Analytically false or true positive elevations of high sensitivity cardiac troponin: a systematic approach

Elevated cardiac troponin secondary to heterophile antibodies: a case series highlighting an underrecognized differential

Background

Heterophile antibody presence confounds troponin assay results, causing falsely elevated troponin levels. This rare phenomenon is an important differential to consider when evaluating patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome. We present a case series of three patients with similar clinical presentations where the presence of heterophile antibodies was confirmed.

Case summary

We reviewed three patients from our hospital who presented with chest pain in a 12-month period. All patients were males aged 50-70. All patients had elevated troponin, and there was clinical concern for acute coronary syndrome in two patients. Two patients underwent coronary angiography during admission, and the third had a recent angiogram within the last 6 months. No obstructive lesions were found, and no alternative diagnoses were identified. Ultimately, the presence of heterophile antibodies was confirmed in all three patients.

Discussion

Heterophile antibody presence is an important differential to consider in patients with unexplained troponin elevation. Once the presence of heterophile antibodies is confirmed, this aids in clinician decision-making and helps to guide investigations and treatment in future.

Macrotroponins cause discrepancy in high-sensitivity examination

AIM

We present two cases with clearly discrepant results of clinical examination and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) concentrations. In similar cases with discrepant results, the possibility of interference should be considered.

METHODS

Due to the suspicion of the presence of macrotroponin I in both of the presented cases, the patients were invited to our laboratory and both cTnI (Architect i1000, Abbott) and cTnT (Cobas 8000, Roche) concentrations were analysed. The samples were treated by preincubation in a heterophilic antibodies blocking tube (HBT) and analysed. Precipitation with polyethylene glycol solution (PEG) and molecular weight separation by gel filtration on Sephadex G100 was performed and concentrations of cTnI were analysed.

RESULTS

In the same blood sample, the cTnT and cTnI concentrations were 7 and 1782 ng/L, respectively, in Case 1, and 6 and 96 ng/L, respectively, in Case 2. Incubation of samples in HBT had no significant effect. CTnI concentrations after precipitation with PEG - presented as the percentage of initial concentrations - were 7.4% in Case 1 (and 26.8% in the control sample) and 1.4% in Case 2 (and 56.0% in the control sample). These results indicate a significant decrease in both cases, supporting presence of macrotroponin I. Finally, analyses of cTnI concentrations after gel filtration also supported the presence of macrotroponin I.

CONCLUSION

The present cases show that the presence of macrotroponin can lead to unnecessary investigation of the patient. When the possibility of interference is suspected, cooperation with laboratory staff to help with interpretation or to perform more detailed analysis is crucial.

Troponin T Assessment Allows for Identification of Mutation Carriers among Young Relatives of Patients with LMNA-Related Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Background:LMNA-related dilated cardiomyopathy (LMNA-DCM) caused by mutations in the lamin A/C gene (LMNA) is one of the most common forms of hereditary DCM. Due to the high risk of mutation transmission to offspring and the high incidence of ventricular arrhythmia and sudden death even before the onset of heart failure symptoms, it is very important to identify LMNA-mutation carriers. However, many relatives of LMNA-DCM patients do not report to specialized centers for clinical or genetic screening. Therefore, an easily available tool to identify at-risk subjects is needed. Methods: We compared two cohorts of young, asymptomatic relatives of DCM patients who reported for screening: 29 LMNA mutation carriers and 43 individuals from the control group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for potential indicators of mutation carriership status were analyzed. Results: PR interval, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hscTnT) serum levels were higher in the LMNA mutation carrier cohort. Neither group differed significantly with regard to creatinine concentration or left ventricular ejection fraction. The best mutation carriership discriminator was hscTnT level with an optimal cut-off value at 5.5 ng/L, for which sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 93%, respectively. The median hscTnT level was 11.0 ng/L in LMNA mutation carriers vs. <3.0 ng/L in the control group, p < 0.001. Conclusions: Wherever access to genetic testing is limited, LMNA mutation carriership status can be assessed reliably using the hscTnT assay. Among young symptomless relatives of LMNA-DCM patients, a hscTnT level >5.5 ng/L strongly suggests mutation carriers.

Cord-Blood High-Sensitivity Troponin-I Reference Interval and Association with Early Neonatal Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to establish a reference interval for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) in umbilical cord blood of infants and to assess its association with the risk of predetermined early neonatal outcomes in a high-acuity tertiary care hospital.

STUDY DESIGN

Umbilical cord-blood samples were collected and hs-cTnI was measured in all infants born between August 2015 and September 2015 at McMaster Children's Hospital (n = 256). Gestational age, birth weight, Apgar's scores, age in days at which feeding was established, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and discharge in days after birth were recorded.

RESULTS

The 90th, 95th, and 99th percentiles for the term infant subcohort were 19.75, 41.45, and 166.30 ng/L, respectively. We observed decreased mean gestational ages and birth weights in both the 90th (37.7 weeks; 2,961.4 g) and 95th percentiles (37.1 weeks; 2,709.9 g) when compared with the remaining infants. Moreover, levels of hs-cTnI were significantly higher in infants with respiratory distress requiring intervention (p < 0.05), low birth weight infants (p < 0.01), preterm infants (p < 0.001), and those requiring NICU admission (p < 0.01). Multiple linear regression of the recorded demographic factors revealed prematurity (gestational age <35 weeks: coefficient 0.346 ± 0.160, p < 0.05; gestational age <37 weeks: coefficient 0.253 ± 0.105, p < 0.05) and male sex (coefficient 0.138 ± 0.047; p < 0.01) to be most predictive of log-hs-cTnI levels.

CONCLUSION

This study establishes the reference values for cord-blood hs-cTnI in infants at a tertiary care center. Premature and sick infants requiring NICU admission had significantly higher levels of hs-cTnI.

KEY POINTS

· Established the 90th, 95th, and 99th percentiles of neonatal cord-blood hs-cTnI in term infants as 19.75, 41.45, and 166.30 ng/L, respectively.. · Infants with hs-cTnI levels exceeding the 90th percentile had lower gestational ages and birth weights with higher rates of NICU admissions.. · Infants with respiratory distress or requiring NICU admission were found to have higher levels of hs-cTnI..

The performance of HEAR score for identification of low-risk chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Chest pain is one of the most common presentations to the emergency department (ED) and HEART score (history, ECG, age, risk factors, and cardiac troponin) is recommended for risk stratification. It has been proposed that the sum of four items with no troponin (HEAR score) below 2 can be used safely to lower testing and reduce length of stay. To assess the performance of the HEAR score in hospital and prehospital settings, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. English studies on the performance of the HEAR score in patients with acute chest pain were included. They were excluded if data are inaccessible. MEDLINE, Embase, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Scopus, and web of science were searched from 1946 to July 2021. The quality of studies was assessed using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies version 2. Acute coronary syndrome or major adverse cardiac events prediction were outcomes of interest. The performance indices with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Inverse variance and the random-effects model were used to report the results. Of the 692 articles on the HEAR score, 10 studies were included in the analysis with 33 843 patients. Studies were at low to moderate risk of bias. Three studies were in prehospital and three were retrospective. The pooling of data on the HEAR score showed that the sensitivity at the HEAR<2, <3, and <4 cutoffs in the ED were 99.03% (95% CI, 98.29-99.77), 97.54% (95% CI, 94.50-100), and 91.80% (95% CI, 84.62-98.98), respectively. The negative predictive values (NPVs) for the above cutoffs were 99.84% (95% CI, 99.72-99.95), 99.75% (95% CI, 99.65-99.85), and 99.57% (95% CI, 99.11-100), respectively. Of note, for the HEAR<2, negative likelihood ratio was 0.07 (95% CI, 0.02-0.12). In the prehospital, at the HEAR<4 cutoff, the pooled sensitivity and NPV were 85.01% (95% CI, 80.56-89.47) and 91.48% (95% CI, 87.10-95.87), respectively. This study showed that in the ED, the HEAR score<2 can be used for an early discharge strategy. Currently, this score cannot be recommended in prehospital setting. Prospero (CRD42021273710).

Troponin interference with special regard to macrocomplex formation

Biomarkers, such as troponin-T and troponin-I, are regarded as the gold standard laboratory parameter for diagnosing many cardiological diseases. These parameters have been approved for clinical use. Many cardiological guidelines recommend the analysis of troponins in the majority of cardiological disease diagnoses and to also gain prognostic information. Nonetheless, many medical circumstances could cause false troponin elevations. In this article, we focus on troponin artifacts, particularly macro-immune complex formation, as important interference factors. Therefore, we performed a literature search from 2006 to 06/2021.

Cardiac troponins: are there any differences between T and I?

The most recent international guidelines recommend the measurement of cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and cardiac troponin T (cTnT) using high-sensitivity methods (hs-cTn) for the detection of myocardial injury and the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Myocardial injury is a prerequisite for the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, but also a distinct entity. The 2018 Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction states that myocardial injury is detected when at least one value above the 99th percentile upper reference limit is measured in a patient with high-sensitivity methods for cTnI or cTnT. Not infrequently, increased hs-cTnT levels are reported in patients with congenital or chronic neuromuscular diseases, while the hs-cTnI values are often in the normal range. Furthermore, some discrepancies between the results of laboratory tests for the two troponins are occasionally found in individuals apparently free of cardiac diseases, and also in patients with cardiac diseases. In this review article, authors discuss the biochemical, pathophysiological and analytical mechanisms which may cause discrepancies between hs-cTnI and hs-cTnT test results.

Skeletal myopathies as a non-cardiac cause of elevations of cardiac troponin concentrations

Skeletal myopathies have been suggested as a non-cardiac cause of elevations of cardiac troponin (cTn), particularly cardiac troponin T (cTnT). This is of major clinical relevance and concern as cTn plays a major role in the early diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). While both the incidence as well as the true pathophysiology (cardiac versus non-cardiac) underlying elevations in cTn in skeletal myopathies remain largely unknown, re-expression of cTnT in regenerating adult skeletal muscle has been suggested as a possible contributor. However, unequivocal protein characterization in skeletal muscle and quantification of the relative amounts of this possible signal versus the cTn signal derived from true cardiomyocyte injury remains elusive. Alternatively, minor cross-reactivity of the cTnT (and possibly at times also cTnI) detection and capture antibodies used in current monoclonal immunoassays with the skeletal troponin T or I isoform may be considered. Both would represent "false positive" elevations from a clinical perspective and would need to be reliably differentiated from "true positive elevations" from subclinical cardiomyocyte injury not detectable by currently available imaging techniques such as echocardiography and contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which have at least a 5 times lower sensitivity for cardiomyocyte injury. This review aims to explore the currently available data, its methodological limitations and provide guidance to clinicians to avoid misinterpretation of cTn concentrations.

High-sensitivity troponin assays: development and utility in a modern health-care system

Introduction: The introduction of cardiac troponin (cTn) assays have revolutionized the diagnosis and management of acute myocardial infarction in Emergency Departments worldwide. Its success has led to significant research and development investment in this area culminating in the development of newer high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays (hs-cTn). While these newer assays allow for more rapid diagnosis by decreasing the time interval between serial data points, there is an inevitable trade off between increasing sensitivity and specificity. This review examines in detail the introduction and implementation of hs-cTN and its implications for clinical practice.Areas covered: This article reviews the history and development of high-sensitivity troponin assays and their application to clinical practice and current evidence base. It also discusses both the positive and negative aspects of the continuing increasing sensitivity of biochemical assays and the translation of this into clinical practice. Potential future developments are also discussed.Expert commentary: It is clear that there are many benefits to detecting extremely low concentration of cardiac troponin including the development of rapid rule out algorithms and the cost and time-saving advantages associated with the quicker movement of patients through the health-care system. It is important to note however that detecting troponin at very low concentrations also dramatically increases the false-positive rates and leads to a potentially large increase in invasive testing and diagnosis of myocardial infarction.

Description of interference in the measurement of troponin T by a high-sensitivity method

Introduction

Measurement of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) has become an essential step in the diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. This high-sensitivity method allows quantifying the concentration of troponin T in blood of healthy subjects with a lower inaccuracy compared to previous reagent generations. However, the presence of certain compounds in the sample may interfere with the result. We present a patient who had repeatedly high concentrations of hs-TnT in the serum sample that did not agreed with the signs and symptoms. In addition, ultrasensitive troponin I concentration was undetectable.

Materials and methods

To investigate the presence of an interfering compound, different analysis were carried out. In order to discard macro complexes in the sample, the serum was precipitated with polyethylene glycol. In addition, the serum was incubated with Scantibodies Heterophilic Blocking Tube, which can block heterophilic antibodies. Finally, a size exclusion chromatography of the sample was performed by the manufacturer.

What happened

The interfering substance was allocated into fractions with proteins of 150kDa, corresponding to high molecular weight proteins like immunoglobulin G (IgG). This compound was responsible for the falsely elevated hs-TnT results and it affected only the high-sensitivity methods.

Main lesson

The detected interfering compound was probably an IgG. This type of interference must be kept in mind in front of discordant results, even if they are extremely rare. Therefore, interdisciplinary cooperation between clinicians, laboratory and manufacturer is essential.

False-positive troponin I elevation in a newborn with neonatal encephalopathy

Serum biomarkers of myocardial damage are commonly used in babies after perinatal asphyxia. We present a case report of a persistently troponin I elevation without evidence of clinical or instrumental signs of myocardial ischaemia in a baby with perinatal asphyxia. When the blood was mixed with polyethylene glycol we found that the troponin I levels were falsely elevated due to interfering antibodies. This case shows that analytical errors may still occur despite modern immunoassay systems and underlines the need for further investigations to identify false-positive values in case of disagreement between clinical conditions and laboratory values.

[Diagnosis of myocardial infarction in critically ill, ventilated patients]

Elevated cardiac troponin values are frequently observed in critically ill patients. These are often not due to myocardial infarction (MI) but caused by various other etiologies of myocardial injury. Understanding the etiology of any troponin elevation is of enormous importance for management and therapy. According to the fourth version of the Universal Definition of MI, myocardial injury is present if at least one troponin value is above the 99th percentile upper reference limit and considered acute, when a rise and/or fall occurs. Patients with acute MI are a subgroup of patients with acute myocardial injury, who present in an ischemic clinical context. Variables defining the clinical criteria of MI include symptoms of ischemia, presumably new electrocardiographic (ECG) changes or imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or regional wall motion abnormalities, or detection of an intracoronary thrombus. In critically ill or mechanically ventilated patients, the diagnosis of MI is challenging due to limitations in history taking, co-existence of comorbidities, overlapping symptoms and equivocal or unspecific ECG changes. This article presents the diagnostic criteria of the Universal MI definition, discusses subtypes of MI and focuses on various differential diagnoses. Furthermore, implications of diagnosis of MI in critically ill patients, especially regarding the use of ECG and troponin assays, are discussed.

Cardiac troponin T and NT-proBNP as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of primary cardiac involvement and disease severity in systemic sclerosis: A prospective study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of our study was to define the role of high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and NT-proBNP in identifying Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients with cardiac involvement and at higher risk of cardiac death.

METHODS

Plasma hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP concentrations were measured in 245 SSc-patients.

RESULTS

hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP levels were higher in SSc-patients than in healthy controls. Hs-cTnT levels were higher than 0.014 ng/ml in 32.3% SSc-patients, while NT-proBNP was above 125 pg/ml in 31.8% of them, irrespective of classical cardiovascular risk factor and of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Elevated hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP were associated with diffuse skin involvement and directly correlated with the skin score. Patients with increased cardiac markers presented a lower left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and a higher rate of right bundle branch block (RBBB) on electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to patients with normal cardiac enzymes. During the follow-up, 12 SSc-patients experience a disease-related death; 9 of these were directly related to cardiac involvement (sudden cardiac death or heart failure) and the majority of them occurred among patients with increase of at least one cardiac biomarker. Long-term survival was worse in patients with increase of both cardiac biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of hs-cTnT and NT-proBNP levels may provide a tool to screen non-invasively SSc-patients for heart involvement. A higher incidence of impaired systolic function, ECG abnormalities and a poor outcome in SSc-patients with elevated cardiac enzymes suggests that they may be valuable screening biomarkers to detect a cardiac damage at early stages and to improve risk stratification.

Clinical Significance of Elevated High-sensitivity Troponin T in Low Likelihood Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) is widely used in Oman and other Gulf countries. The availability of newer generation hs-cTnT has increased the sensitivity of diagnosing non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS). They utilize same antibodies as fourth-generation assay but can measure 10-fold lower levels of cTnT. Any detectable level above the 99^th percentile of population suggests myocardial damage. However, the cause could be non-ACS. Therefore, the increase in sensitivity of hs-cTnT assays for ACS comes at the cost of a reduced ACS specificity because more patients with other causes of myocardial injury are detected than with previous cTnT assays. Hence, there is large confusion among emergency physicians regarding optimal cutoff values to definitely confirm non-ST-elevation ACS, especially in patients with low likelihood of ACS. This review summarizes the available clinical and biochemical data to make recommendations about hs-cTnT cutoff values which will guide physicians to take decision in patients presenting with low likelihood ACS.

Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS) decision aid: single biomarker re-derivation and external validation in three cohorts

Background

The original Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes model (MACS) ‘rules in’ and ‘rules out’ acute coronary syndromes (ACS) using high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) measured at admission. The latter is not always available. We aimed to refine and validate MACS as Troponin-only Manchester Acute Coronary Syndromes (T-MACS), cutting down the biomarkers to just hs-cTnT.

Methods

We present secondary analyses from four prospective diagnostic cohort studies including patients presenting to the ED with suspected ACS. Data were collected and hs-cTnT measured on arrival. The primary outcome was ACS, defined as prevalent acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or incident death, AMI or coronary revascularisation within 30 days. T-MACS was built in one cohort (derivation set) and validated in three external cohorts (validation set).

Results

At the ‘rule out’ threshold, in the derivation set (n=703), T-MACS had 99.3% (95% CI 97.3% to 99.9%) negative predictive value (NPV) and 98.7% (95.3%–99.8%) sensitivity for ACS, ‘ruling out’ 37.7% patients (specificity 47.6%, positive predictive value (PPV) 34.0%). In the validation set (n=1459), T-MACS had 99.3% (98.3%–99.8%) NPV and 98.1% (95.2%–99.5%) sensitivity, ‘ruling out’ 40.4% (n=590) patients (specificity 47.0%, PPV 23.9%). T-MACS would ‘rule in’ 10.1% and 4.7% patients in the respective sets, of which 100.0% and 91.3% had ACS. C-statistics for the original and refined rules were similar (T-MACS 0.91 vs MACS 0.90 on validation).

Conclusions

T-MACS could ‘rule out’ ACS in 40% of patients, while ‘ruling in’ 5% at highest risk using a single hs-cTnT measurement on arrival. As a clinical decision aid, T-MACS could therefore help to conserve healthcare resources.

Analytical validation and establishment of reference intervals for a 'high-sensitivity' cardiac troponin-T assay in horses

BACKGROUND

Cardiac troponin-I assays have been validated in horses.'High-sensitivity' cardiac troponin assays are now the standard in human cardiology.

OBJECTIVE

Appropriately validate the'high-sensitivity' cardiac Troponin-T (hscTnT) assay for clinical use in horses, establish reference intervals, determine the biological variation, and demonstrate assay utility in selected clinical cases.

METHODS

Analytical validation of the Roche hscTnT assay included within- and between-run precision, linear dose response, limit of quantitation (LoQ), stability, and comparison with cTn-I (iSTAT). Reference intervals and biological variation were determined using adult, healthy, Non-Competition Horses (N = 125) and Racing-Thoroughbreds (N = 178). HscTnT levels were measured in two horses with cardiac pathology.

RESULTS

The hscTnT demonstrates acceptable within-run (L1 = 6.5 ng/L, CV 14.9 %, L2 = 10.1 ng/L, CV 8.7 %, L3 = 15.3 ng/L, CV 5.4 %) and between-run precision (L1 = 12.2 ng/L, CV 8.4 %, L2 = 57.0 ng/L, CV 8.4 %, L3 = 256.0 ng/L, CV 9.0 %). The assay was linear from 3 to 391 ng/L. The LoQ was validated at 3 ng/L. Samples demonstrated insignificant decay over freeze-thaw cycle. Comparison with cTnI assay showed excellent correlation (range: 8.0-3535.0 ng/L, R(2) = 0.9996). Reference intervals: The upper 95(th) and 99(th) percentile of the hscTnT population distribution were 6.8 and 16.2 ng/L in Non-Competition Horses, and 14.0 and 23.2 ng/L in Racing-Thoroughbreds. Between-breed, diurnal effect, and between-day variation was below LoQ. Two clinical cases with presumed cardiac pathology had hscTnT levels of 220.9 ng/L and 5723.0 ng/L.

CONCLUSIONS

This benchmark study is the first to comply with CLSI guidelines, thus further establishing the performance characteristics of the hscTnT assay, and reference intervals in healthy horses. Two clinical cases demonstrated further the clinical utility of the assay.

A clinical and laboratory approach used to elucidate discordant results of high-sensitivity troponin T and troponin I

BACKGROUND

Careful interpretation of discordant results in high-sensitivity troponin measurements is necessary in cases of suspect immunoassay interferences. We describe several procedures taken in a case of a polymorbid patient with chest pain, without clear evidence of myocardial necrosis and with increased high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT). We checked the Vafaie's algorithm for the evaluation of suspect interference in troponin measurements.

METHODS

We conducted a case report analysis, additional measurements, a dilution test and pretreatment of plasma with blocking agents.

RESULTS

Concentration of hs-cTnT (99 th percentile of "healthy" population 14 ng/L) increased from 120.1 ng/L to 280.4 ng/L during an 8-month period and decreased to 216.3 ng/L during the following month with repeatedly negative troponin I (TnI), hs-cTnI, myoglobin and creatine kinase MB (CK-MB). Suspected false positivity of hs-cTnT was further confirmed by treatment of plasma with an antiheterophile blocking agent (hs-cTnT before treatment 280.4 ng/L, after 16.53/16.23 ng/L). This outcome was further confirmed by the manufacturer's experiments.

CONCLUSIONS

The false-positive results of hs-cTnT were caused by the presence of extremely rare high molecular weight protein, presumably IgM, most likely HAMA (human anti-mouse antibody). Only the pre-treatment of plasma with a blocking agent provided a reliable indication of the interference. Cooperation among clinicians, laboratory personnel and the manufacturer is essential.

Making sense of high sensitivity troponin assays and their role in clinical care

Cardiac troponin assays have an established and undisputed role in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with acute myocardial infarction. As troponin assays gets more sensitive and more precise, the number of potential uses has rapidly expanded, but the use of this test has also become more complicated and controversial. Highly sensitive troponin assays can now detect troponin levels in most individuals, but accurate interpretation of these levels requires a clear understanding of the assay in the context of the clinical scenario. This paper provides a practical and up-to-date overview of the uses of highly sensitive troponin assays for diagnosis, prognosis, and risk stratification in clinical practice.

High-sensitivity troponin: where are we now and where do we go from here?

High-sensitivity troponin (hsTn) assays are used clinically in most parts of the world and are expected to be approved by the US FDA for clinical use in the USA soon. Clinical use of hsTn leads to improvements in the detection of myocardial injury, shorter time to ruling out acute myocardial infarction, improved risk-stratification of patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation among others. HsTn may also guide strategies for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, unmet challenges remain, including distinguishing between acute and chronic hsTn elevations, distinguishing between type 1 and type 2 acute myocardial infarction and determining whether to use gender-neutral or gender-specific reference values.