Divergent effects of epidermal growth factor and calcipotriol on human rectal cell proliferation

ERK-associated changes in E2F4 phosphorylation, localization and transcriptional activity during mitogenic stimulation in human intestinal epithelial crypt cells

Background

The transcription factor E2F4 controls proliferation of normal and cancerous intestinal epithelial cells. E2F4 localization in normal human intestinal epithelial cells (HIEC) is cell cycle-dependent, being cytoplasmic in quiescent differentiated cells but nuclear in proliferative cells. However, the intracellular signaling mechanisms regulating such E2F4 localization remain unknown.

Results

Treatment of quiescent HIEC with serum induced ERK1/2 activation, E2F4 phosphorylation, E2F4 nuclear translocation and G1/S phase transition while inhibition of MEK/ERK signaling by U0126 prevented these events. Stimulation of HIEC with epidermal growth factor (EGF) also led to the activation of ERK1/2 but, in contrast to serum or lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), EGF failed to induce E2F4 phosphorylation, E2F4 nuclear translocation and G1/S phase transition. Furthermore, Akt and GSK3β phosphorylation levels were markedly enhanced in serum- or LPA-stimulated HIEC but not by EGF. Importantly, E2F4 phosphorylation, E2F4 nuclear translocation and G1/S phase transition were all observed in response to EGF when GSK3 activity was concomitantly inhibited by SB216763. Finally, E2F4 was found to be overexpressed, phosphorylated and nuclear localized in epithelial cells from human colorectal adenomas exhibiting mutations in APC and KRAS or BRAF genes, known to deregulate GSK3/β-catenin and MEK/ERK signaling, respectively.

Conclusions

The present results indicate that MEK/ERK activation and GSK3 inhibition are both required for E2F4 phosphorylation as well as its nuclear translocation and S phase entry in HIEC. This finding suggests that dysregulated E2F4 nuclear localization may be an instigating event leading to hyperproliferation and hence, of tumor initiation and promotion in the colon and rectum.

Dairy foods and prevention of colon cancer: human studies

Colon cancer is the commonest gastrointestinal cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Recent approaches to lowering the incidence of colon cancer have included attempts at dietary prevention and chemoprevention. International and national incidence rates for colon cancer suggest an inverse relationship with dietary calcium and/or vitamin D intake (or sun exposure). Several human intervention studies have suggested that supplemental calcium administration will change proliferative indices of risk for colon cancer from high to lower risk patterns. The principal current hypothesis for the action of calcium implies that calcium may precipitate or bring out of solution fatty acids and bile acids that are potentially toxic to the colorectal epithelium. Both calcium administration and dairy food administration are associated with lowering aqueous fecal concentrations of bile acids and fatty acids accompanied by a highly significant lowering of cytotoxicity in studies in vitro. There is biochemical and biological evidence in cell culture systems that exposure to calcium and/or vitamin D reduces the oncogenic properties of colon cancer cells. A recent blinded study of the administration of low-fat dairy foods demonstrated a significant improvement in several parameters of proliferation as well as in two differentiation markers from a high to a lower risk pattern. Furthermore, administration of calcium also has been shown to reduce the incidence of recurrent adenomatous polyps in individuals at increased risk for colon polyp formation because of the presence of prior colon adenomata. These combined data suggest that administration of supplemental calcium or low-fat dairy foods may have a significant effect upon colonic polyp and perhaps colon cancer incidence.

In colorectal carcinoma patients, serum vitamin D levels vary according to stage of the carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated an inverse correlation between dietary calcium and vitamin D intake and the incidence of colorectal carcinoma. Elevated serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OH-D3) are associated with a major reduction in the incidence of this neoplasm. The reduction in tumor size and number induced by calcium supplements in an experimental carcinogenesis model was neutralized by vitamin D3 deficiency. To the authors' knowledge, vitamin D serum levels have never been determined previously in colorectal carcinoma patients. They compared serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), 25-OH-D3, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels of colorectal carcinoma patients with those of healthy controls.

METHODS

Serum 1,25(OH)2D3, 25-OH-D3, and PTH levels were determined in 84 colorectal carcinoma patients (10 with Stage I, 29 with Stage II, 25 with Stage III, and 20 with Stage IV) and 30 healthy controls, all of whom were normocalcemic and not taking calcium or vitamin D supplements.

RESULTS

25-OH-D3 serum levels were higher in cancer patients than controls, irrespective of stage. Serum 1,25(OH)2D3 decreased with advancing stage: 73 +/- 18, 48 +/- 16, 39 +/- 12, 34 +/- 13, and 75 +/- 20 pg/mL in Stages I, II, III, IV, and controls, respectively. There was a corresponding increase in serum PTH levels: 58.0 +/- 9.4, 73.7 +/- 14.4, 79.0 +/- 21.3, 100.4 +/- 30.9, and 51.2 +/- 3.9 pg/mL in Stages I, II, III, IV, and controls, respectively. Serum vitamin D metabolite levels did not correlate with gender, age, tumor localization, or histologic grade.

CONCLUSIONS

An inverse correlation between serum levels of the active metabolite of vitamin D and colorectal carcinoma stage has been demonstrated for the first time, to the authors' knowledge, in colorectal carcinoma patients. Because 1,25(OH)2D3 has been shown to inhibit proliferation of colonic epithelial cells, decreased serum levels may facilitate the growth of colorectal carcinoma and influence its biologic behavior.

Vitamin D receptor expression in colorectal cancer

AIMS

To determine whether the vitamin D receptor is expressed in colorectal cancer, and its relation to stage of disease.

METHODS

Paraffin embedded sections of colorectal cancer from 30 patients who had undergone surgery were studied. Immunohistochemistry using the specific monoclonal antibody 9A7 gamma directed against the nuclear vitamin D receptor was used to identify receptors for the active metabolite of vitamin D3 (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3).

RESULTS

Microscopically normal human colorectal epithelium showed vitamin D receptor expression predominantly in the mid and upper crypts. All the colorectal cancer tissue studied showed vitamin D receptor expression, with a median of 25.3 (range 10.1 to 43.7) cells/graticule field (x 400). Although vitamin D receptor staining was heterogeneous within the individual cancers, neither Dukes stage nor the degree of differentiation appeared to influence expression of the receptor.

CONCLUSIONS

Colorectal cancer tissue expresses the nuclear vitamin D receptor and this could act as a potential therapeutic target for synthetic vitamin D3 differentiating agents.

Novel formula for cell kinetics in xenograft model of hepatocellular carcinoma using histologically calculable parameters

The growth rate of tumors should be assessed in terms of both tumor cell proliferation and death. The former is considered to be determined by growth fraction and cell-cycle time, whereas the latter is mainly determined by apoptosis, especially in tumors with a low level of necrosis. While most hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) in a relatively early stage contain only a small amount of necrosis, the growth rate supposedly depends mainly on growth fraction, cell-cycle time, and apoptosis. However, their quantitative relationship remains unknown. We have derived a novel theoretical formula for determining this relationship in nonnecrotic HCC, using Ki-67-positive index, apoptotic score, and a correction factor, all calculable by histological assessment without injecting labeling agents. Furthermore, we confirmed the reliability of this formula, using a xenograft model of human HCC with less than 15% necrosis. In this model the values of cell-cycle time calculated from the formula were very close to those estimated by a conventional double-labeling method and showed high correlations. Since our novel formula can clarify the cell kinetics without cumbersome labeling procedures, it is expected to be clinically applicable to HCC with a small portion of necrosis, using the radiographically measured growth rate and the histologically assessed cell kinetic parameters.

Prospective randomized study of sulindac versus calcium and calciferol for upper gastrointestinal polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis

Eighteen patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) who had previously undergone colectomy but had upper gastrointestinal polyps were studied in a double-blind randomized crossover trial comparing sulindac with calcium and calciferol. Sulindac produced a reduction in the crypt proliferation index in the gastric epithelium of patients but did not significantly affect duodenal mucosa. Calcium with calciferol did not have any effects on crypt proliferation index in patients with FAP.

Calcium and vitamin D: possible protective agents against colorectal cancer?

Nutritional factors are important determinants of colorectal cancer risk. Diets high in fat and/or low in fibre are especially recognised to increase risk. Dietary calcium and vitamin D have been suggested to be protective against colorectal cancer. With respect to calcium, its possible effect is thought to be mediated at least in part through intraluminal precipitation of hydrophobic, cytotoxic substances, in particular fatty and bile acids, which can promote colorectal cancer development. Data from studies in vitro and in animals support a protective effect of calcium, but studies in humans, both epidemiological and interventional, have given inconclusive results. With respect to vitamin D, data from only a small number of studies are available. Results suggest a protective effect by inhibition of cell proliferation, mediated through specific receptors. It is concluded that there are currently insufficient reasons to supplement subjects at increased colon cancer risk with calcium or vitamin D, especially when dietary intake of these substances is in agreement with general guidelines.