1
|
Scarallo L, Russo G, Renzo S, Lionetti P, Oliva S. A journey towards pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy and its training: a narrative review. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1201593. [PMID: 37576143 PMCID: PMC10416625 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1201593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and aims Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy in pediatric setting has unique features and, therefore, requires an approach that is tailored to pediatric practice. There is still heterogeneity between training programs worldwide in terms of duration, number of procedures and assessment during and at the end of the training process. Methods We conducted a narrative review aiming to describe and summarize the existing literature on the various training methods for pediatric GI endoscopy to highlight the significance of specific pediatric endoscopy training. Results Simulation-based tools have been implemented in several training programs, providing a safer learning environment for trainees, especially in their earlier stages of training. Assessment of competence is gradually shifting from the sole evaluation of procedural numbers towards the development of more reliable and valid tools that can accurately measure technical competence. Despite such seismic shift, there is still a need for a standardized and comprehensive pediatric-oriented endoscopy curriculum that incorporates acquisition of procedural skills education and is built on the current competency-based model of training. All the above must sink their roots in trainees and to ensure that the endoscopists of tomorrow are capable of delivering high quality of care for children undergoing endoscopy. Conclusion It is crucial to parallelly focus on the way trainers teach trainees. In this context, the implementation of "train the trainers" courses has improved important quality meters in GI endoscopy. Future research should put the focus on the potential subsequent favorable benefits of these changes on child health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Scarallo
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Meyer Children Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Giusy Russo
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Department of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Sara Renzo
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Meyer Children Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
| | - Paolo Lionetti
- Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Meyer Children Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Salvatore Oliva
- Pediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Department of Maternal Infantile and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ruan W, Narula P, Fishman DS. Upskilling Pediatric Ileocolonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:253-265. [PMID: 36948745 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/24/2023]
Abstract
Upskilling in ileocolonoscopy is an important aspect of pediatric endoscopic practice as it enables endoscopists to learn additional skills through education and training to improve outcomes. With the advent of technologies, endoscopy is continuously evolving. Many devices can be applied to improve endoscopy quality and ergonomics. In addition, techniques such as dynamic position change can be employed to increase procedural efficiency and completeness. Key to upskilling is enhancing endoscopists' cognitive, technical and nontechnical skills and the concept of "training the trainer" to ensure trainers have the requisite skills to teach endoscopy effectively. This chapter details aspects of upskilling pediatric ileocolonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenly Ruan
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Priya Narula
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation, TrustWestern Bank, Sheffield S10 2TH, United Kingdom
| | - Douglas S Fishman
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA; Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Papadopoulou A, Ribes-Koninckx C, Baker A, Noni M, Koutri E, Karagianni MV, Protheroe S, Guarino A, Mas E, Wilschanski M, Roman E, Escher J, Furlano RI, Posovszky C, Hoffman I, Bronsky J, Hauer AC, Tjesic-Drinkovic D, Fotoulaki M, Orel R, Urbonas V, Kansu A, Georgieva M, Thomson M. Pediatric endoscopy training across Europe: a survey of the ESPGHAN National Societies Network 2016-2019. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1371-E1379. [PMID: 36262519 PMCID: PMC9576335 DOI: 10.1055/a-1898-1364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The ability to perform endoscopy procedures safely and effectively is a key aspect of quality clinical care in Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (PGHN). The aim of this survey, which was part of a global survey on PGHN training in Europe, was to assess endoscopy training opportunities provided across Europe. Methods Responses to standardized questions related to endoscopy training were collected from training centers across Europe through the presidents/representatives of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition National Societies from June 2016 to December 2019. Results A total of 100 training centers from 19 countries participated in the survey. In 57 centers, the endoscopy suit was attached to the PGHN center, while in 23, pediatric endoscopies were performed in adult endoscopy facilities. Ninety percent of centers reported the availability of specialized endoscopy nurses and 96 % of pediatric anesthetists. Pediatric endoscopies were performed by PGHN specialists in 55 centers, while 31 centers reported the involvement of an adult endoscopist and 14 of a pediatric surgeon. Dividing the number of procedures performed at the training center by the number of trainees, ≤ 20 upper, lower, or therapeutic endoscopies per trainee per year were reported by 0 %, 23 %, and 56 % of centers, respectively, whereas ≤ 5 wireless capsule endoscopies per trainee per year by 75 %. Only one country (United Kingdom) required separate certification of competency in endoscopy. Conclusions Differences and deficiencies in infrastructure, staffing, and procedural volume, as well as in endoscopy competency assessment and certification, were identified among European PGHN training centers limiting training opportunities in pediatric endoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Papadopoulou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, First Department of Pediatrics, University of Athens, Childrenʼs Hospital Agia Sofia, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Alastair Baker
- Pediatric Liver Center, Kingʼs College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Noni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, First Department of Pediatrics, University of Athens, Childrenʼs Hospital Agia Sofia, Athens, Greece
| | - Eleni Koutri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, First Department of Pediatrics, University of Athens, Childrenʼs Hospital Agia Sofia, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria-Vasiliki Karagianni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, First Department of Pediatrics, University of Athens, Childrenʼs Hospital Agia Sofia, Athens, Greece
| | - Sue Protheroe
- Birmingham Childrenʼs Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Alfredo Guarino
- Department of Translational Medical Science, Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Emmanuel Mas
- Unit of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Nutrition, Diabetes, and Inborn Errors of Metabolism, Children Hospital, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Michael Wilschanski
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Hadassah University Hospitals, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Enriqueta Roman
- Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, University Hospital Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Johanna Escher
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Childrenʼs Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raoul I. Furlano
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, University Childrenʼs Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Carsten Posovszky
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Ilse Hoffman
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Leuven University Hospital, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jiri Bronsky
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Duska Tjesic-Drinkovic
- University Hospital Center Zagreb – Division for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition & University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Maria Fotoulaki
- 4th Department of Pediatrics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Rok Orel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Ljubljana University Childrenʼs Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Vaidotas Urbonas
- Vilnius University Clinic of Childrenʼs Diseases, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Aydan Kansu
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Miglena Georgieva
- 2nd Department of Pediatrics, Saint Marina University hospital, Varna, Bulgaria
| | - Mike Thomson
- Sheffield Childrenʼs Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Screening and Treatment of Vitamin D Deficiency in UK Patients with Crohn's Disease: Self-Reported Practice among Gastroenterologists. Nutrients 2020; 12:nu12041064. [PMID: 32290515 PMCID: PMC7230977 DOI: 10.3390/nu12041064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, there is no UK national recommendation to measure vitamin D levels in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Patients with IBD are at risk of developing vitamin D deficiency with the highest prevalence frequently reported in those with Crohn’s disease (CD). Treating vitamin D deficiency as part of CD management continues to be of interest. Our aim was to identify influences on practice and self-reported practice among British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG)-IBD section members in the screening and the treatment of vitamin D deficiency in patients with CD. A web-based survey was distributed via email to members of the BSG-IBD section. Reported screening practice was generally annual in those with a history of previous surgery related to CD or small bowel CD. A total of 83% of respondents (n = 64) thought that vitamin D levels should be routinely monitored in patients with CD. Treatments for mild/moderate deficiency included increased sunlight exposure (mean frequency = 21, SD = 15) and dietary advice (mean frequency = 22, SD = 14); in moderate/severe deficiency, oral supplementation was recommended (mean frequency = 14, SD = 13). Respondents reported factors most likely to influence practice, including clearer evidence and guidance. Well conducted studies in CD patients with identified vitamin D deficiency are needed to inform national guidance and clinical practice.
Collapse
|
5
|
Learning Curve Analyses for Achieving Satisfactory Procedural Completion Rates in Paediatric Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2020; 70:336-340. [PMID: 31436700 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The learning curve in paediatric oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) is unknown. Using ≥95% D2 (second part of the duodenum) intubation rates as a marker of technical competency, we conducted learning curve analyses to identify when trainees achieve competency in paediatric OGD. Factors associated with competency were also evaluated. METHODS This nationwide study analysed data from paediatric OGD procedures prospectively entered into the UK endoscopy training e-portfolio between 2014 and 2018. Moving average and learning curve cumulative summation analyses were performed to determine procedural numbers required to achieve ≥95% D2 intubation rates. Factors associated with D2 intubation were assessed using a multivariable binary logistic regression approach. RESULTS A total of 8929 procedures performed by 61 trainees were identified. These 61 trainees had recorded a mean of 124.6 procedures (range 22-571, interquartile range 165). By moving average analysis, 95% D2 intubation was achieved after 79 procedures. By learning curve cumulative summation analysis, 81.6% of trainees were competent after 100 procedures. Multivariable factors associated with unassisted procedural completion included: lifetime procedure count (P < 0.001), higher trainee seniority (P < 0.001), patient age (P = 0.002), outpatient status (P < 0.001), and attendance at a national Basic Skills OGD course (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that, on average, 79 procedures in paediatric OGD are required to attain the competency outcome of ≥95% D2 intubation rates. By 100 procedures, 81.6% of our sample had achieved ≥95% D2 intubation. The minimum procedural count of 100 set by the UK and international training programmes can be used alongside existing objective assessment measures to safeguard competency within a training cohort.
Collapse
|
6
|
Paediatric Colonoscopy Direct Observation of Procedural Skills: Evidence of Validity and Competency Development. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2019; 69:18-23. [PMID: 30889133 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000002321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The paediatric series of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) were introduced into the UK national endoscopy training curriculum in 2016, but lack validity evidence. We aimed to present validity evidence for paediatric colonoscopy DOPS and study competency development in a national trainee cohort. METHODS This prospective UK-wide study analysed formative paediatric colonoscopy DOPS which were submitted to the e-Portfolio between 2016 and 2018. Item, domain, and average DOPS scores were correlated with the overall DOPS rating to evidence internal structure validity. Overall DOPS ratings were compared over lifetime procedure count to demonstrate learning curves (discriminant validity). Consequential validity was founded on receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. RESULTS A total of 203 DOPS assessments were completed for 29 trainees from 11 UK training centres. Internal structure validity was provided through item-total correlation analyses. DOPS scores positively correlated with trainee seniority (P < 0.001) and lifetime procedure count (P < 0.001). Competency acquisition followed the order of: "preprocedure," "postprocedure," "endoscopic nontechnical skills," "management," "procedure" domains, followed by overall DOPS competency, which was achieved in 81% of the cohort after 125 to 149 procedures. Mean DOPS scores could be used to predict overall procedure competence (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.969, P < 0.001), with a mean score of 3.9 demonstrating optimal sensitivity (93.5%) and specificity (87.6%). CONCLUSIONS This study provides validity evidence supporting the use of paediatric colonoscopy DOPS as an in-training competence assessment tool. DOPS may also be used to measure competency development and benchmark performance during training, which may be of value to trainees, trainers, and training programmes.
Collapse
|