A controlled trial of high dose interferon, alone and after prednisone withdrawal, in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: long term follow up

Systematic review of the literature on comparative effectiveness of antiviral treatments for chronic hepatitis B infection

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the comparative effectiveness of antiviral drugs in adults with chronic hepatitis B monoinfection for evidence-based decision-making.

METHODS

A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) published in English. Results after interferon and nucleos(t)ides analog therapies were synthesized with random-effects meta-analyses and number needed to treat (NNT).

RESULTS

Despite sustained improvements in selected biomarkers, no one drug regimen improved all intermediate outcomes. In 16 underpowered RCTs, drug treatments did not reduce mortality, liver cancer, or cirrhosis. Sustained HBV DNA clearance was achieved in one patient when two were treated with adefovir (NNT from 1 RCT=2 95%CI 1;2) or interferon alpha-2b (NNT from 2 RCTs=2 95%CI 2;4), 13 with lamivudine (NNT from 1 RCT=13 95%CI 7;1000), and 11 with peginterferon alpha-2a vs. lamivudine (NNT from 1 RCT=11 95%CI 7;25). Sustained HBeAg seroconversion was achieved in one patient when eight were treated with interferon alpha-2b (NNT from 2 RCTs=8 95%CI 5;33) or 10--with peginterferon alpha-2b vs. interferon alpha-2b (NNT from 1 RCT=10 95%CI 5;1000). Greater benefits and safety after entecavir vs. lamivudine or pegylated interferon alpha-2b vs. interferon alpha-2b require future investigation of clinical outcomes. Adverse events were common and more frequent after interferon. Treatment utilization for adverse effects is unknown.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual clinical decisions should rely on comparative effectiveness and absolute rates of intermediate outcomes and adverse events. Future research should clarify the relationship of intermediate and clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of drugs for evidence-based policy and clinical decisions.

Long-term follow-up of HBeAg-positive young adult Japanese patients treated with corticosteroid withdrawal therapy for chronic hepatitis B

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term effects of corticosteroid withdrawal therapy (CSWT) in young adult Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis B (CH-B) virus infection.

METHODS

The subjects were 106 patients with CH-B who received CSWT, were less than 35 years of age and had been followed for more 10 years after CSWT.

RESULTS

Retreatment was not required in 41 patients (38.7%; retreatment(-) group) while 65 (61.3%) received treatment after the initial CSWT (retreatment(+) group). Larger proportions of patients of the retreatment(-) group were females, had liver histology stage F2/F3, high ICG R15, and genotypes A/B/D/E, compared with the retreatment(+) group. At the last follow-up examination, the HBeAg seronegative rate was 90.2% in the retreatment(-) group and 98.5% in retreatment(+) group. In the retreatment(-) group, the rate of liver cirrhosis (LC; 7.3%, 3 patients) was lower, but the rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC; 12.2%, 5 patients) was higher than in the retreatment(+) group (20%, 13 patients, and 4.6%, 3 patients, respectively). At the 10-year period, the overall HBsAg loss, LC and HCC rates were 2.8, 13.2 and 1.9%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that CSWT is good short-term therapy and has possible long-term effects in young adult Japanese patients with CH-B.

Sequential combination of glucocorticosteroids and alfa interferon versus alfa interferon alone for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B has serious effects on morbidity and mortality. Alfa interferon has been shown to increase the rates of HBeAg-clearance as well as seroconversion to anti-HBe, but response rates are unsatisfactory. Glucocorticosteroid pretreatment may increase the response to alfa interferon.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to assess the effects of the sequential combination of glucocorticosteroids and alfa interferon versus alfa interferon alone in hepatitis B 'e' antigen positive chronic hepatitis B on mortality, virological response, biochemical response, liver histology, quality of life, and adverse events.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible trials were identified through searches of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Controlled Trials Register (May 2005), The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1950 to May 2005), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database) (1980 to May 2005), BIOSIS (1969 to May 2005), and reference lists of relevant articles. Further trials were sought through correspondence with authors of trials and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing identical alfa interferon treatment regimens with and without glucocorticosteroid pretreatment for hepatitis B 'e' antigen positive chronic hepatitis. We included trials irrespective blinding, publication status, or language.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors selected the trials independently and one extracted the data, which were then validated. We performed assessments of the outcome measures at the end of treatment and at six months and at maximal follow-up after the end of treatment with alfa interferon.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 13 randomised trials with 790 patients. Loss of hepatitis B 'e' antigen (OR 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.92, P = 0.03) and hepatitis B virus DNA (OR = 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 2.05, P = 0.008) were significantly more frequent among patients treated with the sequential combination of glucocorticosteroids and alfa interferon than among patients treated with alfa interferon alone. Glucocorticosteroid pretreatment did not significantly influence seroconversion from hepatitis B 'e' antigen to antibodies to hepatitis B 'e' antigen, loss of hepatitis B surface antigen, normalisation of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase activities, and severity of adverse events. Glucocorticosteroid pretreatment did not significantly affect mortality and adverse events. The effect of glucocorticosteroid pretreatment on liver histology and quality of life could not be assessed due to insufficient data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with glucocorticosteroids before treatment with alfa interferon in patients with hepatitis B 'e' antigen positive chronic hepatitis B may be more effective than treatment with alfa interferon alone with regard to loss of hepatitis B 'e' antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA, but evidence for effect on clinical outcomes is lacking.

Glucocorticosteroids for viral hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus may cause liver inflammation and fibrosis. It is not known whether glucocorticosteroids are beneficial or harmful for patients with hepatitis C infection.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of glucocorticosteroids for patients with acute or chronic hepatitis C infection with or without hepatitis C related autoimmune disorders.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Searches of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and reference lists of relevant articles and hand searches of relevant journals were performed in July 2003. Principal authors of clinical trials were approached.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials dealing with glucocorticosteroids for viral hepatitis C - acute or chronic with or without autoimmune disorders.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by one reviewer and validated by another. Further information was sought by correspondence with the principal investigator of the trial in case the relevant data were not published. Disagreements were solved by discussion before the meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials randomised 384 patients with chronic hepatitis C to glucocorticosteroids plus interferon versus interferon plus placebo/no intervention, glucocorticosteroids versus interferon, or glucocorticosteroids versus placebo. Glucocorticosteroids treatment given as short pre-treatment followed by interferon or as long-term parallel treatment combined with interferon versus interferon monotherapy had no significant effect on mortality (no deaths occurred; 342 patients), virological response at six months follow-up (RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.38; 38 patients), or biochemical response at six months follow-up (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.06; 307 patients). There was no significant difference in serious adverse events between combination therapy versus interferon monotherapy (RR 4.76; 95% CI 0.24 to 93.19; 342 patients). Glucocorticosteroids versus interferon had no significant effect on mortality (RR 2.33; 95% CI 0.27 to 17.80; 13 patients) or virological response at follow-up (RR 1.17; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.58; 13 patients). We found no trials on glucocorticosteroids for acute hepatitis C.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence neither to confirm nor exclude both beneficial and harmful effects of glucocorticosteroids for chronic hepatitis C with or without autoimmune disorders. This Review is not able to rule out potential serious adverse effects of glucocorticosteroids. Therefore, this Review cannot establish whether glucocorticosteroids treatment can be safely administrated for indications requiring glucocorticosteroids without analysing for hepatitis C virus. The effect of glucocorticosteroids for acute hepatitis C has not been examined in randomised trials.

Impact of whole wheat flour and its milling fractions on the cecal fermentations and the plasma and liver lipids in rats

The aim of the present work was to evaluate the cholesterol-lowering potency of the different milling fractions of whole wheat flour, by investigating the effects of these wheat fractions (white flour, whole flour, and bran) on digestive fermentations and lipid metabolism in Wistar rats. Compared to the control, which was fiber-free, the different cereal fractions did not affect the daily food intake or weight gain. The white flour and whole flour diets markedly enlarged the cecum and elicited acidic fermentations (pH approximately 6.2), whereas bran was less effective. It appears that white flour rather promoted propionate-rich fermentations (+62%), whereas bran favored butyrate-rich fermentations (+178%). White flour or bran did not significantly affect total steroid excretion, but whole flour was effective (+41%). Both white flour and whole flour decreased cholesterol in the d < 1.040 fraction, but only whole flour significantly lowered cholesterolemia. However, all the cereal diets significantly decreased liver lipids, whole flour being the most potent (-54%). In conclusion, the totality of the wheat grain is important for cholesterol- and triglyceride-lowering effects, and the splitting up of the grain alters its health effects.

Sequential combination of glucocorticosteroids and alfa interferon versus alfa interferon alone for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B has serious effects on morbidity and mortality. Alfa interferon has been shown to increase the rates of HBeAg-clearance as well as seroconversion to anti-HBe, but response rates are unsatisfactory. Glucocorticosteroid pretreatment may increase the response to alfa interferon.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to assess the effects of the sequential combination of glucocorticosteroids and alfa interferon versus alfa interferon alone in hepatitis B 'e' antigen positive chronic hepatitis B on mortality, virological response, biochemical response, liver histology, quality of life, and adverse events.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the controlled trial registers of The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group and The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, BIOSIS, and EMBASE were combined (May 2000). Reading the bibliography of retrieved articles identified further trials. Alfa interferon-manufacturing companies were approached in order to inquire about any published and unpublished randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The analyses included randomised trials comparing identical alfa interferon treatment regimens with and without glucocorticosteroid pretreatment for hepatitis B 'e' antigen positive chronic hepatitis. The trials could be open, single blinded, or double blinded. No patient exclusion criteria were applied.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three reviewers independently selected the trials and one extracted the data, which were validated. Assessments of the outcome measures were performed at the end of treatment and at six months and at maximal follow up after the end of treatment with alfa interferon.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 13 randomised trials including 790 patients were included. Loss of hepatitis B 'e' antigen (OR 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.92, P = 0.03) and hepatitis B virus DNA (OR = 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 2.05, P = 0.008) were significantly more frequent among patients treated with the sequential combination of glucocorticosteroids and alfa interferon than among patients treated with alfa interferon alone. Glucocorticosteroid pretreatment did not significantly influence seroconversion from hepatitis B 'e' antigen to antibodies to hepatitis B 'e' antigen, loss of hepatitis B surface antigen, normalisation of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase activities, and severity of adverse events. Glucocorticosteroid pretreatment did not significantly affect mortality and adverse events. The effect of glucocorticosteroid pretreatment on liver histology and quality of life could not be assessed due to insufficient data.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with glucocorticosteroids before treatment with alfa interferon in patients with hepatitis B 'e' antigen positive chronic hepatitis B may be more effective than treatment with alfa interferon alone with regard to loss of hepatitis B 'e' antigen and hepatitis B virus DNA, but evidence for effect on clinical outcomes is lacking.

Virological response to interferon therapy of chronic hepatitis B as measured by a highly sensitive assay

In the interferon (IFN) treatment of chronic hepatitis B, there is no accepted definition of virological response as measured by highly sensitive HBV DNA assays. In the present study of 98 patients given IFN (10 MU/day for 1 week, then 10 MU TIW for 11 weeks) with or without prednisolone priming, a virological response was identified as log HBV DNA/mL below 6.0 (by Amplicor Monitor, Roche) 6 months post-treatment. At this time, 92% (33/36) of the sustained responders (SR) still had detectable viraemia with log HBV DNA/mL at 4.30 +/- 0.15 (+/- SEM), as compared with 8.69 +/- 0.097 in nonsustained responders. Pretreatment viraemia below a threshold at 500 million copies/mL was associated with higher chance of response (P=0.023). Prednisolone enhanced the sustained response (53% vs. 30%, P=0.025), and in particular end-of-treatment response (ETR, 50% vs. 10%, P < 0.0001). ETR was predictive for SR (P < 0.0001), especially when log HBV DNA/mL was < 4.0 (PPV=92%). The potential value of differentiating the therapy of chronic hepatitis B on the basis of viraemia levels, as measured by highly sensitive assays, should be further investigated.

Role of steroid priming in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B is the result of the immunological response of the host to persistently replicating hepatitis B virus. Steroids can modulate this response; after steroid administration, viral replication increases and after drug withdrawal, it decreases in conjunction with a temporal increase in the transaminase level. Long-term decrease of the viral level is observed in some patients, but the beneficial effect of steroid withdrawal alone has not been confirmed. Interferon and other anti-viral agents can suppress virus replication, but the effect of these agents is still unsatisfactory. The combination of steroid priming and anti-viral treatment may be beneficial. Recent large-scale controlled trials indicate the utility of the combination therapy, but other randomized trials show no significant difference between therapy with or without steroid priming. Although steroid priming in combination with antiviral agents may be useful in some patients, it should be carefully performed due to the potential risk of liver failure.