Need for cardiac catheterisation in assessment of patients for valve surgery

Prevalence of coronary artery disease in patients with valvular heart disease

To evaluate the usefulness of preoperatie coronary angiography in patients undergoing preoperative investigation because of valvular heart disease, we performed coronary angiography in a consecutive series of 329 patients. The prevalence of significant coronary artery disease was 32%. Asymptomatic coronary artery disease was present in 13%. Angina pectoris proved to be a poor predictor of coronary artery disease in aortic valve disease. In mitral valve disease, however, the specificity was high. A cost-benefit calculation was carried out in order to assess what advantage routine coronary angiography might have. According to this, coronary angiography should be performed in all patients suffering from valvular heart disease with angina pectoris, whereas it can be omitted in younger patients without angina. A cut-off point of 60 years seems appropriate for aortic valve disease and 65 years for mitral valve disease.

The value of Doppler echocardiography in the management of patients with valvular heart disease: analysis of one year of clinical practice

Management recommendations based on Doppler echocardiographic examination and cardiac catheterization were compared in a prospective study in 100 consecutive patients who were admitted for evaluation and treatment of suspected valvular heart disease during 1988. Management recommendations were provided independently after both Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization by different and blinded investigators. Criteria for severe (clinically significant) and moderate to mild (insignificant) valvular lesions and management recommendations were agreed on in advance. There was disagreement on the severity of aortic stenosis based on the aortic valve area and maximum instantaneous pressure gradient in 1 of 54 patients, which resulted in differing management recommendations. Mitral stenosis was severe (valve area less than or equal to 1 cm2) at Doppler echocardiography but not at cardiac catheterization in 5 of 14 patients. Because pulmonary artery pressure increase during exercise at cardiac catheterization also suggested severe obstruction, management recommendations were similar. There was a potentially significant disagreement on the severity of aortic regurgitation in 9 of 76 patients and of mitral regurgitation in 14 of 90 patients; however, this did not produce differing management recommendations because with most patients coexistent valvular lesions or an impaired ventricular function mainly determined the ultimate management decision. Although of good quality, Doppler echocardiographic examination was nonconclusive for clinical decision-making in 15% of the study population because of uncertainty about the severity of mitral regurgitation or aortic regurgitation or because of problems in assessing the degree of left ventricular dysfunction in patients with severe regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Valvar stenosis: a comparison of clinical assessment, echocardiography, Doppler ultrasound and catheterisation

The relative merits of noninvasive techniques in the assessment of valve stenosis were examined by comparing the results of clinical assessment by two independent clinicians, the cross-sectional echocardiogram and Doppler ultrasound using the results of cardiac catheterisation as reference in 58 patients with a total of 60 stenotic valve lesions. Doppler ultrasound was the most reliable technique; it was correct in 57 (95%) of the 60 lesions. Clinical assessment and cross sectional echocardiography were correct in 48 (80%), and 46 (77%) of the 60 lesions, respectively. In 7 instances 2 noninvasive assessments were wrong in the same patient but on no occasion were all 3 techniques misleading in the same patient. In 17 patients with severe mitral stenosis, clinical assessment Doppler ultrasound and cross-sectional echocardiography were correct in 14 (82%), 16 (94%) and 17 (100%) patients, respectively, whilst in the 4 patients with moderate mitral stenosis the corresponding figures were 3 (75%), 4 (100%) and 2 (50%). In mild mitral stenosis (3 patients), the clinical assessment was correct in 2 (67%) patients, Doppler ultrasound in 3 (100%) patients and cross-sectional echocardiography in 2 (67%) patients. In 22 patients with severe aortic stenosis, the clinical assessment and Doppler ultrasound were correct in every patient (100%), whilst the cross-sectional echocardiogram was correct in 18 (82%) patients. In 11 patients with moderate aortic stenosis, the clinical assessment was correct in only 5 (45%) patients, the cross-sectional echocardiogram in 5 (45%) patients and Doppler assessment in 9 (82%) patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical evaluation versus Doppler echocardiography in the quantitative assessment of valvular heart disease

We tested the hypotheses that Doppler echocardiography has a higher accuracy than clinical evaluation in the detection of significant aortic and mitral valvular heart disease and that Doppler echocardiography is highly accurate as compared with cardiac catheterization for the assessment of valvular disease severity. Thus, cardiac catheterization for the assessment of valve lesion severity may be unnecessary in selected patients. We prospectively evaluated 75 consecutive patients, ages 20-74 years (mean, 52 years), with clinically suspected valvular heart disease. Specific clinical and Doppler echocardiographic criteria were used to categorize each valve lesion as absent, insignificant, or significant. Criteria for a significant lesion at cardiac catheterization was an aortic or mitral valve area less than 1.1 or 1.5 cm2, respectively, or equal to or greater than 3+ cm2 aortic or mitral regurgitation at angiography. In all valve lesions, Doppler echocardiography had a higher overall accuracy than clinical evaluation. Increases in accuracies of 28%, 19%, 15%, and 7% occurred for mitral stenosis, aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and mitral regurgitation, respectively, resulting in overall accuracies of 97%, 100%, 95%, and 96%. Clinical evaluation alone made 28 errors (37% of patients and 19% of valve lesions assessed), and 17 of these errors (23% of patients and 12% of valve lesions) would have resulted in inappropriate management. In only four (24%) of these 17 patients, the attending cardiologist would not have proceeded to assess the valve at cardiac catheterization.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical value of Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of adults with aortic stenosis

Continuous wave Doppler echocardiography was used to study 41 adults with clinically suspected aortic stenosis undergoing cardiac catheterisation. Non-invasive assessment of the severity of stenosis was made before catheterisation using electrocardiograms, chest radiographs, and cross sectional echocardiography in addition to clinical examination and assessment modified, where appropriate, by the result of the Doppler examination. Catheterisation gradients were obtained in 33 patients and correlated well with those obtained by Doppler examination particularly when simultaneous recordings were obtained. All patients with surgically significant stenoses were identified by non-invasive assessment including Doppler examination and overestimation was not found in any patient with a less than significant stenosis. Thus surgery can be recommended in patients with aortic stenosis without the need for previous cardiac catheterisation.