Assessment of variceal pressure by continuous non-invasive endoscopic registration: a placebo controlled evaluation of the effect of terlipressin and octreotide

Vasopressin and Its Analogues: From Natural Hormones to Multitasking Peptides

Human neurohormone vasopressin (AVP) is synthesized in overlapping regions in the hypothalamus. It is mainly known for its vasoconstricting abilities, and it is responsible for the regulation of plasma osmolality by maintaining fluid homeostasis. Over years, many attempts have been made to modify this hormone and find AVP analogues with different pharmacological profiles that could overcome its limitations. Non-peptide AVP analogues with low molecular weight presented good affinity to AVP receptors. Natural peptide counterparts, found in animals, are successfully applied as therapeutics; for instance, lypressin used in treatment of diabetes insipidus. Synthetic peptide analogues compensate for the shortcomings of AVP. Desmopressin is more resistant to proteolysis and presents mainly antidiuretic effects, while terlipressin is a long-acting AVP analogue and a drug recommended in the treatment of varicose bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis. Recently published results on diverse applications of AVP analogues in medicinal practice, including potential lypressin, terlipressin and ornipressin in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2, are discussed.

Primary prevention of variceal bleeding in people with oesophageal varices due to liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% to 95% of people with cirrhosis have oesophageal varices. About 15% to 20% of oesophageal varices bleed in about one to three years. There are several different treatments to prevent bleeding, including: beta-blockers, endoscopic sclerotherapy, and variceal band ligation. However, there is uncertainty surrounding their individual and relative benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and harms of different treatments for prevention of first variceal bleeding from oesophageal varices in adults with liver cirrhosis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different treatments for prevention of first variceal bleeding from oesophageal varices according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers to December 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in people with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults with cirrhosis and oesophageal varices with no history of bleeding. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had previous bleeding from oesophageal varices and those who had previously undergone liver transplantation or previously received prophylactic treatment for oesophageal varices.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the differences in treatments using hazard ratios (HR), odds ratios (OR), and rate ratios with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance. We performed the direct comparisons from randomised clinical trials using the same codes and the same technical details.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 66 randomised clinical trials (6653 participants) in the review. Sixty trials (6212 participants) provided data for one or more comparisons in the review. The trials that provided the information included people with cirrhosis due to varied aetiologies and those at high risk of bleeding from oesophageal varices. The follow-up in the trials that reported outcomes ranged from 6 months to 60 months. All but one of the trials were at high risk of bias. The interventions compared included beta-blockers, no active intervention, variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy, beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus nitrates, nitrates, beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy, and portocaval shunt. Overall, 21.2% of participants who received non-selective beta-blockers ('beta-blockers') - the reference treatment (chosen because this was the most common treatment compared in the trials) - died during 8-month to 60-month follow-up. Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers, variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy, and beta-blockers plus nitrates all had lower mortality versus no active intervention (beta-blockers: HR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.36 to 0.67; direct comparison HR: 0.59, 95% CrI 0.42 to 0.83; 10 trials, 1200 participants; variceal band ligation: HR 0.51, 95% CrI 0.35 to 0.74; direct comparison HR 0.49, 95% CrI 0.12 to 2.14; 3 trials, 355 participants; sclerotherapy: HR 0.66, 95% CrI 0.51 to 0.85; direct comparison HR 0.61, 95% CrI 0.41 to 0.90; 18 trials, 1666 participants; beta-blockers plus nitrates: HR 0.41, 95% CrI 0.20 to 0.85; no direct comparison). No trials reported health-related quality of life. Based on low-certainty evidence, variceal band ligation had a higher number of serious adverse events (number of events) than beta-blockers (rate ratio 10.49, 95% CrI 2.83 to 60.64; 1 trial, 168 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers plus nitrates had a higher number of 'any adverse events (number of participants)' than beta-blockers alone (OR 3.41, 95% CrI 1.11 to 11.28; 1 trial, 57 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, adverse events (number of events) were higher in sclerotherapy than in beta-blockers (rate ratio 2.49, 95% CrI 1.53 to 4.22; direct comparison rate ratio 2.47, 95% CrI 1.27 to 5.06; 2 trials, 90 participants), and in beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation than in beta-blockers (direct comparison rate ratio 1.72, 95% CrI 1.08 to 2.76; 1 trial, 140 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, any variceal bleed was lower in beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation than in beta-blockers (direct comparison HR 0.21, 95% CrI 0.04 to 0.71; 1 trial, 173 participants). Based on low-certainty evidence, any variceal bleed was higher in nitrates than beta-blockers (direct comparison HR 6.40, 95% CrI 1.58 to 47.42; 1 trial, 52 participants). The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions in the remaining comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers, variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy, and beta-blockers plus nitrates may decrease mortality compared to no intervention in people with high-risk oesophageal varices in people with cirrhosis and no previous history of bleeding. Based on low-certainty evidence, variceal band ligation may result in a higher number of serious adverse events than beta-blockers. The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of beta-blockers versus variceal band ligation on variceal bleeding. The evidence also indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions in most of the remaining comparisons.

Secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Approximately 40% to 95% of people with cirrhosis have oesophageal varices. About 15% to 20% of oesophageal varices bleed in about one to three years of diagnosis. Several different treatments are available, which include endoscopic sclerotherapy, variceal band ligation, beta-blockers, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), and surgical portocaval shunts, among others. However, there is uncertainty surrounding their individual and relative benefits and harms.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the benefits and harms of different initial treatments for secondary prevention of variceal bleeding in adults with previous oesophageal variceal bleeding due to decompensated liver cirrhosis through a network meta-analysis and to generate rankings of the different treatments for secondary prevention according to their safety and efficacy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and trials registers until December 2019 to identify randomised clinical trials in people with cirrhosis and a previous history of bleeding from oesophageal varices.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or status) in adults with cirrhosis and previous history of bleeding from oesophageal varices. We excluded randomised clinical trials in which participants had no previous history of bleeding from oesophageal varices, previous history of bleeding only from gastric varices, those who failed previous treatment (refractory bleeding), those who had acute bleeding at the time of treatment, and those who had previously undergone liver transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We performed a network meta-analysis with OpenBUGS using Bayesian methods and calculated the differences in treatments using hazard ratios (HR), odds ratios (OR) and rate ratios with 95% credible intervals (CrI) based on an available-case analysis, according to National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Decision Support Unit guidance.

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 48 randomised clinical trials (3526 participants) in the review. Forty-six trials (3442 participants) were included in one or more comparisons. The trials that provided the information included people with cirrhosis due to varied aetiologies. The follow-up ranged from two months to 61 months. All the trials were at high risk of bias. A total of 12 interventions were compared in these trials (sclerotherapy, beta-blockers, variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy, no active intervention, TIPS (transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt), beta-blockers plus nitrates, portocaval shunt, sclerotherapy plus variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus nitrates plus variceal band ligation, beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation, sclerotherapy plus nitrates). Overall, 22.5% of the trial participants who received the reference treatment (chosen because this was the commonest treatment compared in the trials) of sclerotherapy died during the follow-up period ranging from two months to 61 months. There was considerable uncertainty in the effects of interventions on mortality. Accordingly, none of the interventions showed superiority over another. None of the trials reported health-related quality of life. Based on low-certainty evidence, variceal band ligation may result in fewer serious adverse events (number of people) than sclerotherapy (OR 0.19; 95% CrI 0.06 to 0.54; 1 trial; 100 participants). Based on low or very low-certainty evidence, the adverse events (number of participants) and adverse events (number of events) may be different across many comparisons; however, these differences are due to very small trials at high risk of bias showing large differences in some comparisons leading to many differences despite absence of direct evidence. Based on low-certainty evidence, TIPS may result in large decrease in symptomatic rebleed than variceal band ligation (HR 0.12; 95% CrI 0.03 to 0.41; 1 trial; 58 participants). Based on moderate-certainty evidence, any variceal rebleed was probably lower in sclerotherapy than in no active intervention (HR 0.62; 95% CrI 0.35 to 0.99, direct comparison HR 0.66; 95% CrI 0.11 to 3.13; 3 trials; 296 participants), beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy than sclerotherapy alone (HR 0.60; 95% CrI 0.37 to 0.95; direct comparison HR 0.50; 95% CrI 0.07 to 2.96; 4 trials; 231 participants); TIPS than sclerotherapy (HR 0.18; 95% CrI 0.08 to 0.38; direct comparison HR 0.22; 95% CrI 0.01 to 7.51; 2 trials; 109 participants), and in portocaval shunt than sclerotherapy (HR 0.21; 95% CrI 0.05 to 0.77; no direct comparison) groups. Based on low-certainty evidence, beta-blockers alone and TIPS might result in more, other compensation, events than sclerotherapy (rate ratio 2.37; 95% CrI 1.35 to 4.67; 1 trial; 65 participants and rate ratio 2.30; 95% CrI 1.20 to 4.65; 2 trials; 109 participants; low-certainty evidence). The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions including those related to beta-blockers plus variceal band ligation in the remaining comparisons.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions on mortality. Variceal band ligation might result in fewer serious adverse events than sclerotherapy. TIPS might result in a large decrease in symptomatic rebleed than variceal band ligation. Sclerotherapy probably results in fewer 'any' variceal rebleeding than no active intervention. Beta-blockers plus sclerotherapy and TIPS probably result in fewer 'any' variceal rebleeding than sclerotherapy. Beta-blockers alone and TIPS might result in more other compensation events than sclerotherapy. The evidence indicates considerable uncertainty about the effect of the interventions in the remaining comparisons. Accordingly, high-quality randomised comparative clinical trials are needed.

Comparison of continuous versus intermittent infusions of terlipressin for the control of acute variceal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension: An open-label randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Continuous infusion of terlipressin causes more stable reduction in portal venous pressure than intermittent infusion. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of continuous infusion vs. intermittent boluses of terlipressin to control acute variceal bleeding (AVB) in patients with portal hypertension.

METHODS

Eighty-six consecutive patients with portal hypertension and AVB were randomized to receive either continuous intravenous infusion (Group A, n = 43) or intravenous boluses of terlipressin (Group B, n = 43). Group A received 1 mg intravenous bolus of terlipressin followed by a continuous infusion of 4 mg in 24 h. Group B received 2 mg intravenous bolus of terlipressin followed by 1 mg intravenous injection every 6 h. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy was done within 12 h of admission. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) was done using a multi-band ligator. In both groups, treatment was continued up to 5 days. The primary endpoint was rebleeding or death within 5 days of admission.

RESULTS

Patients in group A had lower rate of treatment failure (4.7%) as compared to patients in group B (20.7%) (p = 0.02). Within 6 weeks, four and eight patients died in group A and B, respectively (p = 0.21). Model for end-stage liver disease sodium (MELD-Na) score and continuous infusion of terlipressin showed significant relationship with treatment failure on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous infusion of terlipressin may be more effective than intermittent infusion to prevent treatment failure in patients with variceal bleeding. There is significant relationship between MELD-Na score [Odd ratio = 1.37 (95% CI-1.16 - 1.62), p-value < 0.001] and continuous infusion of terlipressin [Odd ratio = 0.18 (95% CI-0.037 - 0.91), p-value - 0.04] with treatment failure.

Terlipressin: Current and emerging indications in chronic liver disease

Terlipressin is an analogue of vasopressin that has potent vasoactive properties and has been available for use in most countries for nearly two decades. It has both established roles and emerging indications in the management of complications of decompensated chronic liver disease. We explore historic and emerging literature regarding the use of terlipressin for a range of indications including hepatorenal syndrome, portal hypertensive bleeding, and disruptions in sodium homeostasis. Novel methods of infusion-based terlipressin administration including the beneficial effect in reduction of adverse events are explored, in addition to new indications for the use of terlipressin in decompensated cirrhosis in an outpatient setting.

Octreotide bolus injection and azygos blood flow in patients with cirrhosis: is the effect really predictable?

BACKGROUND

Octreotide (OCT) improves the management of variceal bleeding, but the pattern of administration is not clearly defined. Available data show a transient decrease in portal pressure and azygos blood flow (AzBF) after OCT bolus injection with desensitization at readministration.

AIM

To explore the sustained hemodynamic effects of OCT and changes associated with readministration at 60 minutes on AzBF in patients with portal hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

AzBF was measured invasively (thermodilution technique) in 12 patients at baseline and at 10 minutes intervals after OCT 50-μg IV bolus for a total of 60 minutes. Readministration of OCT was followed by AzBF measurement for another 15 minutes. Patients [age 51.4 y (30 to 69)] had cirrhosis (alcoholic in 9 patients; Pugh's score 8.8±0.3), portal hypertension (HVPG 19±1 mm Hg), and elevated AzBF (658±138 mL/min).

RESULTS

The bolus of OCT was followed at 10 minutes by a 34% decline in AzBF as compared with baseline value. This AzBF reduction was sustained over the 60-minute study period (-36%±1.4%) with the values that remained decreased as compared with baseline (P<0.01). Mean arterial pressure remained stable. At 60 minutes, the repeat OCT bolus induced a further significant (P<0.01) decline in AzBF, although the response was blunted (-18%±1.2%).

CONCLUSION

The AzBF showed a sustained decrease of value after a bolus injection of 50-μg OCT. A further hemodynamic response is detectable at OCT readministration after 60 minutes. The pattern of hemodynamic response to OCT may not be uniform among cirrhotics.

[Recent advances in diagnosis of portal hypertension]

Complications of portal hypertension are major concerns in liver cirrhosis and significant morbidity and mortality mainly because of variceal bleeding, ascites, bacterial infections, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatorenal syndrome. Various modalities in the diagnosis of portal hypertension are reviewed. The measurement of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is a simple, invasive, reproducible method and regarded as the gold standard for the diagnosis and staging of portal hypertension. Other tests such as transient elastography, per-endoscopic variceal pressure measurement, endoscopic ultrasonography, and Doppler ultrasonography may be complementary and promising.

Systematic review: endoscopic and imaging-based techniques in the assessment of portal haemodynamics and the risk of variceal bleeding

BACKGROUND

Invasive measurement of the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) is regarded as the gold standard for risk stratification and the evaluation of pharmaceutical agents in patients with portal hypertension.

AIM

To review the techniques for endoscopic and imaging-based assessment of portal haemodynamics, with particular emphasis on trials where the results were compared with HVPG or direct portal pressure measurement.

METHODS

Systematic search of the MEDLINE electronic database with keywords: portal hypertension, variceal bleeding, variceal pressure, endoscopic ultrasound, Doppler ultrasonography, magnetic resonance angiography, CT angiography, hepatic venous pressure gradient.

RESULTS

Computed tomography angiography and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) have been both employed for the diagnosis of complications of portal hypertension and for the evaluation of the efficacy of endoscopic therapy. Colour Doppler ultrasonography and magnetic resonance angiography has given discrepant results. Endoscopic variceal pressure measurements either alone or combined with simultaneous EUS, correlate well with HVPG and risk of variceal bleeding and have a low interobserver variability.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic and imaging-based measurements of portal haemodynamics provide an alternate means for the assessment of complications of portal hypertension. Further studies are required to validate their use in risk stratification and the evaluation of drug therapies in patients with portal hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of terlipressin in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding or hepatorenal syndrome

Terlipressin is an analog of the natural hormone arginine-vasopressin. It is used in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis and bleeding esophageal varices (BEV) and in patients with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS): two of the most dramatic and feared complications of cirrhosis. Terlipressin exerts its main pharmacological effect through stimulation of vasopressin-1 receptors. These receptors are located in vascular smooth muscle and mediate vasoconstriction. In patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, treatment with terlipressin increases mean arterial pressure and decreases portal flow and pressure within minutes of administration. Furthermore, in patients with ascites terlipressin improves glomerular filtration and excretion of sodium. Terlipressin decreases failure of initial hemostasis by 34%, decreases mortality by 34%, and is considered a first-line treatment for BEV, when available. Terlipressin in combination with albumin reverses type 1 HRS in 33%-60% of cases and is the only treatment with proven efficacy in randomized trials. The safety profile is favorable when considering the clinical efficacy and the high mortality of these clinical entities. Adverse events are mostly cardiovascular and related to vasoconstriction. Mortality and withdrawal of terlipressin due to adverse events occurs in less than 1% of cases. Mild adverse events related to terlipressin treatment occur in 10%-20% of patients. The benefit, however, of terlipressin on long-term survival in HRS remains to be determined. At present, treatment with terlipressin and albumin is considered the most efficient therapy and should therefore be recommended for the treatment of type 1 HRS-1.

Pharmacology, clinical efficacy and safety of terlipressin in esophageal varices bleeding, septic shock and hepatorenal syndrome

Terlipressin, a vasopressin agonist, is a commonly used drug with different indications, particularly in patients with end-stage liver disease. As a V(1) receptor agonist, it increases systemic vascular resistance, particularly in the splanchnic area, resulting in a decrease of portal pressure. Besides the approved use for variceal bleeding, terlipressin also has beneficial effects in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome and norepinephrine-resistant septic shock. In patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding, the use of terlipressin reduces the portal vein pressure and decreases the pressure in esophageal varices. This can save lives when skilled endoscopists are not immediately available. Hepatorenal syndrome is associated with vasodilation in the mesenteric circulation with arterial underfilling and consecutive renal vasoconstriction. Restoration of an effective arterial blood volume can be achieved by the combination of terlipressin and volume expansion. In some cases, a success rate of up to 75% is reported. The early use of terlipressin in catecholamine-resistant shock can improve organ perfusion.

Current management of the complications of portal hypertension: variceal bleeding and ascites

Portal hypertension is one of the main consequences of cirrhosis. It results from a combination of increased intrahepatic vascular resistance and increased blood flow through the portal venous system. The condition leads to the formation of portosystemic collateral veins. Esophagogastric varices have the greatest clinical impact, with a risk of bleeding as high as 30% within 2 years of medium or large varices developing. Ascites, another important complication of advanced cirrhosis and severe portal hypertension, is sometimes refractory to treatment and is complicated by spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome. We describe the pathophysiology of portal hypertension and the current management of its complications, with emphasis on the prophylaxis and treatment of variceal bleeding and ascites.

Esophageal Varices: Evaluation with Transesophageal MR Imaging—Initial Experience

PURPOSE

To prospectively use transesophageal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to determine the morphologic and hemodynamic characteristics of esophageal varices.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was approved by the ethics committee. All patients gave written informed consent. Forty-two patients (29 men, 13 women; mean age, 58 years +/- 11 [standard deviation]) with esophageal varices that were recently demonstrated at endoscopy were included in the study. MR imaging was performed by using a receiver probe that was placed in the esophagus. Black-blood T2-weighted MR images were obtained with cardiac triggering and navigator gating of the right hemidiaphragm. On these images, the maximal diameter, minimal diameter, and surface area of the largest esophageal varix were measured. Periesophageal and paraesophageal varices were recorded. A hemodynamic examination was performed in the last 21 patients to undergo MR imaging, which was used to obtain measurements of flow velocity and rate before and after intravenous injection of 50 mug of octreotide or a placebo. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences in the diameter and surface area of the varices according to endoscopic grade. Hemodynamic changes observed after octreotide or placebo injection were compared by using an analysis of variance and a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Periesophageal varices were observed in 36 patients, and paraesophageal varices were observed in 32 patients. The minimal diameter, maximal diameter, and surface area of the esophageal varices at MR imaging differed significantly according to endoscopic grade (P < .001). In the periesophageal varices, the velocity and flow changes caused by octreotide differed significantly from those caused by the placebo (P < .001). A decrease in velocity (mean velocity change, -2.766 cm.sec(-1)) and flow (mean flow change, -0.455 mL.sec(-1)) was noted after octreotide injection, but no significant change in velocity (mean velocity change, 0.252 cm.sec(-1)) or flow (mean flow change, 0.018 mL.sec(-1)) was noted after placebo injection. The surface area of the varices did not change significantly after octreotide (mean change, -0.771 mm2) or placebo (mean change, -0.015 mm2) injection.

CONCLUSION

Transesophageal MR imaging is a feasible method to assess the morphologic and hemodynamic characteristics of esophageal varices before and after pharmacologic treatment.

Hemodynamic effects of terlipressin and high somatostatin dose during acute variceal bleeding in nonresponders to the usual somatostatin dose

OBJECTIVES

High dose of somatostatin infusion achieves a greater reduction of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than the usual dose, and terlipressin decreases HVPG through mechanisms other than somatostatin. Our aim was to assess the hemodynamic effects of terlipressin and high somatostatin dose during acute variceal bleeding in nonresponders to the usual somatostatin dose.

METHODS

Hemodynamic studies were performed in 80 patients with cirrhosis and variceal bleeding during the first 3 days of admission. After baseline measurements, somatostatin was administered (250 microg/h with an initial bolus of 250 microg). Patients were considered responders when the HVPG decreased by >10% from baseline (n = 31). Nonresponders were randomized under double-blind conditions to a control group (n = 7), or to receive terlipressin (2 mg IV bolus, n = 22), or high dose of somatostatin (500 microg/h, n = 20). Final measurements were obtained 30 min later.

RESULTS

Terlipressin caused a decrease in HVPG (from 22.2 +/- 5 to 19.1 +/- 5.2, p < 0.01) and heart rate (p < 0.01), while mean arterial pressure increased (p < 0.01). High somatostatin dose also reduced HVPG (from 21.8 +/- 3.4 to 19.6 +/- 3.1, p < 0.01), although this decrease was more pronounced with terlipressin (15%+/- 9%vs 10%+/- 6% from baseline, p= 0.05). Both terlipressin and high somatostatin dose achieved a significantly higher rate of response than that in the control group. A decrease in HVPG >20% was observed in 36% of cases with terlipressin versus 5% with high somatostatin dose (p= 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In nonresponders to usual somatostatin dose, both terlipressin and high-dose of somatostatin infusion significantly decreased HVPG and increased the rate of hemodynamic responders. Such effects were greater with terlipressin. Both treatments may be an alternative when standard somatostatin fails.

Review article: a critical comparison of drug therapies in currently used therapeutic strategies for variceal haemorrhage

Vasoactive drugs are safe and easy to administer, and universal treatment is the first-line approach for all patients with suspected variceal bleeding. There are strong arguments that the combination of vasoactive drugs, started as soon as possible, and endotherapy later on is the best therapeutic option, particularly in cases of ongoing bleeding at the time of endoscopy. The main action of vasoactive drugs is to reduce variceal pressure. This can be achieved by diminishing the variceal blood flow and/or by increasing resistance to variceal blood flow inside the varices. Changes in variceal pressure parallel changes in portal pressure. Drugs for the treatment of variceal bleeding can therefore be assessed by measuring the changes in portal pressure, azygos blood flow and variceal pressure. Vasoactive drugs can be divided into two categories: terlipressin (Glypressin), and somatostatin and its analogues, especially octreotide. Terlipressin significantly reduces portal and variceal pressure and azygos flow, is superior to placebo in the control of variceal haemorrhage and improves mortality. It is beneficial when combined with sclerotherapy. It also has the advantage that it might preserve renal function, one of the most important factors affecting the outcome of cirrhosis. As such, terlipressin is the most potent of the various vasoactive drugs. Somatostatin significantly reduces portal and variceal pressure and azygos flow, is superior to placebo in controlling variceal haemorrhage, and improves the success of sclerotherapy. The effect of octreotide is well established for preventing the increase in portal pressure after a meal (similar to blood in the intestines) though the effect of ocreotide on variceal pressure is controversial.

A new ultrasound-guided esophageal variceal pressure-measuring device

OBJECTIVE

To develop a noninvasive method and device to determine intravariceal pressure and variceal wall tension by measuring the variables of the Laplace equation and test this device in a model of esophageal varices.

METHODS

Two variceal pressure measurement devices were constructed. The first device consists of an Olympus 20 MHz ultrasound transducer placed next to a latex balloon catheter attached to a pressure transducer. The second device was constructed by placing the same ultrasound transducer inside a latex condom balloon attached to a pressure transducer. These pressure measurement devices were tested blindly in varix models with different intravariceal pressures, by inflating the balloon to flatten the varix models. Each variceal pressure was measured 10 times by two separate investigators blinded to the actual pressures. The mean intravariceal pressures were calculated. The variceal models were made of a latex balloon filled with water and coffeemate.

RESULTS

The correlation coefficient between the actual and measured varix pressures for both devices was 0.99. The percent error ranged from 0 to 10%. The correlation coefficient between the investigators making the blinded measurements for both devices was 0.98.

CONCLUSION

Two pressure-measuring devices were developed to determine intravariceal pressure in a model varix system. These devices demonstrate a low percent error and a high correlation to the actual variceal pressures with low intra- and interobserver variability. These devices have the potential to measure all the variables of the Laplace equation for wall tension. We plan to test these devices in human subjects.

TIPS: an update

During the last 15 years the transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) procedure has become a safe and effective treatment of portal hypertension. Its major obstacle, the high rate of shunt insufficiency, is going to be solved by the availability of covered stents showing a patency rate of up to 90%. The treatment of acute oesophageal and gastric variceal bleeding is an unsolved problem because variceal bleeding remains the major cause of death in patients with cirrhosis. TIPS has become the rescue treatment of choice because it combines high efficacy with low invasiveness. In this context, the timing of the rescue TIPS is of major importance for achieving definitive haemostasis before multi-organ failure develops. In the prevention of re-bleeding, TIPS is accepted as a second-line treatment, required in about 10-20% of patients. TIPS may be indicated when more than two significant re-bleedings occurred within a time frame of 12 months in spite of adequate first-line measures i.e. drugs or ligation. Refractory ascites is the third main indication for TIPS. Five randomized studies comparing TIPS with paracentesis show good response and comparable survival. Interpretations of authors and comments of reviewers are, however, controversial and do not permit a definitive recommendation.

Pharmacological rationale for the use of somatostatin and analogues in portal hypertension

Somatostatin and its analogue octreotide have been used for two decades to treat oesophageal variceal haemorrhage. The drug was introduced because of its capacity to decrease portal venous pressure without major side effects. In clinical trials assessing the efficacy of somatostatin and long-acting analogues in arresting variceal haemorrhage, conflicting results have been obtained. Furthermore, in haemodynamic studies evaluating the effects of somatostatin and analogues in patients with cirrhosis, divergent effects were observed. The main reason for these differences is probably related to different affinities of the drugs for different somatostatin receptor subtypes. The effects of somatostatin and analogues are mediated via five different G-protein coupled receptors (somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5), which regulate the activity of ion channels (Ca2+, K+, Na+ and Cl-) and enzymes (adenyl cyclase, phospholipase C, phospholipase A2, phosphoinositide 3-kinase and guanylate cyclase) responsible for the synthesis or degradation of intracellular second messengers including cyclic AMP, inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate, diacylglycerol and cyclic GMP. Despite universal use of somatostatin, the cellular and biochemical mechanisms of its effects in portal hypertension are relatively poorly studied and remain incompletely understood. In this review, we summarize relevant signal transduction of somatostatin and analogues, the haemodynamic effects of the drugs and the possible mechanisms by which these effects are mediated.

When endoscopic therapy or pharmacotherapy fails to control variceal bleeding: what should be done? Immediate control of bleeding by TIPS?

BACKGROUND

Acute variceal bleeding is the major cause of death in patients with chronic liver disease. This justifies the search for a more effective therapy to achieve rapid and definitive hemostasis in every patient. At present, the recommended standard treatment for acute variceal bleeding consists of immediate drug treatment with terlipressin or octreotide together with early endoscopic band ligation or sclerotherapy. In the case of ectopic varices terlipressin and cyanoacrylate embolization (if varices can be reached by endoscope) are in use.

FOCUS

The treatment is considered to have failed when bleeding continues or significant bleeding recurs within 48 h. This indicates the need for emergency transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS) which has been regarded as rescue treatment of choice when standard treatment fails. Although randomized studies against supportive treatment are lacking, the high efficacy and relatively low mortality after TIPS implantation are convincing. It is reasonable that smaller shunts should be preferred (probably 8 mm in diameter) since most patients have an increased risk of liver failure. To increase the effect of the shunt with respect to acute hemostasis it should be combined with transjugular embolization of the varices.

CONCLUSION

Only strict adherence to the definition of failure of standard treatment and a generous indication to the TIPS implantation before multiorgan failure occurs may decrease the high mortality of acute variceal bleeding.

A new device for measuring esophageal variceal pressure

BACKGROUND

Esophageal varices are a frequent source of bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. Elevated intravariceal pressure is associated with variceal bleeding. There is no simple, easy-to-use device for noninvasive measurement of intravariceal pressure. The purposes of this study were to develop a noninvasive method for measuring intravariceal pressure, and to develop a model of esophageal varices that can be used to test this pressure measurement device.

METHODS

A variceal pressure measurement device was constructed by placing a 20 MHz US transducer in a latex balloon catheter sheath and attaching the catheter to a pressure transducer. The pressure measurement device was passed though the accessory channel of a large-channel endoscope and tested in blinded fashion by using tip deflection to compress each of 4 variceal models with the device. The pressure within each model was measured 10 times by 2 separate investigators blinded to the actual pressures. The mean (SD) pressure was calculated for each model. The variceal models were made of nitrocellulose dialysis tubing filled with water. Each "varix" had the same diameter but a different intraluminal pressure (5.5, 10, 15, 21.5 mm Hg).

OBSERVATIONS

The correlation coefficient between the actual and measured "varix" pressures for the first investigator (L.S.M.) was r = 0.96: 99% CI [0.93, 0.98]. For the varix models with pressures of 21.5, 15, 10, and 5.5 the percent errors were, respectively, 9.5, 3.9, 5.1, and 0.7. The correlation coefficient between the actual and measured varix pressures for the second investigator (Q.D.) was r = 0.97: 99% CI [0.94, 0.98]. For the varix models with pressures of 21.5, 15, 10, and 5.5 the percent errors were, respectively, 10.3, 3.4, 9.8, and 1.1. The correlation coefficient between the 2 investigators (L.S.M., Q.D.) for the varix model pressures was r = 0.97: 99% CI [0.95, 0.99].

CONCLUSION

The variceal pressure measuring device developed for this study measured intravariceal pressure in a model varix with a low percent error and high correlation to the actual pressures. Intraobserver and interobserver variability was low.

Management of portal hypertension after variceal hemorrhage

Each variceal bleed is associated with 20% to 30% risk of dying. Management of portal hypertension after a bleed consists of (1) control of bleeding and (2) prevention of rebleeding. Effective control of bleeding can be achieved either pharmacologically by administering somatostatin or octreotide or endoscopically via sclerotherapy or variceal band ligation. In practice, both pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy are used concomitantly. Rebleeding can be prevented by endoscopic obliteration of varices. In this setting, variceal ligation is the preferred endoscopic modality. B-blockade is as effective as endoscopic therapy and, in combination, the two modalities may be additive.

Bolus somatostatin but not octreotide reduces hepatic sinusoidal pressure by a NO-independent mechanism in chronic liver disease

BACKGROUND

Evidence exists that somatostatin and octreotide might have different effects on hepatic haemodynamics.

AIM

The investigation of the effects of somatostatin and its octapeptide analogue, octreotide, on sinusoidal pressure measured by the wedged hepatic venous pressure in patients with cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis and the correlation with the levels of hepatic vein NO.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive an injection of either 250 microg somatostatin (n=14: cirrhosis six, chronic hepatitis eight) or an injection of 125 microg octreotide (n=19: cirrhosis nine, chronic hepatitis 10) during hepatic vein catheterization. Baseline wedged hepatic venous pressure was measured, followed by measurements at 2, 5, 10 and 15 min after the injection of the drug. Nitrites/nitrates of the hepatic vein were measured before the injection and after 15 min.

RESULTS

Both agents showed a similar qualitative but a different quantitative haemodynamic profile. No change in the wedged hepatic venous pressure was observed during the first 2 min after the injection of both drugs. This was followed by a decrease: 18% at 5 min (N.S.), 23% at 10 min (P < 0.01) and 24% at 15 min (P < 0.01) for somatostatin. Octreotide induced a relatively smaller decrease in the wedged hepatic venous pressure: 8% at 5 min (N.S.), 20% at 10 min (P < 0.01) and 16% at 15 min (N.S.). Further analysis of the sub-groups of cirrhotic and chronic hepatitis patients revealed a different effect. In the sub-group of cirrhotic patients, somatostatin caused a maximum decrease of 34% at 15 min post-injection (P < 0.01), but octreotide failed to produce a significant change on the wedged hepatic venous pressure. In contrast, no change was observed in chronic hepatitis patients with either drug. No change in the hepatic vein concentration of NO after treatment was observed with either somatostatin or octreotide. Moreover, no correlation of the levels of NO with the wedged hepatic venous pressure values was found.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that somatostatin is more effective than octreotide in acutely reducing the wedged hepatic venous pressure after bolus injection and the observed change is probably mediated by a NO-independent mechanism.

Management of acute variceal haemorrhage

Endoscopic therapy and in particular endoscopic variceal banding ligation, in experienced hands, is the treatment of choice for acute variceal bleeding which remains a major cause of death in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Pharmacological therapy with Glypressin or somatostatin can be useful to gain time when the endoscopic expertise is not available or to help to obtain a clearer endoscopic view. Transjugular intrahepatic porto-systemic stent shunt is currently used for endoscopic failures, producing similar results with the surgical portacaval shunts. Which one of the two should be preferred, since they both work best in relatively compensated patients, should be a balance between the available surgical and radiological expertise, the urgency of the situation and the expected course of the disease.

Desensitization to the effects of intravenous octreotide in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Octreotide has been suggested for the treatment of variceal bleeding, but detailed dose-finding studies are not available. We performed a dose-finding study investigating the hemodynamic effects of several forms of intravenous octreotide administration.

METHODS

Splanchnic hemodynamics and plasma glucagon levels were measured in 68 cirrhotics in baseline conditions and (1) after a double-blind intravenous injection of octreotide (50 microg [n = 9] or 500 microg [n = 8]) or placebo (n = 7); (2) after a 50-microg octreotide bolus followed by continuous infusion of 50 microg/h (n = 8), 250 microg/h (n = 8), or placebo (n = 6); (3) after repeated 50-microg injections of octreotide (n = 9) or placebo (n = 6) after an initial bolus (50 microg octreotide); and (4) after a placebo bolus and continuous octreotide infusion (50 microg/h; n = 7).

RESULTS

Placebo caused no significant changes. Octreotide caused a marked and transient decrease in portal pressure and azygos blood flow and an increase in mean arterial pressure. These effects lasted only 5 minutes despite addition of continuous octreotide infusions. Repeated octreotide injections had shorter, less marked effects than the first bolus. A continuous octreotide infusion did not decrease portal pressure. Glucagon levels were markedly reduced by octreotide, but gradually returned to baseline despite continuous infusions or repeated injections of octreotide.

CONCLUSIONS

Octreotide injection caused marked but transient reductions in portal pressure and azygos blood flow. Adding a continuous octreotide infusion neither maintained nor prolonged its effects. Repeated boluses caused significant tachyphylaxis. This rapid desensitization to the effects of octreotide may explain the divergent effects achieved with octreotide infusions in acute variceal bleeding.

Oesophageal varices: assessment of the risk of bleeding and mortality

Patients with oesophageal varices run a high risk of bleeding and even death, however rates of bleeding and mortality vary greatly. Indeed, a number of patients with varices never bleed. Prophylactic therapy is effective, but can be associated with side-effects. It remains to be determined which patients are at high risk of bleeding and require treatment. In addition, since non-response to medical therapy has been reported to occur in 20-40% of patients, the effect of a given prophylactic drug, or combinations of drugs, needs to be tested. A review is given of available methods of assessment. The Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient, and measurements of the variceal pressure, are two proven methods, and the latter has the advantages of being non-invasive and having value in presinusoidal portal hypertension.

Efficacy of octreotide and sclerotherapy in the treatment of acute variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients. A prospective, multicentric, and randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Sclerotherapy is the most widely used method for treatment of acute variceal bleeding. Previous reports have suggested that octreotide infusion is as effective as sclerotherapy. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of octreotide in comparison with sclerotherapy in controlling variceal bleeding.

METHODS

Seventy-six cirrhotic patients were randomized to receive either sclerotherapy (n = 37) or octreotide (n = 39) infusion of 50 microg/h intravenously for 48 h after a bolus of 100 microg, followed by subcutaneous injection of 100 microg/8 h for an additional 72 h.

RESULTS

The two groups were similar in base-line data. A similar initial control of bleeding was obtained in 94.6% for sclerotherapy and 84.6% for octreotide (NS). No difference was observed between sclerotherapy and octreotide in rebleeding (23% versus 33%) and treatment failure (22% versus 36%, respectively). Furthermore, the overall success of treatment was 78% for sclerotherapy and 64% for octreotide. No significant difference in mortality was observed between treatments (eight patients for octreotide and three patients for sclerotherapy, NS).

CONCLUSIONS

These results show that both treatments present a very high and similar initial and final control of bleeding. However, there is a trend that could be clinically important towards better results in the patients treated with sclerotherapy.

Terlipressin is more effective in decreasing variceal pressure than portal pressure in cirrhotic patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Terlipressin decreases portal pressure. However, its effects on variceal pressure have been poorly investigated. This study investigated the variceal, splanchnic and systemic hemodynamic effects of terlipressin.

METHODS

Twenty cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices grade II-III, and portal pressure > or =12 mmHg were studied. Hepatic venous pressure gradient, variceal pressure and systemic hemodynamic parameters were obtained. After baseline measurements, in a double-blind administration, 14 patients received a 2mg/iv injection of terlipressin and six patients received placebo. The same measurements were repeated 60 min later.

RESULTS

No demographic or biochemical differences were observed in basal condition between groups. Terlipressin produced significant decreases in intravariceal pressure from 20.9+4.9 to 16.3+/-4.7 mmHg (p<0.01, -21+/- 16%), variceal pressure gradient from 18.9+/-4.8 to 13.5+/-6.0 mmHg (p<0.01, -28+/-27%), estimated variceal wall tension from 78+/-29 to 59+/-31 mmHg x mm (p<0.01, -27+/-22%), and hepatic venous pressure gradient from 19.4+/-4.5 to 16.8+/-5 mmHg (p<0.01, -14+/-12%) at 60 min. The change in variceal pressure after 60 min of terlipressin administration was greater than the change in wedge hepatic venous pressure (-4.7 mmHg vs -0.5 mmHg, respectively, p<0.0001). Terlipressin also caused significant decreases in heart rate and cardiac index and increases in mean arterial pressure and peripheral vascular resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that terlipressin produces significant and prolonged decreases in variceal pressure and variceal wall tension and has intrinsic effects on portal pressure and systemic hemodynamics. Variceal pressure provides a better assessment of the effects of terlipressin administration on esophageal varices than hepatic venous pressure gradient.

Variceal pressure is a strong predictor of variceal haemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis as well as in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension

BACKGROUND

Variceal pressure is a strong predictor for a first variceal bleed in patients with cirrhosis.

AIMS

To evaluate whether variceal pressure is also a determinant of the risk of a first variceal bleed in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension.

METHODS

Variceal pressure was measured non-invasively in 25 patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension and large varices while receiving a stable therapeutic regimen. Factors predictive of bleeding were compared with those observed in 87 cirrhotics.

RESULTS

The one year incidence of variceal bleeding was 32% (n=28) for the cirrhotic and 20% (n=5) for the non-cirrhotic patients. There was no difference in factors predicting the risk of bleeding between the groups, except for variceal pressure. For the same level of variceal pressure, the risk of variceal bleeding was lower in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed the following variables as having a significant predictive power: variceal pressure (p=0.0001), red spots (p=0.004), and the time interval between the first observation of the varices and the moment of variceal pressure measurement (p=0. 0046). For the non-cirrhotics the risk of bleeding increased with higher Child-Pugh score (p=0.0024); this was not the case for the cirrhotic patients (p=0.9521).

CONCLUSION

Variceal pressure is a major predictor of variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis as well as in patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. The risk of bleeding in non-cirrhotics is less than in cirrhotics for the same level of variceal pressure. In patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension the risk of variceal bleeding increases more with advancing disease.

Doppler evaluation of the effects of pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension

The splanchnic pharmacodynamic effects of the drugs used for the treatment of hemorrhagic complications of portal hypertension were poorly clarified until some years ago. The introduction of Doppler ultrasound provided a powerful tool to investigate such hemodynamic effects and brought new insights in this field. The present article reviews the pharmacodynamics of the substances used in the treatment of portal hypertension, with particular regard to the effects assessable by duplex Doppler ultrasonography.

Splanchnic haemodynamics after intravenous terlipressin in anaesthetised healthy pigs

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Terlipressin is used for the treatment of bleeding oesophageal varices. We evaluated the effects of terlipressin on hepatic haemodynamics, with special focus on the interactions between portal venous flow and hepatic arterial flow over time. Secondly, we evaluated the estimated hepatic blood flow by the ICG clearance method against direct measurements of hepatic blood flow.

METHODS

Eight healthy anaesthetised pigs received terlipressin 1 mg or placebo intravenously in a randomised, blind, cross-over design. Hepatic arterial flow, portal venous flow, systemic haemodynamics, and portal vein diameter were recorded simultaneously. Portal venous flow and hepatic arterial flow were measured by transit time ultrasound flowmetry. Estimated hepatic blood flows at baseline and after terlipressin were compared with the sum of the portal venous flow and hepatic arterial flow.

RESULTS

Portal venous flow decreased significantly 5 min after administration of terlipressin (p<0.05). At 30 min it had decreased by 34% (p<0.01) and the hepatic arterial flow had increased by 81% (p<0.01). The estimated hepatic blood flow and the hepatic blood flow decreased by 23% (p<0.015). At baseline the estimated hepatic blood flow and the hepatic blood flow correlated significantly (r=0.85, p<0.01), but this correlation disappeared after administration of terlipressin (r=0.06, p=ns). The hepatic blood flow was 12% higher than the estimated hepatic blood flow before and after terlipressin.

CONCLUSIONS

Terlipressin decreased the portal venous flow, hepatic blood flow, and estimated hepatic blood flow significantly and was accompanied by a substantial increase in hepatic arterial flow. The estimated hepatic blood flow and hepatic blood flow were strongly correlated at baseline, but after terlipressin the correlation disappeared.

Somatostatin and octreotide modulate the function of Kupffer cells in liver cirrhosis

In our previous studies we have shown that somatostatin and octreotide modulate the function of peritoneal macrophages and Kupffer cells in noncirrhotic livers. However, the effects of somatostatin on the Kupffer cells in cirrhotic livers are not known. In the present study, Kupffer cells, obtained from male rats with carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhotic livers, were treated in vitro with somatostatin or octreotide and their effects on the release of nitric oxide, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and peroxide (H2O2) determined. At concentrations of 10(-13) or 10(-10) to 10(-6) M of somatostatin or 10(-12) to 10(-10) M, or 10(-6) M of octreotide, the amount of nitric oxide released by Kupffer cells was significantly suppressed relative to that of untreated cells. Kupffer cells treated with less than 10(-12) M or greater than 10(-12) M of somatostatin or octreotide released less TNF-alpha compared to the untreated controls. In addition, zymosan-induced H2O2 release by Kupffer cells treated with 10(-9) to 10(-7) M somatostatin or with 10(-15) to 10(-13) M and 10(-9) to 10(-7) M of octreotide was greater than that of the untreated controls. These findings demonstrate that somatostatin and octreotide modulate the release of nitric oxide, TNF-alpha and H2O2 by Kupffer cells in cirrhotic livers depending on the concentrations of hormones used.

Hemodynamic effects of terlipressin and octreotide administration alone or in combination in portal hypertensive rats

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The action sites and kinetic effects of octreotide and terlipressin may be different. Therefore, we studied the hemodynamic effects of acute administration of these drugs alone or in combination in rats with portal hypertension due to portal vein ligation.

METHODS

In a first study performed in anesthetized rats, hemodynamics were measured before and after drug administration (placebo, octreotide: 8 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 30 min, terlipressin: 50 microg/kg bolus, terlipressin + octreotide at the same doses). The second study, performed in conscious rats, included the same groups and drug doses; hemodynamics were measured every 10 min for 1 h. The third study tested the effect of preinfusion of octreotide on responsiveness to terlipressin.

RESULTS

Terlipressin produced more marked systemic effects than octreotide by decreasing heart rate and cardiac output and increasing mean arterial pressure. Terlipressin produced a greater decrease in portal pressure than octreotide: placebo: -3+/-5%, terlipressin: -42+/-8%, octreotide: -16+/-10%, combination: -44+/-8% (conscious rats at 20 min, p<10(-4)). The decrease in portal pressure was immediate and lasted at least 60 min with both drugs. Octreotide significantly decreased spleno-renal shunt blood flow (% variation): placebo: -6+/-8, terlipressin: -15.5+/-20, octreotide: -22.5+/-20, combination: -27+/-10 (p<10(-2)). Octreotide preinfusion significantly increased the responsiveness of arterial pressure and heart rate to terlipressin.

CONCLUSIONS

Terlipressin decreases portal pressure significantly more than octreotide, while only octreotide significantly decreases collateral blood flow. Simultaneous administration of these drugs does not have significant additive effects but has complementary effects. The preadministration of octreotide alters systemic response to terlipressin.

Variceal pressure is a factor predicting the risk of a first variceal bleeding: a prospective cohort study in cirrhotic patients

Predictive criteria for a first variceal hemorrhage lack substantial accuracy. Cross-sectional studies suggest a close relationship between variceal pressure (VP) and the occurrence of variceal bleeding. In the present prospective cohort study, the significance of VP measurement for prediction of a first variceal bleed was assessed. Eighty-seven patients with cirrhosis and large esophageal varices who had never developed variceal bleeding were followed for 12 months. The endpoint of the study was the presentation or not of a variceal hemorrhage. Thirty-four patients (39%) were in Child's class A, 37 in class B (43%), and 16 in class C (18%). The median interval between endoscopic diagnosis of varices and the beginning of the study was 15 months. Twenty-eight patients (32%) developed a variceal hemorrhage with a bleeding-related mortality of 18% (n=5). The 1-year mortality overall was 16% (n=14). Variables predictive of a first bleed identified by Cox proportional hazards regression model were: the level of VP, the North Italian Endoscopic Club (NIEC) score, and the interval between the diagnosis of varices and the start of the study. By adding VP to NIEC, a significant gain in prognostic accuracy was obtained (P = .003). In conclusion, the present study provides evidence that the level of VP is a major predictive factor for variceal hemorrhage, and that it provides further prognostic information in addition to the NIEC index.

Advances in drug therapy for acute variceal haemorrhage

Recent advances in the pharmacology of portal hypertension are reviewed, against the background of existing knowledge and current clinical research. The most recent trials are analysed, and conclusions made about the use of drugs in acute variceal haemorrhage, as well as directions for further clinical trials and research.