Laser and brachytherapy in the palliation of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia

Palliative therapy for esophageal cancer: laser therapy alone is associated with a better functional outcome

The aim of our study was to compare functional outcome and survival in patients who underwent laser therapy (LT) or laser therapy and esophageal stenting (LTES) to palliate inoperable esophageal cancer. Two hundred and twenty-seven consecutive patients who had endoscopic palliation for esophageal cancer were enrolled in this retrospective study. One hundred and sixty-four underwent LT alone and 63 had LTES. A dysphagia score was adopted (0: absolute dysphagia; 1: liquid diet; 2: semisolid diet; 3: free diet). Survival analysis and non parametric statistics were performed. Patients in the LTES group reported a significantly worse dysphagia score than LT patients (p < 0.01). LTES patients more frequently reported difficulty swallowing than LT patients (p < 0.01). No difference between LTES and LT groups was observed in terms of overall survival. Only radiotherapy resulted in a significant predictor of better survival (p = 0.007). Despite a similar survival, LTES is a predictor of a worse functional palliation than LT alone. Radiotherapy was associated with better survival in patients treated with LT. Therefore, these data seem to suggest that a combination of endoscopic LT and external radiotherapy may yield the best results in palliative care of advanced esophageal cancer.

Endoscopic palliation of advanced esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer represents one of the most aggressive digestive tumors, with a survival rate at 5 years of only 10%. Globally, during the last three decades, there has been an increasing incidence of the esophageal cancer, approx. 400,000 new esophageal cancers being currently diagnosed annually. This represents the eighth leading cause of cancer incidence and the sixth leading cause of cancer death overall. Taking into account the population's global aging and thus, the increase in the number of patients who will not bear surgery, PCT and radiation, or the fact that they do not want it especially because of deficiencies and associated pathology, the endoscopic ablative techniques with palliation purposes represent the alternative. If we refer to the Western Europe countries and North America, we notice an increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma rate versus squamous cancer. As for the Asian region, referring in particular to China and Japan, 9 out of 10 esophageal cancers are squamous cell carcinomas. For at least half of the patients with EC (esophageal cancer) there is no hope of healing because of the advanced regional malignant invasion (T3-4, N+, M+) with no chemo and radiotherapy response, poor preoperative patients' conditions or systemic metastasis. The low life expectancy does not justify the risky medical procedures, the goal of the therapy consisting in the improvement of the quality of life by eliminating dysphagia (reestablishing oral feeding) which represents the most common complication of EC, the respiratory tract complication caused by eso-tracheal fistulas or by eliminating chest pain. To treat dysphagia, which is the main target of palliation, combined methods like endoscopic, chemo and radio-therapy, can be used, each one with indications, benefits and risks.

Randomized comparison of three palliative regimens including brachytherapy, photodynamic therapy, and APC in patients with malignant dysphagia (CONSORT 1a) (Revised II)

OBJECTIVES

Because most esophageal cancers are diagnosed at an advanced stage, a majority of patients require palliative dysphagia treatment. Dysphagia severity and the need for repeated re-canalization procedures significantly affect patients' quality of life (QoL). The aim of this study was to establish whether combining argon plasma coagulation (APC) of the neoplastic esophageal tissue with another re-canalization method results in a longer dysphagia-free period compared with APC alone.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial in 93 patients with malignant dysphagia. Patients were followed until death. We compared three regimens of esophageal re-canalization; APC combined with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, APC combined with photodynamic therapy (PDT), and APC alone. The primary outcome measure was the dysphagia-free period following randomization. Secondary measures were survival, QoL, treatment-associated complications, and treatment tolerance. A per-protocol analysis was carried out.

RESULTS

The time to first dysphagia recurrence was significantly different between each combination treatment group and the control group (overall test: P=0.006; HDR vs. control, log-rank P=0.002, PDT vs. control, log-rank P=0.036), but not different between the combination groups (HDR vs. PDT, log-rank P=0.36). The median time to first dysphagia recurrence was 88, 59, and 35 days in the HDR, PDT, and control groups, respectively. There was no difference in overall survival between the study groups (P=0.27). No deaths, perforations, hemorrhages, or fistula formations were attributed to treatment. The only major complication was fever, occurring in three PDT patients. Minor complications were observed significantly more often in the combination treatment groups and included pain in both groups, transient dysphagia worsening, and skin sensitivity in the PDT group. The QoL 30 days after treatment in the HDR group was significantly better than in the other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with inoperable esophageal cancer, palliative combination treatment of dysphagia with APC and HDR or PDT was significantly more efficient than APC alone, and was safe and well tolerated. APC combined with HDR resulted in fewer complications and better QoL than APC with PDT or APC alone (CONSORT 1b).

Esophageal stenting

Malignant obstruction of the esophagus is a debilitating condition, with dysphagia as its main symptom. Many patients present with advanced disease and palliative treatment is the only possibility. Since their widespread introduction 10 years ago, self-expanding metal stents have become accepted as an extremely effective method of palliating malignant dysphagia. Early reports suggesting very low complications have been superseded by results from randomized trials. It is now evident that the complication rate is significant and the need for reintervention can be as high as 50%. Modifications in stent design should reduce this reintervention rate. There are a large number of stent designs now available and it is essential that the interventional radiologist understand the particular strengths and weaknesses of each design, so that the correct choice of stent can be made for a particular patient. The most recent designs include antireflux stents and removable stents. Both represent significant advances and should reduce stent-related complications.

Palliative therapy

There are a wide variety of palliative treatments for esophageal cancer. The aim of most treatments is to maintain oral food intake, which should stabilize or even improve quality of life. Stent placement is currently the most widely used treatment modality for palliation of dysphagia from esophageal cancer. Stent placement offers a rapid relief of dysphagia, however, the rate of complications (late hemorrhage) and recurrent dysphagia (stent migration, tumor overgrowth) is relatively high. The scientific evidence to advocate the use of anti-reflux stents for the prevention of gastro-esophageal reflux is currently too low. Photodynamic therapy is mostly used in North America; however, due to the high costs of the treatment, the long-lasting side effects and the necessity of repeated treatments, it is not an ideal treatment for palliation of malignant dysphagia. Nd:YAG laser is a relatively effective and safe treatment modality, although laser treatment is also expensive, technically difficult and requiring repeated treatment sessions at 4-6 weeks intervals. Single dose brachytherapy compares favorably to stent placement in long-term effectiveness and safety. Effective treatment strategies are probably 12 Gy given in one fraction or 16 Gy given in two fractions. Palliative chemotherapy offers response rates in recent trials (including partial and complete responses) ranging from 35% to 50%. Whether palliative chemotherapy also results in a survival benefit is not established yet. For clinical trials on palliation of esophageal cancer, the measurement of quality of life is an important outcome measure. The cancer-specific EORTC QLQ-C30 and the esophageal cancer-specific EORTC-OES-18 are validated measures for establishing quality of life status. For the future, a multimodality approach with stent placement or brachytherapy in combination with chemotherapy may be indicated.

Palliative treatment by high–dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to analyze the results of palliative HDR brachytherapy in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-one patients with unresectable, advanced esophageal cancer were treated palliatively by HDR brachytherapy. All patients received a total dose of 22.5 Gy in three fractions per week. Remissions of dysphagia and other clinical and radiological factors were assessed in the first month posttreatment, and then in the third, sixth, and twelfth months. The survival rate was compared with some chosen clinical factors using a log-rank test and the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The median survival time among all patients was 8.2 months. The median survival time according to the obtained remission was 14.6, 7.2, and 3.8 months (log-rank p = 00001, F Cox p = 0.00001) for complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), and lack of remission (NR), respectively. A longer median survival time was observed when tumor size was less then 5 cm (12.1 months), than between 5 and 10 cm (7.8 months), or longer than 10 cm (6.4 months) (log-rank p = 0.002). Longer median survival times were observed in clinical stage II (14.1 months), compared with clinical stage III (7.7 months) and IV (7.2 months) (log-rank p = 0.01). Significant correlations were found between survival and the Karnofsky Performance Status, grade of dysphagia, and age.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy for advanced esophageal cancer allowed for improvement of dysphagia in most patients. The complete or partial remission, the older age of patients, and the lower grade of dysphagia observed in first month posttreatment were the most important prognostic factors allowing for prolonged survival (confirmed by a multivariate analysis). In the univariate analysis, important prognostic factors for prolonged survival were: a higher Karnofsky Performance Status, a lower clinical stage and a small tumor size.

High dose rate brachytherapy for the palliation of malignant dysphagia

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is a commonly used palliative treatment for esophageal carcinoma. We evaluated the outcome of HDR brachytherapy in patients with malignant dysphagia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis over a 10-year period was performed of 149 patients treated with HDR brachytherapy, administered in one or two sessions, at a median dose of 15Gy. Patients were evaluated for functional outcome, complications, recurrent dysphagia, and survival.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks after HDR brachytherapy, dysphagia scores had improved from a median of 3 to 2 (n=104; P<0.001), however, dysphagia had not improved in 51 (49%) patients. Procedure-related complications occurred in seven (5%) patients. Late complications, including fistula formation or bleeding, occurred in 11 (7%) patients. Twelve (8%) patients experienced minor retrosternal pain. Median survival of the patients was 160 days with a 1-year survival rate of 15%. Procedure-related mortality was 2%. At follow-up, 55 (37%) patients experienced recurrent dysphagia. In 34 (23%) patients a metal stent was placed to relieve persistent or recurrent dysphagia.

CONCLUSION

HDR brachytherapy is a moderately effective treatment for the palliation of malignant dysphagia. The incidence of early major complications is low, however, persistent and recurrent dysphagia occur frequently, and require often additional treatment.

Photodynamic therapy for esophageal cancer: a useful and realistic option

The use of light therapy for tissue destruction is highly attractive for the endoscopic and minimally invasive therapy of esophageal cancer. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) offers the possibility of palliation of advanced obstructing tumors. However, there are other competing techniques, which can be used to open the esophageal lumen. It has also proved very effective in providing prolonged palliation of patients with advanced irresectable cancer. Completely obstructing tumors, tortuous and long lesions, and tumors near the upper end of the esophagus are particularly suitable for photodynamic therapy. Patients with obstruction to an esophageal prosthesis are also well palliated with PDT. A more interesting and exciting development is its use for the eradication of early asymptomatic mucosal disease. Photodynamic therapy is particularly useful for the eradication of field cancerous change in patients with pre-malignant Barrett's esophagus, or early tumors in patients unfit for radical therapy.

Endoluminal palliation for dysphagia secondary to esophageal carcinoma

There are now a variety of treatment options available to palliate dysphagia in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma. The decision as to which therapy to recommend for a patient should be based on a though understanding of the therapies and must be individualized for each patient and on the experience of the endoscopist or surgeon. In addition, consideration should be given as to resource availability at a particular institution. External beam radiation currently has little role as primary treatment for dysphagia. Brachytherapy is labor intensive; requires 2 to 3 weekly treatments, highly specialized radiation equipment, and an experienced radiation oncologist; and is therefore limited to tertiary care centers. Endoluminal YAG-laser tumor ablation is feasible at many institutions and provides immediate dysphagia relief but has limited durability (weeks) if not followed by adjuvant therapy, and requires an endoscopist with significant laser experience. PDT is relatively easy to perform and has a lower perforation rate and longer durability than YAG laser therapy but it is relatively costly and less patient friendly due to the morbidity of its attendant 6 weeks of photosensitivity. Advances in stent technology have rendered this a safe, readily available treatment for the palliation of dysphagia. Palliation of dysphagia is an important but difficult goal that may require creative use of a variety of endoscopic interventions, either in combination or serially. Ideally, physicians who palliate dysphagia secondary to esophageal cancer should be facile in both endoscopic ablative and stenting techniques and have a close working relationship with both radiation and medical oncologists.

Combined external and intraluminal radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Oesophageal cancer still has a dismal prognosis. Radical surgery is by far the most successful treatment but most patients are not operable at the time of diagnosis and for these patients external beam radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy offers the best choice for cure or palliation. In patients with advanced oesophageal cancer, intraluminal brachytherapy has been proposed as a complementary method to increase local control.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1989 and 1999, 40 patients with inoperable oesophageal cancer were treated with combined external and intraluminal radiation therapy in Turku University Central Hospital. The external radiation was performed with a median total dose of 40 Gy given in 20 fractions. On the average a week after the external radiation a median total dose of 10 Gy intraluminal radiation therapy was given in 4 fractions.

RESULTS

The intraluminal brachytherapy could be performed without technical difficulties and no major complications were seen. In many cases (16 out of 40 patients, 40%), the symptoms could be relieved immediately and in most cases the progression of the disease could be delayed as evidenced by post-treatment serial endoscopy. No major complications were encountered. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 30 and 17.5%, respectively. All patients alive at 2 years can be considered as long-term survivors. Median follow-up was 86 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraluminal brachytherapy is a safe and efficient treatment modality which offers a potential means of cure for selected patients with oesophageal cancer.

Intraoperative magnetic resonance: the future of surgery

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is a new development in medicine that bridges the specialties of surgery and radiology. Deficiencies in the visualization of anatomical architecture and the perception of tumour boundaries in conventional open surgery have led to the integration of imaging within surgery. The superior soft tissue and multiplanar imaging features of magnetic resonance (MR) make this imaging modality superior to that of alternatives. The unique properties of MR to detect heat change and perfusion, and diffusion characteristics of tissue enhance the usefulness of this medium. Concurrent developments in computer aided image guidance and thermoablative technology, herald the era of minimally invasive tumour ablation. Applications have been developed for areas such as neurosurgery, general surgery, gynaecology and urology.

Endoscopic Nd:YAG laser with aggressive multimodality therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Laser therapy of esophageal carcinoma has been limited to management of malignant dysphagia. To investigate its cytoreductive potential, Nd:YAG laser tumor debulking was added to multimodality therapy.

METHODS

From 1994-1998, 29 patients with advanced locoregional esophageal carcinoma were enrolled in a prospective experimental study of high-dose neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy together with endoscopic Nd:YAG laser photoablation. Comparisons were made to a retrospective cohort of 31 patients treated from 1990 to 1994 who underwent similar neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy without laser debulking.

RESULTS

Laser dosage ranged from 3457 to 67,443 J (mean 21,832 [SD 16,999]) delivered in 1 to 6 (mean 2.6 [1.4]) treatment sessions. Actuarial analysis showed improved survival in the laser-treated group versus the reference group (30.1 months vs. 16.5 months; p = 0.047). Multivariable analysis of the impact of age, T-stage, N-stage, completion of neoadjuvant therapy, and laser debulking that included all patients in both treatment groups showed completion of therapy to be the most significant variable associated with survival. There were 3 complications related to laser therapy. Relief of dysphagia was achieved in 19 of 29 patients (66%) in the laser group versus 13 of 31 (42%) in the reference group.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignant dysphagia may be more effectively treated by the addition of Nd:YAG laser therapy to aggressive multimodality therapy. Improved survival with the addition of laser debulking warrants longer follow-up and a prospective comparative trial.

Methods of palliation of esophageal and gastric cancer

Esophageal and gastric malignancies are common worldwide. Less than half are amenable to curative treatment at the time of diagnosis because of advanced or metastatic disease. Palliation is often required for symptoms, such as dysphagia, gastrointestinal bleeding, aspiration caused by tracheoesophageal fistula, nausea and emesis secondary to gastric outlet obstruction, and malnutrition. This article reviews the gastric outlet obstruction, and malnutrition. This article reviews the medical, endoscopic, and surgical options for palliative treatment.

Laser augmented by brachytherapy versus laser alone in the palliation of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus and cardia: a randomised study

BACKGROUND

Many patients with advanced malignant dysphagia are not suitable for definitive treatment. The best option for palliation of dysphagia varies between patients. This paper looks at a simple technique for enhancing laser recanalisation.

AIM

To assess the value of adjunctive brachytherapy in prolonging palliation of malignant dysphagia by endoscopic laser therapy.

PATIENTS

Twenty two patients with advanced malignant dysphagia due to adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastric cardia, unsuitable for surgery or radical chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

Patients able to eat a soft diet after laser recanalisation were randomised to no further therapy or a single treatment with brachytherapy (10 Gy). Results were judged on the quality and duration of dysphagia palliation, need for subsequent intervention, complications, and survival.

RESULTS

The median dysphagia score for all patients two weeks after initial treatment was 1 (some solids). The median dysphagia palliated interval from the end of initial treatment to recurrent dysphagia or death increased from five weeks (control group) to 19 weeks (brachytherapy group). Three patients had some odynophagia for up to six weeks after brachytherapy. There was no other treatment related morbidity or mortality. Further intervention was required in 10 of 11 control patients (median five further procedures) compared with 7/11 brachytherapy patients (median two further procedures). There was no difference in survival (median 20 weeks (control), 26 weeks (brachytherapy)).

CONCLUSIONS

Laser therapy followed by brachytherapy is a safe, straightforward, and effective option for palliating advanced malignant dysphagia, which is complementary to stent insertion.

[Non-surgical treatments of esophageal cancers]

INTRODUCTION

Despite improvements in surgical techniques and perioperative mortality, only slight improvements in the 5-year survival of patients with esophageal cancer have been observed in the last 20 years. Many patients with apparently localized cancer will have recurrences or metastatic disease despite surgery with curative resection. Consequently, multimodal therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, were introduced. This review outlines and critically analyzes current non-surgical treatments, including palliative care.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

Esophageal cancers appear to be chemosensitive but the median duration of response is short and toxicity consistent, especially in metastatic disease. Consequently, palliative chemotherapy should be offered preferably within a clinical trial. Chemotherapy as the only adjuvant treatment cannot be recommended outside clinical trials. Radiotherapy alone as a curative treatment has been proven to be inferior to chemoradiotherapy in inoperable tumors. Some data support the use of preoperative chemoradiotherapy, but randomized trials are conflicting. A pathological complete response has been identified as a favorable prognostic factor for survival. Self-expanding esophageal metal stents are a simple and effective palliative treatment of malignant dysphagia and can be considered as the reference treatment in patients with obstruction of the lower esophagus or with fistula.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

Taxanes should be evaluated in randomized studies using chemotherapy or chemo-radiotherapy. Progress in radiotherapy, such as accelerated fractionation, greater radiation dose, and the addition of brachytherapy, will increase locoregional control and probably survival. The role of secondary surgery in patients responding to chemoradiotherapy still needs to be answered.

Palliation of malignant dysphagia from oesophageal cancer. Rotterdam Oesophageal Tumor Study Group

Palliative therapies for advanced oesophageal cancer include surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, endoscopic procedures and combinations of these. Of the non-endoscopic modalities is external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) effective and non-invasive. A disadvantage is that relief of dysphagia only occurs over a period of 4-6 weeks. Brachytherapy is more rapid in locally controlling tumour growth and in relieving dysphagia. One of the more commonly used endoscopic procedures is laser therapy, which provides symptomatic relief with low complication rates. Recurrent dysphagia is a problem necessitating repeated treatment sessions. Self-expanding metal stents offer a high degree of palliation and are associated with fewer complications compared with prosthetic tubes. Longer palliation and perhaps even longer survival might be achieved by the combination of different therapies. Most promising are the combination of EBRT plus brachytherapy or chemoradiation. Now is the time to determine which treatment (combination) is best for individual patients.