Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Diagnostic and prognostic scoring systems for autoimmune hepatitis: a review

INTRODUCTION

Auto-immune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare condition which primarily affects young women. Several diagnostic scoring systems exist based on clinical, biochemical, immunologic and histologic characteristics of AIH. Additionally, prognostic parameters can be identified. The purpose of this literature review is to compare the clinical value, strengths and limitations of these diagnostic and prognostic scoring systems.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in two databases and selected based on diagnostic and prognostic criteria. Only studies concerning AIH in adults were included.

RESULTS

The backbone of scoring systems remains the revised AIH criteria published in 1999 and the simplified from 2008. The revised system shows a higher sensitivity, lower specificity and lower diagnostic accuracy compared to the simplified. Limitations to these scoring systems include limited diagnostic accuracy in acute or fulminant liver failure, insufficient inclusion of atypical auto-antibodies and lacking diagnostic power in presence of overlap syndromes. Concerning these overlap syndromes, the Paris criteria show a higher diagnostic accuracy compared to the scoring systems for AIH. Presently, no clinical prognostic scoring systems are available. However, a first system based on response to treatment accurately predicts long-term survival in AIH.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic scoring systems are useful in diagnosing AIH and have complementary value. However, they are no substitute for the gold standard of appropriate clinical assessment and are mostly useful in defining cohorts for research purposes. An evolution towards a more dynamic scoring system, using prognostic parameters and the progression of typical features, seems more valuable than the current diagnostic systems.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Liver Diseases in a Tertiary Referral Center in Cuba

Background

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) comprise a set of entities characterized by tissue damage as a result of the loss of self-tolerance. There are few reports of AILD from Caribbean countries.

Objectives

The aim of our study was to investigate the clinical patterns, laboratory findings, and immunologic features, treatment responses, and prognoses of AILD in adult patients at a Cuban tertiary referral center.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted at the National Institute of Gastroenterology in Havana, Cuba, from May 2012 to April 2016. Clinical, immunologic, and histologic features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cirrhosis, AIH/primary biliary cirrhosis overlap syndrome, autoimmune cholangiopathy, and primary sclerosing cholangitis were recorded. Response to therapy was assessed by serum alanine aminotransferase and bilirubin levels at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment initiation.

Results

Of the 106 patients included in the study, 85.5% were women. The median age at presentation was 47 years. AIH was the most common AILD and was diagnosed in 60 patients (56.6%), 55 of whom had type 1 AIH. Primary biliary cirrhosis was diagnosed in 22 patients (20.7%), overlap syndrome in 16 patients (15%), autoimmune cholangiopathy in 5 patients (4.71%), and PSC in 3 patients (2.8%). Most patients were symptomatic; 48 patients (45.2%) presented with liver cirrhosis, 14.5% of whom had decompensated cirrhosis. Follow-up of treatment was between 6 and 24 months. Prednisone monotherapy was used in 22 AIH patients (36.6%) and a combination of prednisone and azathioprine was used in 28 (46.6%) AIH patients. Response to treatment was seen in 41 AIH patients (68.3%), 33 of whom (55%) had a complete response and 8 of whom (24.2%) relapsed after 12 months of maintenance therapy. No or incomplete response to treatment was seen in 18 patients (30%). In 46 patients with autoimmune cholestasis, ursodeoxycholic acid was used as monotherapy in 25 patients (54.3%).

Conclusions

The clinical profile of AILD in a sample of the Cuban population is similar to that reported in South areas (Developing countries). AIH was more frequent than PBC, and usually presented with advanced liver disease that responded poorly to treatment.