Evidence of improving survival of patients with rectal cancer in france: a population based study

Net survival of patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison of two periods

BACKGROUND

The purpose of our analysis was to compare the results of treatment in patients who underwent resection for colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

In the period from 1/1/1991 to 31/12/2000 1478 patients with colorectal carcinoma underwent potentially curative resection. We divided them into two 5-year period groups according to different treatment regimes. The 5-year net survival rate was estimated, where the net survival is the probability of survival derived solely from the cancer-specific hazard.

RESULTS

In a 10-year period, we resected 1478 patients. The 5-year net survival rate for R0-resected patients with colon cancer increased from 76.3 to 85.2% between the periods 1991-1995 and 1995-2000. The 5-year net survival rate for R0-resected patients with rectal cancer also increased from 67.5 to 73% in the same period.

CONCLUSION

A comparison of the 5-year net survival rate for R0-resected patients with colorectal cancer increased in the last period from 1995 to 2000 compared with the period from 1991 to 1995. In multivariate analysis, early stage at diagnosis and adjuvant chemotherapy was both associated with better net survival after surgery with curative intent. The improvement of net survival is potentially the result of combination of better surgical and adjuvant therapy.

Management of rectal cancers in relation to treatment guidelines: a population-based study comparing Italian and French patients

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated rectal cancer management at the population level. We compared how rectal cancers diagnosed in Italy (2003-2005) and France (2005) were managed, and evaluated the extent to which management adhered to European guidelines.

METHODS

Samples of 3938 Italian and 2287 French colorectal cancer patients were randomly extracted from 8 and 12 cancer registries respectively. Rectal cancer patients (860 Italian, 559 French) were analysed. Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) of being treated with curative intent, receiving sphincter-saving surgery, and receiving preoperative radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Similar proportions of Italian and French patients were treated with curative intent (70% vs. 67%; OR=0.92 [0.73-1.16]); the respective proportions receiving sphincter-saving surgery were 21% and 33% (OR=1.15 [0.86-1.53]). In about 50% of those treated with curative intent, ≥ 12 lymph nodes were harvested in both countries. The proportion receiving postoperative radiotherapy was higher in Italy than in France (25% vs. 11%, p<0.01), but French patients were more likely to receive preoperative radiotherapy (52% vs. 21%; OR=4.06 [2.79-5.91]).

CONCLUSION

The proportions of patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy and the numbers of lymph nodes sampled were low in both countries. Centralising treatment and potentiating screening would be practical ways of improving outcomes and adhering to guidelines.

Changes in management and outcome of patients with rectal cancer in Northern Ireland: 1996-2006

AIM

This study aimed to document developments in rectal cancer services in a UK population and evaluate changes in outcome over a 10-year period.

METHOD

Patients diagnosed with primary rectal carcinoma in 1996, 2001 and 2006 were identified by the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry. Data were retrospectively collected on presentation, investigation, treatment and staging. Differences over the period were analysed using the chi-squared test; Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression tests were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

After exclusions there were 636 patients, including 187 presenting in 1996, 203 in 2001 and 246 in 2006. The use of preoperative MRI of the rectum, endorectal ultrasound and abdominal CT increased during the study period. For patients treated by surgery, total mesorectal excision (TME) increased from 19% in 1996 to 64% in 2006 (P < 0.001). The use of radiotherapy (27% in 1996, 47% in 2006) and chemotherapy (21% in 1996, 32% in 2006) increased. The overall 5-year survival improved significantly between 1996 and 2006 from 34% in 1996 to 45% in 2006 (P = 0.02). Among patients having surgery, 5-year survival increased from 43% in 1996 to 63% in 2006 (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the improvement in survival was associated with TME and chemotherapy, while radiotherapy was not.

CONCLUSION

Survival of patients with rectal cancer in Northern Ireland has improved significantly over the last decade, probably due to the increased use of TME and chemotherapy.

Have French recommendations had an impact on the treatment and survival of middle and lower rectal cancer patients?

OBJECTIVE

Compare the survival of middle and lower rectal cancer (MLRC) patients before and after the 1994 issue of rectal cancer (RC) consensus conference recommendations.

METHODS

Cases of MLRC noted in the Hérault department of France in 1992 (n=58) and 2000 (n=93) yielded exhaustive epidemiological, clinical-pathological and treatment data that were used to compare MLRC patient management and survival in these two periods.

RESULTS

Significantly more lymph nodes (≥ 8) were harvested in 2000 (≥ 8, 47%) than in 1992. In all, 45 patients (77.6%) received radiotherapy in 1992, and 74 (82%) in 2000. Chemotherapy was employed in 15 patients (25.9%) in 1992 and in 39 patients (43%) in 2000. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy, together with sphincter conservation, were dependent upon the year. Overall 5-year relative survival for rectal cancer in the Hérault department did not vary between 1992 (56%) and 2000 (56%). Independent poor prognostic factors were the same in both years: age over 75 years, lymph node involvement and metastases. Management place and year had no significant impact on prognosis.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations made have had little impact on disease management and the quality of anatomic pathology reports, and have not improved 5-year relative survival.

[Postoperative follow-up in patients with colorectal cancers who have undergone curative resection: intensive or conventional follow-up?]

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common human malignancies. Surgical resection remains the primary treatment but cancer recurrences (locoregional or distant) are associated with a poor prognosis. Follow-up is of particular importance in the three-years after surgery and various strategies have been purposed in the surveillance of patients after curative resection for colorectal cancer. The objective is to diagnose a recurrence at the earliest possible stage, enabling a second curative treatment. Optimal strategy for follow-up remains controversial. Results from randomized trials comparing low intensity programs and intensive programs of colorectal cancer surveillance are insufficient to recommend a follow-up strategy. To update recommendations for surveillance of colorectal cancer, larger prospective randomized studies are required.

Hazard regression model and cure rate model in colon cancer relative survival trends: are they telling the same story?

Hazard regression models and cure rate models can be advantageously used in cancer relative survival analysis. We explored the advantages and limits of these two models in colon cancer and focused on the prognostic impact of the year of diagnosis on survival according to the TNM stage at diagnosis. The analysis concerned 9,998 patients from three French registries. In the hazard regression model, the baseline excess death hazard and the time-dependent effects of covariates were modelled using regression splines. The cure rate model estimated the proportion of 'cured' patients and the excess death hazard in 'non-cured' patients. The effects of year of diagnosis on these parameters were estimated for each TNM cancer stage. With the hazard regression model, the excess death hazard decreased significantly with more recent years of diagnoses (hazard ratio, HR 0.97 in stage III and 0.98 in stage IV, P < 0.001). In these advanced stages, this favourable effect was limited to the first years of follow-up. With the cure rate model, recent years of diagnoses were significantly associated with longer survivals in 'non-cured' patients with advanced stages (HR 0.95 in stage III and 0.97 in stage IV, P < 0.001) but had no significant effect on cure (odds ratio, OR 0.99 in stages III and IV, P > 0.5). The two models were complementary and concordant in estimating colon cancer survival and the effects of covariates. They provided two different points of view of the same phenomenon: recent years of diagnosis had a favourable effect on survival, but not on cure.

Changes in disease pattern and treatment outcome of colorectal cancer: a review of 5,474 cases in 20 years

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death in Taiwan. During the past 20 years, several advances have improved the treatment outcome and quality of life of CRC patients. The purpose of this study was to identify the changes in the clinicopathological features and outcome of CRC over this period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Based on the computerized database of the Taipei Veterans General Hospital, between January 1981 and December 2000, 5,474 CRC patients were identified and divided into 2 groups based on the date of treatment (1981-1990 and 1991-2000). The clinicopathological features, outcome, and prognostic factors were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS/FINDINGS

The age at onset of cancer was 61 years in the 1980s group and 66 years in the 1990s group. The frequency of rectal tumors decreased from 50% in the 1980s group to 44% in the 1990s group. Tumor, nodes, metastasis (TNM) stage distribution, surgical mortality, and anastomosis leakage were similar in the two groups. However, the 5-year overall survival rate was better in the 1990s group (56%) than that in the 1980s group (50%, P = 0.001). For rectal cancer patients, the local recurrence rate was lower in the 1990s group (6%) than that in the 1980s group (10%, P < 0.01). In stage III CRC, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the 1990s group (54%) than that in the 1980s group (48%, P = 0.011). TNM stage was the most important independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survivals, followed by differentiation grade, CEA level, and treatment period.

INTERPRETATION/CONCLUSION

Advances in surgical technique and more standard use of chemotherapy have improved CRC outcome.

Survival of cancer patients in France: a population-based study from The Association of the French Cancer Registries (FRANCIM)

We present the main results of the first population-based cancers survival study gathering all French registry data. Survival data on 205,562 cancer cases diagnosed between 01/01/1989 and 31/12/1997 were analysed. Relative survival was estimated using an excess rate model. The evolution of the excess mortality rate over the follow-up period was graphed. The analysis emphasised the effect of age at diagnosis and its variation with time after diagnosis. For breast and prostate cancers, the age-standardised five-year relative survivals were 84% and 77%, respectively. The corresponding results in men and women were 56% versus 58% for colorectal cancer and 12% versus 16% for lung cancer. For some cancer sites, the excess mortality rate decreased to low values by five years after diagnosis. For most cancer sites, age at diagnosis was a negative prognostic factor but this effect was often limited to the first year after diagnosis.

A population-based study of the incidence, management and prognosis of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this population-based study was to evaluate the incidence, management and prognosis of patients with hepatic metastases related to colorectal cancer using data from the Digestive Cancer Registry of Calvados, France.

METHODS

Of 1325 patients with colorectal cancer registered between January 1994 and December 1999, 358 developed hepatic metastases. Logistic regression was used to analyse prognostic factors. Survival analysis was carried out with Cox's proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Some 18.8 per cent of patients had synchronous metastases, while 29.3 per cent developed metastases at 3 years. Of patients with hepatic metastases, 17.3 per cent had a surgical resection, 40.2 per cent were treated with palliative chemotherapy and 42.5 per cent had symptomatic treatment. Factors associated with receiving symptomatic treatment only were age over 75 years and more than one metastasis, but not place of treatment. Median survival after a diagnosis of hepatic metastases was 10.7 (range 4.6-23.1) months. Significant adverse prognostic factors were: age over 75 years (P = 0.001), lymph node invasion of primary tumour (P = 0.024), bilateral distribution of metastases (P = 0.001), other metastases (P = 0.004) and symptomatic treatment only (P = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

Despite improvement in treatment for hepatic metastases, age and extent of disease remain limiting factors for surgical resection and palliative chemotherapy.

Improvement in colorectal cancer survival: A population-based study

The aim of this study was to explore the reasons for improvement in colorectal cancer survival. Trends in relative survival among 5874 patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer over a 24-year period in a well-defined French population were analysed. The 5-year relative survival rate, excluding operative mortality, increased from 49.2% to 56.3% between the periods 1976-1987 and 1988-1999. In multivariate analysis, stage at diagnosis and adjuvant chemotherapy were both associated with better survival after surgery with curative intent. Survival trends differed markedly by age. The improvement in overall survival for older patients can be attributed to the increase in the proportion of patients resected for cure. For younger patients, there was an increase in the proportion of patients operated for cure, but also an improvement in stage-specific survival, particularly for stage III tumours, suggesting an impact of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Thirty-day mortality after surgery for colorectal cancer in Denmark

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the 30-day mortality after colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery in Denmark. Mortality was compared to other studies, and between departments, unadjusted and adjusted for case-mix.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients in Denmark with a first-time colorectal adenocarcinoma operated between 1 May 2001 and 31 December 2002 were eligible, 5187 patients were included. Mortality was adjusted for age, sex, urgency, tumour location, Dukes' stage and ASA-score.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality in Denmark after CRC-surgery was 9.9%. Adjusted for case-mix, four departments had significantly higher mortality than average. The variation between the 44 departments was significant both for radically operated (P = 0.02) patients and for all operated patients (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The 30-day mortality in Denmark seems to be higher than in studies from other countries, but the lack of comparable nationwide studies makes it difficult to evaluate. To uncover the reasons for the departments to diverge significantly from average, further studies are needed.

Improvement in survival following surgery for colorectal cancer

Background

Recent reports based on registry data have shown that survival after surgery for colorectal cancer is improving in the UK. It is not clear whether these improvements are due to earlier presentation or more effective treatment.

Methods

Outcome for 645 patients with colorectal cancer admitted to Glasgow Royal Infirmary between 1974 and 1979 was compared with that for 354 patients admitted between 1991 and 1994.

Results

More patients in the later period had Dukes' A or B tumours and fewer had evidence of metastatic spread (P &lt; 0·001); more underwent potentially curative resection (57·6 versus 49·9 per cent; P &lt; 0·001) and fewer underwent palliative diversion. The overall postoperative mortality rate fell from 14·1 to 8·5 per cent (P = 0·017). Overall and cancer-specific 5-year survival after potentially curative resection increased from 40·1 to 60·5 per cent and from 47·3 to 71·7 per cent respectively (both P &lt; 0·001). Compared with the earlier period, the adjusted hazard ratio for cancer-specific survival following potentially curative resection was 0·452 (95 per cent confidence interval 0·329 to 0·622; P &lt; 0·001).

Conclusion

The observed improvement in survival was mainly due to improvements in the quality of surgery and in perioperative care rather than earlier presentation.

Survival for rectal cancer patients and international comparisons

BACKGROUND

Population-based cancer registry data are important because they reflect routine care, present long-term follow-up, can show differences in treatment, outcomes and health care over time, and can be used for comparisons between regions and countries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Details of all cancer patients in the Munich region are recorded by the Munich Cancer Registry. Rectal cancer patients with an invasive primary tumor diagnosed between 1996 and 1998 were included in this analysis (n=936). Observed and relative survival are presented. Observed survival was also investigated with a Cox proportional hazards regression model.

RESULTS

Median follow-up time of survivors was 5.7 years. Five-year relative survival for the whole sample was 62.2%. International Union Against Cancer (UICC) stage was the most important prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. Compared with the 1992-1999 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data (62.4%), relative survival for each disease stage and the whole sample were very similar. In comparison with other European registries, Munich patients had slightly higher survival rates per stage (for example, 5-year relative survival in UICC III was 58.3% in Munich, 54.6% in South East Netherlands, 33.3% in Modena and 47.4% in Cote d'Or); however, more patients in Munich were in higher disease stages with worse prognoses, indicating poorer early detection.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that treatment of rectal cancer in Munich is good, but early detection could be improved. Cancer registries should publish their population-based stage data to ensure quality of care and provide regular feedback to health-care workers and decision makers. Comparisons between countries without stage data should be conducted cautiously.

Increased use of low anterior resection for veterans with rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Two surgical procedures with curative intent are available to patients with rectal cancer: lower anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection; however, lower anterior resection may improve quality of life and functional status.

AIM

To examine temporal changes in after lower anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection between 1989 and 2000. Potential factors associated with the use of lower anterior resection were evaluated.

METHODS

Using national administrative data, we identified patients who received lower anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection. Logistic regression models examined the association between use of lower anterior resection and time period of surgical resection.

RESULTS

A total of 5201 rectal cancer patients underwent resection. The use of lower anterior resection increased from 40.0% (1989-91) to 50.1% (1998-2000) paralleled by a corresponding decline in abdominoperineal resection (60.1 to 49.9%; P < 0.001). Patients who received surgery during 1992-94, 1995-97 and 1998-2000 were 6, 7 and 28% more likely to receive lower anterior resection, when compared with 1989-1991 after adjusting for demographic characteristics, co-morbidity and hospital surgical volume. Older age, lower co-morbidity score and lower hospital surgical volume were predictive of lower anterior resection.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in the use of lower anterior resection for rectal cancer was observed over time. This observed increase in use is not confined to high-volume hospitals.

Evaluation of the management of rectal cancers before and after the consensus conference in France

OBJECTIVES

Population-based registries are the best way to draw a picture of the management of a disease. The purpose of this study was to analyse therapeutic modalities for rectal cancers in seven French areas in 1990 and 1995, before and just after a consensus conference devoted to this topic.

METHODS

A community-based series of 945 patients (402 in 1990, 543 in 1995) with rectal cancer was used to assess therapeutic modalities and stage at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Colonoscopy was performed in most of the cases (90% in 1990 and 1995). There was significant change between 1990 and 1995 in stage at diagnosis and cancer resection. The rate of continence-preserving operations was similar in 1990 and in 1995, as was the rate of adjuvant radiotherapy. There was a shift between 1990 and 1995 from postoperative radiotherapy to preoperative radiotherapy. There was an increase in the use of adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Changes in the management of rectal cancer in France over the past few years have concerned mainly resection rate, stage at diagnosis and adjuvant therapy. The recommendations of the consensus conference were followed only partly, in particular for adjuvant preoperative radiotherapy, which has not reached its full development, and adjuvant chemotherapy, which tends to be overprescribed, considering how little is known about its effectiveness.

Survival of rectal cancer patients in Denmark during 1994-99

OBJECTIVE

As survival from rectal cancer in Denmark is below the European average, we analysed survival during the period of 1994-99 focusing upon improvement strategies.

METHOD

All patients with a first-time rectal cancer were registered in a national database during this 5-year period. In the observational cohort study, data on patient age and gender, tumour stage, surgical procedures, adjuvant radiotherapy, anastomotic leakage, 30-day mortality and long-term survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

The database comprised 5021 patients. Sixty-four percent had a localized tumour. Less than a third of patients with fixed tumours had pre-operative radiotherapy and curative surgery was achieved in 70%. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 13%, and 30-day mortality was 4% following abdominoperineal or anterior resection and 11% following a Hartmann's procedure. The relative 5-year survival in the entire series was 39% in males and 47% in females, respectively. Following curative surgery the relative 5-year survival was 55% in males and 63% in females, respectively. Survival was 71% in the subset of patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision.

CONCLUSION

The average tumour stage upon diagnosis was probably more advanced compared to the other Nordic countries and pre-operative radiotherapy was administered to a minority of patients with fixed tumours. The anastomotic leakage rate was relatively high, whereas the 30-day mortality was comparable to other studies. Survival from rectal cancer in Denmark is still less favourable compared to the other Nordic and several European countries but improved from 1996 and onwards.

Regional variations in management of rectal cancer in France

BACKGROUND

Population-based registries provide excellent data for drawing an accurate picture of disease management practices. The purpose of this study was to determine whether diagnostic and therapeutic management practices for rectal cancer vary in different geographic regions of France.

METHODS

Data Issued from nine cancer registries covering 11% of the French population. The files of 683 patients with a rectal cancer diagnosed in 1995 were selected for analysis.

RESULTS

Colonoscopy was performed in a mean of 91.6% of patients (range: 80.9%-98.2%) (P=0.01). The practice of colonoscopy concomitantly with barium enema varied greatly, ranging from 1.9%-57.7% of patients (P<0.001). Pretherapeutic work-up practices were significantly different depending on the region with respect to: abdominal CT scans (13.4%-69.2%), thoracic CT scans (0.9%-13.2%) and tumor markers (46.8%-80.8%). There were no significant differences between geographic regions concerning rate of resection, use of colostomy, or tumor stage at diagnosis. Administration of adjuvant radiotherapy (mean, 46.8%; range: 21.6%-70%; P<0.001) and adjuvant chemotherapy (mean, 24.1%; range: 10.3%-40.6%; P<0.05) varied significantly between regions.

CONCLUSION

Diagnostic practices and administration of adjuvant treatments vary significantly between geographic regions in France. The recommendations of the French consensus guidelines are only partially adhered to. Practitioners and healthcare Authorities should be aware of these differences in order to provide more harmonious patient care.

Rectal cancer in Luxembourg : a national population-based data report, 1988-1998

BACKGROUND

Morphologic criteria which might help to support the need for a preventive strategy for early detection of rectal cancer were analysed. Population-based data on rectal adenomas with high-grade dysplastic changes (n = 199) and invasive adenocarcinomas (n = 912) registered by the national Morphologic Tumour Registry (MTR) and diagnosed in a central department of pathology in Luxembourg between 1988 and 1998 were considered.

METHODS

The analysis concerned time trends in frequency, crude incidence, tumour-stage, the rectal "high-grade" adenoma/invasive adenocarcinoma-ratio and the survival rates. Histopathological tumour-stage parameters (UICC/AJCC, 1997) in a consecutive series of 641 resected rectal cancers and their relationship with the observed patient survival are investigated.

RESULTS

The majority of invasive adenocarcinomas are diagnosed at a late stage (i.e. Stage II and III) into contrast with the highly significant increase (355 %) in frequency of rectal high-grade adenomas (Stage 0). During the two-time periods 1988-1992 and 1994-1998 Stage I and Stage IV-cases decreased by 11 % and 47 % respectively. Tumour-stage correlates with prognosis. The rectal high-grade adenoma / invasive adenocarcinoma-ratio improved significantly over the last five years.

CONCLUSION

Over the study period, there has been a highly significant rise in the incidence of resected rectal adenomas with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. The ratio of early tumours to invasive cancers has risen while the numbers of colonoscopies and rectoscopies remained unchanged respectively decreased. As the number of advanced tumour-stages remained stable, mass-screening procedures focusing on the fifty to sixty age group should be reinforced.

Improved survival of patients with rectal cancer since 1980: a population-based study

The treatment of rectal cancer has changed over the last two decades as far as surgical techniques and radiotherapy are concerned. We studied the changes in patterns of care for patients with rectal cancer and the effect on prognosis. All patients with cancer of the rectum or rectosigmoid in South-east Netherlands, diagnosed in the period of 1980-2000, were included in our analyses (n=3635). The use of surgery as the only treatment decreased from 62% in the period of 1980-1989 to 42% in the period of 1995-2000, whereas the combination of surgery and radiotherapy increased from 26 to 40%. The use of postoperative radiotherapy decreased from 25 to 4%, while preoperative radiotherapy increased from 1 to 35%. Patients aged 75 years or older were less likely to receive radiotherapy. After adjustment for age, gender, tumour stage and tumour site, significant improvements in the relative risk of death were observed between the periods of 1995-2000 and 1980-1989 for patients under 60 years of age (Relative Risk (RR)=0.45; 95% Confidence Interval (CI)=0.35-0.58) and those 60-74 years old (RR=0.62; 95% CI 0.53-0.72). No improvement in the risk of death was found for patients aged 75 years and over. No improvements in the distribution of tumour stage were observed, making it very likely that the continuing increase in population-based survival among patients aged <75 years results from the shift from postoperative to preoperative radiotherapy, the development of the total mesorectal excision technique and the related tendency to subspecialisation of surgeons in colorectal cancer surgery.

Benefit of operative mortality reduction on colorectal cancer survival

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine trends in operative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery over a 20-year period in a well defined population, and consequences on overall survival.

METHODS

Some 4745 new cases of colorectal adenocarcinoma were registered between 1976 and 1995 in a French region containing 500 000 people. Among these, 84.3 per cent were operated on, of whom 78.1 per cent were resected.

RESULTS

The overall operative mortality rate decreased from 17.7 to 8.1 per cent between 1976-1979 and 1992-1995. Corresponding rates after curative surgery were 12.6 and 6.2 per cent respectively. Period of diagnosis, age and subsite were factors independently associated with operative mortality. Applying the operative mortality rates for the interval 1976-1979 to the 1992-1995 cohort, the expected 5-year survival rate after curative surgery would have been 40.0 per cent, compared with an observed rate of 51.0 per cent. This corresponds to a 27.5 per cent improvement in 5-year overall survival. Applying this result to the French population as a whole, it was estimated that almost 3000 deaths are avoided each year in France as a result of the reduction in operative mortality.

CONCLUSION

Operative mortality decreased dramatically over the 20 years of the study. It was associated with a significant improvement in survival after surgery for cure.

Population-based study of factors influencing occurrence and prognosis of local recurrence after surgery for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Few data are available from population-based statistics on the risk of local recurrence after surgery for rectal cancer. The aims of this study were to determine factors influencing local control and to analyse treatment and prognosis of recurrences in a well defined population.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the cancer registry of the Côte d'Or (France). From 1976 to 1995, 682 patients resected for cure for a rectal carcinoma were included. Recurrence rates and survival rates were calculated using actuarial methods. A relative survival analysis and Cox multivariate analysis were performed.

RESULTS

During the study 135 local recurrences were registered. The 5-year cumulative local recurrence rate was 22.7 per cent. In multivariate analysis the two variables significantly associated with local recurrence risk were stage at diagnosis and the macroscopic type of growth. There was a non-significant decrease in local recurrence rate in patients treated by preoperative radiotherapy compared with that in patients treated by surgery alone. The proportion of patients re-resected for cure was 25.2 per cent, and increased from 13.0 per cent in 1976-1985 to 37.9 per cent in 1986-1995 (P = 0.001). The 5-year relative survival rate was 13.6 per cent overall and 40.6 per cent after resection for cure (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Local recurrence of rectal cancer following resection remains a substantial problem. Improvement can be expected from better care and earlier diagnosis.

Stage of extension and treatment for colorectal cancer after a negative test and among non-responders in mass screening with guaiac faecal occult blood test: a French experience

Despite its proven efficacy in three randomized trials, the relevance of mass screening for colorectal cancer using the guaiac faecal occult blood test is still debated. The low sensitivity of the test and the poor participation rate, especially in France, are major obstacles to its effectiveness. The aim of our study was to characterize cancers occurring after a negative test and among non-participants in the screening programme organized in the French department of Calvados. Cancers in the negative test group had a later stage of extension than subjects testing positively but an earlier stage of extension than cancers in the reference group, which were not different from those of non-responders. The proportion of resection for non-responders was significantly lower than that for participants, whatever the test result (P < 0.001), and lower than that for reference subjects (P < 0.05). There was no difference in treatment between negative and positive responders. Negative responders did not have a delayed cancer diagnosis or a worse condition of treatment than people who were not screened. Low sensitivity reduced the efficacy of colorectal cancer screening but did not seem to increase the potential to do harm.

Colorectal adenocarcinoma in patients under 45 years of age: comparison with older patients in a well-defined French population

PURPOSE

Little is known about colorectal cancer in young patients at a population level, and the behavior, characteristics, and prognosis of such tumors continue to be debated.

METHODS

A population-based series of 4,643 new cases of colorectal adenocarcinomas diagnosed between 1976 and 1996 in C te d'Or, France, was used to describe time trends in incidence, predisposing conditions, location, stage, and treatment and to evaluate the prognosis of such tumors in patients under 45 years of age (n = 146). Prognosis was determined using relative survival rates and predictive factors using a multivariate relative survival model.

RESULTS

Before the age of 45 years, age-standardized incidence rates were 1.9 per 100,000 in males and 1.4 per 100,000 in females. Incidence rates almost doubled from 1976 to 1982 and from 1983 to 1989 in both genders and stabilized thereafter. The frequency of predisposing conditions was significantly higher before the age of 45 years (11.7 vs. 0.4 percent; P < 0.001). TNM Stage III tumors were more frequent in younger patients, and Stage II tumors were more frequent in older patients. The postoperative mortality rate was lower in the 0-to-44 age group, 2.1 percent, compared with 8.4 percent for the 45-and-over age group (P = 0.004). Five-year relative survival rates were 51.9, 49.2, and 41.4 percent, respectively. In both overall and stage-for-stage comparisons, patients before the age of 45 years had a better survival rate than older patients. Gender and stage at diagnosis were the only independent prognostic factors of survival for young patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the high frequency of predisposing conditions in young patients and that young age is not a poor prognostic factor for colorectal cancer. This underlines the importance of family screening, aggressive surveillance, and treatment in the young with known predisposing conditions.

Estimation of colorectal cancer prevalence in France

The prevalence in France of patients with colorectal cancer was estimated using data from five population-based cancer registries. At the end of 1994, the number of cases diagnosed in France no more than 5 years before was approximately 95000, of whom 12180 had suffered metastasis and 9746 a local recurrence. This type of cancer is the most common in both men and women and these results enable the need for care or surveillance to be evaluated more accurately.

[Curative treatment of local and regional rectal cancer recurrences]

How to select patients likely to benefit from reoperation? When a neoadjuvant treatment is still feasible, is it useful to perform preoperative radiation or chemoradiation? What can be expected after resection of local recurrences in terms of survival and quality of life? Does surveillance of patients operated for rectal carcinoma influence resectability of local recurrences and results? These are the main questions concerning the management of local recurrences after resection of a rectal carcinoma.

Changes in the practice of adjuvant radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer within a French well-defined population

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To assess the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in treating rectal cancers at a population level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1976 to 1996, the influence of the period of diagnosis, sex, age, type of surgical resection, place of surgical resection on the use of radiotherapy was studied. A non-conditional logistic regression was performed to obtain the odds radio for each studied period adjusted for the other variables.

RESULTS

The use of adjuvant radiotherapy increased over time from 14.3% in 1976-1978 to 61.7% in 1994-1996 (odds ratio (OR): 28.0 for the 1994-1996 period compared with 1976-1978). It was also influenced by age (OR: 0.26 for patients >74 years compared with those <65 years), type of resection (OR: 3.42 for abdominoperineal resection compared with anterior resection) and place of surgery (OR: 0.39 for non-university hospitals compared with university hospitals). The nature of adjuvant radiotherapy altered over time: most adjuvant radiotherapy being done postoperatively before 1988, then preoperatively subsequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial changes have occurred in both the degree of use of adjuvant radiotherapy and in its timing. Some progress is still possible, in particular in older patients and in patients treated in non-university hospitals.

Colorectal cancer prevalence in France

Cancer prevalence is a crucial indicator that allows the magnitude of the problem of colorectal cancer to be monitored. Population-based cancer registries with long-standing activity are the most appropriate tools for providing prevalence data. All colorectal cases registered between 1976 and 1995 in the Côte d'Or Cancer Registry have been considered in this study. Total prevalence (20 years) was the number of patients with a previously diagnosed colorectal cancer, alive on 31 December 1995. Cumulative recurrence rates up to 5 years after diagnosis were calculated and applied to the number of prevalent cases to estimate the number of recurrences by one-year intervals up to 5 years. The overall age-standardized prevalence rate was 170.8/100000, which yielded an estimated 185857 French people alive with a history of colorectal cancer. The 5-year prevalence rates were 149.4/100000, which represented 46.4% of prevalent cases. Five-year prevalence rates regularly increased with periods of diagnosis. These results represent useful indicators for monitoring the colorectal cancer problem and for health care planning.