Cognitive–behavioural therapy for personal recovery of patients with schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Depression, anxiety, and personal recovery outcomes after group vs individual transdiagnostic therapy: a brief report

Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) is an evidence-informed treatment utilizing Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) treatment principles. UP has demonstrated promising treatment effects comparable to single disorder protocol across several mental disorders. Its impact on personal recovery in anxiety and depression has not been examined. This study compares clinical and personal recovery outcomes of UP treatment for depression and anxiety disorders when delivered in a group vs. individual format. Retrospective chart review of outcomes was conducted for outpatients receiving 12-week individual (n = 65) and group (n = 62) UP treatment in a specialized psychiatric hospital. Descriptive and repeated measures ANOVA analyses were conducted on outcomes on Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale, Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale, Recovery Assessment Scale administered pre and post treatment. On average, participants in both group and individual UP treatment showed improvements in anxiety, depression, and recovery scores. Greater proportion of group participants showed improvements on two interpersonal-focused domains of personal recovery. Results indicate group UP treatment is comparably effective compared to individual UP in improving clinical and recovery outcomes, and treatment modality affects the degree of personal recovery. Overall findings offer important clinical promise of UP treatment as a transdiagnostic treatment option for individuals with anxiety and depression.

Psychosocial interventions promoting personal recovery in people with schizophrenia: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Personal recovery is an important aspect for many individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, as people can live rich, fulfilling lives despite ongoing symptoms. Prior reviews have found several factors to be associated with personal recovery, but a comprehensive overview of the psychosocial interventions aimed at improving personal recovery in schizophrenia is needed.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Key terms relating to personal recovery and psychosocial interventions to promote personal recovery will be searched for in the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane. Additionally, a simple search for grey literature will be conducted in The Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations. Two reviewers will individually screen and extract the data, and the selection of sources will be documented in a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses flow chart. A content analysis will be conducted on the data, and the findings will be presented in tables, and narratively synthesised. Lastly, research gaps will be identified, and recommendations for future research will be proposed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval was not required for the development or publishing of this protocol. Findings will be disseminated through conferences, meeting with patient organisations and consumers, and published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.

Clinical and personal recovery for people with schizophrenia in China: prevalence and predictors

BACKGROUND

Recovery from schizophrenia is a multidimensional construct that includes two categories: clinical recovery (symptomatic and functional remission) and personal recovery.

AIMS

To investigate the overlap between clinical and personal recovery and identify correlates of each.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted with 356 people living with schizophrenia and randomly selected from 12 communities in China. Clinical recovery was assessed using both the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). Personal recovery was assessed using the 8-item Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS). Disability and quality of life were assessed using the WHODAS 2.0 and WHOQOL-BREF-2, respectively.

RESULTS

Our results showed a recovery proportion of 36.52% for clinical recovery (66.57% for symptomatic remission and 40.73% for functional remission), and 17.42% for personal recovery. Only 8.99% of individuals achieved overall recovery (i.e. they met criteria for both clinical and personal recovery), and there was only a modest correlation (r = 0.26) between these two types of recovery. Overall recovery was only correlated with the quality of life (OR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.03), but there were various correlates for clinical recovery and personal recovery separately.

CONCLUSIONS

Recovery from schizophrenia involves both clinical and personal recovery, but when examined in the same sample, personal recovery, and thus overall recovery, is less common, particularly among people with schizophrenia in China.