥65 years living in the Canary Islands, Spain, who are prescribed medications that increase the risk of falls and are polymedicated. To do so we have made use of the electronic prescription and the RStudio®.

Method

For the detection of Fall-Risk-Increasing Drugs (FRIDs), outpatient electronic prescription dispensing data were used in two pharmacies. A total of 118,890 dispensations grouped into 15,601 treatment plans for 2,312 patients were analyzed. The FRIDs analyzed were antipsychotics (APSI), benzodiazepines (BZPN), antidepressants (DEPR), opioids (OPIO) and Z-hypnotics (ZHIP). For the development of the algorithms for the construction of tables and data screening, the statistical programming language RStudio® was used.

Results

Of the total number of patients and prescriptions analyzed, 46.6% were polymedicated and 44.3% had prescribed an FRID. 28.7% of the patients presented both factors, had a dispensation from an FRID and were polymedicated. Of the 14,278 dispensations with FRID, 49% had a benzodiazepine, 22.7% opioids, 18% antidepressants, 5.6% hypnotics, and finally 4.4% antipsychotics. At least 32% of the patients had been dispensed a benzodiazepine together with another FRID and 23% an opioid together with another FRID.

Conclusions

The method of analysis developed and applied in RStudio® allows to detect and determine in a simple and fast way polymedicated patients, as well as the number and therapeutic class of drugs in their treatment plan and identify prescriptions that can increase the risk of falls. Our results show a high number of prescriptions for benzodiazepines and opioids.