BET 2: Treatment of frostbite with iloprost

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Frostbite: 2024 Update

The Wilderness Medical Society convened an expert panel to develop a set of evidence-based guidelines for the prevention and treatment of frostbite. We present a review of pertinent pathophysiology. We then discuss primary and secondary prevention measures and therapeutic management. Recommendations are made regarding each treatment and its role in management. These recommendations are graded on the basis of the quality of supporting evidence and balance between the benefits and risks or burdens for each modality according to methodology stipulated by the American College of Chest Physicians. This is an updated version of the guidelines published in 2019.

Can iloprost be used for treatment of cold weather injury at the point of wounding in a forward operating environment? A literature review

INTRODUCTION

Cold Weather Injury (CWI) represents a spectrum of pathology, the two main divisions being Freezing Cold Injury (FCI) and Non-Freezing Cold Injury (NFCI). Both are disabling conditions associated with microvascular and nerve injury often treated hours after initial insult when presenting to a healthcarestablishment. Given that iloprost is used for the treatment of FCI, could it be used in a forward operating environment to mitigate treatment delay? Is there a role for its use in the forward treatment of NFCI? This review sought to evaluate the strength of evidence for the potential use of iloprost in a forward operating environment.

METHODS

Literature searches were undertaken using the following question for both FCI and NFCI: in [patients with FCI/NFCI] does [the use of iloprost] compared to [standard care] reduce the incidence of [long-term complications]. Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE databases were searched using the above question and relevant alternative terminology. Abstracts were reviewed before full articles were requested.

RESULTS

The FCI search yielded 17 articles that were found to refer to the use of iloprost and FCI. Of the 17, one referred to pre-hospital treatment of frostbite at K2 base camp; however, this was utilising tPA. No articles referred to pre-hospital use in either FCI or NFCI.

DISCUSSION

Although evidence exists to support the use of iloprost in the treatment of FCI, its use to date has been in hospital. A common theme is delayed treatment due to the challenges of evacuating casualties from a remote location. There may be a role for iloprost in the treatment of FCI; however, further study is required to better understand the risk of its use.

Frostbite: Current status and advancements in therapeutics

Frostbite is a severe ischemic injury which occurs due to the tissue vascular damage after sub-zero temperature tissue exposure. Deep frostbite can result in necrosis and may need amputation of affected tissue. Though a serious injury, it is not very well understood, and further scientific exploration is needed. This work explores the current understanding of the pathophysiology of frostbite. We reviewed the current status of the diagnostics, the drugs, the therapies and the surgical practices for prevention and management of frostbite. Advances in nanotechnology and drug delivery had improved the therapeutic outcomes significantly. This review also explored the latest advancements and researches done for development of newer therapeutics and diagnostics for frostbite care.

Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Frostbite: 2019 Update

The Wilderness Medical Society convened an expert panel to develop a set of evidence-based guidelines for prevention and treatment of frostbite. We present a review of pertinent pathophysiology. We then discuss primary and secondary prevention measures and therapeutic management. Recommendations are made regarding each treatment and its role in management. These recommendations are graded on the basis of the quality of supporting evidence and balance between the benefits and risks or burdens for each modality according to methodology stipulated by the American College of Chest Physicians. This is an updated version of the guidelines published in 2014.

Barriers to frostbite treatment at an academic medical center

The treatment of frostbite injuries has undergone a radical change over the past decade with a shift from supportive therapy and observation towards early and aggressive medical intervention with thrombolytics and vasodilators. Institutions that have implemented evidence-based protocols have significantly decreased their amputation rates (Bruen et al., 2007; Lindford et al., 2017a; Twomey et al., 2005). We present the case of a middle-aged male treated for frostbite of multiple fingers on both hands. Because there was no treatment protocol at our institution, there were multiple delays in the patient's care including imaging and initiation of intravenous (IV) prostanoids. This case illustrates the deleterious effects of delays in treatment and strongly suggests that all facilities located in areas of cold exposure should have protocols in place for such an occurrence.

Amputation Risk Factors in Severely Frostbitten Patients

In recent years, the incidence of frostbite has increased among healthy young adults who practice winter sports (skiing, mountaineering, ice climbing and technical climbing/alpinism) at both the professional and amateur levels. Moreover, given that the population most frequently affected is healthy and active, frostbite supposes a substantial interruption of their normal activity and in most cases is associated with long-term sequelae. It particularly has a higher impact when the affected person’s daily activities require exposure to cold environments, as either sports practices or work activities in which low temperatures are a constant (ski patrols, mountain guides, avalanche forecasters, workers in the cold chain, etc.). Clinical experience with humans shows a limited reversibility of injuries via potential tissue regeneration, which can be fostered with optimal medical management. Data were collected from 92 frostbitten patients in order to evaluate factors that represent a risk of amputation after severe frostbite. Mountain range, years of expertise in winter mountaineering, time elapsed before rewarming and especially altitude were the most important factors for a poor prognosis.

The Use of tPA in the Treatment of Frostbite: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The use of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) for the treatment of frostbite has been reported and advocated, but its efficacy has not been well established. We conducted a systematic review to guide physicians on the role of tPA in the treatment of frostbite. Our hypothesis was that the use of tPA improves clinical outcomes, as measured by amputation rate.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE for primary research articles on the use of tPA for the treatment of extremity frostbite. Information related to study design, outcomes, and complications was extracted. A total of 204 citations were screened, and then 35 abstracts and 24 reports were reviewed. Fifteen studies met the standard for final review.

RESULTS

One randomized, prospective study; 3 cohort studies; 8 case series; and 3 case reports were found. A total of 208 patients were treated. Differences in protocols, inclusion criteria, and outcomes measures prevented combining the study results. In all the studies, the authors reported that the use of tPA was or may have been useful in reducing amputation rates or increasing tissue salvage. Complication rates ranged from 0% to 100%, with a combined rate of 13%. The quality of the evidence was low.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the low scientific quality of the studies, the efficacy of tPA in reducing amputation rates cannot currently be established. Randomized, prospective trials or well-controlled cohort studies are needed to better assess the role of tPA. Consideration should be given to limiting its use to research protocols.