Pressure and prolapse--the cause of solitary rectal ulceration

Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome in Patients Presenting With Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience

BACKGROUND

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign rectal condition associated with defecation disorder that has multifactor pathologies and variable findings on presentation, endoscopy, and histopathology. A diagnostic dilemma with an overlap of differentials and step-wise management that starts with conservative therapies and goes up to repeated surgeries in case of failure of the conservative approach.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to observe clinical, endoscopic, and histological features of SRUS in patients presenting with lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was conducted at the Department of Gastroenterology, Medical Teaching Institute, Lady Reading Hospital Peshawar from October 2018 to April 2020. After written informed consent, 257 patients (149 males and 108 females) from ages 15 to 70 who presented with lower GI bleeding were included via non-probability convenient sampling. Sociodemographic details were recorded in a pre-designed proforma. A colonoscopy was performed with the Colonoscope CF200 Z, Olympus Tokyo, Japan, and findings were noted. Suspected lesions were magnified, dyed with 0.2% indigo carmine, biopsied from the middle and edges of the ulcer, and sent for histopathology. All data were recorded and analyzed in SPSS-20. The mean with SD was calculated for quantitative variables, and frequency and percentages were calculated for qualitative variables. The chi-square test was used to check the significance, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

SRUS was found in 17 (6.6%) patients with lower GI bleeding, with a male predominance of 57% (n=11). Perirectal bleeding, constipation, mucous discharge, abdominal pain, and anemia were common clinical findings. Solitary lesions, ulceration, and anterior rectum location were the most common endoscopy findings. Obliterated lamina propria with collagen, ulceration, crypt distortion, and inflammatory infiltrates were common histopathological findings.

CONCLUSION

SRUS is a benign defecation disorder commonly presenting with lower GI bleeding, constipation, straining, and abdominal pain. It needs a stepwise approach with conservative management, medical management, biofeedback, and surgeries as a last resort.

Endoscopic Mucosectomy: A Novel Technique for Management of Polypoidal Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon disorder often challenging to treat. Surgical treatment is associated with suboptimal outcomes and postoperative complications. Argon plasma coagulation helps control rectal bleeding and healing of ulcers, but more extended follow-up data are not available. The macroscopic appearance of SRUS can be polypoid in 17%–25% of cases. Here, we describe a novel endoscopic technique for treating symptomatic patients with polypoidal variant of SRUS after failed medical and endoscopic argon plasma coagulation treatments.

Rectal mucosal prolapse with an emphasis on endoscopic ultrasound appearance

AIM

The diagnosis of mucosal prolapse syndrome (MPS) continues to be a challenge. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is of clinical value in anorectal diseases. This study seeks to investigate the use of EUS in the diagnosis of MPS.

METHODS

A total of 39 patients diagnosed with MPS between June 2015 to December 2019 were included in this study. Their clinical histories, endoscopic images, EUS images, and pathological data were retrospectively collected, and the EUS images were reviewed to summarize the characteristics of MPS.

RESULTS

In total, 39 MPS patients were enrolled. The main presenting symptoms were bleeding (61.5%) and constipation (53.8%). Gross appearance of the rectal lesions was mainly classified into three types: 51.3% of the lesions were polypoidal/nodular, 33.3% were ulcerative and 15.4% were flat with erythematous mucosa only. A total of 10 patients underwent EUS operation. With regard to the EUS appearance of MPS, four patients with polypoidal/nodular lesions showed thickening of the mucosa on EUS. The diffuse thickening of the mucosa-submucosa layer and disappearance of the architectural structure was observed in four patients with ulcerative lesions. Finally, the thickening of the muscularis propria was observed in two flat lesions. The serosal layers were intact in all the MPS patients. Neither blood flow signals nor regional lymph nodes were observed on EUS.

CONCLUSION

The EUS characteristics for MPS corresponding to different gross appearance can be classified into three types. These findings suggest that EUS is useful in the diagnosis of MPS.

Risk Factors for Acute Hemorrhagic Rectal Ulcer Syndrome and Its Prognosis: A Density Case-Control Study

Acute hemorrhagic rectal ulcer syndrome (AHRUS) can cause fatal gastrointestinal bleeding. However, there have been few epidemiological studies investigating risk factors of AHRUS. To determine the risk factors and predict one-year survival after onset of AHRUS, we conducted a retrospective density case-control study in a tertiary referral hospital. Patients with hematochezia, bloody stool, and rectal ulcer confirmed by colonoscopy between 2003 and 2011 were diagnosed as AHRUS (n = 38). Patients with malignancies, infectious colitis, ulcerative colitis, or solitary rectal ulcer syndrome were excluded. Control subjects (n = 123) without rectal ulcer were selected by risk set sampling for each AHRUS. Multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the significant adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of hospitalization, antithrombotic drug use, and one gram increase of serum albumin was 15.7 (2.25–108.9), 12.1 (1.53–94.4), and 0.11 (0.02–0.52), respectively. Endoscopic hemostasis for rectal bleeding was performed in 8 cases (21%). Seventeen percent of patients died within one year after the episode of AHRUS from non-AHRUS causes. This study revealed that hospitalization, antithrombotic drug use, and lower serum albumin value were significant risk factors for AHRUS, and that AHRUS was an unfavorable prognostic condition. This information could be helpful in recognizing high-risk patients of rectal bleeding and applying preventive measures.

A case report on a rare presentation of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

We describe a highly unusual case of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) that presented as a large polyp protruding from the anal canal. A 67-year-old man presented with rectal bleeding and mucus discharge. At examination under anaesthesia, a large pedunculated polypoidal lesion was found, measuring 25 × 20 mm, arising posterolaterally from the anorectal junction and protruding externally 50 mm in size. SRUS can be a misnomer as the condition can present in a number of different ways and only a minority of patients has a solitary ulcer. Other findings include multiple ulcers, hyperaemic mucosa or a broad-based polypoidal mass. In this case, a rare presentation of SRUS in the form of a large polyp was confirmed by histology. A key learning point is to remember that although less common than other causes of rectal symptoms, it should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis once sinister causes have been excluded.

Abdominal Approaches to Rectal Prolapse

Rectal prolapse is a debilitating condition with a complex etiology. Symptoms are most commonly prolapse of the rectum and pain with bowel movements or straining, with worsening fecal incontinence over time due to progressive stretching of the anal sphincters. Physical findings are fairly consistent from patient to patient-most notably diastasis of the levator ani muscles, deep pouch of Douglas, redundant sigmoid colon, a mobile mesorectum, and occasionally a solitary rectal ulcer. Evaluation includes a physical exam or imaging demonstrating the prolapse, and evaluating for other causes of pelvic floor dysfunction. Multiple surgical repairs are available, but treatment must be individualized based on patient symptoms and the presence or absence of constipation or other pelvic floor disorders. Mesh repairs have shown promising results, but carry the added risks of mesh erosion, infection, and mesh migration. The optimal repair has not been clearly demonstrated at this time.

Functional Disorders: Rectoanal Intussusception

Rectoanal intussusception is an invagination of the rectal wall into the lumen of the rectum. Patients may present with constipation, incomplete evacuation, incontinence, or may be asymptomatic. Defecography has been the gold standard for detection. Magnetic resonance imaging defecography and dynamic anal endosonography are alternatives to conventional defecography. However, both methods are not as sensitive as conventional defecography. Treatment options range from conservative/medical treatment such as biofeedback to surgical procedures such as Delorme, rectopexy, and stapled transanal rectal resection. Recent studies conducted after a trial of failed nonoperative management show adequate results with operations performed for rectal intussusception with or without rectocele if other causes of constipation are not present.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: Is it really a rare condition in children?

AIM: To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of the children with solitary rectal ulcer.

METHODS: Fifty-five children with a confirmed diagnosis of solitary rectal ulcer were studied in a period of 11 years from March 2003 to March 2014. All data were collected from the patients, their parents and medical records in the hospital.

RESULTS: From 55 studied patients, 41 were male (74.5%) and 14 female (25.5%). The mean age of the patients was 10.4 ± 3.7 years and the average time period from the beginning of symptoms to diagnosis of solitary rectal ulcer was 15.5 ± 11.2 mo. The most common clinical symptoms in our patients were rectal bleeding (n = 54, 98.2%) and straining during defecation or forceful defecation (n = 50, 90.9%). Other symptoms were as follows respectively: Sense of incomplete evacuation (n = 34, 61.8%), mucorrhea (n = 29, 52.7%), constipation (n = 14, 25.4%), tenesmus and cramping (n = 10, 18.2%), diarrhea (n = 9, 16.4%), and rectal pain (n = 5, 9.1%). The colonoscopic examination revealed 67.3% ulcer, 12.7% polypoid lesions, 10.9% erythema, 7.3% both polypoid lesions and ulcer, and 1.8% normal. Most of the lesions were in the rectosigmoid area at a distance of 4-6 cm from the anal margin. Finally, 69.8% of the patients recovered successfully with conservative, medical and surgical management.

CONCLUSION: The study revealed that solitary rectal ulcer is not so uncommon despite what was seen in previous studies. As the most common symptom was rectal bleeding, clinicians and pathologists should be familiar with this disorder and common symptoms in order to prevent its complications with early diagnosis.

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is effective for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome when associated with rectal prolapse

AIM

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is uncommon and its management is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with SRUS who underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR).

METHOD

A review was performed of a prospective database at the Oxford Pelvic Floor Centre to identify patients between 2004 and 2012 with a histological diagnosis of SRUS. All were initially treated conservatively and surgical treatment was indicated only for patients with significant symptoms after failed conservative management. The primary end-point was healing of the ulcer. Secondary end-points included changes in the Wexner Constipation Score and Faecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI).

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients with SRUS were identified (31 women), with a median age of 44 (15–81) years. The commonest symptoms were rectal bleeding (75%) and obstructed defaecation (64%). The underlying anatomical diagnosis was internal rectal prolapse (n = 20), external rectal prolapse (n = 14) or anismus (n = 2). Twenty-nine patients underwent LVR and one a stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedure. Nine (30%) required a further operation, six required posterior STARR for persistent SRUS and two a per-anal stricturoplasty for a narrowing at the healed SRUS site. Healing of the SRU was seen in 27 (90%) of the 30 patients and was associated with significant improvements in Wexner and FISI scores at a 3-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Almost all cases of SRUS in the present series were associated with rectal prolapse. LVR resulted in successful healing of the SRUS with good function in almost all patients, but a significant number will require further surgery such as STARR for persistent obstructed defaecation.

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a cause for optimism?

AIM

The treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is notoriously difficult. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is a nonresectional technique for patients with full thickness external rectal prolapse and internal prolapse with obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS), features associated in the pathogenesis of SRUS. Our aim was to assess the short- and long-term efficacy of LVMR in treating SRUS.

METHOD

Forty-eight patients with SRUS who underwent LVMR over a 15-year period (December 1996 to July 2012) were identified from a prospectively maintained electronic database.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients, 38 (79%) women, median age 43 (18-80) years, median body mass index 26 (21-40) kg/m(2) underwent LVMR for SRUS after initial biofeedback. The median follow-up was 33 months (95% CI 31-55, range 1-186 months); 52% were followed for more than 3 years and 13 (27%) for more than 5 years. Five (10%) had relapsed following a response to stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR; 10 additional patients have had a continued response to STARR). Eleven (23%) had intermittent reducible external prolapse. Epithelial ulcer healing was reported in all patients at 3 months. The ODS scores improved by 68% (P < 0.0001) and quality of life (QoL; Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire-22) scores improved by 45% (P < 0.0001). There was a significant improvement in bowel visual analogue scale (VAS) scores at 3 and 12 months (P = 0.0007). Sustained improvement in QoL and VAS scores was maintained at 2 years and continued in the 52% followed up for between 3 and 15 years. There were four (8%) symptomatic ODS recurrences: posterior rectal wall prolapse successfully treated by STARR (3) and one symptom free for 2 years following a temporary loop ileostomy. There were two recurrences (4%).

CONCLUSION

LVMR appears to provide a sustained improvement in QoL, VAS and patient satisfaction in patients with SRUS. Morbidity, recurrence and safety profiles are low.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children: A literature review

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a benign and chronic disorder well known in young adults and less in children. It is often related to prolonged excessive straining or abnormal defecation and clinically presents as rectal bleeding, copious mucus discharge, feeling of incomplete defecation, and rarely rectal prolapse. SRUS is diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and endoscopic and histological findings. The current treatments are suboptimal, and despite correct diagnosis, outcomes can be unsatisfactory. Some treatment protocols for SRUS include conservative management such as family reassurance, regulation of toilet habits, avoidance of straining, encouragement of a high-fiber diet, topical treatments with salicylate, sulfasalazine, steroids and sucralfate, and surgery. In children, SRUS is relatively uncommon but troublesome and easily misdiagnosed with other common diseases, however, it is being reported more than in the past. This condition in children is benign; however, morbidity is an important problem as reflected by persistence of symptoms, especially rectal bleeding. In this review, we discuss current diagnosis and treatment for SRUS.

Clinical presentation of and outcome for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome in children

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon but troublesome and easily misdiagnosed condition of childhood. We have reviewed the presentation and outcome following conservative management of a group of children with SRUS attending a single national paediatric gastrointesinal referral unit.

METHODS

Eight children were identified with histology-proven SRUS. Chart review was conducted for relevant history and examination at diagnosis. Patients were contacted to assess success of treatment at the time of follow-up.

RESULTS

Symptoms at presentation included repeated prolonged and ineffectual straining at stool, passage of blood/mucous per rectum, diarrhoea, and constipation. Most children were referred with suspected constipation, diarrhoea, or inflammatory bowel disease. On the basis of retrospective chart review, 7 of 8 children responded well to conservative management (behavioural modification programme involving reduction of time spent straining at defecation). The child failing treatment could not comply with advice because of comorbid autism. Six of the initial responders were available for follow-up. Four were asymptomatic. Two had relapsed and were not compliant with the management programme.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

SRUS can masquerade as more common childhood intestinal conditions such as inflammatory bowel disease or constipation. A biopsy is required for diagnosis, because ulceration may not be apparent at the time of endoscopy. Most patients with SRUS in childhood have a satisfactory outcome using a simple behavioural modification approach. Ongoing follow-up to reinforce behavioural modification is important and may avoid long-term, treatment-resistant disease into adulthood.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome mimicking rectal neoplasm on MRI

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a rare condition that typically affects young adults and describes a spectrum of clinicopathological abnormalities. The diagnosis of SRUS is usually made on the basis of a combination of presenting symptoms and endoscopic and histological appearances. Characteristic radiological appearances have been described on transrectal and endoanal ultrasound, defecating proctography and barium enema. The radiological appearance of solitary rectal ulcer on MRI has not been previously described. MRI appearance of thickened ulcerated mucosa in the anterior rectal wall are non-specific and was indistinguishable from a malignant process. However, given that solitary rectal ulcer has a pre-disposition to occur in the anterior rectal wall, the presence on MRI of thickened rectal mucosa in this location could suggest solitary rectal ulcer in the correct clinical context.

Rectal prolapse

Despite the innovation of more than 100 surgical procedures for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse, no one procedure is best and applicable to all patients. Traditionally, procedures have been divided into abdominal and perineal approaches. The application of the laparoscopic approach to colon and rectal disease has allowed an additional less invasive method of therapy to treat rectal prolapse successfully. In comparison with conventional approaches, laparoscopy has achieved similar functional results and recurrence rates while reducing postoperative pain and hospital length of stay.

Perineal rectosigmoidectomy for gangrenous rectal prolapse

Incarceration rarely complicates the chronically progressive form of the full thickness rectal prolapse. Even more rarely, it becomes strangulated, necessitating emergency surgery. We describe an extremely rare case of incarcerated acute rectal prolapse, without a relevant previous history or symptoms of predisposing pathology. The patient underwent emergency perineal proctosigmoidectomy, the Altemeier operation, combined with diverting loop sigmoid colostomy. The postoperative course was quite uneventful with an excellent final result after colostomy closure. The successful treatment of this patient illustrates the value of the Altemeier procedure in the difficult and unusual case scenario of bowel incarceration.

Healing of solitary rectal ulcers with multiple sessions of argon plasma coagulation

BACKGROUND

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon disorder of evacuation. Management of bleeding ulcers is usually unsatisfactory with conventional treatment. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) has been reported to control bleeding; however, it has not been shown to result in ulcer healing. The aim of the present study was to: (i) to investigate the efficacy and safety of APC in controlling bleeding from SRUS; and (ii) to study its efficacy in the healing of ulcer/s.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with bleeding SRUS diagnosed on clinical, colonoscopic, and histological findings were randomized to receive either standard care alone (12 patients) or to undergo multiple sessions of APC in addition (12 patients). All patients were followed up to determine ulcer healing.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with a mean duration of symptoms of 12.6 +/- 4.8 months were included. Bleeding was controlled with one (n = 5) or two sessions (n = 7) of APC. Reduction in size and depth of ulcer was noted. Eight out of 12 patients who received APC had complete healing of ulcers after four to eight sessions, carried out 2-4 weeks apart. The remaining four patients had a reduction in size and depth of ulcers compared to their pretreatment appearance. All patients were advised to have a high intake of fluids, fiber and laxatives, and to undergo biofeedback and behavior modification therapy in addition to the treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

APC controls bleeding in patients with SRUS and it also improves the healing of these ulcers.

Healing of a bleeding solitary rectal ulcer with multiple sessions of argon plasma

BACKGROUND

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is an uncommon disorder of evacuation. Management of bleeding ulcers is usually unsatisfactory with conventional treatments. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) has been reported in case reports to control bleeding; however, it has not been shown to result in ulcer healing.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of APC in controlling bleeding from SRUS and to study its efficacy in eventual healing of ulcers.

DESIGN

A randomized, controlled trial of the management of 24 consecutive patients with SRUS.

SETTING

The gastroenterology unit at 2 tertiary care hospitals.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four patients with bleeding SRUS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Control of bleeding and endoscopic healing of SRUS.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with bleeding SRUS, whose diagnoses were based on clinical, colonoscopic, and histologic findings, were randomized to receive either standard care only (12 patients, biofeedback therapy [BT] group) or multiple sessions of APC in addition to BT (12 patients, APC group). All patients were advised to intake a high level of fluids and fibers, laxatives, biofeedback, and behavior modification therapy in addition to the treatment. Patients were followed to determine whether ulcers healed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients with symptoms that lasted 12.6 +/- 4.8 months were included. Bleeding was controlled in all 12 patients in the APC group, but only in 5 of 12 patients in BT group. We also made the following observations about healing of the ulcers: 8 of 12 patients in the APC group had complete healing of their ulcers after 4 to 8 sessions, whereas in the BT group, ulcers healed in only 2 of 12 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

APC controls the bleeding in patients with SRUS and also improves the healing of these ulcers.

Incidence and etiology of overt gastrointestinal bleeding in adult patients with aplastic anemia

Patients with thrombocytopenia caused by various neoplastic and primary bone marrow diseases are susceptible to major hemorrhage. There are few reports addressing the incidence and outcome of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients with aplastic anemia characterized by long-standing thrombocytopenia. We sought to retrospectively determine the incidence, etiology, clinical outcomes, and risk factors associated with overt GI bleeding in patients with aplastic anemia. We analyzed the medical records of 508 patients with aplastic anemia after excluding patients below 15 years of age or those who underwent stem cell transplantation between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2007. A total of 32 patients developed overt GI bleeding during this period. We evaluated the site, etiology, outcomes, and major risk factors in these patients who developed GI bleeding episodes. The incidence of GI bleeding was 6.3% (32 of 508 patients) in adult patients with aplastic anemia. The incidence increased to 12.6% (28 of 222 patients) in patients with severe disease. One patient died from massive GI bleeding. Bleeding sites included the esophagus (two patients, 6.3%), stomach (five, 16.3%), duodenum (two, 6.3%), small intestine (five, 15.6%), large intestine (seven, 21.6%), and unknown site (11, 34.4%). Lower GI bleeds mainly caused by neutropenic enterocolitis (NEC) and solitary ulcer developed more frequently than upper GI bleeds. The major risk factors for GI bleeding included old age (P = 0.004, odds ratio (OR) = 1.039), severe aplastic anemia (P < 0.001, OR = 11.934), non-response to therapy (P = 0.001, OR = 5.652), and major bleeding history in another organ (P < 0.001, OR = 6.677). Overt GI bleeding in patients with aplastic anemia more frequently develops in the lower tract than in the upper tract. The risk of GI bleeding is higher in patients with the following risk factors: older age, severe disease, poor response to treatment, and major bleeding history in another organ.

A report of 112 cases of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome from Iran

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a syndrome with symptoms such as rectal bleeding, obstructed defecation, straining at stool and incomplete evacuation, and rectal polyps. In the present study, the clinical features of SRUS among Iranian patients is reviewed. Records of 112 patients diagnosed with SRUS between 1997 and 2007 admitted to a special coloproctology clinic have been analyzed retrospectively. Of 112 patients with SRUS, 61 were male (54.4%) and 51 female (45.6%) with a mean age of 32.2 years (range, 16–64 years). The mean interval between onset of symptoms and final diagnosis of SRUS was 3.8 years (range, 1–14 years). Rectal bleeding (67%) was the most common symptom in both genders, while a feeling of fullness was the least common symptom, observed only in one woman (2%). Incontinence was observed in 4 women (7.8%) and 3 men (4.9%), comprising 6.25% of the total clinical presentations. There were 38 patients (33.9%) with mucosal prolapse and 2 patients (1.8%) with total rectal prolapse. In conclusion, rectal bleeding in the presence of constipation or diarrhea is the main sign for diagnosis of SRUS. This syndrome is usually misdiagnosed; it is frequently confused with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) because the rectal macroscopic and microscopic lesions and true polyps of rectum are similar. We suggest that most of patients who are treating for IBD and true polyps without any response are suffering from SRUS. Regarding misdiagnosis between SRUS and IBD or rectal polyp, the exact prevalence of SRUS has been mistakenly underestimated.

Isolated colonic ulcers: diagnosis and management

Isolated ulcers of the large intestine are not associated with an underlying colitis and may be an incidental finding on screening colonoscopy or present with abdominal pain, hematochezia, chronic gastrointestinal bleeding, and rarely, perforation. A common cause of isolated colonic ulcers is the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with ulcers in the cecum and right colon. Isolated rectal ulcers are caused by ischemia, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), radiation, or fecal impaction. Stercoral ulceration and nonspecific ulcers of the colon are rare but can cause colonic perforation. Infectious causes include tuberculosis and amebiasis. Histology is important to rule out malignancy but is not helpful for diagnosis except in SRUS and certain infections. The approach to isolated colonic ulceration includes biopsy of the ulcer and surrounding tissue, cessation of any NSAIDs, management of constipation, and recognition of the patient with SRUS. Inflammatory bowel disease should be ruled out in appropriate patients.

Rectal prolapse

INTRODUCTION

Rectal prolapse, or procidentia, is defined as a protrusion of the rectum beyond the anus. It commonly occurs at the extremes of age. Rectal prolapse frequently coexists with other pelvic floor disorders, and patients have symptoms associated with combined rectal and genital prolapse. Few patients, a lack of randomized trials and difficulties in the interpretation of studies of anorectal physiology have made the understanding of this disorder difficult.

METHODS OF TREATMENT

Surgical management is aimed at restoring physiology by correcting the prolapse and improving continence and constipation, whereas in patients with concurrent genital and rectal prolapse, an interdisciplinary surgical approach is required. Operation should be reserved for those patients in whom medical treatment has failed, and it may be expected to relieve symptoms. Numerous surgical procedures have been suggested to treat rectal prolapse. They are generally classified as abdominal or perineal according to the route of access. However, the controversy as to which operation is appropriate cannot be answered definitively, as the extent of a standardized diagnostic assessment and the types of surgical procedures have not been identified in published series.

LITERATURE REVIEW

This review encompasses rectal prolapse, including aetiology, symptoms and treatment. The English-language literature about rectal prolapse was identified using Medline, and additional cited works not detected in the initial search were obtained. Articles reporting on prospective and retrospective comparisons and case reports were included.

[The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome]

The solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is a rare debilitating disorder of the rectum characterized by perianal chronic pain with passage of blood and mucus. The pathogenesis remains uncertain, rectal prolapse and trauma from straining are the main hypothesis. The diagnosis includes clinical symptoms associated with endoscopic lesion (erythema, ulcer or polypoïd lesion) and histological features. Mano-metric studies and defecography are helpful to determinate an underlying defecation disorder or rectal prolapse. The treatment is controversial including a conservative option (medications and behavioural therapy) with poor long term results, and the surgical option (treatment of a rectal prolapse with or without resection of the lesion), more aggressive with uncertain results in a long follow-up period.

Pathophysiology and role of biofeedback therapy in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

BACKGROUND

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a behavioral disorder whose pathophysiology is incompletely understood. Likewise, its treatment, particularly the role of biofeedback therapy (BT) is unclear.

AIM

To evaluate anorectal function and morphology and to assess efficacy of BT.

METHODS

Eleven patients (8f) with refractory SRUS underwent symptom assessments, anorectal manometry, defecography, balloon expulsion test, and sigmoidoscopy. Physiological tests were also performed in 15 (11f) healthy controls. Subsequently, SRUS patients underwent biofeedback treatment. Symptoms and manometry were reassessed.

RESULTS

Nine (82%) patients exhibited dyssynergia ( p < 0.001). Rectal sensory thresholds were decreased (p < 0.04). After biofeedback, straining effort and stool frequency decreased ( p < 0.05), and bowel satisfaction score (VAS) improved ( p < 0.001). Digital maneuvers were discontinued by all five patients and bleeding stopped in 56%. The defecation index increased ( p < 0.05), dyssynergia normalized, and balloon expulsion time decreased ( p < 0.05). There was complete healing in 4 (36%), > or =50% healing in 2 (18%), and <50% healing in 4 (36%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

SRUS associated with excessive straining, digital disimpaction, rectal hypersensitivity, dyssynergic defecation, and prolonged evacuation. BT may improve symptoms and anorectal function and facilitate healing.

Anorectal physiology in solitary ulcer syndrome: a case-matched series

PURPOSE

Solitary ulcer syndrome is a rare condition characterized by inflammation and chronic ulcer of the rectal wall in patients suffering from outlet constipation. Despite similar surgical options (rectopexy, anterior resection), solitary ulcer syndrome may differ from overt rectal prolapse with regard to symptoms and pathogenesis. The present work analyzed differences between these conditions in a case-control physiology study.

METHODS

From 1997 to 2002, 931 consecutive subjects were investigated in a single physiology unit for anorectal functional disorders. Standardized questionnaires, anorectal physiology, and evacuation proctography were included in a prospective database. Diagnosis of solitary ulcer syndrome was based on both symptoms and anatomic features in 25 subjects with no overt rectal prolapse (21 females and 4 males; mean age, 37.2 +/- 15.7 years) and no past history of anorectal surgery. They were compared with age-matched and gender-matched subjects: 25 with outlet constipation (also matched on degree of internal procidentia), 25 with overt rectal prolapse without any mucosal change, and 14 with overt rectal prolapse and mucosal changes.

RESULTS

Subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome reported symptomatic levels (digitations, pain, incontinence) similar to those of patients with outlet constipation, but they had significantly more constipation and less incontinence than patients with overt rectal prolapse. Compared with each of the three control groups (dyschezia, rectal prolapse without mucosal change, and rectal prolapse with mucosal change), subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome more frequently had an increasing anal pressure at strain (15 vs. 5, 3, and 1, respectively ; P < 0.01) and a paradoxical puborectalis contraction (15 vs. 9, 1, and 1, respectively; P < 0.05). With respect to evacuating proctography, complete rectal emptying was achieved less frequently in this group (5 vs. 12, 23, and 10, respectively; P < 0.05). Compared with patients with overt rectal prolapse, mean resting and squeezing anal pressures were significantly higher in both groups of subjects with solitary ulcer syndrome and with outlet constipation. Prevalence and levels of anatomic disorders (perineal descent, rectocele) did not differ among the four groups except for rectal prolapse grade and prevalence of enterocele (higher in overt rectal prolapse group). Interestingly, and despite matched controls for degree of intussusception, individuals with solitary ulcer syndrome had circular internal procidentia more often compared with those suffering from outlet constipation without mucosal lesions (15 vs. 8, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This case-controlled study quantifies functional anal disorders in patients suffering from solitary ulcer syndrome. Despite no proven etiologic factor, sphincter-obstructed defecation and circular internal procidentia both may play an important part in the pathogenesis and an exclusive surgical approach may not be appropriate in this context.

Rectal intussusception: a study of rectal biomechanics and visceroperception

OBJECTIVES

Rectal intussusception (RI) is a significant cause of morbidity amongst those with a rectal evacuatory disorder. The pathophysiology is unknown, but may involve abnormal biomechanics of the rectal wall similar to that previously demonstrated in patients with overt rectal prolapse (RP). Using an electromechanical barostat, this study aimed to investigate the biomechanics and visceroperception of the rectal wall in patients with RI.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients (12 females, median age 46 yr (range 24-66)) with symptomatic, full-thickness RI were studied. Patients underwent assessment of rectal compliance, visceroperception, adaptive response to isobaric distension at urge threshold, and assessment of the postprandial response. Results were compared with those obtained in 28 asymptomatic volunteers, 10 with RI (6 females, median age 29 yr (range 21-36)) and 18 (9 females, median age 33 yr (range 21-62)) without.

RESULTS

In the absence of the clinical finding of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), patients with symptomatic RI have normal rectal wall biomechanics, as do asymptomatic volunteers with RI (p < 0.05). Patients with the clinical finding of SRUS had reduced compliance and adaptation. In all three groups, there was a linear relationship between rectal pressure and visceroperception. The postprandial contractile response was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with RI have normal rectal wall biomechanics. This is in contrast to patients with RP, and suggests that while they may represent different stages of the same disease process, they are physiologically distinct. In patients with RI and SRUS, rectal wall inflammation and fibrosis, perhaps arising secondary to the intussusception, may explain the physiological changes observed.

Dynamic evaluation of the anorectum

The evaluation of EP is complicated by the lack of any gold standard and a shifting clinical emphasis as management regimens go in and out of favor. As with all functional bowel disease, there is a residue of patients who are difficult to manage, and in whom a clinician will want maximum information before deciding on treatment. The examination has been criticized as lacking clinical relevance, and of having poor interobserver reliability except for rectal emptying and rectocele formation. Others have found a higher (83.3%) observer accuracy and a high yield of positive diagnoses. A questionnaire showed that clinicians found EP of major benefit in 40%, altering management from surgical to medical in 14% and vice versa in 4%. Radiographic examinations only impact on clinical management when findings alter management. Management protocols are evolving in functional disorders, but important features that EP reveals are anismus, trapping in rectoceles, IAI, and rectal prolapse. EP is the only method to diagnose some of these conditions and within defined parameters is extremely valuable in clinical management.

Predictive value of internal anal sphincter thickness for diagnosis of rectal intussusception in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine any association between a thickened internal anal sphincter (IAS) on anal endosonography and high-grade rectal intussusception on evacuation proctography in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.

METHODS

Anal endosonography was performed in 20 patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and IAS thickness defined as normal or abnormal depending on age. Sphincter thickness was compared with the presence or absence of high-grade intussusception on subsequent evacuation proctography to determine any relationship between the two.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients had an abnormally thick IAS, two of whom were unable to evacuate. Of the remaining 11 patients, ten showed high-grade intussusception (positive predictive value 91 per cent). Only three of seven patients with a normal IAS had high-grade intussusception (negative predictive value 57 per cent). Patients with a thick IAS were significantly more likely to have proctographic evidence of high-grade intussusception (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

Sonographic findings of a thick IAS are highly predictive for high-grade rectal intussusception in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.

Nonsurgical Therapy for Solitary Rectal Ulcer Syndrome

The treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) remains problematic and is less than ideal. Prospective, well-designed studies assessing the efficacy of treatment for SRUS are few; most of the knowledge imparted for treating SRUS is experiential. As such, firm treatment recommendations can not be made. Rather, a conservative, stepwise, individualized approach must be employed. Diagnostic modalities should be incorporated in the management scheme to direct treatment when indicated. Management must include patient reassurance that the underlying lesion is benign, because complete "cures" are uncommon in those with SRUS. The goals of therapy should be discussed with the patient prior to initiating treatment. Although the ultimate goal is macroscopic and microscopic healing, a realistic goal is cessation or minimization of symptoms. We outline a reasonable approach to the management of SRUS. Histologic confirmation of SRUS should prompt a discussion of the presumed pathogenic mechanisms with the patient. Conservative therapy with dietary fiber, bowel retraining, and bulk laxatives should be employed. If symptoms persist, the patient should receive a trial of sucralfate enemas for 6 weeks. Individuals who respond should continue conservative therapy. However, if symptoms persist, defecography can be done to assess for inappropriate puborectalis contraction and occult rectal mucosal prolapse. Patients with inappropriate contraction of the puborectalis can be offered biofeedback. Patients with occult rectal mucosal prolapse can be considered for surgery. However, the risks, benefits, and success rates of surgery should be discussed at length, prior to any procedure being performed. Rectopexy or Delorme's procedure offer the best success rates to date; however, the choice of surgical procedure must take into account the experience of the surgeon and wishes of the patient.

Prolapsing mucosal polyps: an underrecognized form of colonic polyp--a clinicopathological study of 15 cases

OBJECTIVE

Prolapsing intestinal mucosa occurs in many forms throughout the GI tract. We describe 15 patients with polypoid masses in the sigmoid colon and histological features of mucosal prolapse.

METHODS

Fifteen patients with colon polyps demonstrating endoscopic and histological features of mucosal prolapse were retrospectively identified from our database.

RESULTS

Twelve patients presented with signs and symptoms that were nonspecific, but consistent with mucosal prolapse, such as occult or gross intestinal bleeding and lower abdominal pain. Three patients were asymptomatic. The polyps occurred in the sigmoid colon, usually in association with diverticular disease, and appeared more often in men. Endoscopically, the polyps appeared to be well-circumscribed, hyperemic masses that contrasted sharply with normal-appearing adjacent mucosa. Histological features include glandular crypt abnormalities, fibromuscular obliteration of the lamina propria, and thickened and splayed muscularis mucosa.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolapsing mucosal polyps of the colon are histologically similar to other mucosal prolapsing conditions in the GI tract, such as the solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, inflammatory cloacogenic polyps, inflammatory "cap" polyps, and gastric antral vascular ectasia, and should therefore be designated as part of the "mucosal prolapse syndrome."

Solitary rectal ulcer: a rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in an adolescent with hemophilia A

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) is a rarely reported condition in children. The typical presentation is one of anorectal pain with passage of blood and mucus per rectum in the setting of defecation abnormalities. Diagnosis is made via endoscopy and biopsy. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome alone is usually a benign condition; however, significant morbidity can occur if complicated by underlying disease states. We report an adolescent with hemophilia A and SRUS who presented with a rectal bleed that required blood transfusion.

Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

Rectal prolapse can be diagnosed easily by having the patient strain as if to defecate. A laparoscopic rectopexy should be recommended. Intussusception is more an epiphenomenon than a cause of defecatory disorder and should be managed conservatively. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is a consequence of chronic straining, and therapy should include restoring a normal defecation habit. Rectocele should be left alone; an operation may be considered if it is larger than 3 cm and is causing profound symptoms despite maximizing medical therapy for the associated defecation disorder.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome

BACKGROUND

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome is a rare disorder characterized by erythema or ulceration of the rectal wall, associated with typical histological features, and disturbed defaecatory behaviour with the passage of blood and mucus.

METHODS

This is a review based on a literature search using a computer database (Medline) and manual cross-referencing.

RESULTS

The pathogenesis is likely to vary in different patients; it includes trauma from straining, direct digital trauma and possibly primary neuromuscular pathology. The histological findings of extension of the muscularis mucosa between crypts and muscularis propria disorganization on full-thickness specimens are characteristic. Biofeedback defaecation retraining, including habit training, can lead to symptom improvement and return to work in a majority of patients. Abdominal rectopexy offers long-term symptom improvement in approximately 50 per cent of patients. Rectal ulceration may persist after any treatment, even if symptoms improve.

CONCLUSION

Behavioural therapy and carefully considered operations offer the best treatment results. Further work on psychological factors and neuromuscular and vascular pathology is required.

The best operation for rectal prolapse

Rectal prolapse remains a disorder for which the cause is not clearly understood and the best method of management is debated. Because the natural history of prolapse frequently leads to complications of incontinence and constipation, we believe that all patients presenting with internal and external prolapse should be considered for repair. Although the type of operative repair recommended may vary, it is clear that all patients with external rectal prolapse should be offered some type of repair. What is not clear from the literature is the appropriate management of those patients with internal prolapse. As shown in the George Washington University experience, surgery is rarely performed for isolated internal prolapse. Most patients who present with internal prolapse also have an associated enterocele, rectocele, or cystocele. Repair of the internal prolapse and the associated disorder may benefit many of these patients. If internal prolapse is an isolated finding, it is not clear to what extent the prolapse is responsible for the patient's symptoms, and repair is generally not advised. These guidelines are easy to enumerate but may be difficult to practice in some patients. Therefore, ongoing evaluation of clinical results is critical to improve our understanding of these disorders. This discussion has outlined the current theories of the cause of rectal prolapse, the symptoms and findings patients present with, and the possible approaches to repair.

Ileal conduit stenosis--an enigma

Ileal conduit stenosis was diagnosed in 12 patients in the period 1981-1994. The time between urinary diversion and this diagnosis was 7-30 (mean 14) years. The clinical picture, i.e. colicky flank pain and/or fever, was produced by upper urinary tract obstruction. Intravenous urography, loopography and looposcopy were used in diagnosis. Treatment consisted of removal of the conduit and replacement by a new ileal loop or a continent reservoir, or partial resection with or without ureteric reimplantation. Light microscopy of the removed conduits showed severe, sometimes transmural inflammation with submucosal fibrosis. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) demonstrated reduced height of microvilli, presence of glycocalyceal bodies and an increased number of lysosomes. Other subcellular structures were intact. The pathogenesis of the stenosis is obscure. Microvascular insufficiency, infection in conjunction with exposure to urine, reaction to some noxious agent in the urine or immunologic causation have been proposed. This late stenosis seems to arise only when ileum is used as conduit. Its insidious course calls for lifelong observation of the upper urinary tracts in these patients.

Pathology of the rectal wall in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and complete rectal prolapse

BACKGROUND

The aetiology and pathology of rectal prolapse and solitary rectal ulcer are poorly understood.

AIMS

To examine the full thickness rectal wall in these two conditions.

METHODS

The pathological abnormalities in the surgically resected rectal wall were studied from nine patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, 11 complete rectal prolapse, and nine cancer controls. Routine haematoxylin and eosin and Van Gieson staining for collagen were performed.

RESULTS

The rectal wall from solitary rectal ulcer syndrome specimens was thickened compared with complete rectal prolapse and controls. The major difference was in the muscularis propria (2.2 v 1.1 v 1.2 mm, medians, p < 0.005) and particularly the inner circular muscular layer, and to a lesser extent the submucosal and outer longitudinal muscular layers. Some solitary rectal ulcer syndrome specimens showed unique features such as decussation of the two muscular layers (four of nine), nodular induration of inner circular layer (four of nine) and grouping of outer longitudinal layer into bundles (three of nine); these were not seen in complete rectal prolapse or control specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

These features, which resemble the features of high pressure sphincter tissue, may be of aetiological importance, and suggest a different pathogenesis for these two disorders. Excess collagen was seen in both disorders, was more severe in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome specimens, and probably reflects a response to repeated trauma.

Is barium trapping in rectoceles significant?

PURPOSE

This study was designed to determine whether rectocele size and contrast retention are significant.

METHODS

Evacuation proctography and simultaneous intrarectal pressure measurements from a small, noncompliant balloon catheter were performed in three matched groups of 11 constipated female patients with rectoceles, rectoceles and contrast trapping of > 10 percent, and no rectocele. Computerized image analysis was used to measure rectocele area and evacuation.

RESULTS

In the two groups with rectoceles, there was no significant difference in rectocele area or width pre-evacuation. The anorectal angle, pelvic floor descent, maximum anal canal width, evacuation time or completeness, maximum and distal intrarectal pressure, or need to digitate did not differ significantly between the groups. In seven patients with barium trapping (64 percent) the intrarectal pressure dropped abruptly as the balloon entered the rectocele, suggesting that trapping results from sequestration into the vagina, closing part of the rectocele from the normal intrarectal pressure zone.

CONCLUSION

Because no impairment of evacuation appears to be associated with either a large rectocele or trapping, these evacuation problems should not be directly attributed to these proctographic findings.

Intrarectal pressures and balloon expulsion related to evacuation proctography

Seventy four patients with constipation were examined by standard evacuation proctography and then attempted to expel a small, non-deformable rectal balloon, connected to a pressure transducer to measure intrarectal pressure. Simultaneous imaging related the intrarectal position of the balloon to rectal deformity. Inability to expel the balloon was associated proctographically with prolonged evacuation, incomplete evacuation, reduced anal canal diameter, and acute anorectal angulation during evacuation. The presence and size of rectocoele or intussusception was unrelated to voiding of paste or balloon. An independent linear combination of pelvic floor descent and evacuation time on proctography correctly predicted maximum intrarectal pressure in 74% of cases. No patient with both prolonged evacuation and reduced pelvic floor descent on proctography could void the balloon, as maximum intrarectal pressure was reduced in this group. A prolonged evacuation time on proctography, in combination with reduced pelvic floor descent, suggests defecatory disorder may be caused by inability to raise intrarectal pressure. A diagnosis of anismus should not be made on proctography solely on the basis of incomplete/prolonged evacuation, as this may simply reflect inadequate straining.

Proctographic changes after rectopexy for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and preoperative predictive factors for a successful outcome

Rectopexy is advocated as treatment for solitary rectal ulcer syndrome despite variable outcome. Sixteen patients with this condition, who remained symptomatic after surgery, were examined before and after operation by evacuation proctography and compared with a matched group of seven patients whose symptoms had been relieved, to investigate the effect of rectopexy on rectal configuration or emptying, or both, and to identify any preoperative factor associated with a good outcome. Rectal prolapse, demonstrated in 19 of 23 patients before operation (internal in 12, external in seven), was seen in only one patient after surgery. The rectal axis became more vertical at rest (median 44 degrees before operation versus 35 degrees after surgery, P = 0.006) and on evacuation (median 38 degrees versus 31 degrees, P = 0.023). Preoperative evacuation time was increased in patients with poor outcome (median (range) 22 (8-60)s versus 10 (5-15)s, P = 0.008). Rectopexy successfully treats rectal prolapse in patients with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and alters rectal configuration. These features, however, are unrelated to outcome. Prolonged preoperative evacuation time, suggesting a defaecatory disorder, may predict poor symptomatic outcome.

Obstructed defecation: current status of pathophysiology and management

Obstructed defecation poses a challenging clinical problem and in many patients presenting with this syndrome the underlying pathophysiology cannot be determined. Up to now, attempts to diagnose and treat obstructed defecation (anismus) have focused on the function of the somatic pelvic floor musculature surrounding the anorectum, and concepts such as 'puborectalis paradox' and 'spastic pelvic floor' have gained widespread acceptance despite there being no objective data to support such concepts. New evidence showing that defecation is an integrated process of colonic and rectal emptying suggests that anismus may be much more complex than a simple disorder of the pelvic floor muscles. In a small number of patients obstructed defecation is caused by a more simple mechanism, such as internal sphincter hypertonia or a large rectocele, which is easily corrected surgically. Careful selection of patients for treatment, based on identifying the underlying pathophysiological disorder, is emphasized.

Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: the clinical entity and anorectal physiological findings in Singapore

The clinical pattern and physiological abnormalities in solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) occurring in Singapore, were investigated. Since April 1989, 25 patients have presented with histologically proven SRUS. There were 13 males and 12 females (20 Chinese, 4 Malay and 1 Indian) with a mean age of 47.5 (+/- 3.1) years. Ninety-six per cent presented with rectal bleeding, 92% strained at stools, 40% had mucus discharge, 40% felt incomplete defecation and 32% digitated to defecate. Four had previous haemorrhoidectomies that did not cure their symptoms. The lesions were at a mean 6.8 (+/- 0.5) cm above the anal verge, usually anteriorly (64%) but one was circumferential. Anorectal physiology performed on 14 patients was compared with 13 age and gender matched normal controls. The measured mean resting perineum level in SRUS (1.4 +/- 0.3 cm) was significantly lower than in normals (P < 0.01). The mean anal electrosensory threshold (2.5 +/- 0.52 mV) was also significantly higher than in the controls (P < 0.05). Fifteen patients were successfully treated with a high fibre diet and avoidance of straining. Three patients required surgery and the most recent seven patients have responded well to biofeedback treatment. Awareness of this uncommon anorectal condition is necessary for early diagnosis and appropriate management. The physiological findings support a pelvic straining pathophysiology resulting in perineal descent, with less sensitive rectal mucosa prolapsing into, and raising, the anal canal electrosensory threshold. Treatment strategies aimed at correcting the straining have usually been successful.