Haemodynamic effects of hydrallazine and of hydrallazine plus glyceryl trinitrate paste in heart failure

Acute improvement of pulmonary hemodynamics does not alleviate Cheyne-Stokes respiration in chronic heart failure-a randomized, controlled, double-blind, crossover trial

OBJECTIVES

This randomized, controlled trial aimed to investigate whether acute improvement of pulmonary congestion would reduce the severity of Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR) in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).

METHODS

Twenty-one consecutive patients with CHF and CSR (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥15/h) underwent right heart catheterization with titration of intravenous (IV) glyceryltrinitrate (GTN) to a maximum tolerable dosage and inhalation of iloprost 10 μg/mL after a washout phase. Maximum tolerable dosages of GTN and iloprost were randomly applied during full cardiorespiratory polysomnography within two split-night procedures and compared with IV or inhaled sodium chloride (NaCl) 0.9 %, respectively.

RESULTS

GTN (6.2 ± 1.5 mg/h) and iloprost significantly lowered \mean pulmonary artery pressure (20.1 ± 9.0 to 11.6 ± 4.2 mmHg, p < 0.001 and 16.9 ± 7.9 to 14.2 ± 6.4 mmHg, p < 0.01, respectively). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was only reduced by GTN (14.0 ± 5.6 to 7.2 ± 3.9 mmHg, p < 0.001), and there was no significant change in the cardiac index. Sleep studies revealed no significant improvement in markers of CSR severity, including AHI, central apnea index, and CSR cycle length following GTN or iloprost treatment. Significant decreases in blood pressure, mean oxygen saturation, and S3 sleep were documented during GTN infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute improvement of pulmonary congestion by GTN had no immediate impact on CSR severity. Future investigations must therefore include longer treatment periods and treatment regimens that have positive, rather than negative, additional effects on peripheral and central chemoreceptors and sleep structure.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trial Registry-ID:DRKS00000467 ( www.germanctr.de ).

Perioperative management of chronic heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is one of the few cardiac conditions that is increasing. Despite a better understanding of how hormones and other signaling systems underlie the pathophysiology, and despite improved outcomes from pharmacologic therapy, many HF patients receive no effective treatment. Patients with HF commonly require medical diagnosis and management in operating rooms and critical care units; thus anesthesiologists are obliged to remain up-to-date both with advances in outpatient (chronic) medical management and with inpatient treatments for acute exacerbations of HF. Accordingly, we reviewed angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-adrenergic receptor blockers, and aldosterone antagonists because these drugs prolong life and are included in current clinical practice guidelines for treating patients with chronic HF. We also reviewed the implications of chronic HF for patients undergoing surgery and anesthesia and discuss how best to provide intensive treatment for acute exacerbations of symptoms, such as might be caused by excessive intravascular volume, inappropriate drug "holidays," or worsening of the underlying cardiac disease.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use of hydralazine in congestive heart failure

Hydralazine (1-hydrazinophthalazine) has been used extensively in the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure and produces arteriolar vasodilation, in part, mediated by prostaglandins. Its associated reflex baroreceptor-mediated responses of tachycardia and increased ejection velocity are attenuated in congestive heart failure. A direct inotropic effect has been attributed to the drug. Pharmacokinetic data indicate hydralazine is absorbed well from the gastrointestinal tract, and has an extensive and complex metabolism depending on acetylator status: slow acetylators undergo primary oxidative metabolism, while rapid acetylators are acetylated. Half-lives, clearances and bioavailability of the drug are not significantly altered in congestive heart failure compared with hypertensive patients. A wide range of dosages in heart failure has been noted (150 to 3000 mg/24h), and may related to a saturation of the first-pass effect. Hydralazine improves haemodynamics in the short term in patients with increased peripheral vascular resistance, and has variable effects on pulmonary capillary wedge and left ventricular filling pressures. Prediction of the short term clinical response is difficult and appears to be independent of pharmacokinetics. A meta analysis did not demonstrate long term efficacy of hydralazine alone in heart failure, but combination therapy with nitrates has been shown to improve survival and exercise performance in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. Side effects are common and are dependent on dose, duration and acetylator status.

Vasodilators as first-line therapy for congestive heart failure: a comparative hemodynamic study of hydralazine, digoxin, and their combination

Although digitalis and vasodilators both enhance cardiac performance in patients with congestive heart failure, their relative efficacy is unknown. Accordingly, the acute hemodynamic effects of intravenous hydralazine (0.15 mg/kg), digoxin (1.0 mg), and the hydralazine-digoxin combination were evaluated in 14 normotensive heart failure patients at sitting rest, nine of whom were also studied during submaximal upright bicycle exercise. Hemodynamic responses at rest and exercise were similar. Cardiac output and stroke volume rose with both agents, the increase in cardiac output with hydralazine exceeding that with digoxin at rest. Left and right ventricular filling pressures declined equally. Systemic arterial mean pressure and total systemic vascular resistance fell with hydralazine, while, with digoxin, systemic arterial mean pressure increased and total systemic vascular resistance was unchanged. The hydralazine-digoxin combination produced increases in cardiac output and stroke volume that were greater than with either drug alone, and that equalled the sum of the drugs' individual effects; reductions in ventricular filling pressures were similar to the single-drug interventions. Thus, hydralazine is at least as effective as digoxin in improving cardiac function over the short term. Vasodilators may constitute an acceptable alternative to digitalis as initial therapy for congestive heart failure, except where a reduction in systemic arterial pressure is potentially deleterious. Use of combined treatment produces greater increases in cardiac output than with either drug alone, but requires risking the toxicities of two agents.

The treatment of heart failure. A methodological review of the literature

In this article literature concerning the major drugs used in the treatment of heart failure is reviewed. Because of major discrepancies in results from short term and uncontrolled studies versus long term randomised control trials, only the latter group of studies are addressed in detail. Of 3 randomised control trials of digoxin, 1 has been positive, and 2 negative. Digoxin is probably of benefit to a minority of heart failure patients. Four randomised control trials of oral nitrates have shown a reduction in left ventricular filling pressure, and trends favouring active treatment for the indices of exercise capacity and functional status. Of 2 randomised control trials of hydralazine one is totally negative, the other difficult to interpret because of major loss of patients to followup. Of 5 trials of quinazolone derivatives (prazosin and trimazosin), 2 have been positive, 2 showed non-statistically significant trends favouring active treatment, and 1 was completely negative. These results are consistent with a modest benefit of prazosin and trimazosin in some heart failure patients. Five trials of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (captopril and enalapril) have shown dramatic and consistent benefit in exercise capacity and functional status. These results support a clinical policy of initial treatment with diuretics and addition of either captopril or enalapril for patients who remain symptomatic on optimal diuretic therapy. A trial of digoxin is warranted in patients whose functional capacity remains reduced on this regimen.

Vasodilator therapy in chronic congestive heart failure

Vasodilator agents are relatively new additions to the armamentarium for the management of patients with congestive heart failure. Myocardial failure, irrespective of the aetiology, tends to create a vicious cycle characterised by reduced cardiac output and elevated systemic vascular resistance, which further decrease cardiac output by increasing left ventricular ejection impedance. The rationale for the use of vasodilators is to interrupt the vicious cycle by decreasing the left ventricular ejection impedance by peripheral vasodilatation. Although most vasodilator agents produce qualitatively similar haemodynamic responses, quantitatively their haemodynamic effects differ considerably. Knowledge of the haemodynamic effects of the various vasodilators helps in the selection of a particular drug for the management of such patients. This article reviews the mechanisms of action, haemodynamic effects, pharmacokinetics, clinical usage and adverse effects of non-parenteral vasodilator agents currently available for the management of patients with chronic heart failure.

The transdermal administration of nitrates: an overview

Nitroglycerin has been the mainstay of the medical management of angina pectoris for over 100 years. The long-held clinical impression of the efficacy of nitroglycerin has now been clearly documented in controlled clinical trials designed to evaluate objective response to antianginal agents. Advances in scientific methodology and improved experimental design have contributed to continuing interest in nitrates. Newer uses of nitroglycerin and other nitrates in congestive heart failure and acute myocardial infarction are the result of a developing understanding of the pharmacology of nitrates.

Acute and long-term effects of vasodilator therapy on resting and exercise hemodynamics and exercise tolerance

The acute hemodynamic response to vasodilators in patients with chronic heart failure has been well characterized, but less is known about the long-term hemodynamic effects of vasodilator therapy. We measured hemodynamic variables at rest and during upright exercise in 11 patients during the initiation of therapy with oral hydralazine and sublingual isosorbide dinitrate and, in eight of these, after 3 months of continuous treatment. Marked initial increases in resting cardiac output and stroke volume and reductions in wedge pressure were sustained during chronic therapy. Similarly, the early improvement in exercise hemodynamic measurements persisted in most subjects. Exercise tolerance, quantified as the maximum duration of treadmill exercise, increased modestly (7.7 +/- 2.6 to 8.9 +/- 3.3 minutes, 0.05 less than p less than 0.10) after several days on vasodilators and further (10.2 +/- 3.7 minutes, p less than 0.01) during long-term treatment. The acute hemodynamic effects of vasodilator therapy at rest or during exercise did not correlate well with the changes in exercise tolerance. Our findings suggest that the combination of hydralazine and isosorbide dinitrate improves cardiac performance at rest and during exercise in patients with chronic heart failure and that this improvement persists during chronic therapy. In most patients, this hemodynamic improvement is accompanied by greater exercise tolerance.

Vasodilator treatment with isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine in chronic heart failure

Several reports have suggested that because isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine have different and additive haemodynamic effects at rest in patients with chronic heart failure, these agents should be administered in combination. Some studies, however, indicate thay they are effective individually as well. Since most patients with heart failure are symptomatic only with activity, we examined the haemodynamic effects of these drugs given individually and in combination, at rest and during upright bicycle exercise. As has been noted previously, at rest isosorbide significantly lowered both ventricular filling pressures and did not change cardiac output; hydralazine increased cardiac output and had only a slight effect on pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; combined treatment produced both beneficial effects. In contrast, during exercise isosorbide dinitrate also raised cardiac output while hydralazine more dramatically lowered the wedge pressure. Combined treatment produced significantly greater improvement in each haemodynamic index than either drug alone, with a resulting 54 per cent increase in exercise cardiac output, and a 33 per cent reduction in exercise wedge pressure. Maximal oxygen consumption increased acutely during combined treatment. These findings suggest that isosorbide dinitrate and hydralazine may each be effective in some patients, but that they are even more beneficial in combination.

Hemodynamic effects of nifedipine in congestive heart failure

Nifedipine, a potent coronary vasodilator, was administered in a single sublingual dose of 20 mg to eight patients with mild to moderate congestive heart failure. Nifedipine produced a slight increase in heart rate (mean +/- standard error of the mean 73.3 +/- 3.2 versus 80.9 +/- 2.1 beats/min, p < 0.025) and an increase in cardiac index (from a control value of 3.51 +/- 0.22 to 4.06 +/- 0.31 liters/min per m2, p < 0.01). Arterial blood pressure decreased from 112.9 +/- 6.2/67.7 +/- 4.2 (mean 84.9 +/- 4.0) to 100.8 +/- 4.4/56.4 +/- 11.0 (mean 76.1 +/- 4.3) mm Hg (p < 0.01) and total systemic vascular resistance also decreased from a control value of 15.6 +/- 1.0 to 12.4 +/- 0.8 units (p < 0.01) after administration of nifedipine. These data suggest that nifedipine may be useful for vasodilation in congestive heart failure.

Rest and exercise hemodynamic effects of oral hydralazine in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction

To determine the hemodynamic effects of afterload reduction at rest and during upright exercise in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction, 12 patients were studied before and after taking 50-75 mg of oral hydralazine every 6 hours for 48 hours. Oxygen consumption and heart rate were unchanged from control both at rest and during two work loads on a bicycle ergometer. Cardiac output was significantly increased at rest and during both workloads. The arteriovenous oxygen difference was significantly reduced at rest and during exercise. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was also significantly lower at rest and during exercise. Systemic vascular resistance was reduced at rest, and exercise-induced vasodilation was augmented by the administration of hydralazine. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume and ejection fraction assessed by radionuclide angiocardiography were not significantly changed at rest or during exercise after hydralazine. Seven of the 12 patients have maintained clinical improvement during a follow-up of 6-12 months. Hemodynamic improvement provided by oral hydralazine at rest is maintained during moderate exertion in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. In selected patients, chronic afterload reduction with oral hydralazine may result in increased cardiac reserve, decreased pulmonary congestion or decreased myocardial oxygen demands, thereby improving or abolishing resting or exertional dyspnea or angina.

Comparison of haemodynamic effects of oral prazosin, oral hydralazine, and intravenous nitroprusside in same patients with chronic heart failure

The haemodynamic effects of oral prazosin and hydralazine were evaluated in patients with refractory heart failure and compared with those of intravenous nitroprusside in the same patients. Both oral agents were well tolerated and appeared to have beneficial haemodynamic effects. Prazosin and hydralazine produced similar increases in cardiac output associated with a similar decrease in systemic vascular resistance. Prazosin and hydralazine produced similar increases in cardiac output associated with a similar decrease in systemic vascular resistance. Prazosin resulted in a more significant decline in left ventricular filling pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance than did hydralazine. Haemodynamic alterations induced by prazosin were similar to those induced by nitroprusside, which suggests a relatively balanced reduction of preload and afterload. With hydralazine, the increase in cardiac output without change in left ventricular filling pressure or pulmonary vascular resistance suggests minimal effect on preload but significant reduction in afterload.

Precipitation of heart failure following sudden withdrawal of hydralazine

Sudden withdrawal of oral therapy with hydralazine for reduction of afterload in a patient precipitated severe congestive heart failure. Signs of metabolic encephalopathy evolved due to low cardiac output. Reinstitution of therapy with hydralazine resulted in prompt improvement in cardiac and neurologic status. This case underscores the need for careful follow-up of such patients and argues against sudden withdrawal of vasodilator therapy.