Directional atherectomy facilitates the interventional procedure and leads to a low rate of recurrent stenosis in left anterior descending and left circumflex artery ostium stenoses: subgroup analysis of the FLEXI-CUT study

Long-term outcomes following ostial left anterior descending artery intervention with or without crossover to left-main

BACKGROUND

Ostial left anterior descending (LAD) artery lesions are a critical area for coronary stenting, given that the location subtends a large area of the myocardium and can also be more technically challenging. It remains controversial whether crossover stenting of ostial LAD back into the left-main (LM) is advantageous over stenting the ostium alone.

METHODS

To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of stenting ostial LAD lesions, we retrospectively reviewed all ostial LAD lesions cases at QEII Health Science Centre between 2008 and 2018. Specifically, we compared the outcomes in those patients that had left main stent crossover vs. ostial stenting (OS) alone.

RESULTS

The total number of patients included in the study was 175, with 25 patients (14%) having a crossover to the LM and 150 (86%) having OS. There were more patients with previous CABG (24%) in the crossover group compared to the OS group (9.2%) (P = 0.042). The one-year MACE was not significantly different between CO vs. OS (13.3% (10.5-16.1) vs. 12% (5.5-18.5)). The five-year MACE was numerically higher, although statistically not significant, in CO vs. OS (19.3 (15.9-22.7) vs. 25.9 (16.6-35.2)).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that percutaneous intervention provides reasonable long-term outcomes and low rates of repeat revascularization for isolated ostial LAD lesions, with no noticeable difference in outcomes with crossover stenting into the LM vs. OS alone. A larger, prospective study may be required to determine the optimal strategy for treating ostial LAD lesions.

Directional coronary atherectomy: a time for reflection. Should we let it go?

A series of interventional tools have emerged since the advent of percutaneous coronary angioplasty. Several are fundamental and used routinely, while others less favourable have fallen short of mainstream therapy and/or have settled as a niche device. We present an overview of the evolution of directional coronary atherectomy (DCA), a unique device that was originally conceived in 1984 to solve the limitations of balloon angioplasty. Unfortunately, we have witnessed its use fall significantly out of favour due to premature and controversial study results. In many interventional laboratories DCA is no longer available. However, we strongly feel that allowing DCA to join the list of extinct interventional tools would be very unfortunate. We, herein, present a series of complex percutaneous coronary procedures to illustrate the convenience of DCA use as a lesion-specific niche device. Finally, DCA offers a valuable distinct clinical research function as it allows for in vivo pathological coronary tissue examination. In conclusion, we plead for its continued production and use as an interventional niche device for the wellbeing of our patients.

Cutting-balloon angioplasty effectively facilitates the interventional procedure and leads to a low rate of recurrent stenosis in ostial bifurcation coronary lesions: A subgroup analysis of the NICECUT multicenter registry

BACKGROUND

Displacement of plaque is a major concern during coronary intervention of ostial bifurcation lesions. For this reason, angioplasty involves complex stenting procedures, which may trigger development of restenosis in a previously non-diseased parent vessel.

OBJECTIVES

To examine, whether plaque displacement may be prevented by scoring atherosclerotic plaque with a cutting-balloon (CB) stand-alone procedure.

METHODS

Data of patients with Duke E and B type ostial bifurcation lesions (>/=70% stenosis involving a diagonal and/or marginal branch >2 mm deriving from a non-diseased parent vessel), who were treated with CB as stand-alone procedure within the prospective NICECUT multicenter trial were analyzed. Primary endpoint was the rate of binary stenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Secondary endpoints were procedural success and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6-months follow-up.

RESULTS

63 out of 65 lesions (56 patients) were successfully amenable to treatment with CB (96.4% procedural success). 76.9% of patients were successfully treated with CB as a stand-alone procedure, while provisional stenting was necessary in 23.1%. At follow-up, binary stenosis was found in 23.2%, among the total population. Total rate of TLR and MACE were 7.7% and 3.6%, respectively, compared to 4.0% and 2.0% in patients for whom CB stand-alone procedure was feasible, while it was 20.0% and 6.7% for stented lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

CB angioplasty as a stand-alone procedure may facilitate interventional treatment of ostial bifurcation lesions and may help to avoid complex stenting procedures. It is associated with a low rate of binary stenosis and TLR.