The Remler ambulatory blood pressure recording system: Accuracy and reliability

Clinical value of ambulatory blood pressure: evidence and limits

This article reviews the clinical value of ambulatory blood pressure (BP) vis-à-vis the traditional BP measurements taken in the physician's office or in the hospital. Mention is initially made that longitudinal studies conducted in the general population or in hypertensive cohorts have shown that ambulatory BP provides a more accurate prediction of outcome than office BP. Namely, that (1) the risk of cardiovascular events increases in a less steep fashion with office than with 24-hour mean BP, (2) the 24-hour BP-dependent prediction is maintained after adjustment for office BP values, and (3) among individuals with normal office BP, those with increased ambulatory BP (masked hypertension) have an increased prevalence of organ damage, a more frequent unfavorable metabolic profile and a higher risk of new onset sustained hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular events than those with normal ambulatory BP. It is further mentioned, however, that more recently similar observations have been made for individuals with high office but normal ambulatory BP (white coat hypertension) suggesting a complementary role of out-of-office and office BP values in the determination of patients' prognosis. The evidence in favor of an independent prognostic value also of some within 24-hour BP phenomena (night BP reduction or absolute values, short-term BP variations, and morning BP surge) is then critically appraised for its elements of strength and weakness. Finally, whether the clinical advantages of ambulatory BP make this approach necessary for all patients with hypertension is discussed. The conclusion is that this is at present still premature because crucial evidence pro or against routine use of this approach in untreated and treated hypertensives is not yet available. It will be crucial for future studies to determine whether, compared with a treatment guided by office BP, a treatment tailored on ambulatory BP allows to improve prevention or regression of organ damage as well as protection from major cardiovascular complications to a degree that justifies the complexity and cost of the procedure.

Double-blind, randomized comparative study of the antihypertensive effect of nicardipine slow-release and nifedipine slow-release in hypertensive patients with coronary heart disease

The main aim of this study was to investigate whether a new slow-release formation of nicardipine can control hypertension and whether its antihypertensive effect is manifest throughout the dose intervals. In a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study, the antihypertensive effect of two calcium antagonists (Type II) was investigated in two independent groups of hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease. One group of patients received 40 mg nicardipine slow-release b.i.d. and the other 20 mg nifedipine slow-release b.i.d. The effect of the active drugs on blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and hemodynamics was compared with placebo within each group. In addition, a group comparison was made to establish whether nicardipine had any advantage over nifedipine. Twenty-eight patients [27 female, 1 male; 55 (41-72) years old], 18 with previous myocardial infarction (MI) entered the study (nicardipine, 15 patients; nifedipine, 13 patients). A placebo period of 3 days was followed by a 13-day drug treatment period. From the first to last trial day, BP and heart rate were measured three times daily. At the end of the placebo and the active drug periods, the following measurements were carried out: ambulatory BP monitoring by half-hourly recording for 12.5 hours with the Remler system, ergometric tests with ECG, and right heart catheterization. Both drugs lowered the BP at rest, during exercise, and during usual daily activities. The antihypertensive effect of nicardipine was significant for the daytime mean arterial BP (MAP) and for systolic BP and diastolic BP at various stages of the exercise tests. The difference between the effect of nicardipine and nifedipine was not significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Accuracy and reliability of two indirect ambulatory blood pressure recorders: Remler M2000 and Cardiodyne Sphygmolog

Images