Vascular brachytherapy versus sirolimus eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis: a prospective registry

Comparison of six-month angiographic and three-year outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation versus brachytherapy for bare metal in-stent restenosis

To evaluate long-term effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation for diffuse bare metal in-stent restenosis (ISR), we compared 6-month angiographic and long-term (3-year) clinical outcomes of SES implantation and intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT). SES implantation for diffuse ISR was performed in 120 consecutive patients and their results were compared with those from 240 patients treated with beta-radiation with balloons filled with rhenium-188 and mercaptoacetyltriglycine. The radiation dose was 15 or 18 Gy at a depth of 1.0 mm into the vessel wall. The primary end point was 3-year major adverse cardiac events including myocardial infarction, cardiac death, and target lesion revascularization. The 2 groups were similar in baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. Lesion lengths were 25.1 +/- 14.2 mm in the SES group and 24.5 +/- 10.4 mm in the ICBT group (p = 0.15). In-stent acute gain was greater in the SES group than in the ICBT group (2.23 +/- 0.62 vs 1.91 +/- 0.54 mm, p <0.001). We obtained 6-month angiographic follow-up in 287 patients (79.7%). In-segment angiographic restenoses were 7.4% (7 of 94) in the SES group and 26.4% (51 of 193) in the ICBT group (p <0.05). Two myocardial infarctions (1 in each group) and 5 deaths (4 in SES group, 1 in ICBT group) occurred during 3-year follow-up. At 3 years, survival rates without target lesion revascularization (94.1 +/- 2.2% vs 84.6 +/- 2.3%, p = 0.011) and major adverse cardiac events (92.5 +/- 2.4% vs 84.2 +/- 2.4%, respectively, p = 0.03) were higher in the SES than in the ICBT group. In conclusion, compared with ICBT, SES implantation for diffuse ISR is more effective in decreasing recurrent restenosis and improving long-term outcomes.

Clinical outcome of patients undergoing low aggressive angioplasty combined with brachytherapy and short-term dual antiplatelet therapy for in-stent restenosis

OBJECTIVE

The impact of vessel injury on the outcome of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention combined with brachytherapy for in-stent restenosis is under investigation. We report our clinical experience adopting a low aggressive balloon angioplasty technique, to limit vessel trauma, associated with brachytherapy and short-term dual antiplatelet therapy.

METHODS

Forty-nine consecutive patients, undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with brachytherapy for symptomatic in-stent restenosis, were prospectively observed for a median time of 21 + or - 8 months. Clinical follow-up included anginal status, death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization; only patients with evidence of ischaemia repeated coronary angiography. Low aggressive angioplasty consisted in the use of a conventional balloon with a balloon to artery ratio < or = 1, avoiding high inflation pressures and the use of other devices. Dual antiplatelet therapy was continued for 3-6 months.

RESULTS

Early angiographic result was good and the need for additional stent implantation was low (3.9%). At follow-up, we did not observe death, acute myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis, but 10 patients repeated coronary angiography for recurrence of ischaemia: disease progression was present in two cases (4.1%). Restenosis emerged in the remaining eight patients (16.3%): two cases showed restenosis within the target lesion segment, one case within the injured segment, one case within the radiated segment, and four cases at the edges. The consequent new revascularization was surgical in three patients and percutaneous in seven patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that low aggressive angioplasty followed by brachytherapy and short-term dual antiplatelet therapy for in-stent restenosis is related to a good outcome, with a low restenosis rate and without stent thrombosis.

Treatment of in-stent restenosis with sirolimus-eluting-stents—

Treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a therapeutic challenge since many pharmacological and mechanical approaches have shown disappointing results except for brachytherapy. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have been reported to effectively reduce ISR in de novo lesions. We studied 55 consecutive patients with ISR in native coronary arteries and 7 with ISR in saphenous vein grafts (SVG) with elective indication for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), who underwent successful implantation with DES. No in-hospital postprocedural major adverse cardiac events were observed. All but one patient (n=61) underwent an angiographic follow-up at 183+/-30 days. Grade of stenosis was assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) at index procedure and at control angiography. Restenosis (>50%) occurred in 5 patients (8.2%). Target vessel revascularization was performed in an additional 4 patients. Minimal intimal hyperplasia was observed in all segments covered by DES (late loss 0.08+/-0.37 mm, loss index 0.11+/-0.47). One patient suffered from subacute stent thrombosis due to discontinuation of clopidogrel medication. At six month follow-up two patients had died. Death was not related to a restenosis in the treated segment. Conclusion Our experiences with DES treatment of ISR lesions show good angiographic and clinical results at index procedure and at the 6 month follow-up with low sub acute thrombosis rate as compared with existing treatment modalities. Restenosis rate seems to be at least as low as reported for brachytherapy.