Echocardiography and rupture of the heart

Role of contrast echocardiography in the assessment of myocardial rupture

Left ventricular free wall rupture is known to complicate acute myocardial infarction and is the second most common cause of inhospital mortality in this patient population. Contrary to widely held medical belief, this does not always result in immediate fatal pericardial tamponade with hemodynamic collapse. Up to 40% of such occurrences are subacute and may evolve over hours or even days. A high index of suspicion and accurate diagnostic tests are required to identify and treat these patients with emergent surgery. Echocardiography has emerged as an important diagnostic modality to identify this catastrophic condition. Although the literature has scattered reports on the role of transesophageal and transthoracic echocardiography in diagnosing free wall rupture, to date, only one report in the literature used ultrasound contrast agents to better delineate echocardiographic findings. We will present two cases in which echocardiography with use of intravenous ultrasound contrast agents was instrumental in helping to exclude rupture in one case and help identify rupture in another.

Transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis of cardiac rupture

Cardiac rupture is a difficult pre-mortem diagnosis to make and is equally difficult to manage. Transesophageal echocardiography may be useful in expediting the diagnosis and in the management of cardiac rupture related to myocardial infarction.

Blinded comparison of an "ultrasound stethoscope" and standard echocardiographic instrument

We evaluated blinded readings by a physician using a miniature real-time "ultrasound stethoscope" compared with a "standard" echo instrument used by an independent physician. Size of all four cardiac chambers, wall motion, all four valves, thickness of interventricular septum and left ventricular posterior wall, and pericardial effusion were assessed in 66 patients. Each physician estimated whether he had answered the referring question and gave a final diagnosis. The physician using the ultrasound stethoscope correctly assessed chamber size in 87 percent of cases, segmental left ventricular wall motion in 71 percent of segments studied, and wall thickness in 88 percent of cases, and the diagnosis by the ultrasound stethoscope agreed with that made by the standard instrument in 68 percent of cases. The physician with the ultrasound stethoscope detected structural valvular problems (eg, stenosis) in 70 percent of cases but only detected flow abnormalities (eg, regurgitation) in 14 percent of cases. We conclude that (1) an experienced echocardiographer using an ultrasound stethoscope can detect most structural abnormalities found by a standard echocardiographic instrument; (2) chamber size, valvular stenosis, and pericardial effusions were accurately assessed; (3) the ultrasound stethoscope cannot be used to detect valvular regurgitation; and (4) limitations include the lack of freeze-frame, M-mode, hard copy, and Doppler.