Tripathi M, Pandey M, Singh U, Dwivedi S. Non-smokers are more prone to pulmonary oedema than smokers during acute coronary syndrome.
Int J Clin Pract 2008;
62:1880-5. [PMID:
19166435 DOI:
10.1111/j.1742-1241.2008.01835.x]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients are prone to develop pulmonary oedema with varied degree of hypoxaemia. The aim was to compare the risk for pulmonary oedema and related complications during ACS amongst non-smokers vs. smokers.
METHODS
Prospective, observational study was performed in consecutive 68 patients presenting with ACS. They were divided into two groups; group 1 (n = 33) non-smokers and group 2 (n = 35) chronic smokers. Standard conservative treatment was given to maintain mean arterial pressure >or= 60 mmHg, oxygen saturation > 95%. The bedside chest x-ray was graded for Battler grading (0-4) for pulmonary oedema. All patients were evaluated for troponin, serial creatinine kinase, echocardiography, arterial blood gas, renal function and correlated with inotropes requirement, active respiratory support, coronary care unit (CCU) stay and hospital outcome.
RESULTS
Patients in both the groups had similar cardiac involvement for cardiothoracic ratio, troponin, ejection fraction and creatinine kinase muscle and brain (CK-MB). The bedside chest x-ray revealed significant (p < 0.05) lung oedema grades (3 and 4) in 60% non-smokers (group 1) vs. smokers (11%). These patients (group 1) also presented with significant (p < 0.001) hypoxaemia (lower PaO(2)/FiO(2)-201 +/- 44), metabolic acidosis (higher lactate; 2.1 +/- 0.72 mmol/l, base deficit; -5.1 +/- 4.8) and hypocarbia (28 +/- 2.9 mmHg) than smokers (group 2). The risk estimates for active respiratory support (OR =1.716) and inotrope use (OR = 1.836) was three times higher in non-smokers than smokers.
CONCLUSIONS
The higher degree of pulmonary oedema and hypoxemia probably contributed to poor short-term outcome in non-smokers than smokers. It would be important to recognise and treat hypoxaemia in non-smokers during ACS.
Collapse