Evaluation of restenosis and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with previous percutaneous coronary interventions by dobutamine stress real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging

Combined assessment of myocardial perfusion and late gadolinium enhancement in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention or bypass grafts: a multicenter study of an integrated cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the accuracy of an integrated cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol for the diagnosis of relevant coronary artery or bypass graft stenosis in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) or with previously performed percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary bypass graft surgery (CABG).

BACKGROUND

CMR is suitable for diagnosing inducible myocardial ischemia in patients with suspected CAD and has been proven to be a helpful diagnostic tool for decision of further treatment. However, little is known about its diagnostic accuracy in patients with known CAD who previously were treated by PCI or CABG.

METHODS

A total of 477 patients with suspected CAD, 236 with previous PCI, and 110 after CABG referred for coronary X-ray angiography (CXA) underwent an integrated CMR examination before CXA. Myocardial ischemia was assessed using first-pass perfusion after vasodilator stress with adenosine (140 microg/kg/min for 3 min) using gadolinium-based contrast agents (0.1 mmol/kg). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was assessed 10 min after a second contrast bolus.

RESULTS

CXA demonstrated a relevant coronary vessel stenosis (> or =70% luminal reduction) in 313 (38%) patients using quantitative coronary analysis. The combination of CMR perfusion and LGE assessment for detecting a relevant coronary stenosis in patients with suspected CAD yielded sensitivity and specificity of 0.94 and 0.87, in PCI patients 0.91 and 0.90, and in CABG patients 0.79 and 0.77, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined CMR protocol for the assessment of myocardial perfusion and LGE is feasible for the detection of relevant coronary vessel stenosis even in patients who previously were treated by PCI or CAG in a routine clinical setting. However, diagnostic accuracy is reduced in patients with CABG. This could be due to different flow and perfusion kinetic. Further studies are needed to optimize the clinical protocols especially in post-surgical patients.

Quantitative contrast stress echocardiography in assessment of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary artery disease

AIMS

Quantitative contrast stress echocardiography (CSE) can assess regional myocardial perfusion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of quantitative CSE in the detection of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Thirty-three patients with stable coronary artery disease, scheduled for PCI, underwent CSE and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) before and 9 months after PCI. Regional myocardial perfusion was analysed blinded to QCA results. QCA identified 38 significant stenoses (> or =50% diameter reduction). Before PCI, perfusion during stress was significantly reduced in regions supplied by stenotic arteries; blood flow velocity (Deltabeta) -3.9 (-9.0 to 0.5) s(-1), perfusion rate (DeltaA x beta) -175.0 (-518.0 to 58.5) s(-1), and refilling time (Deltart) 210 (-22 to 452)ms, compared with the perfusion increase seen in regions supplied by non-stenotic arteries; Deltabeta 1.6 (-0.7 to 4.4) s(-1), DeltaA x beta 151.7 (-67.0 to 300.5) s(-1), and Deltart -47 (-195 to 89) ms, all P < 0.05. At follow-up, regional stress-induced perfusion improved in 29 regions with successful PCI; Deltabeta 0.1 (-2.7 to 3.6), DeltaA x beta 30.5 (-133.3 to 232.1), and Deltart -99 (-247 to 125), all P < or = 0.01, although there was no improvement in nine regions with restenosis; Deltabeta 0.9 (-1.5 to 5.3), DeltaAxbeta 65.7 (-40.8 to 412.6), and Deltart -79 (-268 to 163), P = NS.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative CSE has the potential to detect angiographically significant coronary artery stenoses as well as angiographic success after PCI.

Multidetector computed tomography angiography for assessment of in-stent restenosis: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance

Background

Multi-detector computed tomography angiography (MDCTA)of the coronary arteries after stenting has been evaluated in multiple studies.

The purpose of this study was to perform a structured review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MDCTA for the detection of in-stent restenosis in the coronary arteries.

Methods

A Pubmed and manual search of the literature on in-stent restenosis (ISR) detected on MDCTA compared with conventional coronary angiography (CA) was performed. Bivariate summary receiver operating curve (SROC) analysis, with calculation of summary estimates was done on a stent and patient basis. In addition, the influence of study characteristics on diagnostic performance and number of non-assessable segments (NAP) was investigated with logistic meta-regression.

Results

Fourteen studies were included. On a stent basis, Pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.82(0.72–0.89) and 0.91 (0.83–0.96). Pooled negative likelihood ratio and positive likelihood ratio were 0.20 (0.13–0.32) and 9.34 (4.68–18.62) respectively. The exclusion of non-assessable stents and the strut thickness of the stents had an influence on the diagnostic performance. The proportion of non-assessable stents was influenced by the number of detectors, stent diameter, strut thickness and the use of an edge-enhancing kernel.

Conclusion

The sensitivity of MDTCA for the detection of in-stent stenosis is insufficient to use this test to select patients for further invasive testing as with this strategy around 20% of the patients with in-stent stenosis would be missed. Further improvement of scanner technology is needed before it can be recommended as a triage instrument in practice. In addition, the number of non-assessable stents is also high.