The effects of treatment with felodipine as a single agent in coronary artery disease

Felodipine in Treatment of Arterial Hypertension and Ischemic Heart Disease

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of death both in the world and in the Russian Federation. The most significant contributors to the increase in mortality are arterial hypertension (AH) and ischemic heart disease (IHD). Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are the first line of treatment for these conditions. This is noted in the clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of AH and in the guidelines for the management of patients with chronic coronary syndromes. CCBs are a heterogeneous group of drugs that have both general and individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. They are used in patients with AH and/or IHD, including those with concomitant diseases (diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, bronchial asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, peripheral arterial disease). Felodipine is one of the CCBs. It has a combination of clinical effects, allowing the drug to be prescribed as a first-line therapy for AH, IHD and a combination of these diseases. This is noted in the registered indications for its use. This CCB has a sufficient evidence base of clinical trials demonstrating not only good antihypertensive and antianginal potential of the drug, but also the nephroprotection and cerebroprotection properties. The nephroprotective effect of felodipine is associated with a slowdown in the progression of chronic kidney disease, and the cerebroprotective effect is associated with a decrease in the risk of stroke and an improvement in cognitive functioning. The safety profile of felodipine is favorable: peripheral edema develops much less frequently. This is confirmed by the results of comparative studies. Felodipine is recommended for a wide range of patients with AH, IHD and their combination due to such clinical and pharmacological properties.

Antianginal efficacy of the combination of felodipine-metoprolol 10/100 mg compared with each drug alone in patients with stable effort-induced angina pectoris: a multicenter parallel group study. The TRAFFIC Study Group

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial was to compare the antianginal and antiischemic efficacy of a combination tablet of felodipine-metoprolol 10/100 mg once daily with both drugs given separately once daily in patients with stable effort-induced angina pectoris. The secondary objective was to compare the tolerability of the 3 treatments.

METHODS

The main criteria for inclusion were stable effort-induced angina pectoris for at least 2 months before the enrollment and a positive bicycle exercise test result. Patients were allocated to once-daily treatment with either felodipine-metoprolol 10/100 mg, felodipine 10 mg, or metoprolol 100 mg. The duration of active double-blind treatment was 4 weeks. There were 3 primary efficacy variables in the study; time until end of exercise, time until onset of chest discomfort, and time until 1-mm ST depression during a standardized exercise test.

RESULTS

The number of patients randomized was 397. There was a statistically significant improvement in time until end of exercise with felodipine-metoprolol 10/100 mg compared with metoprolol 100 mg (P =.04) and felodipine 10 mg compared with metoprolol 100 mg ( P =.03). However, for time until onset of pain or time until 1-mm ST-depression there were no significant differences among the treatment groups. At highest comparable workload, ST depression was less pronounced with felodipine-metoprolol than with metoprolol alone (P =.04), and the rate-pressure product was significantly lower in the groups receiving felodipine-metoprolol and metoprolol than in the group receiving felodipine alone. The combination and metoprolol were better tolerated than felodipine alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In stable angina pectoris, the combination felodipine-metoprolol 10/100 mg and felodipine 10 mg alone increased exercise time compared with metoprolol 100 mg. The combination tablet and metoprolol 100 mg alone showed a more favorable tolerability profile than felodipine 10 mg alone.

A cross-over study comparing the efficacy of a combination of atenolol and nifedipine at different doses in angina pectoris

Although the combined administration of atenolol and nifedipine has been shown to be effective in the treatment of angina pectoris the optimum dosage level of the combination has not yet been established. A double-blind, randomly assigned three period cross-over study was carried out therefore to investigate the effects of different daily doses of a fixed combination of 50 mg atenolol and 20 mg sustained-release nifedipine per capsule. Twenty-one patients with stable angina pectoris were randomized, after a 2-week run-in period, to receive treatment for 4 weeks with either 1 capsule twice daily (A), 2 capsules in the morning and 1 in the evening (B), or 2 capsules twice daily (C). A treadmill exercise tolerance test was performed together with a clinical evaluation after the run-in and each of the three treatment periods. Analysis of the results from the 19 patients who completed the study revealed there were no significant differences between the three treatment periods with respect to the general exercise test parameters, number of anginal attacks per week or nitrate consumption. Few side-effects were reported and were only mild in nature. On these findings, therefore, there would appear to be little justification for increasing the dose of the combination above the equivalent of treatment A.

Comparison between felodipine and isosorbide mononitrate as adjunct to beta blockade in patients > 65 years of age with angina pectoris

Coronary artery disease is an increasingly common medical problem in the elderly, and relatively few studies investigating drug therapy focus on this population. To assess the efficacy and safety of the calcium channel blocker, felodipine, and isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN), as adjunct to optimal beta-blocker therapy in elderly patients, a placebo-controlled, double-blind study was conducted in 46 patients, aged between 65 and 80 years, with documented stress-induced angina pectoris and myocardial ischemia. With use of a latin-square design, with 3 periods of 4 weeks each, exercise testing was performed after each period. Felodipine, 5 mg once daily, significantly improved both time to ischemic threshold and pain threshold (p = 0.02 and p = 0.003, respectively, vs placebo), and tended to increase total exercise time (p = 0.06 vs placebo). In contrast, ISMN, 20 mg twice daily, did not significantly affect these parameters. Comparison of the 2 active treatment arms showed that, overall, felodipine was more effective than ISMN, with a statistically significant difference for time to ischemic threshold (p = 0.02). With regard to safety, felodipine was also better tolerated than ISMN, which led to more patients discontinuing study medication with ISMN (p < 0.05 between ISMN and felodipine). It is concluded that in elderly patients who are treated with optimal beta blockade, felodipine, but not ISMN, leads to an additional significant reduction in ischemic parameters during exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Felodipine. A review of the pharmacology and therapeutic use of the extended release formulation in cardiovascular disorders

Felodipine is a vascular-selective, dihydropyridine calcium antagonist previously investigated as a conventional tablet formulation administered twice daily. More recently considerable experience has been gained with an extended release (ER) formulation which has the convenience of once daily administration. Felodipine ER has been well studied in patients with essential hypertension. As monotherapy in mild to moderate essential hypertension, felodipine ER is at least as effective in reducing blood pressure as other calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, diuretics and ACE inhibitors, with some results favouring felodipine ER at a statistically significant level at the dosages used. It is also effective combined with controlled release metoprolol or enalapril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. In patients with more severe forms of essential hypertension uncontrolled by beta-blocker and/or diuretic therapy, felodipine ER was effective as an 'add-on' therapy in placebo-controlled trials, and, at the dosages used, more effective than either sustained release nifedipine or nitrendipine. Felodipine produces effective control of blood pressure without negative effects on cardiac performance. In addition to its antihypertensive action, results suggest that felodipine therapy is associated with significant regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Furthermore, it appears suitable for use in patients with concomitant diabetes, renal dysfunction or asthma, and is also being investigated for use in patients with congestive heart failure or angina pectoris. Felodipine ER is an effective drug for the treatment of all grades of essential hypertension, and can be used both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive agents. Further clinical experience should fully establish the long term tolerability of felodipine ER and consequently its place in therapy relative to other accepted antihypertensive drugs. However, with the convenience of once daily administration, felodipine ER is a worthwhile innovation in the treatment of hypertension.

Felodipine: a new dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist

Felodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist, significantly reduces systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension and has been associated with beneficial hemodynamic effects in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris or congestive heart failure (CHF). In hypertensive patients, felodipine does not appear to significantly affect glomerular filtration rate, creatinine clearance, glucose tolerance, or plasma lipoprotein concentrations. Studies comparing felodipine with other agents as monotherapy in mild to moderate hypertension have demonstrated felodipine to be at least as efficacious as hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and HCTZ plus amiloride hydrochloride in combination. Comparisons of felodipine with other agents as adjuncts to beta-blocker or diuretic therapy have shown felodipine to be at least as effective as HCTZ, propranolol hydrochloride, prazosin hydrochloride, and nifedipine. Evaluations of patients with chronic stable angina are limited, and additional studies are needed before felodipine can be recommended for the routine management of angina pectoris. Similarly, additional studies are essential to delineate the role of felodipine, if any, in the management of CHF. In the management of hypertension, felodipine 5-40 mg/d significantly reduces systolic and diastolic BP. Although some patients may be controlled throughout the entire dosing interval when felodipine is administered bid, many patients will require more frequent dosing to obtain adequate BP control. Adverse effects associated with felodipine are similar to those of other dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonists and include peripheral edema, headache, dizziness, flushing, and fatigue. A potentially clinically important drug interaction was observed when felodipine was administered concomitantly with theophylline aminopropanol; significant decreases in theophylline concentrations were noted. In summary, felodipine appears to be safe and effective for the management of hypertension when used alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents. The efficacy of felodipine in the management of chronic stable angina pectoris and CHF requires further investigation.

The effects of felodipine in angina pectoris

The clinical response to felodipine, in addition to a beta-blocker, was evaluated and compared with placebo in this double-blind cross-over study. Twenty patients with exertional angina pectoris completed the study. Felodipine reduced the number of angina attacks and the Glyceryl Trinitrate (GTN) consumption. The median exercise capacity was increased 33% after 4 weeks' felodipine treatment compared with placebo. At maximal exercise, systolic blood pressure and rate pressure product were reduced by felodipine while no change was seen in heart rate or ST-depression. Felodipine reduced both supine and erect blood pressure. The mean supine blood pressure at rest was 138/82 mm Hg after four weeks' placebo treatment compared with 114/71 mmHg after felodipine 5-10 mg b.i.d. Felodipine has overall a modest but significant anti-anginal benefit when combined with a beta-blocker.

Felodipine prevents the poststenotic myocardial ischemia induced by alpha 2-adrenergic coronary constriction

Alpha 2-adrenoceptor-mediated coronary constriction contributes to the precipitation of myocardial ischemia during sympathetic activation. Felodipine is a novel dihydropyridine calcium-channel antagonist with vascular selectivity. In this study, the effect of felodipine on alpha 2-adrenoceptor-mediated poststenotic coronary constriction was investigated. In ten open-chest dogs, the selective alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist BHT 933 (200 micrograms IC) was infused before and after production of a severe stenosis on the left circumflex coronary artery. BHT 933 increased calculated resistance of the intact left circumflex coronary artery from 1.16 +/- 0.30 (SD) to 2.00 +/- 0.70 mmHg*min*100 g/ml (p less than 0.05) without changing posterior systolic wall thickening (sonomicrometry) (14.2 +/- 2.8% vs. 14.1 +/- 2.7%). In the presence of a severe stenosis, BHT 933 increased poststenotic coronary resistance from 1.59 +/- 0.54 to 2.88 +/- 1.16 mmHg*min*100 g/ml (p less than 0.05) and decreased posterior systolic wall thickening from 11.9 +/- 2.7% to 8.2 +/- 3.1% (p less than 0.05). In contrast, after intravenous pretreatment with felodipine (4 micrograms/kg), intracoronary infusion of BHT 933 did not change coronary resistance (1.69 +/- 0.61 vs. 1.61 +/- 0.64 mmHg*min*100 g/ml) and posterior systolic wall thickening (12.1 +/- 3.0% vs. 12.6 +/- 2.9%). In conclusion, felodipine prevents alpha 2-adrenoceptor-mediated coronary constriction and ischemic regional myocardial dysfunction distal to a severe coronary stenosis.