Coronary revascularisation in women

Gender-Tailored Heart Team Decision Making Equalizes Outcomes for Female Patients after Aortic Valve Replacement through Right Anterior Small Thoracotomy (RAST)

BACKGROUND

Little is known about gender-dependent outcomes after aortic valve replacement (AVR) through right anterior thoracotomy (RAST). The aim of our study was to analyze the mid-term outcomes of our cohort.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of 338 patients (2013-2022). Subgroup analysis included a gender-dependent comparison of age groups ≤60 and >60 years.

RESULTS

Women were older (69.27 ± 7.98 vs. 64.15 ± 11.47, p < 0.001) with higher Euroscore II (1.25 ± 0.73 vs. 0.94 ± 0.45, p < 0.001). Bypass and cross-clamp time were shorter (109.36 ± 30.8 vs. 117.65 ± 33.1 minutes, p = 0.01; 68.26 ± 21.5 vs. 74.36 ± 23.3 minutes, p = 0.01), while ICU, hospital stay and atrial fibrillation were higher (2.48 ± 8.2 vs. 1.35 ± 1.4 days, p = 0.005; 11 ± 7.8 vs. 9.48 ± 2.3 days, p = 0.002; 6.7% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.024). Mortality was 0.9%, while stroke was 0.6%. Age subgroup analysis showed that women were older (p = 0.025) with longer ICU and hospital stays (p < 0.001, p = 0.007). On mid-term follow-up (4.52 ± 2.67 years) of 315 patients (94.3%), there was no significant difference in survival, MACCE and re-intervention comparing gender and age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite older age, higher Euroscore II, longer ICU and hospital stay in women, mortality, MACCE and reoperation were low and comparable in gender and age groups. We believe that our patient-tailored heart team decision making combined with RAST translates into gender-tailored medicine, which equalizes the widely reported negative outcomes of female patients after cardiac surgery.

Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous interventions for women with multivessel coronary artery disease

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes in women undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

DESIGN

This retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort study from the New York State cardiac registry (2012-2018) included all women with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing PCI with everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and CABG surgery. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. The key secondary outcome was major adverse cardiac events, defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke.

RESULTS

PCI with EES was associated with a higher 6-year risk of mortality (25.75% vs 23.57%; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.45). PCI also was associated with a higher rate of the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke (36.58% vs 32.89%; AHR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.17-1.41), as well as myocardial infarction (14.94% vs 9.12%; AHR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.56-2.17), but not stroke (7.07% vs 7.62%; AHR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.03). Repeat revascularization rates also were higher for women undergoing PCI (21.53% vs 11.57%; AHR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.63-2.17). There was no difference in mortality between the 2 interventions when PCI patients received complete revascularization or had noncomplex lesions and for women without diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

For women with multivessel coronary artery disease, CABG surgery is associated with lower 6-year mortality, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization rates compared to PCI with EES.

Interaction Between Treatment and Age or Sex in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Disease and Three-Vessel Disease

Aims

To explore the effects of age and sex on the outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients with the three-vessel disease (TVD).

Methods and Results

The study is a subanalysis of data from a prospective cohort of 8,943 patients with angiographically confirmed TVD at Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. In total, 2,819 patients with NSTE-ACS who received CABG (43.6%) or PCI (56.4%) were included, among whom 32.7% were of 65-74 years, 7.2% were ≥75 years, and 22.6% were women. The median follow-up duration was 6.8 years. The superiority of CABG relative to PCI in terms of MACCE was decreased with age (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: <65 years: 0.662 [0.495-0.885], p = 0.005; 65-74 years: 0.700 [0.512-0.956], p = 0.025; ≥75 years: 0.884 [0.529-1.479], p = 0.640) and was only seen in men (adjusted HR [95% CI]: men: 0.668 [0.526-0.848], p = 0.001; women: 0.713 [0.505-1.006], p = 0.054). Significant treatment-by-sex and treatment-by-age interactions were observed in patients ≥ 75 years and women, respectively, (p interaction with sex = 0.001; p interaction with age = 0.002).

Conclusion

Coronary artery bypass grafting is favorable for most NSTE-ACS patients with TVD. The preponderance of CABG over PCI disappeared in patients ≥ 75 years and women. PCI is superior in women ≥ 75 years.

Sex-Specific Outcomes After Coronary Intravascular Lithotripsy: A Patient-Level Analysis of the Disrupt CAD Studies

Background

Coronary artery calcification increases the procedural complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention and is associated with worse outcomes, especially in women. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for vessel preparation in severely calcified stenotic lesions before stent implantation. Sex-based outcomes of IVL-facilitated stenting have not been defined.

Methods

We performed a patient-level pooled analysis of the 4 prospective, single-arm Disrupt CAD studies that evaluated the safety and efficacy of IVL-facilitated stenting. Patient baseline and procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes were examined based on sex. The primary safety end point was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. The primary efficacy end point was procedural success, defined as stent delivery with residual in-stent stenosis ≤30% without in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events.

Results

A total of 628 patients were included, of which 144 (22.9%) were women. Women were older (P < .001) and more likely to have hyperlipidemia (P = .03), renal insufficiency (P = .05), and prior myocardial infarction (P = .05). Women had smaller mean reference vessel diameter (2.7 ​ ± ​0.4 ​mm vs 3.0 ​ ± ​0.5 ​mm, P < .001), shorter lesion length (22.4 ​ ± ​10.3 ​mm vs 25.0 ​ ± ​11.7 ​mm, P = .01), and less side branch involvement (22.9% vs 32.4%, P = .03). Severe coronary calcification defined by angiography, stent delivery success, lesion predilatation, post-IVL dilatation, and poststent dilatation was similar between groups. There were no significant differences between women and men in the primary safety end point (8.3% vs 7.1%, P = .61; adjusted odds ratio 1.66; 95% confidence interval 0.78, 3.34; P = .17) or the primary efficacy end point (91.7% vs 92.6%, P = .72; adjusted odds ratio 0.58; 95% confidence interval 0.29, 1.24; P = .15). Post-IVL serious angiographic complications (flow-limiting dissection, perforation, abrupt closure, slow flow, no reflow) were similar for women and men (1.6% vs 2.3%, P = .75).

Conclusions

Despite more comorbidities and smaller vessel size, IVL-facilitated stenting of severely calcified lesions achieves similar safety and efficacy in women and men.

Interpreting angina: symptoms along a gender continuum

BACKGROUND

'Typical' angina is often used to describe symptoms common among men, while 'atypical' angina is used to describe symptoms common among women, despite a higher prevalence of angina among women. This discrepancy is a source of controversy in cardiac care among women.

OBJECTIVES

To redefine angina by (1) qualitatively comparing angina symptoms and experiences in women and men and (2) to propose a more meaningful construct of angina that integrates a more gender-centred approach.

METHODS

Patients were recruited between July and December 2010 from a tertiary cardiac care centre and interviewed immediately prior to their first angiogram. Symptoms were explored through in-depth semi-structured interviews, transcribed verbatim and analysed concurrently using a modified grounded theory approach. Angiographically significant disease was assessed at ≥70% stenosis of a major epicardial vessel.

RESULTS

Among 31 total patients, 13 men and 14 women had angiograpically significant CAD. Patients describe angina symptoms according to 6 symptomatic subthemes that array along a 'gender continuum'. Gender-specific symptoms are anchored at each end of the continuum. At the centre of the continuum, are a remarkably large number of symptoms commonly expressed by both men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

The 'gender continuum' offers new insights into angina experiences of angiography candidates. Notably, there is more overlap of shared experiences between men and women than conventionally thought. The gender continuum can help researchers and clinicians contextualise patient symptom reports, avoiding the conventional 'typical' versus 'atypical' distinction that can misrepresent gendered angina experiences.

Gender comparisons in non-acute cardiac symptom recognition and subsequent help-seeking decisions: a mixed methods study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is one of the leading causes of death in both men and women worldwide. Despite the common misconception that CHD is a 'man's disease', it is now well accepted that women endure worse clinical outcomes than men following CHD-related events. A number of studies have explored whether or not gender differences exist in patients presenting with CHD, and specifically whether women delay seeking help for cardiac conditions. UK and overseas studies on help-seeking for emergency cardiac events are contradictory, yet suggest that women often delay help-seeking. In addition, no studies have looked at presumed cardiac symptoms outside an emergency situation. Given the lack of understanding in this area, an explorative qualitative study on the gender differences in help-seeking for a non-emergency cardiac events is needed.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A purposive sample of 20-30 participants of different ethnic backgrounds and ages attending a rapid access chest pain clinic will be recruited to achieve saturation. Semistructured interviews focusing on help-seeking decision-making for apparent cardiac symptoms will be undertaken. Interview data will be analysed thematically using qualitative software (NVivo) to understand any similarities and differences between the way men and women construct help-seeking. Findings will also be used to inform the preliminary development of a cardiac help-seeking intentions questionnaire.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approvals were sought and granted. Namely, the University of Westminster (sponsor) and St Georges NHS Trust REC, and the Trust Research and Development Office granted approval to host the study on the Queen Mary's Roehampton site. The study is low risk, with interviews being conducted on hospital premises during working hours. Investigators will disseminate findings via presentations and publications. Participants will receive a written summary of the key findings.

ACS and STEMI treatment: gender-related issues

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death amongst women, with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) representing a significant proportion. It has been reported that in women presenting with ACS there is underdiagnosis and consequent undertreatment leading to an increase in hospital and long-term mortality. Several factors have to be taken into account, including lack of awareness both at patient and at physician level. Women are generally not aware of the cardiovascular risk and symptoms, often atypical, and therefore wait longer to seek medical attention. In addition, physicians often underestimate the risk of ACS in women leading to a further delay in accurate diagnosis and timely appropriate treatment, including cardiac catheterisation and primary percutaneous coronary intervention, with consequent delayed revascularisation times. It has been acknowledged by the European Society of Cardiology that gender disparities do exist, with a Class I, Level of Evidence B recommendation that both genders should be treated in the same way when presenting with ACS. However, there is still a lack of awareness and the mission of Women in Innovation, in association with Stent for Life, is to change the perception of women with ACS and to achieve prompt diagnosis and treatment.

Sex bias in cardiovascular testing: the contribution of patient preference

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Women with potential acute coronary syndromes are less likely to receive cardiac catheterization or revascularization than men. We hypothesize that this may be due to different diagnostic test preferences of female and male patients.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study at 4 emergency departments enrolling patients who presented with symptoms of potential acute coronary syndromes. After hearing the potential benefits and harms of each test, subjects completed a 21-item survey assessing their preference for noninvasive testing versus cardiac catheterization. Based on hypothetical test results, similar questions about medical versus interventional management were asked. Subjects were also queried about likelihood of following physician recommendation for each test or intervention. Actual 30-day testing and interventions were recorded. The main outcome was patient preference about each procedure and the likelihood of patient saying they would accept the physician recommendation.

RESULTS

One thousand eighty patients enrolled; 652 (60%) were admitted to the hospital. With regard to diagnostic test preference, both women and men preferred stress test to catheterization (women 58% versus men 52%; difference 6% [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.06% to 12%]), and the proportion of women and men who would accept the physician recommendation for stress tests was similar (85% for both); however, the stated acceptance rate for cardiac catheterization was lower for women (65% versus 75%; difference -10% [95% CI -15% to -4%]). Women were 6% less likely (67% versus 73%; 95% CI for difference 12% to 0.5%) to accept percutaneous coronary intervention over medical therapy and 7% less likely (61% versus 68%; 95% CI for difference -13% to 1%) to desire coronary artery bypass grafting over medical therapy. The survey results are consistent with the patients' clinical course. During the initial hospitalization, women were less likely to receive diagnostic testing of any type (38% versus 45%; difference -7%; 95% CI for the difference -13% to -1.5%) and cardiac catheterization (10% versus 17%; difference -7% [95% CI -11% to -2%]). Revascularization was infrequent in both groups (4% versus 6%; difference -2% [95% CI -5% to 0.6%]).

CONCLUSION

Although women and men had similar preferences about cardiac diagnostic tests and treatment options, women were less likely than men to say they would accept the physician recommendation for any intervention. Patient preference may partially explain the disparity in cardiovascular testing between women and men.

A systematic review of pre-operative predictors of post-operative depression and anxiety in individuals who have undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery

In addition to the physical benefits, another important objective of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is improvement of health-related quality of life. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the literature relating to the pre-operative prediction of post-operative depression and anxiety in individuals who have undergone CABG surgery. Forty-six studies were identified through a literature search of electronic databases conducted using explicit inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study characteristics, methodological features, and psychometric and clinical outcomes were summarised in a systematic manner. Collective appraisal of the studies indicated that symptoms of depression and anxiety exhibited after CABG surgery are best predicted by pre-operative measures of functioning in that area. Papers were inconclusive with respect to the predictive qualities of gender and age. Further research is required to clarify the predictive values of these and other factors, including pre-morbid ill health and socio-economic status. The findings of this review indicate a range of pre-operative predictors of post-operative depression and anxiety in patients with CABG. Chief among these are pre-operative depression and anxiety. These findings have clinical implications concerning the importance of pre and post-operative psychological assessment and intervention for individuals at risk of poor psychological recovery.

Effect of gender differences on early and mid-term clinical outcome after percutaneous or surgical coronary revascularisation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: insights from ARTS I and ARTS II

AIMS

The aim of the current study was to compare the short and mid-term outcome between males and females treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stent implantation or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and drug-eluting stent implantation in the Arterial Revascularisation Therapies Study I and II (ARTS I and II).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The patients included in ARTS I were randomised to PCI with bare metal stents or to CABG. The patients enrolled in ARTS II were treated with Cypher stent implantation. All patients were scheduled for clinical follow-up at one, six and twelve months, and after three and five years. Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) included death, cerebrovascular accident (CVA), myocardial infarction (MI), repeat target vessel PCI (RPCI) and CABG. At one and three-year follow-up in ARTS II, both the female and male patients had an incidence of MACCE similar to ARTS I-CABG. When comparing the female and male population of ARTS II, there were no differences between the two genders in terms of in-hospital outcome. At one year and three years there were no gender specific differences in the incidence of MACCE.

CONCLUSIONS

Female and male patients in ARTS II had significantly lower MACCE rates compared with ARTS I-PCI, but similar to that of ARTS I-CABG. In ARTS II, MACCE free survival was similar for the two genders at three years follow-up.

Coronary heart disease in women: less extensive disease and improved long-term survival compared to men

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to compare extent of coronary disease and subsequent long-term survival in women compared to men adjusted for baseline differences in demographics and morbidity.

DESIGN

In the database at Feiring Heart Clinic 18 767 patients had a coronary angiographic examination in the period from March 1999 to December 31, 2006. Their survival status as of May 31, 2007 was ascertained through the Norwegian National Registry. Survival was compared using age stratified analyses and Cox regression adjusting for baseline differences.

RESULTS

Significantly more women than men had no coronary disease (28.7 vs. 10.5%, p <0.001), while three vessel disease was more frequently present in men (38.7 vs. 21.8%, p <0.001), as judged by coronary angiography. Covariate adjusted survival was significantly better in women compared to men with an overall hazard ratio of 1.29 (p <0.001), but with no significant difference in the subgroup with high left ventricular end diastolic pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

At the time of referral to invasive examination women had less extensive coronary artery disease than men as judged by coronary angiography and improved long-term survival when baseline differences were accounted for.

Changes in quality of life, physical activity, and symptomatic status one year after myocardial revascularization for stable angina

BACKGROUND

This study investigates changes of quality of life (QOL), physical activity (PA) and symptomatic status (NYHA) at one-year post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

Of 568 patients undergoing a primary isolated CABG for stable angina (NYHA <IV) pre- and 1-year postoperative data on QOL, PA, and NYHA were complete. Studied outcomes were changes in QOL, EuroQoL questionnaire, PA, the Corpus Christi Heart Project criteria and NYHA. Analysis was based on three age groups. Group A, age <65 years: 285 patients, group B, 65-74 years: 210 patients, and group C, age >or=75 years: 73 patients.

RESULTS

There is a similar, significant decrease of NYHA class (1.4) for the three groups (p<0.0005). An overall significant improvement for QOL and PA is however different in the three subgroups. PA improvement is not significant in group C (p=0.74), significant in group B (p=0.005) and in group A (p<0.0005). For the QOL, group A shows a significant improvement for the five different domains, group B for two, and group C only for one domain. The visual analogue score as part of the QOL registration shows a significant increase for the three groups, however the improvement is minor with age, and between A (14.6) and C (9.1) this improvement is significantly different (p=0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients have the same improvement of their symptomatic status as younger patients. However despite this improvement they have less benefit from CABG regarding to their quality of life and physical activity.

Gender Influence on Hospital Mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

There is still controversy about the influence of gender on hospital mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. We analyzed various risk factors in 1,258 patients undergoing isolated on-pump coronary artery bypass, of whom 19 (1.5%) died in hospital. There were 937 men (74.5%) and 321 women (25.5%). Compared to men, women were older with a higher mean body mass index, twice as many were hypertensive and diabetic, and they had higher serum cholesterol and triglycerides. Men smoked more, had lower ejection fractions, more myocardial infarctions and poorer functional status. Female sex, congestive heart failure, low ejection fraction, diabetes, previous percutaneous interventions and chronic lung disease were more prevalent among the patients who died. These factors were used to form a logistic regression model in which sex did not have an independent influence on hospital mortality. The difference between men and women can be explained by differences in risk factor profile.

Women and men with coronary heart disease in three countries: are they treated differently?

BACKGROUND

Nonmedical determinants of medical decision making were investigated in an international research project in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany. The key question in this paper is whether and to what extent doctors' diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in coronary heart disease (CHD) are influenced by patient gender.

METHODS

A factorial experiment with a videotaped patient consultation was conducted. Professional actors played the role of patients with symptoms of CHD. Several alternative versions were taped featuring the same script with patient-actors of different gender, age, race, and socioeconomic status. The videotapes were presented to a randomly selected sample of 128 primary care physicians in each country. Using an interview with standardized and open-ended questions, physicians were asked how they would diagnose and treat such a patient after they had seen the video.

RESULTS

Results show gender differences in the diagnostic strategies of the doctors. Women were asked different questions, CHD was mentioned more often as a possible diagnosis for men than for women, and physicians were less certain about their diagnosis with female patients. Gender differences in management decisions (therapy and lifestyle advice) are less pronounced and less consistent than in diagnostic decisions. Magnitude of gender effect on doctors' decisions varies between countries with smaller influences in the United States.

CONCLUSION

Although patients with identical symptoms were presented, primary care doctors' behavior differed by patients' gender in all 3 countries under study. These gender differences suggest that women may be less likely to receive an accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment than men.