Loss of ARID1A activates mTOR signaling and SOX9 in gastric adenocarcinoma-rationale for targeting ARID1A deficiency

Methionine and Leucine Promote mTOR Gene Transcription and Milk Synthesis in Mammary Epithelial Cells through the eEF1Bα-UBR5-ARID1A Signaling

Amino acids are essential for the activation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), but the corresponding molecular mechanism is not yet fully understood. We previously found that Met stimulated eukaryotic elongation factor α (eEF1Bα) nuclear localization in bovine mammary epithelial cells (MECs). Herein, we explored the role and molecular mechanism of eEF1Bα in methionine (Met)- and leucine (Leu)-stimulated mTOR gene transcription and milk synthesis in MECs. eEF1Bα knockdown decreased milk protein and fat synthesis, cell proliferation, and mTOR mRNA expression and phosphorylation, whereas eEF1Bα overexpression had the opposite effects. QE-MS analysis detected that eEF1Bα was phosphorylated at Ser106 in the nucleus and Met and Leu stimulated p-eEF1Bα nuclear localization. eEF1Bα knockdown abrogated the stimulation of Met and Leu by mTOR mRNA expression and phosphorylation, and this regulatory role was dependent on its phosphorylation. Akt knockdown blocked the stimulation of Met and Leu by eEF1Bα and p-eEF1Bα expression. ChIP-PCR detected that p-eEF1Bα bound only to the -548 to -793 nt site in the mTOR promoter, and ChIP-qPCR further detected that Met and Leu stimulated this binding. eEF1Bα mediated Met and Leu' stimulation on mTOR mRNA expression and phosphorylation through inducing AT-rich interaction domain 1A (ARID1A) ubiquitination degradation, and this process depended on eEF1Bα phosphorylation. p-eEF1Bα interacted with ARID1A and ubiquitin protein ligase E3 module N-recognition 5 (UBR5), and UBR5 knockdown rescued the decrease of the ARID1A protein level by eEF1Bα overexpression. Both eEF1Bα and p-eEF1Bα were highly expressed in mouse mammary gland tissues during the lactating period. In summary, we reveal that Met and Leu stimulate mTOR transcriptional activation and milk protein and fat synthesis in MECs through eEF1Bα-UBR5-ARID1A signaling.

Rapamycin alleviates mitochondrial dysfunction in anti-NMDAR encephalitis mice

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is one of the most prevalent forms of autoimmune encephalitis, characterized by a series of neurological and psychiatric symptoms, including cognitive impairment, seizures and psychosis. The underlying mechanism of anti-NMDAR encephalitis remains unclear. In the current study, the mouse model of anti-NMDAR encephalitis with active immunization was performed. We first uncovered excessive mitochondrial fission in the hippocampus and temporal cortex of anti-NMDAR encephalitis mice, indicated by elevated level of Phospho-DRP1 (Ser616) (p-Drp1-S616). Moreover, blockade of the autophagic flux was also demonstrated, leading to the accumulation of fragmented mitochondria, and elevated levels of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (mtROS) and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. More importantly, we found that the mTOR signaling pathway was overactivated, which could aggravate mitochondrial fission and inhibit autophagy, resulting in mitochondrial dysfunction. While rapamycin, the specific inhibitor of the mTOR signaling pathway, significantly alleviated mitochondrial dysfunction by inhibiting mitochondrial fission and enhancing autophagy. Levels of mtROS and mtDNA were markedly reduced after the treatment of rapamycin. In addition, rapamycin also significantly alleviated cognitive dysfunction and anxious behaviors found in anti-NMDAR encephalitis mice. Thus, our study reveals the vital role of mitochondrial dysfunction in pathological mechanism of anti-NMDAR encephalitis and lays a theoretical foundation for rapamycin to become a clinically targeted drug for anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

The role of SWI/SNF complexes in digestive system neoplasms

Chromatin remodeling is a critical step in the DNA damage response, and the ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers are a group of epigenetic regulators that alter nucleosome assembly and regulate transcription factor accessibility to DNA, preventing genomic instability and tumorigenesis caused by DNA damage. The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex is one of them, and mutations in the gene encoding the SWI/SNF subunit are frequently found in digestive tumors. We review the most recent literature on the role of SWI/SNF complexes in digestive tumorigenesis, with different SWI/SNF subunits playing different roles. They regulate the biological behavior of tumor cells, participate in multiple signaling pathways, interact with multiple genes, and have some correlation with the prognosis of patients. Their carcinogenic properties may help discover new therapeutic targets. Understanding the mutations and defects of SWI/SNF complexes, as well as the underlying functional mechanisms, may lead to new strategies for treating the digestive system by targeting relevant genes or modulating the tumor microenvironment.

The Role of the AT-Rich Interaction Domain 1A Gene (ARID1A) in Human Carcinogenesis

The switch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) (SWI/SNF) complex uses energy from ATP hydrolysis to mobilise nucleosomes on chromatin. Components of SWI/SNF are mutated in 20% of all human cancers, of which mutations in AT-rich binding domain protein 1A (ARID1A) are the most common. ARID1A is mutated in nearly half of ovarian clear cell carcinoma and around one-third of endometrial and ovarian carcinomas of the endometrioid type. This review will examine in detail the molecular functions of ARID1A, including its role in cell cycle control, enhancer regulation, and the prevention of telomerase activity. ARID1A has key roles in the maintenance of genomic integrity, including DNA double-stranded break repair, DNA decatenation, integrity of the cohesin complex, and reduction in replication stress, and is also involved in mismatch repair. The role of ARID1A loss in the pathogenesis of some of the most common human cancers is discussed, with a particular emphasis on gynaecological cancers. Finally, several promising synthetic lethal strategies, which exploit the specific vulnerabilities of ARID1A-deficient cancer cells, are briefly mentioned.

The effects of ARID1A mutation in gastric cancer and its significance for treatment

Gastric cancer (GC) has emerged as a significant issue in public health all worldwide as a result of its high mortality rate and dismal prognosis. AT-rich interactive domain 1 A (ARID1A) is a vital component of the switch/sucrose-non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex, and ARID1A mutations occur in various tumors, leading to protein loss and decreased expression; it then affects the tumor biological behavior or prognosis. More significantly, ARID1A mutations will likely be biological markers for immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) treatment and selective targeted therapy. To provide theoretical support for future research on the stratification of individuals with gastric cancer with ARID1A as a biomarker to achieve precision therapy, we have focused on the clinical significance, predictive value, underlying mechanisms, and possible treatment strategies for ARID1A mutations in gastric cancer in this review.

Comprehensive molecular phenotyping of ARID1A-deficient gastric cancer reveals pervasive epigenomic reprogramming and therapeutic opportunities

OBJECTIVE

Gastric cancer (GC) is a leading cause of cancer mortality, with ARID1A being the second most frequently mutated driver gene in GC. We sought to decipher ARID1A-specific GC regulatory networks and examine therapeutic vulnerabilities arising from ARID1A loss.

DESIGN

Genomic profiling of GC patients including a Singapore cohort (>200 patients) was performed to derive mutational signatures of ARID1A inactivation across molecular subtypes. Single-cell transcriptomic profiles of ARID1A-mutated GCs were analysed to examine tumour microenvironmental changes arising from ARID1A loss. Genome-wide ARID1A binding and chromatin profiles (H3K27ac, H3K4me3, H3K4me1, ATAC-seq) were generated to identify gastric-specific epigenetic landscapes regulated by ARID1A. Distinct cancer hallmarks of ARID1A-mutated GCs were converged at the genomic, single-cell and epigenomic level, and targeted by pharmacological inhibition.

RESULTS

We observed prevalent ARID1A inactivation across GC molecular subtypes, with distinct mutational signatures and linked to a NFKB-driven proinflammatory tumour microenvironment. ARID1A-depletion caused loss of H3K27ac activation signals at ARID1A-occupied distal enhancers, but unexpectedly gain of H3K27ac at ARID1A-occupied promoters in genes such as NFKB1 and NFKB2. Promoter activation in ARID1A-mutated GCs was associated with enhanced gene expression, increased BRD4 binding, and reduced HDAC1 and CTCF occupancy. Combined targeting of promoter activation and tumour inflammation via bromodomain and NFKB inhibitors confirmed therapeutic synergy specific to ARID1A-genomic status.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest a therapeutic strategy for ARID1A-mutated GCs targeting both tumour-intrinsic (BRD4-assocatiated promoter activation) and extrinsic (NFKB immunomodulation) cancer phenotypes.

Early stage gastric adenocarcinoma: clinical and molecular landscapes

Gastric adenocarcinoma, even when diagnosed at an early (localized) disease stage, poses a major health-care burden with cure rates that remain unsatisfactorily low, particularly in Western countries. This lack of progress reflects, among other aspects, the impracticality of early diagnosis, considerable variations in therapeutic approaches that is partly based on regional preferences, and the ingrained heterogeneity of gastric adenocarcinoma cells and their associated tumour microenvironment (TME). Clinical trials have long applied empirical interventions with the assumption that all early stage gastric adenocarcinomas are alike. Despite certain successes, the shortcomings of these approaches can potentially be overcome by targeting the specific molecular subsets of gastric adenocarcinomas identified by genomic and/or multi-omics analyses, including microsatellite instability-high, Epstein-Barr virus-induced, DNA damage repair-deficient, HER2-positive and PD-L1-high subtypes. Future approaches, including the availability of sophisticated vaccines, novel antibody technologies, agents targeting TME components (including fibroblasts, macrophages, cytokines or chemokines, and T cells) and novel immune checkpoint inhibitors, supported by improved tissue-based and blood-based diagnostic assays, seem promising. In this Review, we highlight current knowledge of the molecular and cellular biology of gastric adenocarcinomas, summarize the current approaches to clinical management of the disease, and consider the role of novel management and/or treatment strategies.

SOX9 Modulates the Transformation of Gastric Stem Cells Through Biased Symmetric Cell Division

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Transformation of stem/progenitor cells has been associated with tumorigenesis in multiple tissues, but stem cells in the stomach have been hard to localize. We therefore aimed to use a combination of several markers to better target oncogenes to gastric stem cells and understand their behavior in the initial stages of gastric tumorigenesis.

METHODS

Mouse models of gastric metaplasia and cancer by targeting stem/progenitor cells were generated and analyzed with techniques including reanalysis of single-cell RNA sequencing and immunostaining. Gastric cancer cell organoids were genetically manipulated with clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) for functional studies. Cell division was determined by bromodeoxyuridine-chasing assay and the assessment of the orientation of the mitotic spindles. Gastric tissues from patients were examined by histopathology and immunostaining.

RESULTS

Oncogenic insults lead to expansion of SOX9+ progenitor cells in the mouse stomach. Genetic lineage tracing and organoid culture studies show that SOX9+ gastric epithelial cells overlap with SOX2+ progenitors and include stem cells that can self-renew and differentiate to generate all gastric epithelial cells. Moreover, oncogenic targeting of SOX9+SOX2+ cells leads to invasive gastric cancer in our novel mouse model (Sox2-CreERT;Sox9-loxp(66)-rtTA-T2A-Flpo-IRES-loxp(71);Kras(Frt-STOP-Frt-G12D);P53R172H), which combines Cre-loxp and Flippase-Frt genetic recombination systems. Sox9 deletion impedes the expansion of gastric progenitor cells and blocks neoplasia after Kras activation. Although Sox9 is not required for maintaining tissue homeostasis where asymmetric division predominates, loss of Sox9 in the setting of Kras activation leads to reduced symmetric cell division and effectively attenuates the Kras-dependent expansion of stem/progenitor cells. Similarly, Sox9 deletion in gastric cancer organoids reduces symmetric cell division, organoid number, and organoid size. In patients with gastric cancer, high levels of SOX9 are associated with recurrence and poor prognosis.

CONCLUSION

SOX9 marks gastric stem cells and modulates biased symmetric cell division, which appears to be required for the malignant transformation of gastric stem cells.

The Ubiquitin-Proteasome System in Tumor Metabolism

Metabolic reprogramming, which is considered a hallmark of cancer, can maintain the homeostasis of the tumor environment and promote the proliferation, survival, and metastasis of cancer cells. For instance, increased glucose uptake and high glucose consumption, known as the "Warburg effect," play an essential part in tumor metabolic reprogramming. In addition, fatty acids are harnessed to satisfy the increased requirement for the phospholipid components of biological membranes and energy. Moreover, the anabolism/catabolism of amino acids, such as glutamine, cystine, and serine, provides nitrogen donors for biosynthesis processes, development of the tumor inflammatory environment, and signal transduction. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) has been widely reported to be involved in various cellular biological activities. A potential role of UPS in the metabolic regulation of tumor cells has also been reported, but the specific regulatory mechanism has not been elucidated. Here, we review the role of ubiquitination and deubiquitination modification on major metabolic enzymes and important signaling pathways in tumor metabolism to inspire new strategies for the clinical treatment of cancer.

ARID1A deficiency is targetable by AKT inhibitors in HER2-negative gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The PI3K/AKT signaling pathway is frequently activated in gastric cancer (GC); however, AKT inhibitors are not effective in unselected GC patients in clinical trials. Mutations in AT-rich interactive domain 1A (ARID1A), which are found in approximately 30% of GC patients, activate PI3K/AKT signaling, suggesting that targeting the ARID1A deficiency-activated PI3K/AKT pathway is a therapeutic candidate for ARID1A-deficient GC.

METHODS

The effect of AKT inhibitors was evaluated using cell viability and colony formation assays in ARID1A-deficient and ARID1A knockdown ARID1A-WT GC cells as well as in HER2-positive and HER2-negative GC. The Cancer Genome Atlas cBioPortal and Gene Expression Omnibus microarray databases were accessed to determine the extent of dependence of GC cell growth on the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

RESULTS

AKT inhibitors decreased the viability of ARID1A-deficient cells and the inhibitory effect was greater in ARID1A-deficient/HER2-negative GC cells. Bioinformatics data suggested that PI3K/AKT signaling plays a greater role in proliferation and survival in ARID1A-deficient/HER2-negative GC cells than in ARID1A-deficient/HER2-positive cells, supporting the higher therapeutic efficacy of AKT inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

The effect of AKT inhibitors on cell proliferation and survival is affected by HER2 status, providing a rationale for exploring targeted therapy using AKT inhibitors in ARID1A-deficient/HER2-negative GC.

Advances in targeted therapy for gastric cancer based on tumor driver genes

As the understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of gastric cancer deepens and the identification of gastric cancer driver genes advances, drugs targeting gastric cancer driver genes have been applied in clinical practice. Among them, trastuzumab, as the first targeted drug for gastric cancer, effectively inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells by targeting overexpressed human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Trastuzumab has become the standard treatment for HER2-positive gastric cancer patients. Ramucirumab, on the other hand, inhibits tumor angiogenesis by targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) and has been used as second-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer patients. In addition, bemarituzumab targets overexpressed fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), while zolbetuximab targets overexpressed claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2), significantly extending progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with gastric cancer in clinical trials. This article reviews the roles of tumor driver genes in the progression of gastric cancer, and the treatment strategies for gastric cancer primarily based on targeting HER2, VEGF, FGFR2, CLDN18.2 and MET. This provides a reference for clinical application of targeted therapy for gastric cancer.

Chromatin and noncoding RNA-mediated mechanisms of gastric tumorigenesis

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common and deadly cancers in the world. It is a multifactorial disease highly influenced by environmental factors, which include radiation, smoking, diet, and infectious pathogens. Accumulating evidence suggests that epigenetic regulators are frequently altered in GC, playing critical roles in gastric tumorigenesis. Epigenetic regulation involves DNA methylation, histone modification, and noncoding RNAs. While it is known that environmental factors cause widespread alterations in DNA methylation, promoting carcinogenesis, the chromatin- and noncoding RNA-mediated mechanisms of gastric tumorigenesis are still poorly understood. In this review, we focus on discussing recent discoveries addressing the roles of histone modifiers and noncoding RNAs and the mechanisms of their interactions in gastric tumorigenesis. A better understanding of epigenetic regulation would likely facilitate the development of novel therapeutic approaches targeting specific epigenetic regulators in GC.

SWI/SNF complex gene variations are associated with a higher tumor mutational burden and a better response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment: a pan-cancer analysis of next-generation sequencing data corresponding to 4591 cases

Background

Genes related to the SWItch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex are frequently mutated across cancers. SWI/SNF-mutant tumors are vulnerable to synthetic lethal inhibitors. However, the landscape of SWI/SNF mutations and their associations with tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have not been elucidated in large real-world Chinese patient cohorts.

Methods

The mutational rates and variation types of six SWI/SNF complex genes (ARID1A, ARID1B, ARID2, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, and PBRM1) were analyzed retrospectively by integrating next-generation sequencing data of 4591 cases covering 18 cancer types. Thereafter, characteristics of SWI/SNF mutations were depicted and the TMB and MSI status and therapeutic effects of ICIs in the SWI/SNF-mutant and SWI/SNF-non-mutant groups were compared.

Results

SWI/SNF mutations were observed in 21.8% of tumors. Endometrial (54.1%), gallbladder and biliary tract (43.4%), and gastric (33.9%) cancers exhibited remarkably higher SWI/SNF mutational rates than other malignancies. Further, ARID1A was the most frequently mutated SWI/SNF gene, and ARID1A D1850fs was identified as relatively crucial. The TMB value, TMB-high (TMB-H), and MSI-high (MSI-H) proportions corresponding to SWI/SNF-mutant cancers were significantly higher than those corresponding to SWI/SNF-non-mutant cancers (25.8 vs. 5.6 mutations/Mb, 44.3% vs. 10.3%, and 16.0% vs. 0.9%, respectively; all p  < 0.0001). Furthermore, these indices were even higher for tumors with co-mutations of SWI/SNF genes and MLL2/3. Regarding immunotherapeutic effects, patients with SWI/SNF variations showed significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) rates than their SWI/SNF-non-mutant counterparts (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56 [95% confidence interval {CI} 0.44–0.72]; p < 0.0001), and PBRM1 mutations were associated with relatively better ICI treatment outcomes than the other SWI/SNF gene mutations (HR, 0.21 [95% CI 0.12–0.37]; p = 0.0007). Additionally, patients in the SWI/SNF-mutant + TMB-H (HR, 0.48 [95% CI 0.37–0.54]; p  < 0.0001) cohorts had longer PFS rates than those in the SWI/SNF-non-mutant + TMB-low cohort.

Conclusions

SWI/SNF complex genes are frequently mutated and are closely associated with TMB-H status, MSI-H status, and superior ICI treatment response in several cancers, such as colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. These findings emphasize the necessity and importance of molecular-level detection and interpretation of SWI/SNF complex mutations.

Next-generation sequencing identifies potential novel therapeutic targets in Chinese HGSOC patients

BACKGROUND

Targeted therapy, especially the use of poly (adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis), has improved the outcome of patients with ovarian cancer. However, most high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) patients have wild-type BRCA1/2, and it is necessary to disclose more potential novel targets for other available targeted drugs. So, detection of genetic alterations beyond BRCA1/2 is critical to screen HGSOC patients for personalized therapy. In this study, a broad, hybrid capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay was used to identify actionable genetic alterations from HGSOC cancer tissues.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with HGSOC were enrolled, including 6 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, 15 stage II, 37 stage III and 10 stage IV patients. All patients signed informed consent forms. Potentially actionable genetic alterations, including base substitutions, indels, copy number alterations, and gene fusions, were identified using targeted NGS.

RESULTS

In our study, 14.7% (10/68) of the tumors harbored actionable genetic alterations in patients with BRCA1. A total of 25.0% (17/68) of patients without BRCA1 mutations harbored other actionable genetic alterations, such as homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway-related genes (ATM, CDK12, FANCA, and FANCD2), PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway genes (NF1, FBXW7, PIK3CA, PTEN, TSC1, and TSC2), and some other genes (ARID1A, FGFR1, KRAS, and NRAS). Furthermore, some patients harboring ARID1A or NF1 actionable genetic alterations showed good clinical efficacy to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and everolimus, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our research indicates that 39.7% (27/68) of patients with HGSOC harbored at least one actionable genetic alteration. 25.0% (17/68) of patients had somatic mutations or copy number variations beyond BRCA1 mutations and might be treated with off-label therapy or to be allocated into clinical trial. NGS assays of HGSOC patients are necessary to screen actionable genetic alterations to guide personalized and precise treatment.

Targeting the alterations of ARID1A in pancreatic cancer: tumorigenesis, prediction of treatment, and prognostic value

The chromatin remodeling gene AT-rich interactive domain 1A (ARID1A), encoding a subunit of the switch/sucrose non-fermentable (SWI/SNF) complex, is one of the most frequently mutated chromatin regulators across a broad spectrum of cancers. Most of the ARID1A alterations are inactivating, leading to the loss or reduced expression of the protein. Recently, ARID1A has been demonstrated as a tumor suppressor gene in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), as its inactive alterations attribute to carcinogenesis. Importantly, ARID1A alterations are revealed as predictive biomarkers for the selection of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. In PDAC, the application of ARID1A alterations in stratifying patients for precise treatment has also been widely explored in preclinical and early clinic studies with encouraging preliminary results. Furthermore, the prognostic value of ARID1A mutations in PDAC has been suggested by various studies. In this review, we focus on the functions of ARID1A alterations in PDAC, particularly their functions during carcinogenesis and their predictive value in treatment selection and prognosis, to provide a comprehensive overview on our current understanding of ARID1A alterations in PDAC.

GRK3 is a poor prognosticator and serves as a therapeutic target in advanced gastric adenocarcinoma

Background

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) is the most targeted protein family by the FDA-approved drugs. GPCR-kinase 3 (GRK3) is critical for GPCR signaling. Our genomic analysis showed that GRK3 expression correlated with poor prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) patients. However, GRK3’s functions and clinical utility in GAC progression and metastases are unknown.

Methods

We studied GRK3 expression in normal, primary, and metastatic GAC tissues. We identified a novel GRK3 inhibitor, LD2, through a chemical-library screen. Through genetic and pharmacologic modulations of GRK3, a series of functional and molecular studies were performed in vitro and in vivo. Impact of GRK3 on YAP1 and its targets was determined.

Results

GRK3 was overexpressed in GAC tissues compared to normal and was even higher in peritoneal metastases. Overexpression (OE) of GRK3 was significantly associated with shorter survival. Upregulation of GRK3 in GAC cells increased cell invasion, colony formation, and proportion of ALDH1+ cells, while its downregulation reduced these attributes. Further, LD2 potently and specifically inhibited GRK3, but not GRK2, a very similar kinase to GRK3. LD2 highly suppressed GAC cells’ malignant phenotypes in vitro. Mechanistically, GRK3 upregulated YAP1 in GAC tissues and its transcriptional downstream targets: SOX9, Birc5, Cyr61 and CTGF. Knockdown (KD) YAP1 rescued the phenotypes of GRK3 OE in GAC cells. GRK3 OE significantly increased tumor growth but LD2 inhibited tumor growth in the PDX model and dramatically suppressed peritoneal metastases induced by GRK3 OE.

Conclusions

GRK3, a poor prognosticator for survival, conferred aggressive phenotype. Genetic silencing of GRK3 or its inhibitor LD2 blunted GRK3-conferred malignant attributes, suggesting GRK3 as a novel therapeutic target in advanced GAC.

Integration of Genomic Biology Into Therapeutic Strategies of Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Metastasis

The peritoneum is a common site of metastasis in advanced gastric cancer (GC). Diagnostic laparoscopy is now routinely performed as part of disease staging, leading to an earlier diagnosis of synchronous peritoneal metastasis (PM). The biology of GCPM is unique and aggressive, leading to a dismal prognosis. These tumors tend to be resistant to traditional systemic therapy, and yet, this remains the current standard-of-care recommended by most international clinical guidelines. As this is an area of unmet clinical need, several translational studies and clinical trials have focused on addressing this specific disease state. Advances in genomic sequencing and molecular profiling have revealed several promising therapeutic targets and elucidated novel biology, particularly on the role of the surrounding tumor microenvironment in GCPM. Peritoneal-specific clinical trials are being designed with a combination of locoregional therapeutic strategies with systemic therapy. In this review, we summarize the new knowledge of cancer biology, advances in surgical techniques, and emergence of novel therapies as an integrated strategy emerges to address GCPM as a distinct clinical entity.

Patient-derived cell lines and orthotopic mouse model of peritoneal carcinomatosis recapitulate molecular and phenotypic features of human gastric adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Gastric adenocarcinoma with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is therapy resistant and leads to poor survival. To study PC in depth, there is an urgent need to develop representative PC-derived cell lines and metastatic models to study molecular mechanisms of PC and for preclinical screening of new therapies.

METHODS

PC cell lines were developed from patient-derived PC cells. The tumorigenicity and metastatic potential were investigated by subcutaneously (PDXs) and orthotopically. Karyotyping, whole-exome sequencing, RNA-sequencing, and functional studies were performed to molecularly define the cell lines and compare genomic and phenotypic features of PDX and donor PC cells.

RESULTS

We established three PC cell lines (GA0518, GA0804, and GA0825) and characterized them in vitro. The doubling times were 22, 39, and 37 h for GA0518, GA0804, and GA0825, respectively. Expression of cancer stem cell markers (CD44, ALDH1, CD133 and YAP1) and activation of oncogenes varied among the cell lines. All three PC cell lines formed PDXs. Interestingly, all three PC cell lines formed tumors in the patient derived orthotopic (PDO) model and GA0518 cell line consistently produced PC in mice. Moreover, PDXs recapitulated transcriptomic and phenotypic features of the donor PC cells. Finally, these cell lines were suitable for preclinical testing of chemotherapy and target agents in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSION

We successfully established three patient-derived PC cell lines and an improved PDO model with high incidence of PC associated with malignant ascites. Thus, these cell lines and metastatic PDO model represent excellent resources for exploring metastatic mechanisms of PC in depth and for target drug screening and validation by interrogating GAC for translational studies.