Multitrait genetic association analysis identifies 50 new risk loci for gastro-oesophageal reflux, seven new loci for Barrett's oesophagus and provides insights into clinical heterogeneity in reflux diagnosis

Causal Effects of Gastroesophageal Reflux on Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study

INTRODUCTION

Observational studies have shown a bidirectional association between gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) or chronic rhinitis (CR), but it is not clear whether this association is causal.

OBJECTIVES

This study was to investigate the causality between GER and CRS or CR using bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.

METHODS

Using pooled data from large genome-wide association studies (GWAS), genetic loci independently associated with GER, CRS and CR in populations of European and American ancestry were selected as instrumental variables (IVs). The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used to analyse the random effects model of MR, and the odds ratio (OR) was used as the evaluation index to explore the bidirectional causality between GER and CRS or CR. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) outliers were detected using MR-pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outliers (MR-PRESSO). The MR-Egger intercept test examined the horizontal pleiotropy of SNPs. The "leave-one-out" sensitivity analysis examined whether MR results were affected by a single SNP.

RESULTS

The main results of IVW showed that GER increased the risk of CRS (OR = 1.3795, 95% CI = 1.188-1.603, p < 0.0500) and CR (OR = 1.3941, 95% CI = 1.1671-1.6652, p < 0.0500). The obtained SNPs as IVs for GER, CRS and CR had no significant horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneity or bias. Regarding the reverse directions, no notable associations could be found.

CONCLUSION

This MR analysis revealed that genetically predicted GER had a causal effect on an increased risk of CRS or CR, but not vice versa. These results have great implications for the management of CRS (especially for refractory CRS) or CR in clinical practice.

The role of inflammatory factors in mediating the causal effects of type 1 diabetes mellitus on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A two-step Mendelian randomization study

While recent studies suggested a potential causal link between type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) but not type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the involved mechanism remains unclear. Here, using a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, we verified the causal relationship between the two types of diabetes mellitus and IPF and investigated the possible role of inflammation in the association between diabetes mellitus and IPF. Based on genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data of T1DM, T2DM, and IPF, the univariable MR, multivariable MR (MVMR), and mediation MR were successively used to analyze the causal relationship. Inverse variance weighted was used as the main method to infer the causal effect, together with a series of sensitivity analyses. The univariable MR showed that only T1DM increased the risk of IPF, and there was no significant causal relationship between T2DM and IPF. The MVMR further verified that there was an independent direct causal effect of T1DM on IPF. Further mediation analysis showed that this effect was partly mediated by increasing C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) and interleukin-12 subunit beta (IL-12B). In conclusion, T1DM is related to an increased risk of IPF. Notably, the causal effect was partially mediated by CXCL10 and IL-12B. Hence, monitoring T1DM patients may help in the early detection and prevention of IPF.

Genetic variation reveals the therapeutic potential of BRSK2 in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND

Current research underscores the need to better understand the pathogenic mechanisms and treatment strategies for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study aimed to identify key targets involved in the progression of IPF.

METHODS

We employed Mendelian randomization (MR) with three genome-wide association studies and four quantitative trait loci datasets to identify key driver genes for IPF. Prioritized targets were evaluated for respiratory insufficiency and transplant-free survival. The therapeutic efficacy of the core gene was validated in cellular and animal models. Additionally, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of therapeutic value, pathogenic mechanisms, and safety through phenome-wide association study (PheWAS), mediation analysis, transcriptomic analyses, shared causal variant exploration, DNA methylation MR, and protein interactions.

RESULTS

Multiple MR results revealed that BRSK2 has a significant pathogenic impact on IPF at both transcriptional and translational levels, with a lung tissue-specific association (OR = 1.596; CI, 1.300-1.961; Pval = 8.290 × 10 - 6). BRSK2 was associated with IPF progression driven by high-risk factors, with mediation effects ranging from 34.452 to 69.665%. Elevated BRSK2 expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells correlated with reduced pulmonary function, while increased circulating BRSK2 levels suggested respiratory failure and shorter transplant-free survival in IPF patients. BRSK2 silencing attenuated lung fibrosis progression in cellular and animal models. Transcriptomic integration identified PSMB1, CTSD, and CTSH as significant downstream effectors of BRSK2, with PSMB1 showing robust shared causal variant support (PPH4 = 0.800). Colocalization analysis and phenotype scan deepened the pathogenic association of BRSK2 with IPF, while methylation MR analysis highlighted the critical role of epigenetic regulation in BRSK2-driven IPF pathogenesis. PheWAS revealed no significant drug-related toxicities for BRSK2, and its therapeutic potential was further underscored by protein interaction analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

BRSK2 is identified as a critical pathogenic factor in IPF, with strong potential as a therapeutic target. Future studies should focus on its translational implications and the development of targeted therapies to improve patient outcomes.

Cerebral cortex changes in FD, IBS, and GERD: A Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Prospective and cross-sectional studies have reported an association between functional gastrointestinal disorders and anxiety and depression. However, the causal relationship remains uncertain. To clarify this, we utilized Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess the causal effects of common gastrointestinal disorders on cortical structures.

METHODS

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) data was gathered for functional dyspepsia (FD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) from European populations numbering 329,262, 16,792, and 602,604, respectively. GWAS cerebral cortical architecture data for cortical thickness (TH) and surface area (SA) were obtained from 51,665 MRI scans. MR was used to analyze the casual relationship between FD, IBS, GERD, and cortical structures. Inverse-variance weighted, weighted median, and MR-Egger tests were performed as assessment indicators. We also evaluated heterogeneity and pleiotropy.

RESULTS

FD significantly decreases the TH in the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (βTH = -0.022 mm; 95%CI: -0.035 mm to -0.009 mm2; PTH = 6.89 × 10-4), and IBS significantly decreases the SA of the pars triangularis (βSA = -21.91 mm2; 95%CI: -32.99 mm to -10.83 mm2; PSA = 1.06 × 10-4), precuneus (βSA = -47.53 mm2; 95%CI: -73.57 mm to-21.48 mm2; PSA = 3.48 × 10-4) and superior frontal regions (βSA = -78.70 mm2; 95%CI: -122.61 mm to -34.78 mm2; PSA = 4.4 × 10-4). At the local functional level, GERD significantly increases the SA of the inferior temporal region (βSA = -113.58 mm2, 95%CI: -113.58 mm to -39.01 mm2, PSA = 6.05 × 10-5).

CONCLUSIONS

FD, IBS and GERD can affect the cerebral cortex architecture through the brain-gut axis, potentially increasing the risks of mental illness and cognitive impairment.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease increases predisposition to severe COVID-19: Insights from integrated Mendelian randomization and genetic analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the potential causal relationship, shared genomic loci, as well as potential molecular pathways and tissue-specific expression patterns between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and the risk of hospitalized/severe 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19).

METHODS

We employed linkage disequilibrium score regression and bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore potential genetic associations between GERD (N = 602,604) and hospitalized COVID-19 (N = 2095,324) as well as severe COVID-19 (N = 1086,211). Additionally, shared genomic loci were extracted from common pivotal regions, further confirmed through corresponding colocalization analyses. GERD-driven molecular pathway network was constructed using extensive literature data mining to understand the molecular-level impacts of GERD on COVID-19.

RESULTS

Our results revealed a significant positive genetic correlation between GERD and both hospitalized (rg  =  0.418) and severe COVID-19 (rg  =  0.314). Furthermore, the MR analysis demonstrated a unidirectional causal effect of genetic predisposition to GERD on COVID-19 outcomes, including hospitalized COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR]: 1.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-1.44, p = 9.17e - 12) and severe COVID-19 (OR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.18-1.37, p = 1.20e - 05). Additionally, GERD and both COVID-19 conditions shared one genomic locus with lead-SNPs rs1011407 and rs1123573, corresponding to the transcription factor BCL11A. Colocalization analysis further demonstrated a significant positive correlation between genome-wide association study and expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) abnormalities, including rs1011407 (eQTL_p = 2.35e - 07) and rs1123573 (eQTL_p = 2.74e - 05). Molecular pathway analysis indicated that GERD might promote the progression of COVID-19 by inducting immune-activated and inflammation-related pathways.

CONCLUSION

These findings confirm that genetically determined GERD may increase the susceptibility to hospitalized/severe COVID-19. The shared genetic loci and the potential molecular pathways offer valuable insights into causal connections between GERD and COVID-19.

Mood instability and risk of gastrointestinal diseases - a univariable and multivariable mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Mood instability, characterized by sudden and unpredictable mood shifts, is prevalent in psychiatric disorders and as a personality trait. Its association with gastrointestinal diseases has been recognized but remains poorly understood in terms of causality.

METHODS

This study aims to investigate the causal relationship between mood instability and a spectrum of gastrointestinal diseases by univariable and multivariable mendelian randomization analysis. The exposure and outcome data were retrieved from the IEU open GWAS database, the UK biobank and the FinnGen study. Instrumental variables were selected to meet relevance, independence, and exclusion restriction criteria. GWAS datasets for mood instability and 28 gastrointestinal diseases were utilized, incorporating diverse populations and genders. Univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization analyses were conducted using R software. MR statistics from different datasets for the same disease were meta-analyzed to maximize the study population.

RESULTS

In univariable MR analysis, genetic predisposition to mood instability showed significant associations with increased risk for several gastrointestinal diseases, including: gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastric ulcer, acute gastritis, irritable bowel syndrome, internal hemorrhoids, cirrhosis, cholecystitis, cholelithiasis, acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis. In multivariable MR analysis, after adjusting for major depression, bipolar disorder, anxiety disorder, and schizophrenia, associations with the following gastrointestinal diseases remained statistically significant: internal hemorrhoids, cirrhosis, acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION

This study provides compelling evidence for a potential causal relationship between mood instability and certain gastrointestinal diseases underscoring the importance of considering mood instability as a potential risk factor for gastrointestinal diseases as well as the positive role of maintaining mood stability in the prevention of gastrointestinal disorders.

Exploration oxidative stress underlying gastroesophageal reflux disease and therapeutic targets identification: a multi-omics Mendelian randomization study

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic inflammatory gastrointestinal disease, which has no thoroughly effective or safe treatment. Elevated oxidative stress is a common consequence of chronic inflammatory conditions.

METHODS

We employed Summary-data based MR (SMR) analysis to assess the associations between gene molecular characteristics and GERD. Exposure data were the summary-level data on the levels of DNA methylation, gene expression, and protein expression, which obtained from related methylation, expression, and protein quantitative trait loci investigations (mQTL, eQTL, and pQTL). Outcome data, Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics of GERD, were extracted from the Ong's study (discovery), the Dönertaş's study (replication), and the FinnGen study (replication). Colocalization analysis was performed to determine if the detected signal pairs shared a causative genetic mutation. Oxidative stress related genes and druggable genes were imported to explore oxidative stress mechanism underlying GERD and therapeutic targets of GERD. The Drugbank database was utilized to conduct druggability evaluation.

RESULTS

After multi-omics SMR analysis and colocalization analysis, we identified seven key genes for GERD, which were SUOX and SERPING1, DUSP13, SULT1A1, LMOD1, UBE2L6, and PSCA. SUOX was screened out to be the mediator, which suggest that GERD is related to oxidative stress. SERPING1, SULT1A1, and PSCA were selected to be the druggable genes.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings offered strong support for the identification of GERD treatment targets in the future as well as for the study of the oxidative stress mechanism underlying GERD.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a mendelian randomization study in European and East Asian populations

Background

Numerous observational studies have shown a potential association between metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, causality is unclear. This study utilized genome-wide association study (GWAS) genetic data to explore the causal relationship between MASLD and GERD in European and East Asian populations.

Methods

This study utilized a bidirectional, two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach. All disease data were obtained from the GWAS database, and single nucleotide polymorphisms strongly associated with exposure were selected as instrumental variables. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method is primarily utilized to evaluate the causal relationship between exposure and outcome. Finally, sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the robustness of the results.

Results

The IVW estimates indicated that non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (odds ratio (OR) = 1.054, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.966-1.150, p = 0.236) and percent liver fat (OR = 0.977, 95% CI, 0.937-1.018, p = 0.258) in European population were not linked to a higher risk of GERD. However, GERD in European population was associated with an increased risk of NAFLD (OR = 1.485, 95% CI, 1.274-1.729, p < 0.001) and percent liver fat (OR = 1.244, 95% CI, 1.171-1.321, p < 0.001). In addition, the IVW analysis in East Asian population showed that alanine aminotransferase (ALT) was associated with an increased risk of GERD (OR = 2.305, 95% CI, 1.241-4.281, p = 0.008), whereas aspartate aminotransferase (AST) had no causal effects on GERD risk (OR = 0.973, 95% CI, 0.541-1.749, p = 0.926). Furthermore, the associations between GERD and ALT (OR = 1.007, 95% CI, 0.998-1.015, p = 0.123) or AST (OR = 1.004, 95% CI, 0.997-1.012, p = 0.246) were not significant. After removing outliers, a significant correlation between GERD and ALT was observed (OR = 1.009, 95% CI, 1.001-1.016, p = 0.020).

Conclusion

There was reverse causality between MASLD and GERD in European population, while there was bidirectional causality between a proxie for MASLD (ALT) and GERD in East Asian population. This study can provide novel insights into cross-ethnic genetic research on MASLD and GERD.

Deciphering the causal landscape: genetic insights into sporadic vestibular schwannoma risk factors through Mendelian Randomization

BACKGROUND

Sporadic vestibular schwannoma, a benign tumor affecting the vestibulocochlear nerve, poses significant health challenges due to its impact on hearing, balance, and facial nerve function. Despite known associations with genetic mutations and environmental factors, the causality between potential risk factors and sporadic vestibular schwannoma remains underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the causal effects of various genetically predicted risk factors on sporadic vestibular schwannoma utilizing a Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) approach to enhance understanding of its etiology and inform prevention strategies.

METHODS

Leveraging data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we analyzed 29 risk factors across five categories: related diseases, lifestyle habits, nutritional status, learning ability, and laboratory indicators. The MR analysis employed instrumental variables (IVs) derived from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to assess causal relationships, overcoming traditional observational study limitations.

RESULTS

Our findings highlight significant associations between sporadic vestibular schwannoma and factors such as ovarian cancer, uterine fibroids and lifestyle habits including dietary intake and alcohol consumption. Notably, higher educational attainment and specific laboratory indicators like high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were linked to altered disease risk. These results suggest a multifaceted etiology involving hormonal, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, immune, and metabolic pathways.

CONCLUSION

This comprehensive MR study provides novel insights into the diverse risk factors contributing to sporadic vestibular schwannoma, emphasizing the role of genetic predispositions, hormonal influences, and lifestyle choices in its development. The associations identified underscore the need for a multidisciplinary research approach and targeted public health strategies to mitigate sporadic vestibular schwannoma risk. Further research into the underlying mechanisms of these associations is crucial for developing effective interventions and improving patient outcomes.

Causal Association Between Sedentary Behaviors and Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mendelian Randomization Studies

BACKGROUND

Different types of sedentary behavior are associated with several health outcomes, but the causality of these associations remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization (MR) studies investigating the associations between sedentary behaviors and health outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and PsycINFO up to August 2023 was conducted to identify eligible MR studies. We selected studies that assessed associations of genetically determined sedentary behaviors and health outcomes. A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the causal associations when two or more MR studies were available. We graded the evidence level of each MR association based on the results of the main method and sensitivity analyses in MR studies.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies with 168 MR associations between six types of sedentary behavior and 47 health outcomes were included. Results from meta-analyses suggested a total of 47 significant causal associations between sedentary behaviors and health outcomes. Notably, more leisure TV watching is robustly correlated with increased risks of myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, all-cause ischemic stroke, and type 2 diabetes. Conversely, robust inverse associations were observed between leisure computer use and risks of rheumatoid arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, and gastroesophageal reflux disease.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that different types of sedentary behavior have distinct causal effects on health outcomes. Therefore, interventions should focus not only on reducing sedentary time but also on promoting healthier types of sedentary behavior.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42023453828.

Role of blood lipids in mediating the effect of dietary factors on gastroesophageal reflux disease: a two-step mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Growing studies have indicated an association between dietary factors and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, whether these associations refer to a causal relationship and the potential mechanism by which dietary factors affect GERD is still unclear.

METHODS

A two-step mendelian randomization analysis was performed to obtain causal estimates of dietary factors, blood lipids on GERD. Independent genetic variants associated with 13 kinds of dietary factors and 5 kinds of blood lipids at the genome-wide significance level were selected as instrumental variables. The summary statistics for GERD were obtained from European Bioinformatics Institute, including 129,080 cases and 473,524 controls. Inverse variance weighted was utilized as the main statistical method. MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out analysis were performed to evaluate possible heterogeneity and pleiotropy. And the potential reverse causality was assessed using Steiger filtering.

RESULTS

The results of the inverse variance weighted method indicated that genetically predicted total pork intake (OR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.21-5.58, p = 0.0143), total bread intake (OR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99, p = 0.0497), total cereal intake (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.31-0.56, p = 2.98E-06), and total cheese intake (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.27-0.61, p = 1.06E-05) were associated with the risk of GERD. Multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis also revealed a negative association between total cereal intake, total cheese intake and the risk of GERD, but the effect of total pork intake and total bread intake on GERD disappeared after adjustment of smoking, alcohol consumption, use of calcium channel blockers, BMI, physical activity levels, and biological sex (age adjusted). Furthermore, the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is negatively correlated with total cheese intake, which mediates the impact of total cheese intake on GERD. The proportion mediated by LDL-C is 2.27% (95%CI: 1.57%, 4.09%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence that an increase in total cereal intake and total cheese intake will decrease the risk of GERD. Additionally, LDL-C mediates the causal effect of total cheese intake on GERD. These results provide new insights into the role of dietary factors and blood lipids in GERD, which is beneficial for disease prevention.

Association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and venous thromboembolism: A Mendelian randomization study

The link between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) is not well understood. We performed a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the potential causal effect of GERD on VTE. To explore the causal relationship between genetically predicted GERD and the risk of VTE, including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Three MR statistical techniques (inverse variance weighting (IVW), weighted median, and MR-Egger) were used to evaluate the potential causal relationship in genome-wide association studies. As part of the sensitivity analysis, we assessed heterogeneity and pleiotropy, and used the leave-one-SNP-out method to enhance the robustness of our findings. MR analysis results indicated that genetically predicted GERD was associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (odds ratio [OR] = 1.239, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.146-1.339), PE (OR = 1.307, 95% CI = 1.156-1.477) and DVT (OR = 1.160, 95% CI = 1.012-1.330). Moreover, this study did not detect any heterogeneity or pleiotropy. GERD has a causal effect on venous thromboembolism, PE, and DVT.

The causal relationship between diabetes mellitus and the risk of sensorineural hearing loss: A Mendelian randomization study

An increasing body of evidence suggests that diabetes mellitus (DM) plays a role in sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, the specific causal relationship between DM and SNHL remains partially uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the causal relationship between DM and the risk of SNHL using a Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Single nucleotide polymorphisms closely related to DM were selected as instrumental variables using open genome-wide association study datasets. Three methods based on inverse variance weighted were utilized to investigate the causal relationship between DM and SNHL. Subsequently, multivariable MR (MVMR) was executed to adjust for confounding genetic associations. In addition, a range of sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the stability and reliability of the MR results. The inverse variance weighted analysis indicated a potential genetic causality between DM and SNHL (odds ratio [OR]: 2.179; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.123-4.231; P = .021). The sensitivity analyses showed that the included single nucleotide polymorphisms had no heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and outliers (P > .05). Moreover, the leave-one-out method further verified the robustness of the MR analysis results. Finally, the results of the MVMR study predicted that there was a genetic causal relationship between type 1 DM and SNHL (OR: 1.032; 95%CI: 1.018-1.047; P = 5.45 × 10-6), while there was no causality between type 2 DM and SNHL (OR: 1.000; 95%CI: 0.958-1.036; P = .853). Our study suggested that DM and type 1 DM may be genetically responsible for SNHL. Although our study did not detect a genetic causal relationship between type 2 DM and SNHL, this does not rule out a relationship between them at other mechanistic levels. Further studies are required to confirm the findings and look into the physiological and pathological mechanism underlying these relationships.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease influences blood pressure components, lipid profile and cardiovascular diseases: Evidence from a Mendelian randomization study

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent gastrointestinal disorder associated with a range of cardiovascular and metabolic complications. However, the relationship between GERD and blood pressure components, lipid profile, and cardiovascular diseases remains unclear.

Methods

Leveraging genetic variants associated with GERD as instrumental variables, we performed this Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses. Blood pressure components, lipid profile parameters, as well as cardiovascular diseases were considered as outcomes. Furthermore, we conducted reverse MR analysis to explore the association of these factors with the risk of GERD.

Results

Our MR analysis discovered a potential causal influence of GERD on blood pressure components, with genetically predicted GERD positively associated with systolic blood pressure (β = 0.053, P = 0.036), diastolic blood pressure (β = 0.100, P < 0.001), and mean arterial pressure (β = 0.106, P < 0.001). Additionally, genetically predicted GERD showed a significant impact on lipid profile, leading to increased genetically predicted levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (β = 0.093, P < 0.001), and triglycerides (β = 0.153, P < 0.001), while having a negative effect on high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (β = -0.115, P = 0.002). Furthermore, our study indicated a noteworthy causal association between genetically predicted GERD and increased risk of myocardial infarction [odds ratio (OR) = 1.272, P = 0.019)] and hypertension (OR = 1.357, P < 0.001). No significant association was found between GERD and pulse pressure, total cholesterol, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation (P > 0.05). Reverse MR analysis indicates that blood pressure components, lipid profile, and cardiovascular diseases do not lead to an increased risk of GERD (all P > 0.05). Furthermore, mediation MR analysis reveals that LDL cholesterol (proportion mediated: 19.99%, 95% CI: 4.49% to 35.50%), HDL cholesterol (proportion mediated: 11.71%, 95% CI: 5.23% to 18.19%), and hypertension (proportion mediated: 35.09%, 95% CI: 24.66% to 45.53%) mediated the effect of GERD on myocardial infarction, while other factors did not participate in this pathway.

Conclusions

This MR study provides evidence supporting a causal relationship between GERD and alterations in blood pressure components, lipid profile, and increased risk of cardiovascular diseases.

The causal role of gastroesophageal reflux disease in endometriosis: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Observational studies have reported an association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and endometriosis. We conducted a two-sample and bidirectional Mendelian randomization analysis to determine whether those associations are causal. Two-sample and bidirectional MR analyses were performed using summary statistics from the European Individual Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS). The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method is used as the main analysis method to evaluate causality. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess heterogeneity, horizontal versatility, and stability. The results showed no significant causal association between GERD in women with endometriosis in the UK Bank database [ratio (OR) ≈ 0, 95% adjusted interval (CI) 1.0007∼1.0044, P = 0.006] and Finn databases [ratio (OR) = 1.29, 95% adjusted interval (CI) 0.99∼1.67, P = 0.06]. However, when studying the Finn database only for endometriosis, which is confined to the uterus, a significant increase in GERD was limited to the risk of endometriosis in the uterus [ratio (OR) = 1.47, 95% adjusted interval (CI) 1.00∼2.17, P = 0.05]. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust and did not detect multi efficacy or heterogeneity. Meanwhile, reverse MR analysis showed that endometriosis did not increase the risk of GERD. This MR study supports a causal relationship between GERD and an increased risk of endometriosis confined to the uterus. Therefore, patients with gastric esophageal reflux should be treated with gynecological examination to avoid and prevent the development of endometriosis.

Association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and metabolic syndrome: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis

Introduction

The development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may be influenced by metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components, but the causal relationships remain unclear. This study employs Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the potential causal effects of MetS and its components on GERD risk.

Methods

Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data were utilized to assess the causal effects of MetS and its components on GERD risk using univariable (UVMR) and multivariable MR (MVMR) analyses. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method served as the primary analytical approach.

Results

UVMR analysis revealed significant associations between GERD risk and genetically predicted MetS and its components. Notably, MVMR analysis identified hypertension (OR (95% CI): 5.087 (3.109–8.324); p = 9.51E–11) and body mass index (BMI) [OR (95% CI): 2.103 (1.752–2.525); p = 1.60E–15) as key factors associated with GERD development.

Conclusions

This study provides evidence of a genetically determined causal relationship between MetS, including its components, and the risk of developing GERD. These findings suggest potential targets for early intervention to reduce GERD risk.

Causal Relationship Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and the Risk of Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Insights from Multivariable and Mediation Mendelian Randomization Analysis

Background: Previous studies have shown an association between chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the findings of these studies are controversial, and evaluating this association could help in the treatment of CRS. Thus, we aimed to clarify the relationship between GERD and CRS. Methods: We conducted a Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Pooled data on CRS, GERD, and their associated risk factors were extracted from large genome-wide association studies. Independent single-nucleotide polymorphisms were rigorously screened as instrumental variables. Causal associations between GERD and CRS were assessed, and mediation analyses were performed using multivariate and 2-step MR. Asthma served as a mediator because of its association with both CRS and GERD. Sensitivity tests were also performed. Results: MR analysis showed that genetically predicted GERD was associated with an increased risk of CRS (P < .001). Multivariate MR analysis showed that the effect of GERD on CRS was relatively independent. Mediation analysis showed that asthma mediated the association with a mediation effect of 21.07% (95% CI, 2.70%-40.18%). Sensitivity analyses did not reveal any significant effects of pleiotropy and heterogeneity. Conclusions: We found a causal relationship between genetically predicted GERD and an increase in the risk of CRS. As a mediator, asthma contributed to the effect of GERD on CRS. This study provides high-quality causal evidence for the prevention of CRS.

Crosstalk between gastrointestinal tract disorders and obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE

Clinical studies suggested associations between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and gastrointestinal tract disorders. This study aims to investigate the genetic causal relationship between OSA and gastrointestinal tract disorders, specifically gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

In this study, we employed two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis to investigate the potential relationships between OSA and GERD, and between OSA and IBD. More specifically, the primary analysis utilized inverse variance weighting (IVW). Weighted median, MR Egger, and MR PRESSO were applied to complicate potential violations of MR assumptions. Also, sensitivity analysis was evaluated and similar analysis was performed again after outliers were removed. Additionally, multivariable MR (MVMR) was conducted for associated pairs to adjust for obesity.

RESULTS

Genetically predicted risk of GERD increased OSA risk by approximately 60% (ORIVW = 1.62, 95%CI = [1.43,1.84]) which was also stable by other complicated approaches, and even with BMI adjusted by MVMR (ORadjBMI[95%CI] = 1.26 [1.15,1.37]). Besides, OSA showed a mild causal effect on increased GERD risk after adjusting for obesity (ORadjBMI[95%CI] = 1.05 [1.02,1.08]). Additionally, OSA increased the risks for IBD (ORIVW[95%CI] = 1.36 [1.12,1.65]), including a higher risk of CD (ORIVW[95%CI] = 1.41 [1.08,1.83]), and a trend for increasing UC risk (ORIVW[95%CI] = 1.29 [0.99,1.67]).

CONCLUSION

GERD exerts a substantial causality on increasing the risk of OSA. Conversely, the potential for a causal relationship that OSA contributes to the development of GERD or IBD remains probable. These findings support the crosstalk between gastrointestinal tract disorders and OSA.

A multi-level investigation of the genetic relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and lung cancer

Background

Observational studies have revealed a potential association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and lung cancer (LC), but the genetic role in their comorbidity have not been fully elucidated. This study aimed to comprehensively dissect the genetic link underlying GERD and LC.

Methods

Using large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS) data, we investigated shared genetic architecture between GERD and LC. Our analyses encompassed genetic correlation, cross-trait meta-analysis, transcriptome-wide association studies (TWASs), and the evaluation of the causality though a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis with sufficient sensitivities.

Results

We identified a significant genome-wide genetic correlation between GERD and overall LC (rg =0.33, P=1.58×10-14), as well as across other subtype-specific LC (rg ranging from 0.19 to 0.39). After separating the whole genome into approximately 2,353 independent regions, 5 specific regions demonstrated significant local genetic correlation, with most significant region located at 9q33.3. Cross-trait meta-analysis revealed 22 pleiotropic loci between GERD and LC, including 3 novel loci (rs537160, rs10156445, and rs17391694). TWASs discovered a total of 49 genes shared in multiple tissues, such as lung tissues, esophagus muscularis, esophagus mucosa, and esophagus gastroesophageal junction. MR analysis suggested a significantly causal relationship between GERD and overall LC [odds ratio (OR) =1.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.19-1.51], as well as other subtype-specific LC (OR ranging from 1.25 to 1.76). No evidence supports a significant causal effect of LC on GERD.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest intrinsic genetic correlation underlying GERD and LC, which provides valuable insights for screening and management of LC in individuals with GERD.

A population-based study of familial coaggregation and shared genetic etiology of psychiatric and gastrointestinal disorders

BACKGROUND

It has been proposed that having a psychiatric disorder could increase the risk of developing a gastrointestinal disorder, and vice versa. The role of familial coaggregation and shared genetic loading between psychiatric and gastrointestinal disorders remains unclear.

METHODS

This study used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database; 4,504,612 individuals born 1970-1999 with parental information, 51,664 same-sex twins, and 3,322,959 persons with full-sibling(s) were enrolled. Genotyping was available for 106,796 unrelated participants from the Taiwan Biobank. A logistic regression model was used to examine the associations of individual history, affected relatives, and polygenic risk scores (PRS) for schizophrenia (SCZ), bipolar disorder (BPD), major depressive disorder (MDD), and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), with the risk of peptic ulcer disease (PUD), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and vice versa.

RESULTS

Here we show that parental psychiatric disorders are associated with gastrointestinal disorders. Full-siblings of psychiatric cases have an increased risk of gastrointestinal disorders except for SCZ/BPD and IBD; the magnitude of coaggregation is higher in same-sex twins than in full-siblings. The results of bidirectional analyses mostly remain unchanged. PRS for SCZ, MDD, and OCD are associated with IBS, PUD/GERD/IBS/IBD, and PUD/GERD/IBS, respectively. PRS for PUD, GERD, IBS, and IBD are associated with MDD, BPD/MDD, SCZ/BPD/MDD, and BPD, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

There is familial coaggregation and shared genetic etiology between psychiatric and gastrointestinal comorbidity. Individuals with psychiatric disorder-affected relatives or with higher genetic risk for psychiatric disorders should be monitored for gastrointestinal disorders, and vice versa.

Genetic evidence causally linking gastroesophageal reflux disease to cholecystitis: a two-sample mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and cholecystitis share overlapping symptoms, including belching, acid reflux, and heartburn. Despite this, the causal relationship between these two conditions remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the causal link between GERD and cholecystitis using a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.

METHODS

A two-sample MR analysis was conducted using the inverse variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, weighted mode, and MR-Egger method to assess the causal effects of GERD on the cholecystitis risk. Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) on GERD (N cases = 129080; N controls = 473524) and cholecystitis (N cases = 1930; N controls =359264) were obtained from the IEU Open GWAS project. Various techniques were employed to assess pleiotropy and heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven single nucleotide polymorphisms from GERD GWASs were selected as instrumental variables (IVs). The primary IVW method revealed a significant association between GERD and an increased risk of cholecystitis (odds ratio = 1.004; 95% confidence interval = 1.003-1.005, p = 2.68 × 10- 9). The absence of heterogeneity and pleiotropy in the data supports the reliability of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

GERD was positively associated with the risk of cholecystitis. This study provides insights into potential avenues for the development of prevention strategies and treatment options for cholecystitis in patients with GERD. These findings contribute to our understanding of the complex interplay between GERD and cholecystitis.

Shared genetic architecture between gastro-esophageal reflux disease, asthma, and allergic diseases

The aim is to investigate the evidence for shared genetic architecture between each of asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD). Structural equation models (SEM) and polygenic risk score (PRS) analyses are applied to three Swedish twin cohorts (n = 46,582) and reveal a modest genetic correlation between GERD and asthma of 0.18 and bidirectional PRS and phenotypic associations ranging between OR 1.09-1.14 and no correlations for eczema and allergic rhinitis. Linkage disequilibrium score regression is applied to summary statistics of recently published GERD and asthma/allergic disease genome wide association studies and reveals a genetic correlation of 0.48 for asthma and GERD, and Genomic SEM supports a single latent factor. A gene-/gene-set analysis using MAGMA reveals six pleiotropic genes (two at 12q13.2) associated with asthma and GERD. This study provides evidence that there is a common genetic architecture unique to asthma and GERD that may explain comorbidity and requires further investigation.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Preterm Birth: Univariate and Multivariate Mendelian Randomization

Background

Observational studies have established a connection between Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and preterm birth (PTB). Nevertheless, these correlations can be affected by residual confounding or reverse causality, resulting in ambiguity regarding the connection. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between genetically predicted GERD and PTB.

Methods

Initially, we performed bidirectional univariate Mendelian randomization (UVMR) analysis utilizing publicly accessible genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data. The primary analytical approach employed to determine the causal impact between GERD and PTB is the inverse variance weighted technique (IVW). Subsequently, we utilized multivariate Mendelian randomization (MVMR) to adjust for potential factors that could influence the results, such as body mass index (BMI), maternal smoking around birth, educational attainment, household income, and Townsend deprivation index (TDI). Furthermore, we performed a sequence of comprehensive sensitivity analyses to assess the reliability of our MR findings.

Results

The UVMR analysis results showed a significant correlation between GERD and PTB (odds ratio [OR]: 1.810; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.344-2.439; P=9.60E-05) in the IVW model, and the Weighted median method (OR=1.591, 95% CI=1.094-2.315, P=0.015) revealed consistent results. The inverse MR findings suggest no causal link between PTB and the incidence of GERD. In addition, the sensitivity analysis did not detect heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy, and the "leave-one-out" examination confirmed that the causal estimation is unlikely to be influenced by the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) effect. The MVMR analysis demonstrated that the causal association between GERD and PTB still existed after considering BMI, maternal smoking around birth, educational attainment, household income, and TDI (OR=1.921, 95% CI=1.401-2.634, P=5.08E-05).

Conclusion

This study presents evidence indicating that genetically predicted GERD can heighten the risk of PTB. Therefore, it is advisable to perform focused screening for pregnant women with GERD in order to find the initial signs of PTB and promptly apply intervention strategies to extend the duration of pregnancy.

Unraveling the causality between gastroesophageal reflux disease and increased cancer risk: evidence from the UK Biobank and GWAS consortia

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition characterized by the reflux of stomach contents into the esophagus. Despite its widespread prevalence worldwide, the causal link between GERD and various cancer risks has not been fully established, and past medical research has often underestimated or overlooked this relationship.

METHODS

This study performed Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the causal relationship between GERD and 19 different cancers. We leveraged data from 129,080 GERD patients and 473,524 controls, along with cancer-related data, obtained from the UK Biobank and various Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) consortia. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with GERD were used as instrumental variables, utilizing methods such as inverse variance weighting, weighted median, and MR-Egger to address potential pleiotropy and confounding factors.

RESULTS

GERD was significantly associated with higher risks of nine types of cancer. Even after adjusting for all known risk factors-including smoking, alcohol consumption, major depression, and body mass index (BMI)-these associations remained significant, with higher risks for most cancers. For example, the adjusted risk for overall lung cancer was (OR, 1.23; 95% CI: 1.14-1.33), for lung adenocarcinoma was (OR, 1.18; 95% CI: 1.03-1.36), for lung squamous cell carcinoma was (OR, 1.35; 95% CI: 1.19-1.53), and for oral cavity and pharyngeal cancer was (OR, 1.73; 95% CI: 1.22-2.44). Especially noteworthy, the risk for esophageal cancer increased to (OR, 2.57; 95% CI: 1.23-5.37). Mediation analyses further highlighted GERD as a significant mediator in the relationships between BMI, smoking, major depression, and cancer risks.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies a significant causal relationship between GERD and increased cancer risk, highlighting its role in cancer development and underscoring the necessity of incorporating GERD management into cancer prevention strategies.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease increases the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common autoimmune disease, and some observational studies have indicated an association between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and RA. However, the causal relationship between the two remains uncertain. We used Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess the causal relationship between GERD and RA. Two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis was performed using pooled data from large-scale genome-wide association studies. In addition, we performed multivariate MR analyses to exclude confounding factors between GERD and RA, including smoking quantity, drinking frequency, BMI, depression, and education attainment. The MR results for GERD on RA suggested a causal effect of the genetic susceptibility of GERD on RA (discovery dataset, IVW, odds ratio [OR] = 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.63, p = 2.81 × 10-6; validation dataset, IVW, OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.23-1.55, P = 1.76 × 10-8). Multivariate MR analysis also supports this result. But the results of the reverse MR analysis did not reveal compelling evidence that RA can increase the risk of developing GERD. Our bidirectional Two-Sample Mendelian randomization analysis and multivariate MR analysis provide support for the causal effect of GERD on RA. This discovery could offer new insights for the prevention and treatment of RA.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and risk for arrhythmias: a Mendelian randomization analysis

Background

Clinical observations and epidemiological studies suggest a potential linkage between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and arrhythmias, yet the underlying mechanism remains elusive. This study investigates the causal relationship between GERD and four types of arrhythmia through a genetic lens, employing Mendelian randomization analysis to elucidate the directionality of these associations.

Methods

Selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from genome-wide association study (GWAS) data were utilized as instrumental variables. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method, MR-Egger regression analysis, and the weighted median method were employed in two-sample Mendelian randomization analysis. Horizontal pleiotropy was detected and corrected using the MR-PRESSO test and MR-Egger regression. The stability and reliability of the Mendelian randomization results were assessed using the leave-one-out method, Cochran's Q test, and funnel plots. The causal relationship between GERD and four types of arrhythmias was evaluated using the odds ratio (OR).

Results

IVW results indicated that GERD could increase the risk of arrhythmias. A one standard deviation increases in the logarithmically transformed GERD score resulted in a 34% increase in the risk of arrhythmia (OR = 1.34; 95% CI 1.19-1.51; p = 1.66E-06). No significant correlation was found between GERD and other arrhythmias.

Conclusion

A causal relationship exists between GERD and arrhythmias, suggesting that GERD increases the risk of developing these arrhythmias.

Causal effects of genetic birth weight and gestational age on adult esophageal diseases: Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the association between gestational age, birth weight, and esophageal cancer risk; however, causality remains debated. We aimed to establish causal links between genetic gestational age and birth weight traits and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Barrett's esophagus (BE), and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EA). Additionally, we explored if known risk factors mediate these links.

AIM

To analyze of the relationship between gestational age, birth weight and GERD, BE, and EA.

METHODS

Genetic data on gestational age and birth weight (n = 84689 and 143677) from the Early Growth Genetics Consortium and outcomes for GERD (n = 467253), BE (n = 56429), and EA (n = 21271) from genome-wide association study served as instrumental variables. Mendelian randomization (MR) and mediation analyses were conducted using MR-Egger, weighted median, and inverse variance weighted methods. Robustness was ensured through heterogeneity, pleiotropy tests, and sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Birth weight was negatively correlated with GERD and BE risk [odds ratio (OR) = 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.8] and (OR = 0.75; 95%CI: 0.60-0.9), respectively, with no significant association with EA. No causal link was found between gestational age and outcomes. Birth weight was positively correlated with five risk factors: Educational attainment (OR = 1.15; 95%CI: 1.01-1.31), body mass index (OR = 1.06; 95%CI: 1.02-1.1), height (OR = 1.12; 95%CI: 1.06-1.19), weight (OR = 1.13; 95%CI: 1.10-1.1), and alcoholic drinks per week (OR = 1.03; 95%CI: 1.00-1.06). Mediation analysis showed educational attainment and height mediated the birth weight-BE link by 13.99% and 5.46%.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports the protective role of genetically predicted birth weight against GERD, BE, and EA, independent of gestational age and partially mediated by educational attainment and height.

Migraine and gastroesophageal reflux disease: Disentangling the complex connection with depression as a mediator

OBJECTIVE

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and migraine are public health concerns worldwide. No observational study has conclusively elucidated the causal relationship between these two conditions. We employed Mendelian randomization (MR) methods to explore the potential causal links between GERD and migraine.

METHODS

Genome-wide association studies were subjected to MR to infer the causality between GERD and migraine. Bidirectional two-sample MR was performed to establish causal relationships. Multivariable MR analysis was conducted to adjust potential confounding factors, and mediation MR analysis was utilized to assess the role of depression between GERD and migraine as a mediator. We primarily utilized the inverse variance weighted method (IVW) and sensitivity analysis methods, including MR-Egger, weighted median, and leave-one-out methods. We assessed heterogeneity and pleiotropy to ensure the reliability of the results.

RESULTS

Bidirectional two-sample MR revealed a positive causal effect of GERD on migraine (IVW: OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.34-1.66, p = 3.70E-13). Migraine did not increase the risk of GERD (IVW: OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.98-1.17, p = 0.1139). Multivariable MR indicated that the positive causal effect of GERD on migraine remained after adjustment for factors, such as smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and depression. Mediation MR revealed that depression mediated 28.72% of GERD's effect on migraine. MR analysis was supported by all sensitivity analyses and was replicated and validated in another independent dataset on migraine.

CONCLUSION

Our findings elucidate the positive causal effect of GERD on migraine and underscores the mediating role of depression in increasing the risk of migraine due to GERD. Effective control of GERD, particularly interventions targeting depression, may aid in preventing the occurrence of migraine. Future research should delve deeper into the specific pathophysiological mechanisms through which GERD affects migraine risk, facilitating the development of more effective drug targets or disease management strategies.

Relationship between Sjogren's syndrome and gastroesophageal reflux: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

The clinical incidence of sjogren's syndrome combined with gastroesophageal reflux disease is high. Existing observational studies have shown inconsistent results in the association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Sjogren's syndrome (SS).We observed that the symptoms of SS patients also improved after receiving GERD-related treatment. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship between GERD and SS through a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study. Independent SNPs associated with GERD and SS were selected from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) as instrumental variables to conduct a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian analysis of GERD and SS. Genetic data were obtained from two databases for the following two outcomes: Gastroesophageal reflux (IEU Open GWAS) [sample size = 602,604 (patients = 129,080; nonpatients = 473,524)] and SS (FinnGen) [sample size = 392,423 (patients = 2,495; nonpatients = 389,928)]. Statistical methods for the MR analysis included the inverse-variance weighting method, weighted median, simple mode and weighted mode, as well as heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses using the Cochran Q statistic, MR‒Egger regression, outlier detection methods (MR-PRESSO). In addition, Steiger Test was conducted to test the direction of causality. MR analysis showed a positive correlation between GERD and SS risk [odds ratio (OR) = 1.3279 (95% confidence interval 1.0312-1.7099, P = 0.0280)]. However, in contrast, no significant causal effect of SS on GERD was observed [OR = 1.0024 (95% CI 0.9651-1.0412; P = 0.8995)]. This bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study confirmed a causal relationship between SS and GERD, and suggested that GERD is a risk factor for SS, while SS does not affect GERD.

Gastroesophageal Reflux and Chronic Rhinosinusitis: A Mendelian Randomization Study

OBJECTIVE

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is associated with gastroesophageal reflux (GERD). However, the causal relationship is controversial. We conducted a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) analysis to explore this potential association.

METHODS

Based on genome-wide association studies (GWAS), a univariable MR was performed to explore the causal relationship of GERD with CRS. Instrumental variables (IVs) pertinent to anti-GERD treatment were employed as a means of validation. The primary MR outcome was established using an inverse variance weighted (IVW) method, supplemented by multiple sensitivity analyses. Subsequently, a multivariable MR was conducted to account for potential confounding variables, thereby ascertaining a direct effect of GERD on CRS. Finally, a network MR analysis was carried out to elucidate the mediating role of asthma in the relationship between GERD and CRS.

RESULTS

The univariable MR demonstrated an association between GERD and an elevated risk of CRS (IVW OR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.18-1.45, p = 4.19 × 10-7). Omeprazole usage was associated with a reduction in CRS risk (IVW OR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.42-0.98, p = 0.039). The causal relationship between GERD and CRS remained after adjusting for potential confounders, such as smoking characteristics, body mass index, asthma, allergic rhinitis, in the multivariable MR analysis. Besides, the proportion of the causal effect of GERD on CRS mediated by asthma was 19.65% (95% CI = 2.69%-36.62%).

CONCLUSION

GERD was independently associated with an increased risk of CRS. The mediating role of asthma between GERD and CRS also reveals that GERD is one of the mechanisms underlying unified airway disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:3086-3092, 2024.

Causal effect between gut microbiota and gastroesophageal reflux disease: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

Previous observational studies have found that the gut microbiota is closely related to the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), while their causal relationship is unclear. A two-sample multivariate Mendelian randomization analysis was implemented to estimate the causal effect of gut microbiota on GERD. The gut microbiota aggregated statistics were derived from a meta-analysis of the largest available genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted by the MiBioGen alliance ( n  = 13 266). GERD aggregated statistics were derived from published GWAS (129 080 cases and 473 524 controls). A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study was conducted to explore the causal relationship between gut microbiota and GERD using the inverse variance weighted (IVW), Mendelian randomization Egger, single model, weighted median, and weighted model. To verify the stability of the main results of Mendelian randomization analysis, we performed sensitivity analysis. Based on the results of IVW, we found that Anaerostipes was causally associated with an increased risk of GERD [odds ratio (OR): 1.09, P  = 0.018]. Eight gut microbiota taxa ( Actinobacteria, Bifidobacteriales, Bifidobacteriaceae, Clostridiales vadin BB60 group, Rikenellaceae, Lachnospiraceae UCG004, Methanobrevibacter , and unknown genus id.1000000073 ) are predicted to act causally in suppressing the risk of GERD ( P  < 0.05). In addition, reverse Mendelian randomization analyses revealed that the abundance of 15 gut microbiota taxon was found to be affected by GERD. No significant estimation of heterogeneity or pleiotropy is detected. Our study presents a complicated causal relationship between gut microbiota and GERD that offers guidance on the selection of appropriate probiotics as clinical interventions for GERD.

Genetic correlation between smoking behavior and gastroesophageal reflux disease: insights from integrative multi-omics data

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have preliminarily revealed an association between smoking and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, little is known about the causal relationship and shared genetic architecture between the two. This study aims to explore their common genetic correlations by leveraging genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of smoking behavior-specifically, smoking initiation (SI), never smoking (NS), ever smoking (ES), cigarettes smoked per day (CPD), age of smoking initiation(ASI) and GERD.

METHODS

Firstly, we conducted global cross-trait genetic correlation analysis and heritability estimation from summary statistics (HESS) to explore the genetic correlation between smoking behavior and GERD. Then, a joint cross-trait meta-analysis was performed to identify shared "pleiotropic SNPs" between smoking behavior and GERD, followed by co-localization analysis. Additionally, multi-marker analyses using annotation (MAGMA) were employed to explore the degree of enrichment of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) heritability in specific tissues, and summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) was further utilized to investigate potential functional genes. Finally, Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was conducted to explore the causal relationship between the smoking behavior and GERD.

RESULTS

Consistent genetic correlations were observed through global and local genetic correlation analyses, wherein SI, ES, and CPD showed significantly positive genetic correlations with GERD, while NS and ASI showed significantly negative correlations. HESS analysis also identified multiple significantly associated loci between them. Furthermore, three novel "pleiotropic SNPs" (rs4382592, rs200968, rs1510719) were identified through cross-trait meta-analysis and co-localization analysis to exist between SI, NS, ES, ASI, and GERD, mapping the genes MED27, HIST1H2BO, MAML3 as new pleiotropic genes between SI, NS, ES, ASI, and GERD. Moreover, both smoking behavior and GERD were found to be co-enriched in multiple brain tissues, with GMPPB, RNF123, and RBM6 identified as potential functional genes co-enriched in Cerebellar Hemisphere, Cerebellum, Cortex/Nucleus accumbens in SI and GERD, and SUOX identified in Caudate nucleus, Cerebellum, Cortex in NS and GERD. Lastly, consistent causal relationships were found through MR analysis, indicating that SI, ES, and CPD increase the risk of GERD, while NS and higher ASI decrease the risk.

CONCLUSION

We identified genetic loci associated with smoking behavior and GERD, as well as brain tissue sites of shared enrichment, prioritizing three new pleiotropic genes and four new functional genes. Finally, the causal relationship between smoking behavior and GERD was demonstrated, providing insights for early prevention strategies for GERD.

Socioeconomic traits and the risk of Barrett’s esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Previous observational studies have shown that the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is associated with socioeconomic status. However, due to the methodological limitations of traditional observational studies, it is challenging to definitively establish causality.

AIM

To explore the causal relationship between the prevalence of these conditions and socioeconomic status using Mendelian randomization (MR).

METHODS

We initially screened single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to serve as proxies for eight socioeconomic status phenotypes for univariate MR analysis. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analytical method to estimate the causal relationship between the eight socioeconomic status phenotypes and the risk of GERD and BE. We then collected combinations of SNPs as composite proxies for the eight socioeconomic phenotypes to perform multivariate MR (MVMR) analyses based on the IVW MVMR model. Furthermore, a two-step MR mediation analysis was used to examine the potential mediation of the associations by body mass index, major depressive disorder (MDD), smoking, alcohol consumption, and sleep duration.

RESULTS

The study identified three socioeconomic statuses that had a significant impact on GERD. These included household income [odds ratio (OR): 0.46; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.31-0.70], education attainment (OR: 0.23; 95%CI: 0.18-0.29), and the Townsend Deprivation Index at recruitment (OR: 1.57; 95%CI: 1.04-2.37). These factors were found to independently and predominantly influence the genetic causal effect of GERD. Furthermore, the mediating effect of educational attainment on GERD was found to be mediated by MDD (proportion mediated: 10.83%). Similarly, the effect of educational attainment on BE was mediated by MDD (proportion mediated: 10.58%) and the number of cigarettes smoked per day (proportion mediated: 3.50%). Additionally, the mediating effect of household income on GERD was observed to be mediated by sleep duration (proportion mediated: 9.75%)

CONCLUSION

This MR study shed light on the link between socioeconomic status and GERD or BE, providing insights for the prevention of esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions.

Socioeconomic traits and the risk of Barrett's esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease: A Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Previous observational studies have shown that the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and Barrett's esophagus (BE) is associated with socioeconomic status. However, due to the methodological limitations of traditional observational studies, it is challenging to definitively establish causality.

AIM

To explore the causal relationship between the prevalence of these conditions and socioeconomic status using Mendelian randomization (MR).

METHODS

We initially screened single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to serve as proxies for eight socioeconomic status phenotypes for univariate MR analysis. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the primary analytical method to estimate the causal relationship between the eight socioeconomic status phenotypes and the risk of GERD and BE. We then collected combinations of SNPs as composite proxies for the eight socioeconomic phenotypes to perform multivariate MR (MVMR) analyses based on the IVW MVMR model. Furthermore, a two-step MR mediation analysis was used to examine the potential mediation of the associations by body mass index, major depressive disorder (MDD), smoking, alcohol consumption, and sleep duration.

RESULTS

The study identified three socioeconomic statuses that had a significant impact on GERD. These included household income [odds ratio (OR): 0.46; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.31-0.70], education attainment (OR: 0.23; 95%CI: 0.18-0.29), and the Townsend Deprivation Index at recruitment (OR: 1.57; 95%CI: 1.04-2.37). These factors were found to independently and predominantly influence the genetic causal effect of GERD. Furthermore, the mediating effect of educational attainment on GERD was found to be mediated by MDD (proportion mediated: 10.83%). Similarly, the effect of educational attainment on BE was mediated by MDD (proportion mediated: 10.58%) and the number of cigarettes smoked per day (proportion mediated: 3.50%). Additionally, the mediating effect of household income on GERD was observed to be mediated by sleep duration (proportion mediated: 9.75%).

CONCLUSION

This MR study shed light on the link between socioeconomic status and GERD or BE, providing insights for the prevention of esophageal cancer and precancerous lesions.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease may causally associate with the increased atrial fibrillation risk: evidence from two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses

Background

The risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) is increased in individuals with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), according to observational research. The causal significance of this association is still unclear. This study sought to assess GERD's role as a potential contributing factor in AF.

Methods

With the use of a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) technique, we assessed the causal relationship between GERD and AF. The association of genetic variants with GERD was examined using data from a recent genome-wide association study (GWAS) that included 602,604 people. Data on the association between genetic variations and AF was obtained from a second GWAS with 1,030,836 participants. The effect sizes were examined based on the inverse-variance weighted method. Additional statistical techniques, including MR-Egger, simple mode, weighted mode, MR Pleiotropy Residual Sum, outlier, and weighted median were used in the sensitivity analysis.

Results

MR analyses in inverse-variance weighted models, using 76 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as markers, revealed a relationship between genetically predicted GERD and a greater AF incidence [odds ratio (OR): 1.165, 95% CI 1.102-1.231; P = 7.637 × 10-8]. According to MR-Egger, there was no evidence of gene pleiotropy that could be found (intercept = 0.003, P = 0.581). The findings of the sensitivity study, which used several MR methods, were found to be reliable.

Conclusion

The MR analysis revealed a correlation between GERD and increased AF incidence, supporting the idea that treating patients with GERD as early as possible might reduce their chance of developing AF.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a two-sample Mendelian randomization combined with meta-analysis

Accumulating evidence from observational studies have suggested an association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, due to that such studies are prone to biases, we imported Mendelian randomization (MR) to explore whether the causal association between two diseases exsit. Hence, we aimed to analysis the potential association with MR. The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of GERD were retrieved from the genome-wide association study dataset as the exposure. The SNPs of NAFLD were taken from the FinnGen dataset as the outcome. The relationship was analyzed with the assistance of inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger, and weighted median. We also uitilized the MR-Egger intercept, Cochran's Q test, leave-one-out analysis, MR-PRESSO, and Steiger directionality test to evaluate the robustness of the causal association. The meta-analysis were also implemented to give an overall evaluation. Finally, our analysis showed a causal relationship between GERD and NAFLD with aid of MR and meta-analysis (OR 1.71 95% CI 1.40-2.09; P < 0.0001).

Potential drug targets for gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus identified through Mendelian randomization analysis

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent chronic ailment, and present therapeutic approaches are not always effective. This study aimed to find new drug targets for GERD and Barrett's esophagus (BE). We obtained genetic instruments for GERD, BE, and 2004 plasma proteins from recently published genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and Mendelian randomization (MR) was employed to explore potential drug targets. We further winnowed down MR-prioritized proteins through replication, reverse causality testing, colocalization analysis, phenotype scanning, and Phenome-wide MR. Furthermore, we constructed a protein-protein interaction network, unveiling potential associations among candidate proteins. Simultaneously, we acquired mRNA expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data from another GWAS encompassing four different tissues to identify additional drug targets. Meanwhile, we searched drug databases to evaluate these targets. Under Bonferroni correction (P < 4.8 × 10-5), we identified 11 plasma proteins significantly associated with GERD. Among these, 7 are protective proteins (MSP, GPX1, ERBB3, BT3A3, ANTR2, CCM2, and DECR2), while 4 are detrimental proteins (TMEM106B, DUSP13, C1-INH, and LINGO1). Ultimately, C1-INH and DECR2 successfully passed the screening process and exhibited similar directional causal effects on BE. Further analysis of eQTLs highlighted 4 potential drug targets, including EDEM3, PBX3, MEIS1-AS3, and NME7. The search of drug databases further supported our conclusions. Our study indicated that the plasma proteins C1-INH and DECR2, along with 4 genes (EDEM3, PBX3, MEIS1-AS3, and NME7), may represent potential drug targets for GERD and BE, warranting further investigation.

Causal association of gastroesophageal reflux disease with chronic sinusitis and chronic disease of the tonsils and adenoids

BACKGROUND

Exploring bidirectional causal associations between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and chronic disease of the tonsils and adenoids and chronic sinusitis, respectively.

METHODS

We first conducted a TSMR (two-sample mendelian randomization) study using the results of the inverse variance weighting method as the primary basis and bidirectional MR to rule out reverse causation. Subsequently, MVMR (multivariate MR) analysis was performed to identify phenotypes associated with SNPs and to explore the independent effect of GERD on two outcomes. Finally, we calculated MR-Egger intercepts to assess horizontal polytropy and Cochran's Q statistic to assess heterogeneity and ensure the robustness of the study.

RESULTS

For each standard deviation increase in genetically predicted GERD rate, there was an increased risk of chronic disease of the tonsils and adenoids (OR 1.162, 95% CI 1.036-1.304, P: 1.06E-02) and of developing chronic sinusitis (OR 1.365, 95% CI 1.185-1.572, P: 1.52E-05), and there was no reverse causality. Causality for TSMR was obtained on the basis of IVW (inverse variance weighting) and appeared to be reliable in almost all sensitivity analyses, whereas body mass index may be a potential mediator of causality between GERD and chronic sinusitis.

CONCLUSION

There is a causal association between GERD and chronic disease of the tonsils and adenoids and chronic sinusitis, respectively, and the occurrence of GERD increases the risk of developing chronic disease of the tonsils and adenoids and chronic sinusitis.

Genome-wide cross-disease analyses highlight causality and shared biological pathways of type 2 diabetes with gastrointestinal disorders

Studies suggest links between diabetes and gastrointestinal (GI) traits; however, their underlying biological mechanisms remain unclear. Here, we comprehensively assess the genetic relationship between type 2 diabetes (T2D) and GI disorders. Our study demonstrates a significant positive global genetic correlation of T2D with peptic ulcer disease (PUD), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), gastritis-duodenitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and diverticular disease, but not inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We identify several positive local genetic correlations (negative for T2D - IBD) contributing to T2D's relationship with GI disorders. Univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomisation analyses suggest causal effects of T2D on PUD and gastritis-duodenitis and bidirectionally with GERD. Gene-based analyses reveal a gene-level genetic overlap between T2D and GI disorders and identify several shared genes reaching genome-wide significance. Pathway-based study implicates leptin (T2D - IBD), thyroid, interferon, and notch signalling (T2D - IBS), abnormal circulating calcium (T2D - PUD), cardiovascular, viral, proinflammatory and (auto)immune-mediated mechanisms in T2D and GI disorders. These findings support a risk-increasing genetic overlap between T2D and GI disorders (except IBD), implicate shared biological pathways with putative causality for certain T2D - GI pairs, and identify targets for further investigation.

Different effects of 24 dietary intakes on gastroesophageal reflux disease: A mendelian randomization

BACKGROUND

In observational studies, dietary intakes are associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

AIM

To conduct a two-sample mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to determine whether those associations are causal.

METHODS

To explore the relationship between dietary intake and the risk of GERD, we extracted appropriate single nucleotide polymorphisms from genome-wide association study data on 24 dietary intakes. Three methods were adopted for data analysis: Inverse variance weighting, weighted median methods, and MR-Egger's method. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to evaluate the causal association between dietary intake and GERD.

RESULTS

Our univariate Mendelian randomization (UVMR) results showed significant evidence that pork intake (OR, 2.83; 95%CI: 1.76-4.55; P = 1.84 × 10-5), beer intake (OR, 2.70, 95%CI: 2.00-3.64; P = 6.54 × 10-11), non-oily fish intake (OR, 2.41; 95%CI: 1.49-3.91; P = 3.59 × 10-4) have a protective effect on GERD. In addition, dried fruit intake (OR, 0.37; 95%CI: 0.27-0.50; 6.27 × 10-11), red wine intake (OR, 0.34; 95%CI: 0.25-0.47; P = 1.90 × 10-11), cheese intake (OR, 0.46; 95%CI: 0.39-0.55; P =3.73 × 10-19), bread intake (OR, 0.72; 95%CI: 0.56-0.92; P = 0.0009) and cereal intake (OR, 0.45; 95%CI: 0.36-0.57; P = 2.07 × 10-11) were negatively associated with the risk of GERD. There was a suggestive association for genetically predicted coffee intake (OR per one SD increase, 1.22, 95%CI: 1.03-1.44; P = 0.019). Multivariate Mendelian randomization further confirmed that dried fruit intake, red wine intake, cheese intake, and cereal intake directly affected GERD. In contrast, the impact of pork intake, beer intake, non-oily fish intake, and bread intake on GERD was partly driven by the common risk factors for GERD. However, after adjusting for all four elements, there was no longer a suggestive association between coffee intake and GERD.

CONCLUSION

This study provides MR evidence to support the causal relationship between a broad range of dietary intake and GERD, providing new insights for the treatment and prevention of GERD.

Investigating the causal relationship of gut microbiota with GERD and BE: a bidirectional mendelian randomization

BACKGROUND

Gut microbiota(GM) have been proven associated with lots of gastrointestinal diseases, but its causal relationship with Gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD) and Barrett's esophagus(BE) hasn't been explored. We aimed to uncover the causal relation between GM and GERD/BE and potential mediators by utilizing Mendelian Randomization(MR) analysis.

METHODS

Summary statistics of GM(comprising 301 bacteria taxa and 205 metabolism pathways) were extracted from MiBioGen Consortium(N = 18,340) and Dutch Microbiome Project(N = 7,738), GERD and BE from a multitrait meta-analysis(NGERD=602,604, NBE=56,429). Bidirectional two-sample MR analysis and linkage disequilibrium score regression(LDSC) were used to explore the genetic correlation between GM and GERD/BE. Mediation MR analysis was performed for the risk factors of GERD/BE, including Body mass index(BMI), weight, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder(MDD), smoking initiation, alcohol consumption, and dietary intake(including carbohydrate, sugar, fat, protein intake), to detect the potential mediators between GM and GERD/BE.

RESULTS

11 bacterial taxa and 13 metabolism pathways were found associated with GERD, and 18 taxa and 5 pathways exhibited causal relationship with BE. Mediation MR analysis suggested weight and BMI played a crucial role in these relationships. LDSC identified 1 taxon and 4 metabolism pathways related to GERD, and 1 taxon related to BE. Specie Faecalibacterium prausnitzii had a suggestive impact on both GERD(OR = 1.087, 95%CI = 1.01-1.17) and BE(OR = 1.388, 95%CI = 1.03-1.86) and LDSC had determined their correlation. Reverse MR indicated that BE impacted 10 taxa and 4 pathways.

CONCLUSIONS

This study established a causal link between gut microbiota and GERD/BE, and identified the probable mediators. It offers new insights into the role of gut microbiota in the development and progression of GERD and BE in the host.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease and atrial fibrillation: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

Background: In observational studies, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is linked to atrial fibrillation (AF). It is uncertain whether the relationship is due to GERD-induced AF or GERD caused by AF, or confusion with factors related to GERD and AF such as obesity and sleep-disordered breathing. We applied bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR), in which genetic variations are used as instrumental variables to resolve confounding and reverse causation issues, to determine the causal effect between GERD and AF. Methods: Using summary data from the GERD and AF genome-wide association study (GWAS), a bidirectional MR was performed to estimate the causative impact of GERD on AF risk and AF on GERD risk. The GWAS of GERD meta-analysis comprised 78707 cases and 288734 controls. GWAS summary data for AF, including 45766 AF patients and 191924 controls, were used to genetically predicted AF. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was the major MR approach used. MR-PRESSO was implemented to detect heterogeneity and correct the effect of outliers. Weighted median and MR-Egger regression were applied to test heterogeneity and pleiotropy. Results: The genetic instruments of GERD related to increasing the risk of AF, with an OR of 1.339 (95% CI: 1.242-1.444, p < 0.001). However, after removing the outlier 8 SNPs, genetically predicted AF was not associated with an elevated risk of GERD (p = 0.351). Conclusions: Our result suggested that GERD had a causal effect on AF. However, no evidence was identified that AF elevated the risk of GERD.

Causal relationship between air pollution, lung function, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization study

Background

The association between air pollution, lung function, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) remains inconclusive. Previous studies were not convincing due to confounding factors and reverse causality. We aim to investigate the causal relationship between air pollution, lung function, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and NAFLD using Mendelian randomization analysis.

Methods

In this study, univariate Mendelian randomization analysis was conducted first. Subsequently, Steiger testing was performed to exclude the possibility of reverse association. Finally, significant risk factors identified from the univariate Mendelian analysis, as well as important factors affecting NAFLD from previous observational studies (type 2 diabetes and body mass index), were included in the multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis.

Results

The results of the univariable Mendelian randomization analysis showed a positive correlation between particulate matter 2.5, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and NAFLD. There was a negative correlation between forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity, and NAFLD. The multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis indicated a direct causal relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (OR = 1.537, p = 0.011), type 2 diabetes (OR = 1.261, p < 0.001), and NAFLD.

Conclusion

This Mendelian randomization study confirmed the causal relationships between air pollution, lung function, gastroesophageal reflux, and NAFLD. Furthermore, gastroesophageal reflux and type 2 diabetes were identified as independent risk factors for NAFLD, having a direct causal connection with the occurrence of NAFLD.

The causal associations of circulating lipids with Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Cancer: a bi-directional, two sample mendelian randomization analysis

OBJECTIVE

The causal associations of circulating lipids with Barrett's Esophagus (BE) and Esophageal Cancer (EC) has been a topic of debate. This study sought to elucidate the causality between circulating lipids and the risk of BE and EC.

METHODS

We conducted two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of circulating lipids (n = 94,595 - 431,167 individuals), BE (218,792 individuals), and EC (190,190 individuals) obtained from the publicly available IEU OpenGWAS database. The robustness and reliability of the results were ensured by employing inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, MR-Egger, and MR-PRESSO methods. The presence of horizontal pleiotropy, heterogeneities, and stability of instrumental variables were assessed through MR-Egger intercept test, Cochran's Q test, and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis. Additionally, bidirectional MR and multivariable MR (MVMR) were performed to explore reverse causality and adjust for known confounders, respectively.

RESULTS

None of the testing methods revealed statistically significant horizontal pleiotropy, directional pleiotropy, or heterogeneity. Univariate MR analyses using IVW indicated a robust causal relationship between increased triglycerides and BE (odds ratio [OR] = 1.79, p-value = 0.009), while no significant association with EC was observed. Inverse MR analysis indicated no evidence of reverse causality in the aforementioned outcomes. In MVMR analyses, elevated triglycerides (TRG) were significantly and positively associated with BE risk (OR = 1.79, p-value = 0.041).

CONCLUSION

This MR study suggested that genetically increased triglycerides were closely related to an elevated risk of BE, potentially serving as a biomarker for the diagnosis of BE in the future.

The causal relationship between genetically predicted blood metabolites and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Numerous metabolomic studies have confirmed the pivotal role of metabolic abnormalities in the development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Nevertheless, there is a lack of evidence on the causal relationship between circulating metabolites and the risk of IPF.

METHODS

The potential causality between 486 blood metabolites and IPF was determined through a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) analysis. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) involving 7,824 participants was performed to analyze metabolite data, and a GWAS meta-analysis involving 6,257 IPF cases and 947,616 control European subjects was conducted to analyze IPF data. The TSMR analysis was performed primarily with the inverse variance weighted model, supplemented by weighted mode, MR-Egger regression, and weighted median estimators. A battery of sensitivity analyses was performed, including horizontal pleiotropy assessment, heterogeneity test, Steiger test, and leave-one-out analysis. Furthermore, replication analysis and meta-analysis were conducted with another GWAS dataset of IPF containing 4,125 IPF cases and 20,464 control subjects. Mediation analyses were used to identify the mediating role of confounders in the effect of metabolites on IPF.

RESULTS

There were four metabolites associated with the elevated risk of IPF, namely glucose (odds ratio [OR] = 2.49, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] = 1.13-5.49, P = 0.024), urea (OR = 6.24, 95% CI = 1.77-22.02, P = 0.004), guanosine (OR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.07-2.30, P = 0.021), and ADpSGEGDFXAEGGGVR (OR = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.00-2.88, P = 0.0496). Of note, the effect of guanosine on IPF was found to be mediated by gastroesophageal reflux disease. Reverse Mendelian randomization analysis displayed that IPF might slightly elevate guanosine levels in the blood.

CONCLUSION

Conclusively, hyperglycemia may confer a promoting effect on IPF, highlighting that attention should be paid to the relationship between diabetes and IPF, not solely to the diagnosis of diabetes. Additionally, urea, guanosine, and ADpSGEGDFXAEGGGVR also facilitate the development of IPF. This study may provide a reference for analyzing the potential mechanism of IPF and carry implications for the prevention and treatment of IPF.

Modifiable risk factors mediate the effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease on stroke and subtypes: A Mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVES

Previous observational studies have suggested that gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) increases the risk of stroke, but the specific underlying mechanisms are unclear. We investigated the causal associations of GERD with stroke and its subtypes using Mendelian randomization (MR), and evaluated the potential mediating effects of modifiable stroke risk factors in the causal pathway.

METHODS

Genetic instrumental variables for GERD were extracted from the latest genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary level data. We initially performed two-sample MR to examine the association of GERD with stroke and its subtypes, including ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and the major subtypes of ischemic stroke. Two-step MR was further employed to investigate the mediating effect of 15 risk factors in the causal pathway.

RESULTS

We found significant causal associations of genetically predicted GERD with increased risk of stroke (OR: 1.22 95% CI: 1.126-1.322), ischemic stroke (OR: 1.19 95% CI: 1.098-1.299), and large-artery stroke (OR: 1.49 95% CI: 1.214-1.836). Replication and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent effect directions and similar estimates. Further mediation analyses indicated that hypertension (HTN), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) mediated 36.0%, 9.0%, and 15.8% of the effect of GERD on stroke; 42.9%, 10.8%, and 21.4% for ischemic stroke, and 23.3%; 7.9%, and 18.7% for large-artery stroke, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports that GERD increases susceptibility to stroke, ischemic stroke, and large-artery stroke, and is partially mediated by HTN, SBP, and T2D.

The association between tea consumption and non-malignant digestive system diseases: A Mendelian randomized study

BACKGROUND

Tea consumption might be closely related to non-malignant digestive diseases. Nevertheless, this correlation remains inadequately comprehended. Therefore, our objective was to elucidate the essence of these connections.

METHODS

This study employed a Mendelian randomization approach to investigate the impact of tea consumption on specific digestive disorders. Genetic data associated with tea consumption were obtained from the UK Biobank (UKB), encompassing 447,485 participants. We chose a gene-wide association study with no sample overlap and UKB as our data source for all outcomes. The primary analytical method utilized was inverse variance weighting, and multiple analytical models were employed to enhance the analysis's reliability and ensure robust results.

RESULT

Our investigation revealed that tea consumption was linked to an elevated susceptibility to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, there was a lack of substantial evidence suggesting an association between tea intake and Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the excessive consumption of tea may heighten the likelihood of GERD. These results hold potential significance in guiding dietary pattern modifications for individuals with GERD. Furthermore, there may be value in implementing GERD monitoring and preventive measures in populations with elevated tea consumption.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease with 6 neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders: Genetic correlations, causality, and potential molecular mechanisms

The comorbidities between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and various neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders have been widely reported. However, the genetic correlations, causal relationships, and underlying mechanisms linking GERD to these disorders remain largely unknown. Here, we conducted a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to determine the causality between GERD and 6 neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Sensitivity analyses and multivariable MR were performed to test the robustness of our findings. Linkage disequilibrium score regression was used to assess the genetic correlation between these diseases as affected by heredity. Multiple bioinformatics tools combining two machine learning algorithms were applied to further investigate the potential mechanisms underlying these diseases. We found that genetically predicted GERD significantly increased the risk of Alzheimer's disease, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorders. There might be a bidirectional relationship between GERD and insomnia. GERD has varying degrees of genetic correlations with AD, ALS, anxiety disorders, insomnia, and depressive disorder. Bioinformatics analyses revealed the hub shared genes and the common pathways between GERD and 6 neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Our findings demonstrated the complex nature of the genetic architecture across these diseases and clarified their causality, highlighting that treatments for the cure or remission of GERD may serve as potential strategies for preventing and managing neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders.