Palliation of malignant dysphagia: surgery, radiotherapy, laser, intubation alone or in combination?

Optimal Management of Dysphagia in Patients with Inoperable Esophageal Cancer: Current Perspectives

The majority of patients with esophageal cancer are diagnosed at an advanced, incurable stage. Palliation of symptoms, specifically dysphagia, is a crucial component to improve quality of life and optimize nutritional status. Despite multiple available treatment modalities, there is not one accepted or recommended to be the preferred treatment option. Palliative management is often decided by a multidisciplinary team considering factors including local availability, preference, patient life expectancy, and symptom severity. Systemic therapies such as chemotherapy are the most commonly used palliative modalities. Oncologists are most familiar with radiation for dysphagia palliation, especially for advanced metastatic cancer patients with good performance status. One common approach used by endoscopist is self-expandable metal stents. This is preferred for patients with short-term survival and poor functional status as it provides rapid relief of dysphagia. Cryotherapy is a relatively new endoscopic ablative modality and appears to be a promising option for dysphagia palliation, but more data is needed for wider adoption. This review summarizes the current literature on endoscopic and non-endoscopic treatment options for malignant dysphagia.

Palliative Radiotherapy Versus Esophageal Stent Placement in the Management of Patients With Metastatic Esophageal Cancer

Background:Patients with advanced esophageal cancer often experience pain and dysphagia, yet the optimal palliative management remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated outcomes and adverse effects of palliative radiotherapy (RT) compared with esophageal stenting among a cohort of U.S. veterans with metastatic esophageal cancer.Patients and Methods:We identified 1,957 veterans in the United States with metastatic esophageal cancer who received palliative RT to the esophagus or esophageal stenting, and assessed the risks of severe adverse effects, including esophageal fistula formation, perforation, obstruction, hemorrhage, and esophagitis. We determined palliative efficacy by evaluating pain and dysphagia scores before and after intervention. Multivariable analyses were used to control for potential confounding factors.Results:In our cohort, 1,593 patients underwent RT and 364 underwent esophageal stenting. The cumulative incidence of any severe adverse effect at 6 months was higher among patients who received stents compared with those who received RT (21.7% vs 12.4%;P<.0010). In multivariable analysis, patients who received stents had an increased risk of any severe adverse effect, including fistula, perforation, and hemorrhage (allP<.0500). Multivariable analysis also showed that, compared with stenting, RT was associated with more rapid and durable pain relief (P<.0010) with no difference in relief of dysphagia over time when accounting for pretreatment dysphagia scores (P=.1029).Conclusions:Compared with esophageal stenting, RT was associated with a decreased risk of adverse effects, greater pain relief, and equivalent relief of moderate to severe dysphagia over time. Unmeasured patient- or tumor-related factors could have influenced the choice of intervention, thereby impacting our study outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the largest study to date analyzing the comparative risks and benefits of palliative RT and esophageal stenting among patients with metastatic esophageal cancer.

The role of palliative interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) in esophageal cancer: An AIRO (Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology) systematic review focused on dysphagia-free survival

PURPOSE

The aim of this review was to examine efficacy of palliative interventional radiotherapy (IRT) in esophageal cancer compared with other treatment in terms of dysphagia-free survival (DyFS) and safety.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

A systematic research using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane library was performed to identify full articles evaluating the efficacy of IRT as palliation in patients with esophageal cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for ongoing or recently completed trials, and PROSPERO was searched for ongoing or recently completed systematic reviews. We analyzed only clinical study as full text of patients with symptomatic esophageal cancer treated with IRT alone or in combination with other treatment. Conference paper, survey, letter, editorial, book chapter, and review were excluded. Time restriction (1990-2018) as concerns the years of the publication was considered. The primary outcome was the duration of dysphagia relief (DyFS) after brachytherapy vs. other treatment (external-beam radiotherapy, photodynamic therapy, argon plasma coagulation, stent, and laser) during followup. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and adverse event rates.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 554 articles. Sixty-six articles were assessed via full text for eligibility. Of these, 59 articles were excluded for various reasons, leaving seven randomized studies. The number of evaluated patients was 905 patients, and median age was 70.5 years. In the IRT group, the median DyFS was 99 days, the most relevant G3-G4 toxicity were fistula development and stenosis reported, respectively, in 8.3% and 12.2%; the overall median survival was 175.5 days.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we provided evidence-based support that IRT is an effective and safe treatment option; therefore, its underuse is no longer justified.

Endoluminal High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy with a Palliative aim in Esophageal Cancer: Preliminary Results at the Institut Gustave Roussy

Ten patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma were treated with endoluminal high-dose-rate brachytherapy at the Institut Gustave Roussy. Eight of them had recurrences after external beam radiotherapy. They were treated with a high-dose rate iridium-192 source. Five patients received 6 sessions of 4 Gy, 4 patients 3 sessions of 4 Gy, and 1 patient received 3 sessions of 8 Gy. The interval time between each session was 1 week. Seventy percent of patients improved their dysphagia, with 80% endoscopic tumor response. The Karnofsky index was improved in most of the patients. The mean survival was 4 months, and dysphagiafree survival was 2.5 months. Two patients had treatment toxicity but only a transitory WHO G1 esophagitis. Endoesophageal high-dose-rate curietherapy seems an effective technique in palliative treatments. We found low toxicity and an excellent tolerance to treatment in previously irradiated patients. The efficacy of the treatment is highly dependent on a precise tumor volume evaluation.

Esophageal Cancer: Recent advances

Esophageal carcinoma has, over the past decade, undergone a sea of change, not only in its pathological distribution, but also in the diagnosis, staging and subsequent management. Although the advent of better imaging techniques has helped in diagnosing patients at an earlier period, the majority of them have unresectable disease at the time of presentation. Despite aggressive treatment protocols involving either one or a combination of the options of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, the five-year survival remains dismal in the order of 10 to 15%. The two most commonly used surgical techniques for resecting the esophagus, the Ivor Lewis and the trans-hiatal esophagectomy, have similar results in terms of morbidity, mortality and, more importantly, five-year survival following resection. There has been an increasing interest in the surgical treatment of carcinoma esophagus by a minimally invasive approach, as meta-analysis of clinical series have shown that a faster recovery time without any statistically significant difference in the in-hospital mortality or morbidity when compared to conventional surgery. Nonrandomized studies suggest that patients receiving neoadjuvant chemo-radiation have a five year survival advantage compared with those treated with surgery alone, especially if they had a complete histological response to the preoperative regimen. Lastly, palliative procedures, form the mainstay of management of patients with non-resectable disease.

Endoscopic palliation of advanced esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer represents one of the most aggressive digestive tumors, with a survival rate at 5 years of only 10%. Globally, during the last three decades, there has been an increasing incidence of the esophageal cancer, approx. 400,000 new esophageal cancers being currently diagnosed annually. This represents the eighth leading cause of cancer incidence and the sixth leading cause of cancer death overall. Taking into account the population's global aging and thus, the increase in the number of patients who will not bear surgery, PCT and radiation, or the fact that they do not want it especially because of deficiencies and associated pathology, the endoscopic ablative techniques with palliation purposes represent the alternative. If we refer to the Western Europe countries and North America, we notice an increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma rate versus squamous cancer. As for the Asian region, referring in particular to China and Japan, 9 out of 10 esophageal cancers are squamous cell carcinomas. For at least half of the patients with EC (esophageal cancer) there is no hope of healing because of the advanced regional malignant invasion (T3-4, N+, M+) with no chemo and radiotherapy response, poor preoperative patients' conditions or systemic metastasis. The low life expectancy does not justify the risky medical procedures, the goal of the therapy consisting in the improvement of the quality of life by eliminating dysphagia (reestablishing oral feeding) which represents the most common complication of EC, the respiratory tract complication caused by eso-tracheal fistulas or by eliminating chest pain. To treat dysphagia, which is the main target of palliation, combined methods like endoscopic, chemo and radio-therapy, can be used, each one with indications, benefits and risks.

Radiotherapy versus stenting in treating malignant dysphagia

The most commonly used treatments for maliganat dysphagia are stenting and radiotherapy (RT). A prospective data of 91 patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer who has been treated with either palliative RT, stent or both. Group I had RT only, Group II had stent only and group III had both RT and stent. The median overall survival was 169, 119 and 237 in the three groups respectively. The difference between GI & III was statistically significant (P=0.01). Combinations of stent and RT may provide survival benefit in patients with malignant dysphagia. A randomized clinical trial is recommended.

What is the optimal management of dysphagia in metastatic esophageal cancer?

BACKGROUND

The palliation of dysphagia in metastatic esophageal cancer remains a challenge, and the optimal approach for this difficult clinical scenario is not clear. We therefore sought to define and determine the efficacy of various treatment options used at our institution for this condition.

METHODS

We reviewed a prospective database for all patients managed in an esophageal cancer referral centre over a 5-year period. All patients receiving palliation of malignant dysphagia were reviewed for demographics, palliative treatment modalities, complications, and dysphagia scores (0 = none to 4 = complete). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to determine significance (p < 0.05).

RESULTS

During 2004-2009, 63 patients with inoperable esophageal cancer were treated for palliation of dysphagia. The primary treatment was radiotherapy in 79% (brachytherapy in 18 of 50; external-beam in 10 of 50; both types in 22 of 50), and stenting in 21%. Mean wait time from diagnosis to treatment was 22 days in the stent group and 54 days in the radiotherapy group (p = 0.003). Mean duration of treatment was 1 day in the stent group and 40 days in the radiotherapy group (p = 0.001). In patients treated initially by stenting, dysphagia improved within 2 weeks of treatment in 85% of patients (dysphagia score of 0 or 1). However, 20% of patients presented with recurrence of dysphagia at 10 weeks of treatment. In the radiotherapy group, the onset of palliation was slower, with only 50% of patients palliated at 2 weeks (dysphagia score of 0 or 1). However, long-term palliation was more satisfactory, with 90% of patients remaining palliated after 10 weeks of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In inoperable esophageal cancer at our centre, radiation treatment provided durable long-term relief, but came at a high price of a long wait time for initiation of treatment and a long lag time between initiation of treatment and relief of symptoms. On the other hand, endoluminal stenting provided more rapid and effective early relief from symptoms, but was affected by recurrence of dysphagia in the long-term. It is now time for a prospective randomized trial to assess the safety and efficacy of combined-modality treatment with both endoluminal stenting and radiation therapy compared with either treatment alone.

Palliative stenting with or without radiotherapy for inoperable esophageal carcinoma: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

A majority of patients with esophageal cancer present with inoperable disease and require rapid and long-lasting palliation of dysphagia.

STUDY AIM

To compare the duration of relief of dysphagia in patients with inoperable esophageal cancer treated with esophageal stenting alone or a combination of esophageal stenting and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), and to assess overall survival, treatment-related complications, and quality of life (QOL) in the two groups.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with inoperable esophageal cancer and with high grade dysphagia were randomized to receive esophageal stenting with self-expandable metal stent (Ultraflex) alone (Group I), versus a combination of stenting followed by EBRT (30 gray in ten divided fractions over 2 weeks) (Group II). Dysphagia relief, overall survival, QOL (using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30, version 3), and treatment-related complications were assessed in the two groups.

RESULTS

From April 2007 to March 2009, 84 patients were randomized to receive esophageal stent alone (42 patients) or a combination of stent and EBRT (42 patients). The two groups were comparable in demographics, tumor characteristics, indications for palliative treatment, and pretreatment dysphagia score. Dysphagia scores improved significantly in both groups following stent insertion. However, dysphagia relief was more sustained in Group II than in Group I (7 vs. 3 months, p = 0.002). Overall median survival was significantly higher in Group II than in Group I (180 vs. 120 days, p = 0.009). Addition of radiotherapy following stenting prolonged the mean dysphagia-free survival (118.6 ± 55.8 vs. 96.8 ± 43.0 days, p = 0.054). There was significant improvement in all QOL parameters at 1 week after stenting. The QOL, however, significantly declined immediately after radiotherapy. There was no treatment-related mortality, and the incidence of complications was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Post-stenting EBRT effectively prolongs duration of dysphagia relief and improves overall survival in inoperable esophageal cancer.

WITHDRAWN: Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The majority of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage and palliative treatment is the realistic management option for most patients. The optimal intervention for the palliation of dysphagia in these patients has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically analyse and summarise the efficacy of different interventions used in the palliation of dysphagia in primary oesophageal carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We undertook a search according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases model using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and major conference proceedings up to August 2005. The literature search was re-run in August 2006 and March 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with inoperable or unresectable primary oesophageal cancer who underwent palliative treatment. We included rigid plastic intubation, self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) insertion, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy, oesophageal bypass surgery, chemical and thermal ablation therapy, either head-to-head or in combination. The primary outcome was dysphagia improvement. Secondary outcomes included recurrent dysphagia, technical success, procedure related mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse effects and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author assessed the eligibility criteria of each study and extracted data regarding outcomes and factors affecting risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 2542 patients from 40 studies. SEMS insertion is safer and more effective than plastic tube insertion. Thermal and chemical ablative therapy provide comparable dysphagia palliation but have an increased requirement for re-interventions and adverse effects. Anti-reflux stents provide comparable dysphagia palliation to conventional metal stents. Some anti-reflux stents might reduce gastro-oesophageal reflux compared to conventional metal stents. Brachytherapy might be a suitable alternative to SEMS in providing a survival advantage and possibly a better quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding metal stent insertion is safe, effective and quicker in palliating dysphagia compared to other modalities. However, high-dose intraluminal brachytherapy is a suitable alternative and might provide additional survival benefit with a better quality of life. Self-expanding metal stent insertion and brachytherapy provide comparable palliation to endoscopic ablative therapy but are preferable due to the reduced requirement for re-interventions. Rigid plastic tube insertion, dilatation alone or in combination with other modalities, chemotherapy alone, combination chemoradiotherapy and bypass surgery are not recommended for palliation of dysphagia due to a high incidence of delayed complications and recurrent dysphagia.

Quality of life in patients with esophageal stenting for the palliation of malignant dysphagia

Incidence of esophageal cancer (EC) is rising more rapidly in the Western world than that of any other cancer. Despite advances in therapy, more than 50% of patients have incurable disease at the time of presentation. This precludes curative treatment and makes palliative treatment a more realistic option for most of these patients. Dysphagia is the predominant symptom in more than 70% of patients with EC and although several management options have been developed in recent years to palliate this symptom, the optimum management is not established. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are a well-established palliation modality for dysphagia in such patients. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is becoming a major issue in the evaluation of any therapeutic or palliative intervention. To date, only a few published studies can be found on Medline examining HRQoL in patients with advanced EC treated with SEMS implantation. The aim of this study was to review the impact on HRQoL of SEMS implantation as palliative treatment in patients with EC. All Medline articles regarding HRQoL in patients with advanced EC, particularly those related to SEMS, were reviewed. In most studies, relief of dysphagia was the only aspect of HRQoL being measured and SEMS implantation was compared with other palliative treatments such as brachytherapy and laser therapy. SEMS insertion provides a swift palliation of dysphagia compared to brachytherapy and no evidence was found to suggest that stent implantation is different to laser treatment in terms of improving dysphagia, recurrent dysphagia and better HRQoL, although SEMS insertion has a better technical success rate and also reduces the number of repeat interventions.

The use of self-expandable metallic stents for palliative treatment of inoperable esophageal cancer

Most patients with esophageal carcinoma present in the advanced stage die from tumor invasion and widespread metastases. Because radical regimens are not appropriate for the majority of patients, and their expected survivals are as short as to be measured by months, the main aim of therapy is palliation with minimum morbidity and mortality. Among the palliative modalities are surgery, external radiotherapy or brachytherapy, dilatation, laser, photodynamic therapy, bipolar electrocoagulation tumor probe, and chemical ablation. The placement of self-expandable metallic stents is another method that improves dysphagia for these patients. In this study, the aim was to evaluate retrospectively the effectiveness of metallic stents deployed because of inoperable malignant esophageal stenosis and esophagotracheal fistulas. The results of 170 patients with 202 stents administered because of inoperable malignant esophageal stenosis and esophagorespiratory fistula between January 2000 and October 2008 at the Ataturk University, Department of Thoracic Surgery, were investigated. Despite epidemiological and clinical data, information regarding relief of dysphagia and quality of life were also examined. One hundred seventy patients with stents were between 28 and 91 years old (mean age 63.7 years+/-11.4 years). Ninety-seven were male and 73 were female. Stent indications were advanced tumors with distant metastasis (82 cases, 48.2%), unresectable tumors (51 cases, 30%), patients who cannot tolerate surgery or chemoradiotherapy (18 cases, 10.5%), local recurrence after primary therapy (1 case, 0.5%), esophagorespiratory fistulas from tumor or therapy (14 cases, 8.2%), and refusal of surgery (4 cases, 2.3%). Dysphagia scores evaluated by a modified Takita's grading system improved from 3.4 before the procedure to 2.6 afterward. The overall complication rate without chest pain was 31.7% (occurring in 64 cases). Mean survival was 177.7 days+/-59.3 days (2-993 days). Quality-of-life scores (The European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30) improved from 73+/-10.3 (57-85) to 112+/-12.6 (90-125). In therapy of malignant esophageal obstructions, metallic stents provide a significant improvement in dysphagia and require less frequent re-intervention according to other methods of dysphagia palliation such as dilatation, laser, and photodynamic therapy, nearly completely relieve esophagotracheal fistulas and improve quality of life to an important degree.

Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The majority of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage and palliative treatment is the realistic management option for most patients. The optimal intervention for the palliation of dysphagia in these patients has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically analyse and summarise the efficacy of different interventions used in the palliation of dysphagia in primary oesophageal carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We undertook a search according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases model using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and major conference proceedings up to August 2005. The literature search was re-run in August 2006 and March 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with inoperable or unresectable primary oesophageal cancer who underwent palliative treatment. We included rigid plastic intubation, self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) insertion, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy, oesophageal bypass surgery, chemical and thermal ablation therapy, either head-to-head or in combination. The primary outcome was dysphagia improvement. Secondary outcomes included recurrent dysphagia, technical success, procedure related mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse effects and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author assessed the eligibility criteria of each study and extracted data regarding outcomes and factors affecting risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 2542 patients from 40 studies. SEMS insertion is safer and more effective than plastic tube insertion. Thermal and chemical ablative therapy provide comparable dysphagia palliation but have an increased requirement for re-interventions and adverse effects. Anti-reflux stents provide comparable dysphagia palliation to conventional metal stents. Some anti-reflux stents might reduce gastro-oesophageal reflux compared to conventional metal stents. Brachytherapy might be a suitable alternative to SEMS in providing a survival advantage and possibly a better quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding metal stent insertion is safe, effective and quicker in palliating dysphagia compared to other modalities. However, high-dose intraluminal brachytherapy is a suitable alternative and might provide additional survival benefit with a better quality of life. Self-expanding metal stent insertion and brachytherapy provide comparable palliation to endoscopic ablative therapy but are preferable due to the reduced requirement for re-interventions. Rigid plastic tube insertion, dilatation alone or in combination with other modalities, chemotherapy alone, combination chemoradiotherapy and bypass surgery are not recommended for palliation of dysphagia due to a high incidence of delayed complications and recurrent dysphagia.

Interventions for dysphagia in oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

The majority of oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage and palliative treatment is the realistic management option for most patients. The optimal intervention for the palliation of dysphagia in these patients has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically analyse and summarise the efficacy of different interventions used in the palliation of dysphagia in primary oesophageal carcinoma.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We undertook a search according to the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases model using the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL and major conference proceedings up to August 2005. The literature search was re-run in August 2006 and March 2007.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with inoperable or unresectable primary oesophageal cancer who underwent palliative treatment. We included rigid plastic intubation, self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) insertion, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, chemotherapy, oesophageal bypass surgery, chemical and thermal ablation therapy, either head-to-head or in combination. The primary outcome was dysphagia improvement. Secondary outcomes included recurrent dysphagia, technical success, procedure related mortality, 30-day mortality, adverse effects and quality of life.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One author assessed the eligibility criteria of each study and extracted data regarding outcomes and factors affecting risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 2542 patients from 40 studies. SEMS insertion is safer and more effective than plastic tube insertion. Thermal and chemical ablative therapy provide comparable dysphagia palliation but have an increased requirement for re-interventions and adverse effects. Anti-reflux stents provide comparable dysphagia palliation to conventional metal stents. Some anti-reflux stents might reduce gastro-oesophageal reflux compared to conventional metal stents. Brachytherapy might be a suitable alternative to SEMS in providing a survival advantage and possibly a better quality of life.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Self-expanding metal stent insertion is safe, effective and quicker in palliating dysphagia compared to other modalities. However, high-dose intraluminal brachytherapy is a suitable alternative and might provide additional survival benefit with a better quality of life. Self-expanding metal stent insertion and brachytherapy provide comparable palliation to endoscopic ablative therapy but are preferable due to the reduced requirement for re-interventions. Rigid plastic tube insertion, dilatation alone or in combination with other modalities, chemotherapy alone, combination chemoradiotherapy and bypass surgery are not recommended for palliation of dysphagia due to a high incidence of delayed complications and recurrent dysphagia.

Palliation of anastomotic obstructions in recurrent gastric carcinoma with the use of covered metallic stents: clinical results in 25 patients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the technical feasibility and the clinical effectiveness of the placement of covered self-expandable metallic stents for the treatment of anastomotic obstructions in recurrent gastric carcinoma.

METHODS

With fluoroscopic guidance, covered stents were placed in 25 patients with recurrent gastric carcinoma for the palliation of obstructions at anastomotic sites (14 gastrojejunostomy, 11 esophagojejunostomy). All patients had severe nausea and recurrent vomiting before the stent placement.

RESULTS

Stent placement was technically successful in 24 patients (96%). After stent placement, symptoms improved in all 24 patients. During the follow-up of 2 to 65 weeks (mean, 13.7 weeks), stent migration occurred in 1 patient 16 days after the procedure. He needed percutaneous catheter drainage because of an abscess, which was followed by esophagojejunostomy site rupture during a second stent trial. Stricture recurred in 4 patients because of tumor overgrowth 10 to 55 weeks after the procedure; all patients underwent coaxial placement of a second stent and had good oral intake.

CONCLUSIONS

The placement of covered expandable metallic stents seems to be both technically feasible and an effective means for the palliation of anastomotic obstructions in recurrent gastric carcinoma. This procedure can be considered to be the primary choice for the palliation in those patients.

Photodynamic therapy for esophageal cancer: a useful and realistic option

The use of light therapy for tissue destruction is highly attractive for the endoscopic and minimally invasive therapy of esophageal cancer. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) offers the possibility of palliation of advanced obstructing tumors. However, there are other competing techniques, which can be used to open the esophageal lumen. It has also proved very effective in providing prolonged palliation of patients with advanced irresectable cancer. Completely obstructing tumors, tortuous and long lesions, and tumors near the upper end of the esophagus are particularly suitable for photodynamic therapy. Patients with obstruction to an esophageal prosthesis are also well palliated with PDT. A more interesting and exciting development is its use for the eradication of early asymptomatic mucosal disease. Photodynamic therapy is particularly useful for the eradication of field cancerous change in patients with pre-malignant Barrett's esophagus, or early tumors in patients unfit for radical therapy.

Endoluminal palliation for dysphagia secondary to esophageal carcinoma

There are now a variety of treatment options available to palliate dysphagia in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma. The decision as to which therapy to recommend for a patient should be based on a though understanding of the therapies and must be individualized for each patient and on the experience of the endoscopist or surgeon. In addition, consideration should be given as to resource availability at a particular institution. External beam radiation currently has little role as primary treatment for dysphagia. Brachytherapy is labor intensive; requires 2 to 3 weekly treatments, highly specialized radiation equipment, and an experienced radiation oncologist; and is therefore limited to tertiary care centers. Endoluminal YAG-laser tumor ablation is feasible at many institutions and provides immediate dysphagia relief but has limited durability (weeks) if not followed by adjuvant therapy, and requires an endoscopist with significant laser experience. PDT is relatively easy to perform and has a lower perforation rate and longer durability than YAG laser therapy but it is relatively costly and less patient friendly due to the morbidity of its attendant 6 weeks of photosensitivity. Advances in stent technology have rendered this a safe, readily available treatment for the palliation of dysphagia. Palliation of dysphagia is an important but difficult goal that may require creative use of a variety of endoscopic interventions, either in combination or serially. Ideally, physicians who palliate dysphagia secondary to esophageal cancer should be facile in both endoscopic ablative and stenting techniques and have a close working relationship with both radiation and medical oncologists.

The role of oesophageal stenting in the non-surgical management of oesophageal strictures

The role of oesophageal stenting continues to evolve, with several new stents currently on the market. These stents possess anti-reflux valves, internal plastic coatings and retrievable threads. In patients with malignant dysphagia, management should ideally take place within multi-disciplinary teams such that accurate tumour staging occurs prior to treatment. Multi-modality therapy can not only improve dysphagia and response rates but may also improve survival. Several non-surgical palliative techniques are available to recanalize malignant obstruction, including oesophageal stenting. Other therapeutic modalities include the use of endoluminal laser therapy, photodynamic therapy, argon beam and bipolar electrocoagulation, ethanol injection and intracavity brachytherapy. Their use often depends on local availability and expertise. Although the initial costs of metal stents are high, the overall costs compare favourably with other forms of palliative therapy that often require multiple procedures with repeated inpatient hospitalization. Treatment of refractory benign strictures with oesophageal stents remains uncommon and several recent reports using retrievable stents appear to improve outcome, although more work is required in this area.

Photodynamic therapy of cancer of the esophagus using systemic aminolevulinic acid and a non laser light source: a phase I/II study

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the mainstay for the treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and is also considered to be effective for palliation of dysphagia. Patients who are unfit for surgery represent a difficult therapeutic problem. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the effects of photodynamic therapy by using systemic administration of 5-aminolevulinic acid and a non laser light source on carcinoma of the esophagus.

METHODS

Patients were given 60 mg/kg 5-aminolevulinic acid orally. Twenty-four hours later gastroscopy was performed. After initial localization of the tumor with the use of white light, the light source was switched to the red light band at 100 J/cm2 for 600 seconds. Gastroscopy was repeated at 48 hours and 7 days after the treatment. The degree of dysphagia was recorded before and 14 days after treatment.

RESULTS

Five patients with advanced nonresectable tumors or who were unfit for surgery were treated. Two patients had squamous cell carcinoma of the mid-esophagus and three had adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. Mild self-limiting photosensitivity was noted in all patients. Liver and renal function tests as well as hemoglobin level and white blood cell count were not affected by the treatment. Improvement of dysphagia was observed in four patients who had pretreatment dysphagia. The patient with the early stage of disease continued to eat a normal diet.

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy with systemic aminolevulinic acid as a photosensitizer and a non laser light source is feasible and safe in advanced-stage esophageal cancer. It can be an effective modality for the relief of dysphagia in these patients.

A comparison study on physical properties of self-expandable esophageal metal stents

BACKGROUND

Currently available esophageal expandable stents differ in design, material, and method of deployment. We compared the expansile force and the susceptibility to buckling force in five commercially available stents.

METHODS

The Esophacoil, Wallstent, Ultraflex, Gianturco-Z and Song stents were tested. The middle sections of fully expanded stents were subjected to compression force using a universal tensile testing machine. The distortion of the stent was measured electronically and the expansile force was calculated. Bending moments were applied to the ends of the stents until buckling occurred in the inner parts. The buckling radius was measured as the radius of the inner curvature of the stent when this occurred.

RESULTS

The stents tested were significantly different in their expansile forces and buckling radii. Song stent and Gianturco-Z stent were similar due to their similar designs. Esophacoil was the strongest with regard to withstanding compressive force and angulation force, followed by Wallstent. Ultraflex stent was the weakest in expansile force but withstood angulation force better than the Song and Gianturco stents.

CONCLUSION

Esophageal stents differ greatly in their elasticity and resistance to angulation. Knowledge of their mechanical properties will be another helpful factor to consider in selecting the appropriate stent in addition to the geometry and consistency of the tumor.

Palliation of malignant dysphagia with expanding metallic stents

PURPOSE

The authors describe their experience with expanding metallic stents for the palliation of malignant dysphagia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

During a 52-month period, 138 stents were inserted in 121 patients with malignant esophageal obstruction. The average age was 74 years; there were 78 men and 43 women. Data regarding the degree of initial dysphagia, presence of an esophago-respiratory fistula, effect of stent placement on swallowing ability, complications at the time of stent placement, and long-term survival were obtained.

RESULTS

An improvement in dysphagia symptoms was recorded in more than 95% of patients. The average survival after stent placement was 24 weeks. Complications necessitating further intervention occurred in 26 patients.

CONCLUSION

Insertion of self-expanding metallic endoprostheses for the palliation of malignant esophageal obstruction is an effective therapy that can be carried out with relative ease. Successful palliation of symptoms can be expected in more than 95% of cases.

Palliation of Dysphagia of Esophageal Cancer by Endoscopic Lumen Restoration Techniques

BACKGROUND: Cure of patients with esophageal cancer has remained rare over the past four decades. The overall five-year survival rate for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus currently is reported as 12% in whites and 8% in blacks. The five-year survival rate for localized disease at initial staging is only 26% for whites and 13% for blacks. With regional involvement, these rates are 11% and 7%, respectively. METHODS: The author reviews the literature on optimal endoscopic lumen restoration techniques, including dilation, thermal laser and chemical ablation, photodynamic therapy, and stents. Procedures for pain relief and nutritional support are also presented. RESULTS: Lumen restoration to relieve dysphagia and provide the opportunity for sustaining reasonable peroral nutrition is an essential element in the overall management. Nonsurgical lumen restoration procedures have much to offer for dysphagia palliation and are briefly reviewed in this presentation. The major options include ablation of intraluminal tumor mass by thermal laser, photodynamic laser, chemical ablation, peroral dilation, and placement of esophageal stents. Most patients require more than one palliative method to sustain lumen patency during the course of their disease. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with esophageal cancer will require palliation for the multiple problems that develop during their limited life span. The responsibility of the palliation therapist is to provide the patient with safe and cost-effective treatments that provide the best possible dysphagia relief.

Palliation of dysphagia from inoperable oesophageal carcinoma using Atkinson tubes or self-expanding metal stents

Until recently, intubation for the palliation of malignant dysphagia has relied upon the insertion of a variety of plastic tubes. Self-expanding metal stents are reported to have a lower complication rate. We have compared the results of Atkinson tube insertion with self-expanding metal stents in patients with inoperable oesophageal carcinoma. From 1990 to 1994 Atkinson tubes were inserted for the palliation of dysphagia from oesophageal cancer, from 1994 onwards self-expanding metal stents were used. Complications, mortality and hospital stay were compared in both groups of patients. In all, 87 patients with inoperable oesophageal carcinoma were treated, 46 with an Atkinson tube and 41 with metal stents. Complications occurred at similar rates in both groups (56% Atkinson tubes, 44% metal stents). There was a significantly higher perforation rate associated with Atkinson tube insertion (8 patients, 17%) compared with metal stents (1 patient, 2.4%, P = 0.02, chi 2). The length of stay was also significantly higher in the Atkinson tube group (median 10 days) compared with the metal stent group (3 days, P < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). Mortality rates were similar in both groups. The use of metal stents for the palliation of dysphagia in inoperable oesophageal carcinoma results in a lower perforation rate and a reduced length of stay and they represent a significant advantage over Atkinson tubes.

Palliation of malignant dysphagia from oesophageal cancer. Rotterdam Oesophageal Tumor Study Group

Palliative therapies for advanced oesophageal cancer include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, endoscopic procedures and combinations of these. Of the non-endoscopic modalities is external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) effective and non-invasive. A disadvantage is that relief of dysphagia only occurs over a period of 4-6 weeks. Brachytherapy is more rapid in locally controlling tumour growth and in relieving dysphagia. One of the more commonly used endoscopic procedures is laser therapy, which provides symptomatic relief with low complication rates. Recurrent dysphagia is a problem necessitating repeated treatment sessions. Self-expanding metal stents offer a high degree of palliation and are associated with fewer complications compared with prosthetic tubes. Longer palliation and perhaps even longer survival might be achieved by the combination of different therapies. Most promising are the combination of EBRT plus brachytherapy or chemoradiation. Now is the time to determine which treatment (combination) is best for individual patients.

Coated self-expanding metal stents versus latex prostheses for esophagogastric cancer with special reference to prior radiation and chemotherapy: a controlled, prospective study

BACKGROUND

Self-expanding metal stents seem to be safer than conventional prostheses for palliation of malignant esophagogastric obstruction. However, recurrent dysphagia caused by tumor ingrowth in uncoated types remains a problem. In addition, prior radiation and/or chemotherapy may entail an increased risk of complications.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients with an esophagogastric carcinoma were randomly assigned to placement of a latex prosthesis under general anesthesia or a coated, self-expanding metal stent under sedation. At entry, patients were stratified for location of the tumor in the esophagus or cardia and for prior radiation and/or chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Technical success and improvement in dysphagia score were similar in both groups. Major complications were more frequent with latex prostheses (47%) than with metal stents (16%) (odds ratio 4.07: 95% CI [1.35, 12.50], p = 0.014). Recurrent dysphagia was not different between latex prostheses (26%) and metal stents (24%). Hospital stay was longer, on average, after placement of latex prostheses than metal stents (6.3 +/- 5.2 versus 4.3 +/- 2.3 days; p = 0.043). Only prior radiation and/or chemotherapy increased the risk of specific device-related complications with respect to the esophagus (12 of 28 [43%] versus 8 of 47 [17%]; odds ratio 3.66: 95% CI [1.24, 10.82], p = 0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

Coated, self-expanding metal stents are associated with fewer complications and shorter hospital stay as compared with latex prostheses, and prior radiation and/or chemotherapy increases the risk of device-related complications with respect to the esophagus.

Laser photocoagulation in the treatment of malignant dysphagia

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia secondary to carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastric cardia is the principal symptom requiring palliation in those patients who present with late-stage disease or who are unfit for surgery. The primary aim of the present study was to determine the safety and efficacy of laser photocoagulation in the palliation of malignant dysphagia. Secondary aims were to look at reasons for failure and predictors of outcome; to determine the most appropriate second line therapy for treatment failures; and to look at the results of treatment for early stage disease.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients treated over a 6-year period with endoscopic Nd:YAG laser photocoagulation were evaluated and the quality of swallowing assessed before and at intervals after treatment.

RESULTS

Ninety per cent of patients achieved successful initial palliation. This was sustained in 76% after 3 months of treatment. Within a month before death 71% of patients were palliated but 29% required the addition of second-line treatment to achieve this. Complications were infrequent. There were no deaths attributable to laser treatment. Five of 10 patients treated with radiotherapy developed fibrous stricturing that required endoscopic dilatation. No variables were independently predictive for treatment failure. Six patients with early stage disease experienced prolonged survival.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that laser photocoagulation offers safe and effective palliation of malignant dysphagia in this group of patients and is appropriate as first-line therapy.

Outcome, survival, and costs in patients undergoing intubation for carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND

In this prospective study a consecutive series of 70 patients undergoing insertion of a Wilson-Cook endoprosthesis for palliation of esophageal carcinoma was examined.

METHODS

The tube was inserted endoscopically using intravenous sedation and a pulsion technique.

RESULTS

The patients had a mean (SEM) age of 70.7 (1.5) years and 44 (63%) were men. Two patients died in hospital and 2 died after discharge, giving a procedure-related mortality of 2.8% and a 30-day mortality of 5.7%. Nine patients experienced complications, giving a morbidity rate of 12.8% following the initial procedure. Twenty patients required a second or further procedure. The indications were tube migration in 22 cases, obstruction in 10, and fistula formation in 2 patients. Thirty-day mortality in this group was significantly greater than after a first procedure (7 patients, 20.1%; P <0.05). The median survival following insertion of a Wilson-Cook endoprosthesis was 16 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes a safe, effective method for insertion of an endoprosthesis, with a low morbidity and mortality. The average cost for endoscopic insertion of a Wilson-Cook endoprosthesis in this unit is $1,600, and in view of the short median survival in this group of patients, the introduction of costly self-expanding stents is not warranted without demonstrable benefits in a controlled, prospective, randomized clinical trial.

Esophageal cancer surgery: the value of controlled clinical trials

Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCT) in esophageal cancer were reviewed. Their value and significance in the areas of multimodality therapy, lymphadenectomy, surgical techniques, palliative treatments, and perioperative management were evaluated. Much has been gained through RCT in the management of esophageal cancer, and RCT is the most reliable scientific method in clinical investigations. Problems in the conduct of such trials include lack of expertise by surgeons, lack of patients, lack of funding, and methodologic and ethical problems. These obstacles could be overcome and more well-conducted RCTs encouraged.

High dose rate brachytherapy before external beam irradiation in inoperable oesophageal cancer

To induce fast relief of dysphagia in patients with oesophageal cancer high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy was applied before external radiotherapy in a prospective study. Seventy-four patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer (36 squamous cell, 38 adenocarcinoma) were treated with a combination of 10 Gy HDR brachytherapy, followed by 40 Gy in 4 weeks external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), starting 2 weeks later. Tumour response, as measured by endoscopy and/or barium swallow, revealed complete remission in 21 and partial response in 38 patients (overall response rate 80%). Improvement of dysphagia was induced by brachytherapy within a few days in 39%, and achieved at the end of treatment in 70% of patients. Further weight loss was prevented in 39 of the 59 patients who presented with weight loss. Pain at presentation improved in 12 out of 25 patients. Median survival was 9 months. No differences in either response rate or survival were found in squamous cell or adenocarcinoma. Side-effects were either acute with minimal discomfort in 32 (42%) or late with painful ulceration in five patients (7%), occurring after a median of 4 months. A fistula developed in six patients, all with concurrent tumour. In conclusion, brachytherapy before EBRT was a safe and effective procedure to induce rapid relief of dysphagia, especially when combined with EBRT.

Modulation of toxicity following external beam irradiation preceded by high-dose rate brachytherapy in inoperable oesophageal cancer

To induce fast relief of dysphagia in inoperable oesophageal cancer, we applied high-dose rate (HDR) intraluminal irradiation followed by external irradiation (EBRT) in a phase II study. 15 patients (group A: n = 15; 10 men, 5 women; median age 66 years) were treated with 10 Gy HDR brachytherapy plus 40 Gy EBRT (15 fractions of 2.67 Gy). Severe side-effects were encountered in 60% of patients: 3 late ulceration, 2 pending fistula, 2 fistula and 2 patients with fatal haemorrhage after an interval of 6 months. Overall response was excellent: 9 complete remissions (60%) and 6 partial responses (40%). Because of the high toxicity rate, in a subsequent study (group B: n = 30; 23 men, 7 women; median age 66 years) the EBRT scheme was changed using smaller fractions (2.0 Gy) to reach the same total dose of 40 Gy. The complication rate (17%) was significantly reduced, while the overall response remained excellent (83%): 17 complete and 8 partial responses. The impressive change in complication rate of HDR brachytherapy and EBRT stresses the impact of the fraction per dose and illustrates the small therapeutic margins.

Palliation of malignant dysphagia: an alternative to surgery

This paper presents the results of palliative treatment of 474 patients with malignant dysphagia. Laser produces good relief of symptoms but requires frequent repetition. Self-expanding metal stents provide one-off relief of dysphagia but do have complications. A randomised trial of laser versus covered and uncovered metal stents has demonstrated improved relief of dysphagia of stents over laser, but highlighted the problems at the cardia when stents are used. Chemotherapy in patients with advanced adenocarcinoma using epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil produces a response in two-thirds of cases, with relief of dysphagia and possible increase in survival. A treatment plan for palliation of patients with malignant dysphagia is presented.

Expandable esophageal wire stents

Esophageal endoprostheses or stents have been used successfully for more than 100 years in patients with esophageal or gastroesophageal (GE) junction cancer. In recent years, many manufacturers have produced these stents in various styles and materials, but the most innovative design is the expandable wire mesh stent. At Virginia Mason Medical Center, The Schneider Wallstent (Minneapolis, MN) and the Wilson Cook Z stent (Winston-Salem, NC) have been placed in a series of patients with obstructing or fistulizing neoplasms of the esophagus, GE junction, stomach, lung, or mediastinum. The nursing care of these patients requires meticulous attention to airway maintenance and oral suction. Stents cannot be repositioned after total deployment; thus, the nurse plays an important role in assuring correct placement. During and after the endoscopy, the nurse must be alert to any signs of possible complications, including bleeding, perforation, dyspnea from tracheal compression, and stent malposition. Several case studies are presented in this article, noting the patients' histories, indications for stent placement, and nursing care pre-, intra-, and postprocedure.

Laser palliation of inoperable malignant dysphagia: initial and at death

BACKGROUND

Nd: YAG laser therapy has been shown to be highly effective in the palliation of dysphagia due to inoperable esophageal malignancy. However, the duration of response and the degree of palliation present at death have not been adequately addressed.

METHODS

Seventy consecutive patients with inoperable malignant dysphagia (mean age, 70 years; 48 men, 22 women) underwent palliative laser therapy. Dysphagia was assessed on a 5-point scale (0, normal; 4, complete dysphagia) before and after laser therapy and within 2 weeks of death.

RESULTS

Ninety-six percent of patients were palliated initially (70% successful, 26% partial). Mean swallowing score improved from 2.3 to 1.1 (p < 0.001) with a mean of 1.9 initial treatment sessions. Swallowing score remained improved in the last two weeks of life at a mean of 1.7 (p < 0.001). Seventy-three percent of patients were palliated at death (36% successful, 37% partial); median survival was six months. The mean total number of laser sessions was 3.4, with a mean time interval between laser sessions of 27.2 days. Complications included one perforation (1.4%) resulting in death.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic laser therapy provides safe and effective initial palliation of inoperable malignant dysphagia. In the majority of patients the palliation is maintained until death.

Quality-of-life assessment in patients undergoing treatment for oesophageal carcinoma

In a prospective study of 69 patients being treated for oesophageal carcinoma, quality of life was assessed with the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, a dysphagia score and an activities of daily living questionnaire. Significant correlations were found between the results of the Rotterdam Symptom Checklist, the dysphagia score and most aspects of the activities of daily living questionnaire. Eighteen patients underwent surgery, 43 radiotherapy or intubation, and eight a combination of surgery and other therapy. Patients undergoing surgery were significantly younger and had better scores in all parameters examined before operation, including significantly better scores in 'knowledge and communication' and 'mobility and fatigue'. The dysphagia score fell significantly after intervention both in patients undergoing surgery alone and in those receiving palliative therapy. The activities of daily living questionnaire showed significant improvements in two parameters in the surgical group ('self-care' and 'eating and drinking') and in none of the parameters assessed in the palliation group in 16 weeks. Quality-of-life assessment is useful in assessing quality of care and patient well-being after the diagnosis and treatment of oesophageal carcinoma.

Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium versus thermal ablation therapy with Nd:YAG laser for palliation of esophageal cancer: a multicenter randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a different type of laser treatment from Nd:YAG thermal ablation for palliation of dysphagia from esophageal cancer.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter study, patients with advanced esophageal cancer were randomized to receive PDT with porfimer sodium and argon-pumped dye laser or Nd:YAG laser therapy.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-six patients were randomized and 218 treated (PDT 110, Nd:YAG 108) at 24 centers. Improvement in dysphagia was equivalent between the two treatment groups. Objective tumor response was also equivalent at week 1, but at month 1 was 32% after PDT and 20% after Nd:YAG (p < 0.05). Nine complete tumor responses occurred after PDT and two after Nd:YAG. Trends for improved responses for PDT were seen in tumors located in the upper and lower third of the esophagus, in long tumors, and in patients who had prior therapy. More mild to moderate complications followed PDT, including sunburn in 19% of patients. Perforations from laser treatments or associated dilations occurred after PDT in 1%, Nd:YAG 7% (p < 0.05). Termination of laser sessions due to adverse events occurred in 3% with PDT and in 19% with Nd:YAG (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium has overall equal efficacy to Nd:YAG laser thermal ablation for palliation of dysphagia in esophageal cancer, and equal or better objective tumor response rate. Temporary photosensitivity is a limitation, but PDT is carried out with greater ease and is associated with fewer acute perforations than Nd:YAG laser therapy.

Comparison of different treatments for unresectable esophageal cancer

Many patient with esophageal cancer have advanced disease that in not amenable to curative treatment. For these individuals the relief of dysphagia is of utmost importance to the quality of their remaining survival time. This article reviews and compares the methods of palliation with focus on indications and contraindications, advantages as well as disadvantages of each technique, success rates, and complications. Tumor characteristics, the physician's experience, the institution's capabilities, cost, and patient preference will influence choice of palliation. Methods are often complementary rather than competitive.

Brachytherapy in oesophageal carcinoma

Patients with recurrent or locally advanced oesophageal carcinoma have a poor prognosis. Relief of dysphagia is often the goal of any further treatment. Several methods, including laser re-canalization, prosthetic intubation, dilatation, external beam irradiation (EBI) and intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) can be used to alleviate dysphagia. In this retrospective review of 11 patients, eight with recurrent tumour and three newly diagnosed patients were treated with low dose rate IBT. Relief of dysphagia was achieved in nine patients, all of whom were able to maintain swallowing of at least a semi-solid diet until death or last follow-up. Toxicity was minimal, but survival was poor, with a median survival of only 3 months. IBT presents several advantages over other palliative methods, especially in recurrent tumours where re-treatment with EBI is often difficult because of normal tissue tolerance. Low dose rate IBT takes only 1-2 days to deliver, is highly effective, has little morbidity and the palliation achieved is relatively durable.