Overaggressive stent expansion without intravascular imaging: impact on restenosis

Postdilatation after stent deployment during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The utilization of postdilatation in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is feared to induce suboptimal coronary blood flow and compromise the outcome of the patients. This meta-analysis sought to verify whether postdilatation during primary PCI is associated with worse angiographic or long-term clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Systematic literature searches were conducted on PubMed, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, EBSCO, and Europe PMC on 10 March 2024. Eligible studies reporting the outcomes of postdilatation among ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients were included. The primary outcome was no-reflow condition during primary PCI based on angiographic finding. The secondary clinical outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) comprising all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

Ten studies were finally included in this meta-analysis encompassing 3280 patients, which was predominantly male (76.6%). Postdilatation was performed in 40.7% cases. Postdilatation was associated with increased risk of no-reflow during primary PCI [Odd Ratio (OR) = 1.33, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.12-1.58; P = .001)]. Conversely, postdilatation had a tendency to reduce MACE (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.51-0.97; P = .03) specifically in terms of TVR (OR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.74; P = .003). No significant differences between both groups in relation to mortality (OR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.32-1.05; P = .07) and myocardial infarction (OR = 1.5, 95% CI: 0.78-2.89; P = .22).

CONCLUSIONS

Postdilatation after stent deployment during primary PCI appears to be associated with an increased risk of no-reflow phenomenon after the procedure. Nevertheless, postdilatation strategy has demonstrated a significant reduction in MACE over the course of long-term follow-up. Specifically, postdilatation significantly decreased the occurrence of TVR. Key messages: What is already known on this topic?  Optimizing stent deployment by performing postdilatation during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is essential for long-term clinical outcomes. However, its application during primary PCI is controversial due to the fact that it may provoke distal embolization and worsen coronary blood flow. What this study adds?  In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 studies, we confirm that postdilatation during primary PCI is associated with worse coronary blood flow immediately following the procedure. On the contrary, this intervention proves advantageous in improving long-term clinical outcomes, particularly in reducing target vessel revascularization. How this study might affect research, practice, or policy?  Given the mixed impact of postdilatation during primary PCI, this strategy should only be applied selectively. Future research should focus on identifying patients who may benefit from such strategy.

Role of stent oversizing in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. An open-labeled randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the treatment of choice. Stent undersizing might occur due to catecholamine release and coronary spasm. Although routine oversizing has been promising in several investigations, it has never been tested in randomized clinical trials. In this single-center open-label randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the role of stent oversizing in PPCI.

METHODS

Candidates for PPCI were randomly divided into oversized and non-oversized groups. In the oversized group, the stent was oversized by 10% according to the mean lumen diameter, retrieved from the quantitative coronary analysis. Primary composite endpoints were defined as the occurrence of complete total ST-segment (STR)resolution and postprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade III.

RESULTS

The study population was comprised of 122 patients, allocated to the oversized group (N.=61) and the non-oversized group (N.=61). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the final TIMI flow grade. Complete STR was marginally more favorable in the non-oversized group (56.05±55.12 vs. 64.64±23.28; P=0.056). The troponin ratio, CK-MB ratio, and 6-month follow-up outcome - defined as target lesion revascularization, heart failure, and cardiovascular death - were comparable between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that routine oversizing in patients undergoing PPCI had no benefit regarding ST-segment resolution and the final TIMI flow, as well as hard cardiac events, during the follow-up.

Long-term in vivo corrosion behavior, biocompatibility and bioresorption mechanism of a bioresorbable nitrided iron scaffold

Pure iron as a potential bioresorbable material for bioresorbable coronary scaffold has major disadvantages of slow corrosion and bioresorption. However, so far, there are neither quantitative data of long-term in vivo corrosion nor direct experimental evidence for bioresorption of pure iron and its alloys, which are fundamental and vital for developing novel Fe-based alloys overcoming the intrinsic drawbacks of pure iron. This work systemically investigated scaffold performance, long-term in vivo corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of a nitrided iron coronary scaffold and explored its bioresorption mechanism. It was found that the 70μm Fe-based scaffold was superior to a state of the art Co-Cr alloy stent (Xience Prime™) in terms of crossing profile, recoil and radial strength. Mass loss was 76.0±8.5wt% for the nitrided iron scaffold and 44.2±11.4wt% for the pure iron scaffold after 36months implantation in rabbit abdominal aorta (p<0.05). The Fe-based scaffold showed good long-term biocompatibility in both rabbit and porcine model. Its insoluble corrosion products were demonstrated biosafe and could be cleared away by macrophages from in situ to adventitia to be indiscernible by Micro Computed Tomography and probably finally enter the lymphatics and travel to lymph nodes after 53months implantion in porcine coronary artery. The results indicate that the nitrided iron scaffold with further improvements shall be promising for coronary application.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

Pure iron as a potential bioresorbable material has major disadvantages of slow corrosion and bioresorption. However, so far, there are neither quantitative data of long-term in vivo corrosion nor direct experimental evidence for bioresorption of pure iron and its alloys. Only this work systemically investigated long-term in vivo corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of a nitrided iron coronary scaffold up to 53months after implantation and explored its bioresorption mechanism. These are fundamental and vital for developing novel Fe-based alloys overcoming the intrinsic drawbacks of pure iron. Novel testing and section-preparing methods were also provided in this work to facilitate future research and development of novel Fe-based alloy scaffolds.