Improving quality in a national intestinal failure unit: greater efficiency, improved access and reduced mortality

Donor, patient age and exposure to antibiotics are associated with the outcome of faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is effective for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI), but its effect varies inexplicably.

AIMS

To optimise the effectiveness of FMT for rCDI and validate determinants for effect METHODS: We conducted a cohort study, including all patients treated with FMT for rCDI between October 2018 and June 2020. Statistical process control was used to evaluate the impact of prospective quality improvement on the effect of single FMT treatments per 10-11 patients. Targeting an 80% effect, optimisations included changes to processing procedures, preparation and clinical application of FMT. The primary outcome was the resolution of Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhoea at week 8. If CDI recurred, FMT was repeated. All patients were followed for 8 weeks after their latest FMT.

RESULTS

183 patients with rCDI received 290 FMT treatments. A single FMT achieved resolution at week 8 in 127 (69%, 95% CI: 62%-76%), while repeated FMT cumulatively achieved resolution in 167/183 (91%, 95% CI: 86%-95%). The single FMT effect varied between 36% and 100% over time. In a mixed-effect model, patient age above 65 years, non-rCDI antibiotics at week 1 post-FMT, and donor were associated with effect. Neither increasing the dosages of faecal microbes nor standardising the processing improved outcomes.

CONCLUSION

FMT has a high cumulative effectiveness in patients with rCDI following multiple administrations, but the single FMT effect is variable and may be optimised using statistical process control. Optimising FMT by considering patient age, post-FMT antibiotics, donor and multiple administrations may improve the treatment outcomes.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (Study identifier: NCT03712722).

Implementation of a parenteral nutrition home care programme in a tertiary hospital

AIM

the objective of this study was to describe the results of the implementation of a home parenteral nutrition (HPN) care programme (Nutrihome©) in a cohort of patients treated at a tertiary hospital.

METHODS

retrospective study of the patients included in Nutrihome© at Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. Nutrihome consists of different modules including pre-discharge nursing hospital visits and nursing home visits, deliveries of the infusion pump, consumables and parenteral nutrition bags, patient training, weekly scheduled nursing home visits, scheduled nursing phone calls, stock control phone calls and 24-hour on-call line manned by the nurses.

RESULTS

the study included 8 (75 % women) and 10 (70 % women) patients in the Nutrihome© pilot and Nutrihome© programme, respectively. A total 37 adverse events were reported during Nutrihome© pilot, 26 of which were technical, 9 clinical, 1 was catheter-related and 1 other event. Nutrihome© programme registered a total of 107 adverse events reported, 57 of which were technical, 21 clinical, 16 were catheter-related and 13 were other events. A total of 99 % of these events were solved by Nutrihome© via phone calls or home visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Nutrihome© programme has been extremely useful during this pandemic, facilitaing both the start of HPN and training at the patient home without the need for hospitalisation. Additionally, the adverse events reported and solved by Nutrihome© not only reduced the physicians' burden during those tough times and the patients´ stress of being hospitalised during a pandemic, but supported the entire healthcare system.

A novel discharge pathway for patients with advanced cancer requiring home parenteral nutrition

BACKGROUND

The use of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) for palliative indications is increasing internationally and is the leading indication in some countries. Discharge on HPN can be complex in metabolically unstable patients and requires intestinal failure expertise.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018, we performed a retrospective analysis aiming to assess the impact of a novel remote discharge pathway for palliative HPN patients. This was evaluated using a quality improvement approach.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-five patients with active malignancy [mean (range) age 58 (25-80) years] were referred to the intestinal failure unit (IFU) for remote discharge. Of 82 patients were discharged from the oncology Centre on HPN using the pathway. The remaining 43 patients either declined HPN or the Oncology team felt that the patient became too unwell for HPN or died prior to discharge. There was an increase in patients referred for remote discharge from 13 in 2012 to 43 in 2017. The mean number of days between receipt of referral by the IFU to discharge on HPN from the oncology centre reduced from 29.4 days to 10.1 days. Following remote discharge, the mean number of days on HPN was 215.9 days. Catheter-related blood stream infection rates in this cohort were very low at 0.169 per 1000 catheter days.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate the remote safe, effective and rapid discharge of patients requiring palliative HPN between two hospital sites. This allows patients with a short prognosis more time in their desired location.

Application of quality improvement techniques to reduce parenteral nutrition wastage in a national intestinal failure unit

Objectives

Parenteral nutrition (PN) costs approximately £80 per day per bag. Unpredictable changes in patients' clinical condition, venous access loss or reasons related to the processes involved in administering PN can lead to PN wastage. Cost efficiencies are imperative to optimise limited resource utilisation in all current healthcare economies. We undertook a quality improvement (QI) project to reduce PN wastage in an adult acute hospital setting. The project SMART's (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, time-based) objective was reducing in-patient PN wastage by 10% in 9 months using QI methodology on a national intestinal failure unit (IFU).

Method

Wastage reasons were evaluated through pareto charts to target waste reduction using 'Plan, Do, Study, Act' (PDSA) cycles. Variation was mapped using c-charts.

Results

12-week baseline wastage data predicted 1000 bags wasted per annum (p.a.). PDSA cycles actioned included: regular enhanced clinical team awareness of wastage; unused PN bags redistributed within expiry date; stock bag rotation; critical path analysis of PN bag journey; enhanced discharge planning/coordination; reorganisation of fridge PN storage according to weekday; changing ordering frequency and bag type (from tailored to standard) to increase flexibility around discharge date and PN weaning. Implementation of PDSA cycles led to a 34% reduction in PN wastage in 9 months.

Conclusion

In a high-use IFU, PN wastage is common and costly. Using a QI approach with concurrent PDSA cycles and a motivated multidisciplinary team, high levels of wastage reduction are possible with associated significant cost savings and from this study a predicted cost saving of approximately £30 000 p.a.