Emergency diagnosis of pulmonary embolism

Outcomes of Surgical and Mechanical Thrombectomy in Massive Saddle Pulmonary Embolism: A National Perspective

Introduction Saddle pulmonary embolism (PE) is a type of central PE that involves the bifurcation of the pulmonary arteries. First-line treatment is usually systemic thrombolytics, but surgical and mechanical thrombectomy (ST and MT) are used for patients with contraindications to thrombolytics or right heart strain. This study compares surgical and mechanical thrombectomy trends and outcomes in patients with saddle PE. Methods The data was extracted from the National In-Patient Sample (NIS) from 2016-2018 using the International Classification of Diseases-10-Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) diagnosis codes. We used the Cochrane-Armitage trend test to analyze the trends of ST and MT and the chi-square test for statistical analyses. A two-tailed p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The overall trend of MT in saddle PE rose from 2016 to 2018, while ST remained stable. Around 95% of patients undergoing ST/MT were emergent admissions, with 82.5% occurring in teaching hospitals. Patients of age >65 years and more with comorbidity burdens were more likely to undergo MT over ST. In-hospital mortality after ST was 15.1%, and after MT was 11.1% (p:<0.001). The most common complications after ST were congestive heart failure (CHF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), and after MT were vascular events and CHF. Conclusion The use of mechanical thrombectomy has steadily increased during the study period. ST is more common in large/teaching hospitals, weekend admissions, and patients transferred from other facilities. MT is more common in elderly patients with a higher comorbidity burden. Patients who underwent MT had lower mortality, length of hospital stay, and post-procedural complications.

Pulmonary Embolism in the Mechanically-Ventilated Critically Ill Patient: Is it Different?

Pulmonary embolism (PE) confers significant in-hospital morbidity and mortality, and critically ill patients remain at risk for venous thromboembolism despite thromboprophylaxis. Recognition of the clinical manifestations and immediate management of PE are of paramount importance. Despite diagnostic advances, PE is often undiagnosed and untreated in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, as these patients do not exhibit the common clinical features of the condition, making the diagnosis very challenging. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography is probably the reference standard for the diagnosis of acute PE in the haemodynamically stable, ventilated patient. In the setting of circulatory collapse, bedside echocardiography may be used to risk stratify these patients, based on the presence or absence of right ventricular dysfunction, and guide further management. Treatment options include anticoagulation alone, anticoagulation plus thrombolysis, surgical or catheter embolectomy. Inotropes, vasopressors and pulmonary artery vasodilators may be considered after initial resuscitation of the right ventricle. Few studies have focused on estimating the prevalence of PE among mechanically-ventilated intensive care unit (ICU) patients and there is notable lack of data assessing predictive factors, prevention, diagnostic strategy and management of PE in the ICU setting.

Delay in diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism in emergency department: is it still a problem?

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a common and serious disease that can result in death unless emergent diagnosis is made and treatment is initiated. In this study, we aimed to identify whether there is still a delay in the diagnosis of PE and to identify the time to delay in diagnosis and factors leading to this delay.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational cohort study performed in an emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care university hospital between September 2008 and September 2010. The rate and cause of delay in diagnosis were analyzed among patients with PE. The "delay" was defined as diagnosing after first 24 hours of symptom onset.

RESULTS

Among the 53 patients who were diagnosed with PE, a delay in diagnosis was present in 49 (93%) of them. Total delay time was 6.8 ± 7.7 days. In 33 (62%) patients, there was a delay of 4.6 ± 6.5 days due to patient-related factors. Delay in diagnosis after admission to hospital was 2.2 ± 2.9 days in 40 (75%) patients. In multivariate regression analysis, being female and having chest pain and cough were identified as significant factors causing patient-related delay. Unilateral leg edema, recent operation, and previous venous thromboembolism (VTE) history were the significant factors causing PE diagnosis without a delay. On the other hand, systemic hypertension as comorbidity was the only factor leading to physician-related delay.

CONCLUSION

The delay in diagnosis of PE in EDs still remains as an important problem. While being female and having chest pain and cough are significantly and independently associated with patient delay in diagnosis, the unilateral leg edema, recent operation, and previous VTE history cause physicians to diagnose on time. On the other hand, having hypertension as comorbidity may lead to physician delay. In order to prevent the delay in diagnosis, hospital-associated factors must be elucidated totally and more interventions must be made to increase public and professional awareness of the disease.

A Retrospective Analysis of Hospitalized Patients With Documented Deep-Venous Thrombosis and Their Risk of Pulmonary Embolism

The question of when and how intensively patients with deep-venous thrombosis (DVT) can ambulate remains scarcely underlined. The authors evaluated the evolution of DVT by comparing bed rest and mobilization and using all variables potentially relevant to a risk/benefit evaluation in 252 patients. The end points were the progression of the thrombotic disease and the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) at 30 days. Immobilized patients had a higher incidence of events (hazard ratio 4.39; P < .0001). At multivariate analysis, immobilization (hazard ratio 2.41; P = .026) and the lack of leg compression (hazard ratio 4.58; P = .009) were the only independent predictors of the clinical end point. This retrospective analysis raises the question as to whether all patients with confirmed DVT should ambulate and receive an adequate leg compression. A prospective study is needed to determine whether immobilization of such patients actually increases their risk of developing pulmonary embolism.

Echocardiography in pulmonary vascular disease

The assessment of pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricular function, right ventricular filling pressure, and tricuspid regurgitation provides invaluable information in the care of patients with pulmonary vascular disease. Echocardiography provides a rapid, noninvasive, portable, and accurate method to evaluate these parameters and also provides information on left ventricular and valvular function. Echocardiography has therefore become one of the most commonly performed diagnostic studies in patients with pulmonary vascular disease, and the technique's applications in this area are likely to grow. This article presents an overview of the current uses of echocardiography in pulmonary vascular disease and pulmonary hypertension.

Patients with acute pulmonary embolism should have an echocardiogram to guide treatment decisions

A 62-year-old man with a past medical history notable for hypertension, osteoarthritis, and calf deep vein thrombosis at age 55 following a total hip arthroplasty presents to the emergency department with acute-onset dyspnea and right-sided pleuritic chest pains. His medications consist of a calcium channel blocker and a COX-2 inhibitor. Pretest clinical suspicion for pulmonary embolism (PE) is high. Ventilation and perfusion lung scintigraphy are interpreted as being high-probability for PE. The nurse asks if a stat transthoracic echocardiogram should be ordered.