Achalasia: outcome of patients treated with intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin

Knowledge and Attitude Towards Botulinum Toxin Use in Cosmetic Injections Among the Arar Population in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background The use of botulinum toxin (BT), commonly known as Botox, has become increasingly popular for cosmetic purposes, particularly in treating wrinkles and facial rejuvenation. While the efficacy of botulinum toxin in achieving desired aesthetic outcomes is well-established, it is also important to consider the level of public knowledge and awareness regarding this potent neurotoxin. This study investigates the knowledge and attitude towards botulinum toxin use in cosmetic injections in the Arar population. Methods This cross-sectional study utilized a self-report questionnaire distributed via social media platforms, employing randomized sampling from May to July 2024. The target population included adults aged 18 and older, regardless of gender, living in the city of Arar, Saudi Arabia. The data were collected through an online self-administered survey using a Google Forms questionnaire template, which was translated into the appropriate language. The collected data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results A total of four hundred and ten (410) participants responded to this study. The maximum number of participants, 149 (36.3%), were in the age group of 20-25 years, while the minimum number of participants, 6 (1.5%), was in the age group of 50-55 years. The results also showed that 341 (83.2%) of participants were females and 69 (16.8%) were males; 262 (63.9%) participants were aware of Botox treatment used in cosmetic clinics. Concerning the most prevalent non-surgical cosmetic treatments, 29 (7%) answered dental procedures, and 19 (4.6%) mentioned its use in pain. Conclusion This study found that 262 (63.9%) of the study population showed knowledge about botulinum toxins used in cosmetic injections. The majority of them were young individuals, females, or unmarried people. Only 83 (20%) were aware of the adverse effects of botulinum toxin. This low level of awareness about the potential risks associated with the use of botulinum toxins for cosmetic purposes is concerning and suggests the need for improved education and information dissemination.

An overview of the efficacy, safety, and predictors of achalasia treatments

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by abnormal esophageal peristalsis and the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax, resulting in poor esophageal emptying. This can be relieved by endoscopic and surgical treatments; each comes with certain advantages and disadvantages.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to guide the clinician in clinical decision making on the different treatment options for achalasia regarding the efficacy, safety, and important predictors.

EXPERT OPINION

Botulinum toxin injection is only recommended for a selective group of achalasia patients because of the short term effect. Pneumatic dilation improves achalasia symptoms, but this effect diminishes over time and requiring repeated dilations to maintain clinical effect. Heller myotomy combined with fundoplication and peroral endoscopic myotomy are highly effective on the long term but are more invasive than dilations. Gastro-esophageal reflux complaints are more often encountered after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Patient factors such as age, comorbidities, and type of achalasia must be taken into account when choosing a treatment. The preference of the patient is also of great importance and therefore shared decision making has to play a fundamental role in deciding about treatment.

Role of endoscopy in patients with achalasia

Achalasia is an esophageal motility disorder characterized by impaired lower esophageal sphincter relaxation and peristalsis of the esophageal body. With the increasing prevalence of achalasia, interest in the role of endoscopy in its diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring is also growing. The major diagnostic modalities for achalasia include high-resolution manometry, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and barium esophagography. Endoscopic assessment is important for early diagnosis to rule out diseases that mimic achalasia symptoms, such as pseudo-achalasia, esophageal cancer, esophageal webs, and eosinophilic esophagitis. The major endoscopic characteristics suggestive of achalasia include a widened esophageal lumen and food residue in the esophagus. Once diagnosed, achalasia can be treated either endoscopically or surgically. The preference for endoscopic treatment is increasing owing to its minimal invasiveness. Botulinum toxins, pneumatic balloon dilation, and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) are important endoscopic treatments. Previous studies have demonstrated excellent treatment outcomes for POEM, with >95% improvement in dysphagia, making POEM the mainstay treatment option for achalasia. Several studies have reported an increased risk of esophageal cancer in patients with achalasia. However, routine endoscopic surveillance remains controversial owing to the lack of sufficient data. Further studies on surveillance methods and duration are warranted to establish concordant guidelines for the endoscopic surveillance of achalasia.

Correlation of timed barium esophagography with Eckardt score in primary achalasia patients treated with peroral endoscopic myotomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the role of timed barium esophagogram (TBE) in quantitative measurement of improved esophageal emptying in primary achalasia patients treated with POEM. Also, we investigated the correlation of TBE with improvement of clinical symptoms as measured by Eckardt score.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent POEM due to primary achalasia. As a baseline study, all patients underwent TBE and were evaluated for clinical status by Eckardt score based on presence and frequency of dysphagia, regurgitation, substernal pain, and weight loss. Follow-up evaluation was performed within 3 months after POEM. Pre- and post-POEM TBE results were compared using a calculated value based on summation of height of the barium columns on 1-, 2- and 5-min delayed images. Also, the correlation of TBE with improvement of Eckardt score was evaluated using Pearson's correlation test.

RESULTS

There was a significant decrease in the calculated value of height between pre- and post-POEM TBE studies (40.5 ± 15.8-17.0 ± 11.6, p < 0.01). Also, the Eckardt score decreased significantly after POEM (6.7 ± 2.0-0.8 ± 1.0, p < 0.01). Pearson's correlation test revealed a positive correlation between improvement of TBE results and Eckardt score (correlation coefficient = 0.56, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

TBE is an objective method for quantitative measurement of improved esophageal emptying in primary achalasia patients treated with POEM and shows positive correlation with clinical symptoms evaluated by Eckardt score.

Beyond the Eckardt Score: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures in Esophageal Disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To provide an overview of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and summarize their role in assessing undifferentiated dysphagia and common esophageal disorders, including achalasia, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

RECENT FINDINGS

Given the subjective nature of swallowing disorders, accurate diagnoses often rely on capturing the patient experience. As a result, the number of PROMs used to characterize esophageal symptoms is increasing with a recent particular emphasis on EoE. Overall, esophageal-focused PROMs are used to interpret patient symptoms and quality of life, diagnosis, and symptom changes over time. There are limitations with each instrument, including factors affecting validity, reliability, accessibility, patient participation, and logistical implementation. PROM instruments can be helpful tools in the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal disorders. Instruments should be chosen based on factors such as target population and setting, including research, clinical, and quality improvement efforts. Future research should address how best to implement PROMs and integrate the obtained data with patient care.

Gastrointestinal Uses of Botulinum Toxin

Botulinum toxin (BT), one of the most powerful inhibitors that prevents the release of acetylcholine from nerve endings, represents an alternative therapeutic approach for "spastic" disorders of the gastrointestinal tract such as achalasia, gastroparesis, sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, chronic anal fissures, and pelvic floor dyssynergia.BT has proven to be safe and this allows it to be a valid alternative in patients at high risk of invasive procedures but long-term efficacy in many disorders has not been observed, primarily due to its relatively short duration of action. Administration of BT has a low rate of adverse reactions and complications. However, not all patients respond to BT therapy, and large randomized controlled trials are lacking for many conditions commonly treated with BT.The local injection of BT in some conditions becomes a useful tool to decide to switch to more invasive therapies. Since 1980, the toxin has rapidly transformed from lethal poison to a safe therapeutic agent, with a significant impact on the quality of life.

ASGE guideline on the management of achalasia

Achalasia is a primary esophageal motor disorder of unknown etiology characterized by degeneration of the myenteric plexus, which results in impaired relaxation of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ), along with the loss of organized peristalsis in the esophageal body. The criterion standard for diagnosing achalasia is high-resolution esophageal manometry showing incomplete relaxation of the EGJ coupled with the absence of organized peristalsis. Three achalasia subtypes have been defined based on high-resolution manometry findings in the esophageal body. Treatment of patients with achalasia has evolved in recent years with the introduction of peroral endoscopic myotomy. Other treatment options include botulinum toxin injection, pneumatic dilation, and Heller myotomy. This American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Standards of Practice Guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of achalasia, based on an updated assessment of the individual and comparative effectiveness, adverse effects, and cost of the 4 aforementioned achalasia therapies.

Management of Functional Esophagogastric Junction Outflow Obstruction: A Systematic Review

GOALS

Awareness of functional esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (fEGJOO) has increased, but because there is no consensus on its management, we performed a systematic review of the literature to explore treatment strategies and outcomes.

BACKGROUND

EGJOO is a heterogenous disorder defined by high-resolution manometry parameters of elevated integrated relaxation pressure with preserved esophageal peristalsis. The etiology may be mechanical obstruction or idiopathic, the latter being fEGJOO.

STUDY

The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane library electronic databases were searched through June 2018 for all studies of adult patients describing a treatment strategy for fEGJOO or incomplete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. The search strategy yielded 1792 studies and 8 (0.4%) met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

All but one included studies were retrospective (n=184 patients). There were 5 interventions described, with botulinum toxin (Botox) injection (n=69) and expectant management (n=82) the most frequently reported, with success rates of 58% and 54%, respectively. There was substantial heterogeneity among patients and treatments were not directly compared, though reported symptom resolution was similar among all strategies with a mean follow-up time of 15 months.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a variety of management strategies available for fEGJOO and some patients may not require any intervention. However, among 4 potential approaches aimed at disrupting lower esophageal sphincter hypertonicity, the largest existing evidence base supports either a therapeutic challenge of Botox injection or watchful waiting. Ultimately, these data indicate the need for further study with controlled trials to identify a definitive approach.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia

Achalasia is an uncommon disorder that results from the degeneration of ganglion cells of the myenteric plexus in the lower esophageal wall. It is manifested by a loss of peristalsis in the lower part of the esophagus and failure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to relax. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive intervention that aims to treat achalasia. It is regarded as the endoscopic equivalent of Heller myotomy. POEM is a form of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery that is completed by creating a submucosal tunnel in the lower part of esophagus to reach the inner circular muscle bundles of the LES to perform myotomy, while preserving the outer longitudinal muscle bundles. The result is decreased resting pressure of the LES, facilitating the passage of ingested material. POEM was initially introduced to treat achalasia by targeting the LES. POEM has expanded to include gastric POEM (G-POEM), myotomy of the pyloric sphincter to treat gastroparesis, and per rectal endoscopic myotomy to treat adult Hirschsprung's disease.

Management of achalasia cardia: Expert consensus statements

Achalasia cardia (AC) is a frequently encountered motility disorder of the esophagus resulting from an irreversible degeneration of neurons. Treatment modalities are palliative in nature, and there is no curative treatment available for AC as of now. Significant advancements have been made in the management of AC over last decade. The introduction of high resolution manometry and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has strengthened the diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium of AC. High resolution manometry allows for the characterization of the type of achalasia, which in turn has important therapeutic implications. The endoscopic management of AC has been reinforced with the introduction of POEM that has been found to be highly effective and safe in palliating the symptoms in short-term to mid-term follow-up studies. POEM is less invasive than Heller's myotomy and provides the endoscopist with the opportunity of adjusting the length and orientation of esophageal myotomy according to the type of AC. The management of achalasia needs to be tailored for each patient, and the role of pneumatic balloon dilatation, POEM, or Heller's myotomy needs to be revisited. In this review, we discuss the important aspects of diagnosis as well as management of AC. The statements presented in the manuscript reflect the cumulative efforts of an expert consensus group.

Complications of botulinum toxin injections for treatment of esophageal motility disorders†

In achalasia and spastic esophageal motility disorders, botulinum toxin (botox) injection is considered an effective and low-risk procedure for short-term symptom relief. It is mainly offered to medically high-risk patients. However, no analysis of risks of botox injections has been performed. To determine the incidence and risk factors of procedure-related complications after esophageal botox injections, we analyzed the records of all patients undergoing botox injection therapy for esophageal motility disorders at four university hospitals in Europe and North America between 2008 and 2014. Complications were assigned grades according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. In 386 patients, 661 botox treatments were performed. Main indications were achalasia (51%) and distal esophageal spasm (DES) (30%). In total, 52 (7.9%) mild complications (Clavien-Dindo grade I) were reported by 48 patients, the majority consisting of chest pain or heartburn (29 procedures) or epigastric pain (5 procedures). No ulceration, perforation, pneumothorax, or abscess were reported. One patient died after developing acute mediastinitis (Clavien-Dindo grade V) following injections in the body of the esophagus. In univariate logistic regression, younger age was associated with an increased risk of complications (OR 1.43, 95%CI 1.03-1.96). Treatment for DES, injections into the esophageal body, more injections per procedure, more previous treatments and larger amount of injected botulinum toxin were no risk factors for complications. Esophageal botox injection seems particularly appropriate for high-risk patients due to low complication rate. However, it should not be considered completely safe, as it is associated with rare side effects that cannot be predicted.

Botulinum Toxin Injection for Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Is There Any Dose-Dependent Efficiency? A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic anal fissure (CAF) is a linear split of the anoderm. The minimally invasive management of CAF such as botulinum toxin (BT) injection is recommended. However, the exact efficient dose of BT, number of injections per session and the injection sites are still debatable. The aim of this analysis was to assess the dose-dependent efficiency of botulinum toxin injection for CAF.

METHODS

PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for terms: "anal fissure" AND "botulinum toxin." Studies published between October 1993 and May 2015 were included and had to meet the following criteria: (1) chronic anal fissure, (2) prospective character of the study, (3) used simple BT injection without any other interventions and (4) no previous treatment with BT.

RESULTS

A total of 1577 patients from 34 prospective studies used either Botox or Dysport formulations were qualified for this meta-analysis. A total number of BT units per session ranged from 5 to 150 IU, whereas the efficiency across analyzed studies ranged from 33 to 96 %. Surprisingly, we did not observe a dose-dependent efficiency (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.060; p = 0.0708). Moreover, there were no BT dose-dependent postoperative complications or fecal incontinence and significant difference in healing rates compared BT injection into the anal sphincter muscles.

CONCLUSIONS

BT injection has been an accepted method for the management of CAF. Surprisingly, there is no dose-dependent efficiency, and the postoperative incontinence rate is not related to the BT dosage regardless the type of formulation of botulinum neurotoxin used. Moreover, no difference in healing rate has been observed in regard to the site and number of injections per session.

Toward a Tailored Treatment of Achalasia: An Evidence-Based Approach

BACKGROUND

The treatment options in achalasia patients aim to improve symptoms by reducing the functional obstruction at the level of the gastroesophageal junction. Available treatment modalities are endoscopic botulinum toxin injection (EBTI), pneumatic dilatation (PD), laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), and peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). We provide an evidence-based review of current indications, limitations, and future perspectives of these options for the treatment of achalasia.

METHODS

The PubMed/Medline electronic databases and the Cochrane Library were searched. Quality of evidence was assessed according to the GRADE system.

RESULTS

Functional outcomes after EBTI are significantly worse than those after PD or LHM. LHM with partial fundoplication is associated with low complication rates and provides excellent long-term results with lower need for additional treatment of recurrent dysphagia than PD. POEM is a new promising treatment option with good short-term outcomes and low morbidity in experienced hands.

CONCLUSIONS

LHM should be considered the procedure of choice for the treatment of achalasia in patients who are fit for surgery. Large randomized controlled trials with long follow-up are needed to validate the role of POEM.

Treatment of gastrointestinal sphincters spasms with botulinum toxin A

Botulinum toxin A inhibits neuromuscular transmission. It has become a drug with many indications. The range of clinical applications has grown to encompass several neurological and non-neurological conditions. One of the most recent achievements in the field is the observation that botulinum toxin A provides benefit in diseases of the gastrointestinal tract. Although toxin blocks cholinergic nerve endings in the autonomic nervous system, it has also been shown that it does not block non-adrenergic non-cholinergic responses mediated by nitric oxide. This has promoted further interest in using botulinum toxin A as a treatment for overactive smooth muscles and sphincters. The introduction of this therapy has made the treatment of several clinical conditions easier, in the outpatient setting, at a lower cost and without permanent complications. This review presents current data on the use of botulinum toxin A in the treatment of pathological conditions of the gastrointestinal tract.

Endoscopic pneumatic dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in the management of primary achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an oesophageal motility disorder, of unknown cause, which results in increased lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) tone and symptoms of difficulty swallowing. Treatments are aimed at reducing the LOS tone. Current endoscopic therapeutic options include pneumatic dilation (PD) or botulinum toxin (BTX) injection.

OBJECTIVES

To undertake a systematic review comparing the efficacy and safety of two endoscopic treatments, PD and intrasphincteric BTX injection, in the treatment of oesophageal achalasia.

SEARCH METHODS

Trials were initially identified by searching MEDLINE (1966 to August 2008), EMBASE (1980 to September 2008), ISI Web of Science (1955 to September 2008), The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2008.  Searches in all databases were conducted in October 2005 and updated in September 2008 and April 2014. The Cochrane highly sensitive search strategy for identifying randomised trials in MEDLINE, sensitivity maximising version in the Ovid format, was combined with specific search terms to identify randomised controlled trials in MEDLINE. The MEDLINE search strategy was adapted for use in the other databases that were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing PD to BTX injection in individuals with primary achalasia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study quality assessment and data extraction.

MAIN RESULTS

Seven studies involving 178 participants were included. Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis of remission rates on the basis of clinical heterogeneity of the initial endoscopic protocols. There was no significant difference between PD or BTX treatment in remission within four weeks of the initial intervention; with a risk ratio of remission of 1.11 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.27). There was also no significant difference in the mean oesophageal pressures between the treatment groups; with a weighted mean difference for PD of -0.77 (95% CI -2.44 to 0.91, P = 0.37). Data on remission rates following the initial endoscopic treatment were available for three studies at six months and four studies at 12 months. At six months 46 of 57 PD participants were in remission compared to 29 of 56 in the BTX group, giving a risk ratio of 1.57 (95% CI 1.19 to 2.08, P = 0.0015); whilst at 12 months 55 of 75 PD participants were in remission compared to 27 of 72 BTX participants, with a risk ratio of 1.88 (95% CI 1.35 to 2.61, P = 0.0002). No serious adverse outcomes occurred in participants receiving BTX, whilst PD was complicated by perforation in three cases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that PD is the more effective endoscopic treatment in the long term (greater than six months) for patients with achalasia.

Botulinum toxin injection for hypercontractile or spastic esophageal motility disorders: may high-resolution manometry help to select cases?

Endoscopic injections of botulinum toxin in the cardia or distal esophagus have been advocated to treat achalasia and spastic esophageal motility disorders. We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate whether manometric diagnosis using the Chicago classification in high-resolution manometry (HRM) would be predictive of the clinical response. Charts of patients with spastic and hypertensive motility disorders diagnosed with HRM and treated with botulinum toxin were retrospectively reviewed at two centers. HRM recordings were systematically reanalyzed, and a patient's phone survey was conducted. Forty-five patients treated between 2008 and 2013 were included. Most patients had achalasia type 3 (22 cases). Other diagnoses were jackhammer esophagus (8 cases), distal esophageal spasm (7 cases), esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (5 cases), nutcracker esophagus (1 case), and 2 unclassified cases. Botulinum toxin injections were performed into the cardia only in 9 cases, into the wall of the distal esophagus in 19 cases, and in both locations (cardia and distal esophagus) in 17 cases. No complication occurred in 31 cases. Chest pain was noticed for less than 7 days in 13 cases. One death related to mediastinitis occurred 3 weeks after botulinum toxin injection. Efficacy was assessed in 42 patients: 71% were significantly improved 2 months after botulinum toxin, and 57% remained satisfied for more than 6 months. No clear difference was observed in terms of response according to manometric diagnosis; however, type 3 achalasia previously dilated and with normal integrated relaxation pressure (4s-integrated relaxation pressure < 15 mmHg) had the worst outcome: none of these patients responded to the endoscopic injection of botulinum toxin. Endoscopic injections of botulinum toxin may be effective in some patients with spastic or hypercontractile esophageal motility disorders. The manometric Chicago classification diagnosis does not seem to predict the results. Prospective randomized trials are required to identify patients most likely to benefit from esophageal botulinum toxin treatment.

Botulinum toxin treatment for oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with stroke

BACKGROUND

In a previous pilot study, we demonstrated that a single injection of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) in the cricopharyngeus muscle is effective in patients with neurologic dysphagia with upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening dysfunction and presence of some pharyngeal contraction (>25 mmHg). The aim of this study was to confirm the long-lasting efficacy of this procedure after stroke.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 23 patients with stroke for at least 6 months before administration of a BTX-A injection. Baseline diagnosis of UES opening dysfunction and presence of some pharyngeal contraction were assessed by videofluoroscopy (VFS) and esophageal manometry (EM). Clinical and VFS follow-up was made at 3 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postinjection.

KEY RESULTS

Eighteen patients (78%) were fed by gastrostomy tube prior to treatment. Videofluoroscopy showed UES relaxation impairment, residue in pyriform sinuses, and aspiration in all cases. After BTX-A, the number of patients with aspiration and pharyngeal residue decreased to 52% and 70%, respectively (p < 0.05 for both); residue was severe in only 4%. Esophageal manometry showed a mean pharyngeal amplitude 66.8 mmHg (range: 25-120 mmHg). We observed a significant improvement in feeding mode during follow-up: after 3 months, 70% of patients were eating exclusively by mouth. Lower residual pressure and minor pharyngeal delay time at baseline were all predictive factors for treatment effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

A single injection of BTX-A is efficacious for a period of at least 12 months in improving oropharyngeal dysphagia in stroke patients with UES opening dysfunction and some pharyngeal contraction (>25 mmHg).

Comparison between botulinum injection and removable covered self-expanding metal stents for the treatment of achalasia

BACKGROUND

Intrasphincteric injection of botulinum toxin (BTX) and removable self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have both been used for the treatment of achalasia.

AIM

To compare the effectiveness and long-term outcome of SEMS placement and BTX injection in patients with achalasia.

METHODS

A total of 110 patients with newly diagnosed achalasia were enrolled in the study between July 2003 and December 2009. The patients received either BTX injection (n = 51) or SEMS placement (n = 59). Clinical symptoms, objective parameters, and long-term clinical outcomes were evaluated after 7 and 30 days and then every 6 months until withdrawal from the study. The mean duration of follow-up was 28 months (range 10-36 months).

RESULTS

Improvements in global symptom and dysphagia scores and in basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure were significantly more marked in the SEMS group than in the BTX group (all P < 0.05). After 12 months, the remission rate in the SEMS group (81.28 %) was statistically significantly higher than that in the BTX group (64.58; P < 0.05). At 36 months, the remission rates in the two groups were 49.1 and. 4.2 %, respectively (P < 0.01). The symptom-free interval was 831 ± 46 days in the SEMS group and 522 ± 42 days in the BTX group (P < 0.01). No side effects were reported with BTX treatment. In the SEMS group there were 13 episodes of chest pain, nine cases of regurgitation, and four stent migrations. No serious complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

Removable SEMS was associated with better long-term outcomes than BTX injection in patients with achalasia.

Achalasia

This article reviews the diagnosis and treatment of achalasia, a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by absent peristalsis and failure of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to relax. Various treatment options including management with sublingual nitrates or calcium channel blockers, injection of the LES with botulism toxin, pneumatic dilation of the LES, and pneumatic dilation are discussed. Laparoscopic Heller myotomy is minimally invasive with incumbent low morbidity and mortality rates, and combined with a partial fundoplication is a durable, safe, and effective treatment option for patients with achalasia.

Botulinum toxin

Botulinum toxin, one of the most poisonous biological substances known, is a neurotoxin produced by the bacterium Clostridium botulinum. C. botulinum elaborates eight antigenically distinguishable exotoxins (A, B, C₁, C₂, D, E, F and G). All serotypes interfere with neural transmission by blocking the release of acetylcholine, the principal neurotransmitter at the neuromuscular junction, causing muscle paralysis. The weakness induced by injection with botulinum toxin A usually lasts about three months. Botulinum toxins now play a very significant role in the management of a wide variety of medical conditions, especially strabismus and focal dystonias, hemifacial spasm, and various spastic movement disorders, headaches, hypersalivation, hyperhidrosis, and some chronic conditions that respond only partially to medical treatment. The list of possible new indications is rapidly expanding. The cosmetological applications include correction of lines, creases and wrinkling all over the face, chin, neck, and chest to dermatological applications such as hyperhidrosis. Injections with botulinum toxin are generally well tolerated and side effects are few. A precise knowledge and understanding of the functional anatomy of the mimetic muscles is absolutely necessary to correctly use botulinum toxins in clinical practice.

Achalasia: A review of Western and Iranian experiences

Achalasia is a primary motor disorder of the esophagus, in which esophageal emptying is impaired. Diagnosis of achalasia is based on clinical findings. The diagnosis is confirmed by radiographic, endoscopic, and manometric evaluations. Several treatments for achalasia have been introduced. We searched the PubMed Database for original articles and meta-analyses about achalasia to summarize the current knowledge regarding this disease, with particular focus on different procedures that are used for treatment of achalasia. We also report the Iranian experience of treatment of this disease, since it could be considered as a model for medium-resource countries. Myotomy, particularly laparoscopic myotomy with fundoplication, is the most effective treatment for achalasia. Compared to other treatments, however, the initial cost of myotomy is usually higher and the recovery period is longer. When performing myotomy is not indicated or not possible, graded pneumatic dilation with slow rate of balloon inflation seems to be an effective and safe initial alternative. Injection of botulinum toxin into the lower esophageal sphincter before pneumatic dilation may increase remission rates. However, this needs to be confirmed in further studies. Due to lack of adequate information regarding the role of expandable stents in the treatment of achalasia, insertion of stents does not currently seem to be a recommended treatment. In summary, laparoscopic myotomy can be considered as the procedure of choice for treatment of achalasia. Graded pneumatic dilation is an effective alternative when the performance of myotomy is not possible for any reason.

Achalasia--which method of treatment to choose for senior patients?

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an uncommon illness affecting 1 per 100,000 patients a year. It encompasses a rare, primary motor disorder of the distal esophagus.

METHODS

Over the period 1998-2006, 115 patients underwent various treatments for achalasia; the subgroup of seniors consisted of 26 patients. Six patients of these (age 69.7 y) underwent a modified Heller cardiomyotomy due to failure of previous endoscopic interventions. Standard esophageal manometry and 24 hour pH metry were performed pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Six senior patients with achalasia underwent a laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Average preoperative tonus of the LES was 55 mmHg, postoperative tonus of the LES decreased to 11 mmHg. We performed Toupet partial fundoplication in all patients; no microperforation of the esophagus was found in the preoperative esophagoscopy. We recorded minimal pathological gastroesophageal reflux in pH metry - the average preoperative DeMeester score was 8, postoperatively 10.5. Prolonged dysphagia was not present in any patient--preoperative GIQLI score was 94, postoperative score was 106. There was no mortality or morbidity in the group of the operated patients.

CONCLUSION

Our operational results and postoperative follow-up show that laparoscopic Heller myotomy with Toupet partial fundoplication is a safe and effective treatment and can be recommended as the method of first choice for senior patients with no contraindication for laparoscopic operation.

Oesophageal achalasia: an argument for primary surgical management

INTRODUCTION

Achalasia is a primary oesophageal motility disorder resulting from damage to the ganglion cells of the myenteric plexus. Impaired relaxation of the lower oesophageal sphincter and aperistalsis causes its cardinal symptoms of dysphagia, chest pain and reflux-type symptoms. Management is somewhat controversial, with options including systemic and local pharmacotherapy, dilatation and oesophagomyotomy. We review the presentation, investigation and management of oesophageal achalasia and make an argument for primary surgical management.

METHODS

We performed a Medline search of the term 'achalasia', limiting the search to clinical trials and meta-analyses. We then selected articles based on their abstracts using four main criteria: previously unreported findings, previously unreported techniques, size of patient cohort and journal impact factor. References in selected articles were manually searched for other relevant articles.

FINDINGS

Achalasia has been managed using a variety of techniques including systemic and local pharmacotherapy, forced dilatation and oesophagomyotomy. Success rates vary widely between techniques. Mechanical disruption ofthe lower oesophageal sphincter is most successful.

DISCUSSION

In achalasia, mechanical disruption of the lower oesophageal sphincter using forced dilatation or surgical myotomy offers the only realistic prospect of long-term symptom relief. Recent evidence suggests that previous medical treatment or dilatation makes oesophagomyotomy more difficult and increases the risk of complications. As the morbidity associated with surgery continues to decrease with improvements in minimal access techniques, the argument for primary management of achalasia with oesophagomyotomy becomes more compelling.

Outcome of a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial of botulinum A toxin for refractory overactive bladder

PURPOSE

We determined the effectiveness of cystoscopic administration of botulinum-A toxin compared to placebo for the treatment of urinary incontinence in subjects with idiopathic overactive bladder.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects were recruited from the Division of Urogynecology at the University of Rochester. Inclusion criteria were overactive bladder refractory to anticholinergic medications, multiple daily incontinence episodes and a 24-hour pad weight of 100 gm or greater. Subjects with low leak point pressures, increased post-void residual volume or neurological etiologies were excluded from study. Subjects were randomized to placebo or to 1 of 2 doses of botulinum-A toxin. The detrusor was injected at 8 to 10 sites above the trigone. Evaluations were performed at baseline, and at 3 and 6 weeks after injection, and included bladder diaries, pad weights, quality of life questionnaires and urodynamic studies.

RESULTS

A total of 22 subjects participated in stage 1 of this 2-stage study. We report on the outcomes of stage 1 of this study. Because stage 2 is still ongoing and investigators remain blind to the doses of botulinum-A toxin, the 2 botulinum-A toxin groups were combined for this report. There were no differences in mean baseline measurements between the 2 groups. Statistically significant improvements in daily incontinence episodes, pads changed per day and quality of life questionnaires were seen in the botulinum-A toxin group with no changes in the placebo group. No change in nocturia, daily voiding frequency, peak flow or detrusor pressure was seen in either group. Of 15 subjects 4 (26%) receiving botulinum-A toxin had a post-void residual volume of 200 cc or greater and 1 subject required intermittent catheterization. Four subjects experienced a urinary tract infection, 2 (13%) in the botulinum-A toxin group and 2 (28%) in the placebo group (not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum-A toxin can significantly reduce urge urinary incontinence due to overactive bladder at 6 weeks. However, there is a risk of urinary retention requiring self-catheterization.

Long-lasting effect of a single botulinum toxin injection in the treatment of oropharyngeal dysphagia secondary to upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of botulinum toxin (BTX-A) injection in the cricopharyngeus muscle in patients with neurological dysphagia caused by alteration in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) opening and with preserved pharyngeal contraction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A prospective pilot study was undertaken in 10 patients (7 brain lesions and 3 cervical spinal cord injuries), with a minimum time-lapse of 6 months from neurological lesion to BTX-A injection. Dysfunction of the UES opening and the presence of pharyngeal contraction were diagnosed by videofluoroscopy (VDF) and esophageal manometry (EM). The BTX-A (100 U) injection was guided by endoscopy. Clinical, VDF, and EM follow-ups were carried out at 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and at 1 year post-injection.

RESULTS

Prior to treatment, 6 patients were fed by nasogastric tube. VDF showed impairment of the UES opening, residue in pyriform sinuses, and aspiration in all cases. During follow-up, there was a decrease in the number of patients that had aspiration: 3 patients at one year. During swallowing, EM showed a mean UES relaxation of 90% (range: 74.5-100%), residual pressure 3.2 mmHg (range: 0-13 mmHg) and pharyngeal amplitude 52 mmHg (range: 25-80 mmHg). At follow-up, a significant improvement in UES relaxation (98% (89-100%)) and pharyngeal contraction (97 mmHg (35-165 mmHg)) was observed. At 3 months, 6 patients were eating exclusively by mouth.

CONCLUSIONS

One single injection of BTX-A in the UES has long-lasting effectiveness in patients with neurological dysphagia caused by alteration in the UES opening and with pharyngeal contraction. Nevertheless, a randomized control trial should be done to confirm these results and rule out the effect of potential spontaneous improvement of neurological injury.

Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although rare, esophageal achalasia is the best described primary esophageal motility disorder. Commonly used treatments are endoscopic botulin toxin injection (EBTI), endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD), and surgical myotomy with or without a fundoplication; however, reported outcomes mostly come from cohort studies.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize and compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic and surgical treatments for esophageal achalasia.

METHODS

A systematic electronic Medline literature search of articles on esophageal achalasia. Treatment options reviewed included EBTI, EBD, and surgical myotomy using open and minimally invasive techniques. Main outcome measures were frequency of symptom relief, prevalence of post-treatment gastroesophageal reflux (GER), and complications. Outcome probability was estimated using weighted averages of the sample prevalence in each study, with weights equal to the number of patients. Outcomes, within or across studies, were compared using meta-analysis and meta-regression, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 105 articles reporting on 7855 patients were selected, tabulated and reviewed. Symptom relief after EBD was better than after EBTI (68.2% vs. 40.6%; OR 3.4; 95% CI, 1.2-9.8; P = 0.02), and the need for additional therapy was greater for patients receiving EBTI (46.6% vs. 25%; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.05-6.5; P = 0.04). Laparoscopic myotomy, when combined with an antireflux procedure, provided better symptom relief (90%) than all endoscopic and other surgical approaches and a low complication rate (6.3%). The incidence of postoperative GER was lower when a fundoplication was added to a laparoscopic myotomy (31.5% without a fundoplication vs. 8.8% with; OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 2.0-19.4; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

EBD is superior to EBTI. Laparoscopic myotomy with fundoplication was the most effective surgical technique and can be considered the operative procedure of choice.

[Surgical management of primary esophageal motility disorders]

Primary esophageal motility disorders are rare, the most common diagnoses being achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm. Treatment aims to alleviate symptoms and may be medical, endoscopic, or surgical. Achalasia is most commonly treated by pneumatic dilatation or by laparoscopic Heller cardiomyotomy. Pneumatic dilatation is effective in 60-80% of cases, but functional results deteriorate over time. Surgical treatment is indicated when endoscopic dilatation is contraindicated or has failed. Functional results after cardiomyotomy are satisfactory in 90% of cases and results appear to be stable over time. The need for an associated antireflux procedure and the type of fundoplication remain controversial. For diffuse esophageal spasm, extended esophageal myotomy has yielded satisfactory functional results, but surgical treatment should be reserved for selected patients with severe symptoms.

Review article: molecular, pathological and therapeutic features of human enteric neuropathies

BACKGROUND

Considerable information has been gathered on the functional organization of enteric neuronal circuitries regulating gastrointestinal motility. However, little is known about the neuropathophysiological mechanisms underlying gastrointestinal motor disorders.

AIM

To analyse the most important pathological findings, clinical implications and therapeutic management of idiopathic enteric neuropathies.

METHODS

PubMed searches were used to retrieve the literature inherent to molecular determinants, pathophysiological bases and therapeutics of gastrointestinal dysmotility, such as achalasia, gastroparesis, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, Hirschsprung's disease and slow transit constipation, to unravel advances on digestive disorders resulting from enteric neuropathies.

RESULTS

Current data on molecular and pathological features of enteric neuropathies indicate that degenerative and inflammatory abnormalities can compromise the morpho-functional integrity of the enteric nervous system. These alterations lead to a massive impairment in gut transit and result in severe abdominal symptoms with associated high morbidity, poor quality of life for patients and established mortality. Many pathophysiological aspects of these severe conditions remain obscure, and therefore treatment options are quite limited and often unsatisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

This review of enteric nervous system abnormalities provides a framework to better understand the pathological processes underlying gut dysmotility, to translate this knowledge into clinical management and to foster the development of targeted therapeutic strategies.

Esophageal motility disorders: medical therapy

Symptoms of chest pain and dysphagia are common in the adult population. Most patients initially undergo an evaluation to exclude anatomic causes (ie, esophagitis, stricture) and cardiovascular disease as the etiology of these symptoms. Patients with persistent symptoms may then be referred for specialized testing of the esophagus, including esophageal manometry. Disorders of esophageal motility, which include achalasia, diffuse esophageal spasm, nutcracker esophagus, hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, and ineffective motility are often identified in these patients. Unfortunately, the etiology of these disorders has not been well characterized and the treatment has not been standardized. This review will briefly discuss the impact, etiology, and diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders, and then focus on the medical management of these disorders using evidence from well-designed, prospective studies, where available.

Postmyotomy recollection of premyotomy symptoms of achalasia is very accurate, supporting longitudinal studies of symptom improvement

BACKGROUND

Recollection of preoperative symptom frequency and severity may change postoperatively, thus invalidating longitudinal studies. This study was undertaken to compare symptoms of achalasia before myotomy to patients' postoperative recollection of premyotomy symptoms.

METHODS

A total of 173 patients, 54% male, of median age 48 years, have undergone laparoscopic Heller myotomy and have been followed through a prospectively maintained registry. Preoperatively, patients scored the frequency and severity of their symptoms on a Likert scale: 0 (never/very bothersome) to 10 (always/very bothersome). Similarly, after laparoscopic Heller myotomy, patients scored the frequency and severity of their symptoms, and re-scored their preoperative symptoms. Data are presented as median, mean +/- SD.

RESULTS

Before myotomy, dysphagia, regurgitation, choking, chest pain, vomiting, and heartburn were particularly notable; symptom scores nearly globally improved after myotomy (p < 0.05 for all, Wilcoxon matched pairs test), especially obstructive symptoms. Postmyotomy recollection of premyotomy symptom frequency and severity was neither substantively nor consistently different from premyotomy scoring.

CONCLUSIONS

Before myotomy, patient symptom scores reflected the deleterious impact of achalasia. After myotomy, patient symptom scores dramatically improved, reflecting the favorable impact of laparoscopic Heller myotomy. Even years after myotomy, patient recollection of premyotomy symptom severity and frequency is very accurate and supports longitudinal studies of symptom improvement after myotomy.

[Pseudoachalasia due to amyloidosis treated by botulinum toxin]

INTRODUCTION

Pseudoachalasia mimics primary achalasia and can provoke serious complications in the elderly.

CASE RECORD

A 84 years-old woman had dysphagia with recurrent pneumonia. Pseudoachalasia related to a multifocal primitive amyloidosis was diagnosed. Treatment with botulinum toxin injection during a gastric fibroscopy resulted in clinical improvement, still notable 15 months later.

DISCUSSION

Botulinum toxin injection may be a useful tool in treatment of pseudoachalasia due to amyloidosis.

Endoscopic pneumatic dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in the management of primary achalasia

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an oesophageal motility disorder, of unknown cause, which results in increased lower oesophageal sphincter (LOS) tone and symptoms of difficulty swallowing. Treatments are aimed at reducing the LOS tone. Current endoscopic therapeutic options include pneumatic dilation (PD) or botulinum toxin injection (BTX).

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy and safety of two endoscopic treatments, pneumatic dilatation and intrasphincteric botulinum toxin injection, in the treatment of oesophageal achalasia.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group trials register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE (1966 to Oct 2005), EMBASE (1980 to Oct 2005), BIOSIS (1969 to Oct 2005) and Web of Science (1955 to October 2005). We also searched abstracts from significant Gastroenterology meetings (DDW, UEGW) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing PD to BTX injection in patients with primary achalasia.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed quality assessment and data extraction.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies involving 178 participants were included. Two studies were excluded from the meta-analysis of remission rates on the basis of clinical heterogeneity of the initial endoscopic protocols. There was no significant difference in remission between PD or BTX treatment within four weeks of the initial intervention, with a relative risk of remission of 1.15 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.38, P = 0.39) for PD compared to BTX. There was also no significant difference in the mean oesophageal pressures between the treatment groups; weighted mean difference for PD of -0.77 (95% CI -2.44 to 0.91, P = 0.37). Data on remission rates following the initial endoscopic treatment was available for two studies at six months and three studies at 12 months. At six months 22 of 29 PD participants were in remission compared to 7 of 27 in the BTX group, giving a relative risk of 2.90 (95% CI 1.48 to 5.67, P = 0.002); whilst at 12 months 33 of 47 PD participants were in remission compared to 11 of 43 BTX participants, relative risk of 2.67 (95% CI 1.58 to 4.52, P = 0.0002). No serious adverse outcomes occurred in participants receiving BTX, whilst PD was complicated by perforation in three cases.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results of this meta-analysis would suggest that PD is the more effective endoscopic treatment in the long term (greater than six months) for patients with achalasia.

Review article: the management of achalasia - a comparison of different treatment modalities

BACKGROUND

Achalasia is an uncommon primary oesophageal motor disorder with an unknown aetiology. Therapeutic options for achalasia are aimed at decreasing the lower oesophageal sphincter pressure, improving the oesophageal empting, and most importantly, relieving the symptoms of achalasia. Modalities for treatment include pharmacologic, endoscopic, pneumatic dilatation and surgical. The decision of which modality to use involves the consideration of multiple clinical and economic factors.

AIM

To review the management strategies currently available for achalasia.

METHODS

A Medline search identified the original articles and reviews the published in the English language literature between 1966 and 2006.

RESULTS

The results reveal that pharmacotherapy, injection of botulinum toxin, pneumatic dilatation and minimally invasive surgical oesophagomyotomy are variably effective at controlling the symptoms of achalasia but that each modality has specific strengths and weaknesses which make them each suitable in certain populations. Overall, pharmacologic therapy results in the shortest lived, least durable response followed by botulinum toxin injection, pneumatic dilatation and surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The optimal treatment for achalasia remains an area of controversy given our lack of complete understanding about the pathophysiology of the disease as well as the high numbers of clinical relapse after treatment. Further research focusing on optimal dosing of botulinum toxin injection and optimal timing of repeated graduated pneumatic dilatations could add to our knowledge regarding long-term therapy.

Controversies in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux and achalasia

The immense success of laparoscopic surgery as an effective treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and achalasia has established minimal invasive surgery as the gold standard for these two conditions with lower morbidity and mortality, shorter hospital stay, faster convalescence, and less postoperative pain. One controversy in the treatment of GERD evolves around laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) as the preferred treatment for Barrett’s esophagus and the procedure’s potential to reduce the risk of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. GERD has also been associated with respiratory symptoms, asthma and laryngeal injury, and a second controversy prompts discussions about whether total or partial fundoplication is the more appropriate treatment for GERD. A new and promising alternative in the treatment of GERD is endoluminal therapy. Three types of this new treatment option will be discussed: radiofrequency energy delivered to the lower esophageal sphincter, the creation of a mechanical barrier at the gastroesophageal junction, and the direct endoscopic tightening of the lower esophageal sphincter.

Laparoscopic surgery is discussed not only as a very effective treatment for GERD but also as permanent cure for achalasia. This review analyzes the three most important treatment options for achalasia: medications, pneumatic dilatation, and surgical therapy. Medications as the only true non-invasive option in the treatment of achalasia are not as effective as LARS because of their short half-life and variable absorption due to the poor esophageal emptying. The second treatment option, pneumatic dilatation, involves the stretching of the lower esophagus and is still considered the most effective non-surgical treatment for achalasia. Finally, surgical therapy for achalasia and the two major controversies concerning this laparoscopic treatment are discussed. The first involves the extent to which the myotomy is extended onto the stomach, and the second concerns the necessity and type of antireflux procedure to prevent GERD after myotomy.

LARS and laparoscopic Heller myotomy are the agreed upon as the gold standards for surgical treatment of GERD and achalasia, respectively. In the hands of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon both are safe and effective treatments for patients with excellent subjective and objective long-term results with at least 90% patient satisfaction.

The effect of botulinum-A toxin on patients with severe urge urinary incontinence

PURPOSE

We determined the effect of 150 units of botulinum-A toxin (Botox, Allergan, Irvine, California) on subjects with severe urge urinary incontinence (UUI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an open label uncontrolled clinical trial. Subjects were recruited from the female urology and urogynecology clinics at Duke University. Inclusion criteria included evidence of UUI on 3-day bladder diary, a 24-hour pad weight of 100 gm or greater, absent or minimal stress leakage, absent detrusor dysfunction, and a history of failed anticholinergic and physical therapies. Exclusion criteria included evidence of a urinary tract infection, or other correctable or neurological etiology for UUI. The detrusor of each subject was injected with 150 units of botulinum-A toxin. Evaluations were performed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after injection. Outcome measures included daily incontinence episodes, Urogenital Distress Inventory and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, 24-hour pad weights, daily pad usage and urinalysis at all visits. Urodynamic studies were performed at the 6-week and 3-month visits.

RESULTS

Three subjects had uncomplicated urinary tract infections during followup. No other adverse effects occurred. Statistically and clinically significant decreases greater than 50% were seen in virtually all outcome measures at all visits up to 3 months. Most subjects showed signs of recurrent UUI by 6 months. All subjects reported remarkable subjective improvement in incontinence. No significant changes in maximal cystometric capacity, maximal detrusor pressure, peak flow or post-void residual volumes were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum-A toxin can significantly decrease urge urinary incontinence and improve quality of life for 3 months after injection. Additional studies are needed to determine ideal doses, dosing intervals, safety and cost-effectiveness of this therapy.

Repeated pneumatic dilations as long-term maintenance therapy for esophageal achalasia

INTRODUCTION

In esophageal achalasia, pneumatic dilations (PD) provide short-term and long-term remission rates of 60-90% and 40-50%, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of repeated PD as long-term maintenance therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1992 to 2004, 150 patients with esophageal achalasia treated by PD were included in this retrospective study (78 males, mean age 57 +/- 20 yr). PD were performed until remission was achieved (symptom score < or = 3, each item < 2) and subsequently when symptomatic recurrence occurred. A standardized symptoms questionnaire was sent to patients lost to follow-up. Results are expressed as mean +/- SD.

RESULTS

Initial remission was achieved in 137 of 150 (91.3%) patients with 2.67 +/- 1.59 dilations [range 1-12]. Failure and perforation rates were 7.3% (n = 11) and 1.3% (n = 2), respectively. After initial remission, 48 of 137 (35%) patients had recurrent symptoms; the probability to be in remission at 5 and 10 yr was 67% and 50%, respectively. At the end of follow-up (45 +/- 38 months, ext. 2-144) 108 of 137 (78.8%) patients were in remission. Among 112 patients whose symptoms could be treated by repeated PD (per protocol analysis), 108 (96.4%) were in remission (3.5 +/- 2.1 PD, ext. 2-12). In this group, the probability of being in remission after repeated PD at 5 and 10 yr was 96.8% and 93.4%, respectively. No pretherapeutic factor influenced long-term remission rate. The overall prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux was 34.7%.

CONCLUSION

One-third of the patients with esophageal achalasia treated by PD will experience symptomatic recurrence during a 4-yr period. Long-term remission can be achieved in virtually all the patients treated by repeated PD according to an "on-demand" strategy based on symptom recurrence.

Evidence-Based Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes With Botulinum Toxin Type A

This review systematically examines the effects of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) on patient-reported outcomes across disorders using evidence-based criteria. The evidence provided by these studies ranged from randomized, controlled trials to case series. The effects of BTX-A on quality of life or global treatment outcomes were assessed in 48 studies across 16 different conditions. All but 7 of these reported benefits of BTX-A over baseline or the comparator condition (placebo or other treatment). The effects of BTX-A on impairment, activities, or participation were assessed in 46 studies across 17 different conditions. All but 4 reported benefits of BTX-A over baseline or the comparison group. The effects of BTX-A on satisfaction or preference were assessed in 14 studies across 11 different conditions, all of which reported high rates of satisfaction with BTX-A or preference over the comparator. These studies provide evidence that BTX-A exerts meaningful benefits on the quality of life of patients treated with this biologic agent.

Dysphagia

Dysphagia is a common complaint that always warrants investigation. The patient's history and preliminary testing can help differentiate between the two types of dysphagia: oropharyngeal or esophageal. Specific treatments for either of these types of dysphagia depend on the underlying etiology. Oropharyngeal dysphagia is often associated with a neuromuscular disorder and is treated with swallowing rehabilitation. Esophageal dysphagia is usually due to an anatomic defect or a motility disorder. Anatomic defects can often be corrected with endoscopic or surgical procedures. Motility disorders often benefit from pharmacologic treatment. Achalasia may be corrected with an endoscopic procedure with pneumatic dilation or, more recently, with injection of botulinum toxin.

New therapeutic indications for botulinum toxins

The efficacy of botulinum toxin (BTX) without systemic effects has led to the rapid development of applications in neuromuscular disorders, hyperactivity of sudomotor cholinergic-mediated glandular function, and pain syndromes. The successful use of BTX in conditions with muscle overactivity, such as dystonia and spasticity, has been established and new areas in the field of movement disorders such as tics, tremor, myoclonic jerks, and stuttering has been explored with satisfactory results. Strategies to temporarily inactivate muscle function after orthopaedic or neurosurgery have also been developed. BTX treatment of hyperhidrosis was followed by its application in other hypersecretory conditions (hyperlacrimation and nasal hypersecretion) and in excessive drooling. Studies are in progress, aimed at optimising the technique and protocol of administration. Other applications for BTX have been proposed in gastroenterological and urogenital practice; it appears to be effective in replacing standard surgical procedures. Trials of BTX in painful conditions are ongoing mainly on refractory tension headache, migraine, and backache as well as dystonia-complex regional pain syndrome and myofascial pain with promising results. Recently, the fastest growing use for BTX toxin has been in the cosmetic applications. Clearly, the indications for the use of BTX are expanding, but further clinical trials will be needed in many different areas.

Behandlung der Achalasie

Achalasia is a condition of unknown etiology. It represents a motor disorder of the esophagus characterized by absent or incomplete relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter upon swallowing and by non-propulsive swallow-induced contraction waves or amotility of the esophageal body. Dysphagia and regurgitation of ingesta are the most frequent symptoms. Medical treatment, i.e. by calcium-channel blockers and nitric oxide donors, may be tried in patients with mild dysphagia or in elderly patients but rarely yields adequate symptom relief. Mechanical dilatation of the achalasic sphincter may be performed as an initial treatment option. Intrasphincteric injections of botulinum toxin seemed to be a promising alternative, but it has become obvious that, in most cases, repeated applications of the toxin are required to maintain patients symptom-free. Myotomy of the achalasic sphincter with or without fundoplication to prevent gastroesophageal reflux, is employed mainly in patients in whom dilatations have failed, but since the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, myotomy has become the primary treatment at many centers. This article aims to provide an overview of the development of the conservative and surgical treatment of achalasia.

The influence of Lactobacillus brevis on ornithine decarboxylase activity and polyamine profiles in Helicobacter pylori-infected gastric mucosa

BACKGROUND

Functional probiotics may prevent Helicobacter pylori infection, and some evidence suggests that they also possess antitumor properties. Lactobacillus brevis (CD2) is a functional Lactobacillus strain with peculiar biochemical features, essentially related to the activity of arginine deiminase. This enzyme catalyzes the catabolism of arginine and affects the biosynthesis of polyamines (putrescine, spermidine, and spermine). Polyamines are polycations found in high concentrations in both normal and neoplastic cells. Our aims were: 1, to assess whether oral administration of L. brevis (CD2) affects H. pylori survival in the human gastric mucosa; 2, to evaluate the effects of L. brevis (CD2) on polyamine biosynthesis in gastric biopsies from H. pylori-positive patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For 3 weeks before endoscopy, 22 H. pylori-positive dyspeptic patients randomly received (ratio 1 : 1) high oral doses of L. brevis (CD2) or placebo. Before and after treatment, H. pylori infection was determined by urea breath test (UBT). In gastric biopsies, ornithine decarboxylase activity and polyamine levels were, respectively, evaluated by a radiometric technique and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC).

RESULTS

L. brevis (CD2) treatment did not eradicate H. pylori. However, a reduction in the UBT delta values occurred, suggesting a decrease in intragastric bacterial load. Significantly, L. brevis (CD2) induced a decrease in gastric ornithine decarboxylase activity and polyamine levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the hypothesis that L. brevis (CD2) treatment decreases H. pylori colonization, thus reducing polyamine biosynthesis. Alternatively, the arginine deiminase activity following L. brevis (CD2) administration might cause arginine deficiency, preventing polyamine generation from gastric cells.

Current and future treatment of chest pain of presumed esophageal origin

Patients with chest pain of presumed esophageal origin should be reassured and should undergo an esophageal manometry study. In patients with spastic esophageal disorders, a trial with calcium channel blockers or low-dose antidepressants used as visceral analgesics is the best approach. Inpatients with non GERD-related, nonspastic esophageal motility disorder, low-dose antidepressants seem reasonable. Anxiolytics are useful in patients with panic disorders, and psychological interventions (eg, cognitive-behavioral therapy) are also valuable, mainly in patients in whom reassurance is not sufficient to avoid the misinterpretation of their symptoms. In the future, visceral sensitivity modifying agents such as serotoninergic agonists or antagonists may become the cornerstone of therapy in patients with chest pain of presumed esophageal origin. Combinations of different approaches, such as proton pump inhibitors and psychotropic or antinociceptive agents, should also be evaluated in clinical trials.