Emergency medicine, organ donation and the Human Tissue Act

Protocols for uncontrolled donation after circulatory death: a systematic review of international guidelines, practices and transplant outcomes

INTRODUCTION

A chronic shortage of organs remains the main factor limiting organ transplantation. Many countries have explored the option of uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) in order to expand the donor pool. Little is known regarding the variability of practices and outcomes between existing protocols. This systematic review addresses this knowledge gap informing policy makers, researchers, and clinicians for future protocol implementation.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar electronic databases from 2005 to March 2015 as well as the reference lists of selected studies, abstracts, unpublished reports, personal libraries, professional organization reports, and government agency statements on uDCD. We contacted leading authors and organizations to request their protocols and guidelines. Two reviewers extracted main variables. In studies reporting transplant outcomes, we added type, quantity, quality of organs procured, and complications reported. Internal validity and the quality of the studies reporting outcomes were assessed, as were the methodological rigour and transparency in which a guideline was developed. The review was included in the international prospective register of systematic reviews (Prospero, CRD42014015258).

RESULTS

Six guidelines and 18 outcome studies were analysed. The six guidelines are based on limited evidence and major differences exist between them at each step of the uDCD process. The outcome studies report good results for kidney, liver, and lung transplantation with high discard rates for livers.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite procedural, medical, economic, legal, and ethical challenges, the uDCD strategy is a viable option for increasing the organ donation pool. Variations in practice and heterogeneity of outcomes preclude a meta-analysis and prevented the linking of outcomes to specific uDCD protocols. Further standardization of protocols and outcomes is required, as is further research into the role of extracorporeal resuscitation and other novel therapies for treatment of some refractory cardiac arrest. It is essential to ensure the maintenance of trust in uDCD programs by health professionals and the public.

Ethical and legal issues related to the donation and use of nonstandard organs for transplants

Transplantation of nonstandard or expanded criteria donor organs creates several potential ethical and legal problems in terms of consent and liability, and new challenges for research and service development; it highlights the need for a system of organ donation that responds to an evolving ethical landscape and incorporates scientific innovation to meet the needs of recipients, but which also safeguards the interests and autonomy of the donor. In this article, the use of deceased donor organs for transplants that fail to meet standard donor criteria and the legitimacy of interventions and research aimed at optimizing their successful donation are discussed.

A model for emergency department end-of-life communications after acute devastating events--part II: moving from resuscitative to end-of-life or palliative treatment

The model for emergency department (ED) end-of-life communications after acute devastating events addresses decision-making capacity, surrogates, and advance directives, including legal definitions and application of these steps. Part II concerns communications moving from resuscitative to palliative and end-of-life treatments. After completing the steps involved in determining decision-making, emergency physicians (EPs) should consider starting palliative measures versus continuing resuscitative treatment. As communications related to these end-of-life decisions increasingly fall within the scope of emergency medicine (EM) practice, we need to become educated about and comfortable with them.

Controlled organ donation after cardiac death: potential donors in the emergency department

BACKGROUND.: The continuing shortfall of organs for transplantation has increased the use of donation after cardiac death (DCD). We hypothesized that some patients who undergo tracheal intubation in the emergency department (ED) and who are assessed for, but not admitted to, critical care might have potential for controlled DCD. METHODS.: We identified all patients who underwent tracheal intubation in the ED between 2004 and 2008 and studied their records to identify those not admitted to an intensive care unit. We reviewed the notes of patients extubated in the ED to ascertain the diagnosis, management, outcome, and potential exclusion criteria for controlled DCD. RESULTS.: One thousand three hundred seventy-four patients had tracheal intubation performed in the ED; 1053 received anesthetic drugs to assist intubation. Three hundred seventy-five patients were not admitted to intensive care unit; 235 died during resuscitation in the ED. Of the 49 patients extubated in the ED to allow terminal care, 26 were older than 70 years and 18 had comorbidities precluding organ donation. Fourteen patients could have been considered for DCD, but in eight, the time from extubation to death exceeded 2 hr. Thus, six patients might have been missed as potential controlled DCD from the ED in this 5-year period. CONCLUSIONS.: Identification of potential donors after cardiac death in the ED with appropriate use of critical care for selected patients may contribute to reducing the shortfall of organs for transplantation, although numbers are likely to be small. This area remains controversial and requires further informed discussion between emergency and critical care doctors and transplant teams.

The importance of emergency medicine in organ donation: successful donation is more likely when potential donors are referred from the emergency department

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to identify factors that are associated with successful organ retrieval among patients referred to organ procurement services for potential organ donation. Particular attention was paid to the frequency, patient characteristics, and outcomes of patients referred for donation from the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

For this retrospective cohort study, data were collected on all solid-organ donor referrals made to a single organ procurement organization serving 78 hospitals over a 45-month period. Data retrieved included patient age, sex, race, referral site (ED vs. inpatient), and mechanism of injury. Outcome of referral (organs retrieved or not) was the primary outcome variable. Pearson chi-square and Student's t-tests were used for bivariate statistical analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine which variables remained associated with organ retrieval after controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 6,886 donor referrals were made in the study population. Of these, 155 were excluded due to incomplete data, leaving 6,731 subjects for analysis. Using bivariate statistical analysis, we found that successful organ retrieval was associated with younger age (donor mean age 40.8 years, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 39.1 to 42.5 vs. nondonor mean age 59.4, 95% CI = 58.9 to 59.9), mechanism of injury (p < 0.001), and referral from the ED (ED 15.5% retrieved, inpatient 5.9%, odds ratio [OR] = 2.92, 95% CI = 2.32 to 3.67). After controlling for potential confounders with multiple logistic regression, referral from the ED remained significantly associated with successful organ retrieval (OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.18 to 1.97), as did age (OR = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.96 to 0.97) and mechanism of injury (p < 0.001). On regression analysis, race emerged as a significant predictor of organ retrieval (p < 0.001). Medically suitable patients referred from the ED were significantly more likely on bivariate analysis to have consent for donation granted compared to patients referred from inpatient settings (OR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.03 to 2.12), but this association was not found to be significant on regression analysis (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.93 to 2.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Referral of potential organ donors from the ED is associated with an increased likelihood of successful organ retrieval. The authors conclude that further attention and resources should be directed toward the role of emergency medicine (EM) in the organ procurement process, owing to the relatively high likelihood of successful organ retrieval among patients referred from the ED.

What does a diagnosis of brain death mean to family members approached about organ donation? A review of the literature

BACKGROUND

What a diagnosis of brain stem death (the term used in the United Kingdom) or brain death (the term used in the United States) means to the family members of potential organ donors is an important issue to explore as biomedicine moves to expand the range of end-of-life technologies that, potentially, blur the demarcation between life and death.

OBJECTIVE

To provide some insights into how a diagnosis of brain stem death or brain death may be perceived by family members approached about organ donation.

METHODS

A review of the literature regarding organ donation was carried out.

RESULTS

Although most publications do not focus specifically on the concept of brain death, those that do so made a valuable contribution, offering potential theoretical frameworks to aid our understanding of what the diagnosis of death by brain-based criteria means to family members of potential organ donors. The diagnosis of brain death is intricately linked to the issue of organ donation and may influence family members' decision making. Also, the perception that death has occurred differs from one person to another.

CONCLUSIONS

A sustained increase in the number of organs available for transplantation may never be achieved until the concepts of brain death, brain stem death, and now non-heart-beating death (1) are debated more widely within society; (2) a greater degree of consensus is reached within health care; and (3) bereaved family members approached to donate the organs of their deceased relative have a better understanding of what these diagnoses mean.

Best interests and potential organ donors

Many potential donor organs are currently lost because of misunderstanding of the law. John Coggon and colleagues clarify what is permissible in non-heart-beating donation

What Does a Diagnosis of Brain Death Mean to Family Members Approached about Organ Donation? A Review of the Literature

Background

What a diagnosis of brain stem death (the term used in the United Kingdom) or brain death (the term used in the United States) means to the family members of potential organ donors is an important issue to explore as biomedicine moves to expand the range of end-of-life technologies that, potentially, blur the demarcation between life and death.

Objective

To provide some insights into how a diagnosis of brain stem death or brain death may be perceived by family members approached about organ donation.

Methods

A review of the literature regarding organ donation was carried out.

Results

Although most publications do not focus specifically on the concept of brain death, those that do so made a valuable contribution, offering potential theoretical frameworks to aid our understanding of what the diagnosis of death by brain-based criteria means to family members of potential organ donors. The diagnosis of brain death is intricately linked to the issue of organ donation and may influence family members' decision making. Also, the perception that death has occurred differs from one person to another.

Conclusions

A sustained increase in the number of organs available for transplantation may never be achieved until the concepts of brain death, brain stem death, and now Non—Heart-beating death (1) are debated more widely within society; (2) a greater degree of consensus is reached within health care; and (3) bereaved family members approached to donate the organs of their deceased relative have a better understanding of what these diagnoses mean.