Pharmacological modulation of the ATP sensitive potassium channels during repeated coronary occlusions: no effect on myocardial ischaemia or function

Preconditioning in neuroprotection: From hypoxia to ischemia

Sublethal hypoxic or ischemic events can improve the tolerance of tissues, organs, and even organisms from subsequent lethal injury caused by hypoxia or ischemia. This phenomenon has been termed hypoxic or ischemic preconditioning (HPC or IPC) and is well established in the heart and the brain. This review aims to discuss HPC and IPC with respect to their historical development and advancements in our understanding of the neurochemical basis for their neuroprotective role. Through decades of collaborative research and studies of HPC and IPC in other organ systems, our understanding of HPC and IPC-induced neuroprotection has expanded to include: early- (phosphorylation targets, transporter regulation, interfering RNA) and late- (regulation of genes like EPO, VEGF, and iNOS) phase changes, regulators of programmed cell death, members of metabolic pathways, receptor modulators, and many other novel targets. The rapid acceleration in our understanding of HPC and IPC will help facilitate transition into the clinical setting.

Searching for NF-kappaB-based treatments of ischemia reperfusion injury

When a tissue becomes ischemic, a host of changes occur at the cellular level that lead to a shift in transcriptional activity of many inflammatory and cytoprotective compounds, a process which is extensively controlled through a family of transcription factors known as nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-kappaB). This shift in activity paradoxically results in both a cytoprotective effect at the cellular level and upon reperfusion, a generally destructive inflammatory response, a phenomenon referred to as ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury. To date, a number of methods of modifying the activity of NF-kappaB through either physiologic or pharmacologic manipulation have been developed and studied in animal models of IR injury and in some cases in human clinical trials. Nearly every method of NF-kappaB antagonism has demonstrated a discrete protective effect allowing investigators to reduce myocardial infarct sizes by 60% and cerebral infarct sizes by 57% relative to untreated control animals. The problem of IR injury is all too common and represents a discrete threat not only to the tissues directly involved in the ischemic event, but also to distal sites as well as is seen in the evolution of acute respiratory distress and severe inflammatory response syndromes. In the course of this review, the nature of NF-kappaB and its involvement in IR injury is examined along with the efficacy of the various NF-kappaB-based investigational treatment developed to date.

Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Children Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a randomized controlled trial of the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in children undergoing repair of congenital heart defects.

BACKGROUND

Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces injury caused by ischemia-reperfusion in distant organs. Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with multi-system injury. We hypothesized that RIPC would modulate injury induced by CPB.

METHODS

Children undergoing repair of congenital heart defects were randomized to RIPC or control treatment. Remote ischemic preconditioning was induced by four 5-min cycles of lower limb ischemia and reperfusion using a blood pressure cuff. Measurements of lung mechanics, cytokines, and troponin I were made pre- and postoperatively.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were studied. There were 20 control patients and 17 patients in the RIPC group. The mean age and weight of the RIPC and control patients were not different (0.9 +/- 0.9 years vs. 2.2 +/- 3.4 years, p = 0.4; and 6.9 +/- 2.9 kg vs. 11.5 +/- 10 kg, p = 0.06). Bypass and cross-clamp times were not different (80 +/- 24 min vs. 88 +/- 25 min, p = 0.3; and 55 +/- 13 min vs. 59 +/- 13 min, p = 0.4). Levels of troponin I postoperatively were greater in the control patients compared with the RIPC group (p = 0.04), indicating greater myocardial injury in control patients. Postoperative inotropic requirement was greater in the control patients compared with RIPC patients at both 3 and 6 h (7.9 +/- 4.7 vs. 10.9 +/- 3.2, p = 0.04; and 7.3 +/- 4.9 vs. 10.8 +/- 3.9, p = 0.03, respectively). The RIPC group had significantly lower airway resistance at 6 h postoperatively (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the myocardial protective effects of RIPC using a simple noninvasive technique of four 5-min cycles of lower limb ischemia and reperfusion. These novel data support the need for a larger study of RIPC in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Ischaemic preconditioning and myocardial adaptation to serial intracoronary balloon inflation: cut from the same cloth?

Elective percutaneous coronary intervention fulfils many of the criteria needed of a clinical model of ischaemic preconditioning. But is this really a reflection of the laboratory phenomenon of ischaemic preconditioning?