Change in delay of atrioventricular conduction after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia

Effect of Direct Slow Pathway Capture Mapping-Guided Ablation on Typical Atrioventricular Nodal Re-Entrant Tachycardia

BACKGROUND

Direct slow pathway capture (DSPC) mapping is a novel electrophysiological technique for detecting antegrade slow pathway input sites. However, the effect of DSPC mapping-guided ablation on atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DSPC mapping-guided ablation in typical AVNRT patients.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 301 consecutive typical AVNRT patients. The outcomes in patients who underwent DSPC mapping-guided ablation (DSPC group) and those who underwent conventional anatomical ablation (conventional group) were compared. The conventional group was established before introducing DSPC mapping-guided ablation. Positive DSPC sites were defined as sites with a return cycle atrioventricular prolongation of ≥20 ms with high-output (10-20 V) pacing during tachycardia or the last paced beat of the atrial extrastimulation.

RESULTS

Among 116 patients in the DSPC group, 102 (88%) had positive DSPC sites, and 86 (74%) had a successful ablation at that site. Of the remaining 30 patients, 27 had a successful anatomical ablation. The DSPC group had a significantly lower frequency of radiofrequency applications and shorter total application time than the conventional group (median: 5.5 [IQR: 3-11] times vs 9 [IQR: 5-15] times, and 168 [IQR: 108-266] seconds vs 244 [IQR: 158-391] seconds, respectively; P < 0.01). Moreover, the DSPC group had a numerically lower incidence of permanent pacemaker implantations and AVNRT recurrences than the conventional group (0% vs 1.6%; P = 0.17, and 1.7% vs 3.2%; P = 0.43, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

DSPC mapping-guided ablation was associated with a lower operative time, which can reduce the risk of AV conduction injury in typical AVNRT.

Periprocedural, early, and long-term risks of pacemaker implantation after atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia ablation: a French nationwide cohort

AIMS

Pacemaker implantation (PI) after atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia (AVNRT) ablation is a dreadful complication. We aimed to assess periprocedural, early, and late risks for PI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All 27 022 patients who underwent latest AVNRT ablation in France from 2009 to 2017, were identified in the nationwide medicalization database. A control group of 305 152 patients hospitalized for arm, leg, or skin injuries with no history of AVNRT or supraventricular tachycardia were selected. After propensity score matching, both groups had mean age of 53 ± 18 years and were predominantly female (64%). During this 9-year period, 822 of 27 022 (3.0%) AVNRT patients underwent PI, with significant higher risk in propensity-matched AVNRT patients compared to propensity-matched controls [2.9% vs. 0.9%; hazard ratio 3.4 (2.9-3.9), P < 0.0001]. This excess risk was significant during all follow-up, including periprocedural (1st month), early (1-6 months), and late (>6 months) risk periods. Annualized late risk per 100 AVNRT patients was 0.2%. In comparison to controls, excess risk was 0.2% in <30-year-old AVNRT patients; 0.7% in 30-50-year-old; 1.1% in 50-70-year-old and 6.5% over 70-year-olds. Risk for PI was also significantly different according to three procedural factors: centres, experience, and ablation date, with a 30% decrease since 2015.

CONCLUSION

Periprocedural, early, and late risks for PI were higher after AVNRT ablation compared to propensity-matched controls. Longer follow-up is needed as the excess risk seems to persist late after AVNRT ablation.

Permanent pacemaker implantation for late atrioventricular block in patients receiving catheter ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

The present study investigated the incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation for late atrioventricular block (AVB) in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) who received ablation. The data from 3,442 patients with AVNRT who received ablation were analyzed. Those who developed late AVB (>1 month after ablation) and received a PPM were identified. The incidence of PPM implantation in 1,148 matched patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and in the whole population of Taiwan were compared. Of the patients with AVNRT receiving ablation (mean follow-up duration 128.3 ± 62.5 months), 15 (0.4%) received PPM implantation for late AVB (mean interval after catheter ablation 95.4 ± 55.0 months). Only age (odds ratio 1.05, p = 0.02) and transient AVB (odds ratio 8.55, p = 0.01) during the procedure were independently associated with PPM implantation for late AVB. The patients with AVNRT had a greater incidence of PPM implantation due to late AVB compared to the matched patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. The annual incidence of PPM implantation for AVB was also greater in the patients with AVNRT than in the general population. In conclusion, the incidence of PPM implantation for late AVB in patients with AVNRT who received catheter ablation was low but still greater than that in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and the general population in Taiwan.

Catheter ablation of junctional ectopic tachycardia in children, with preservation of atrioventricular conduction

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic junctional ectopic tachycardia is a rare arrhythmia in children. Several studies have demonstrated that drug therapy is often ineffective and sometimes the only achieved effect is rate control. Early presentation and frequent recurrence are associated with adverse outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three consecutive children, aged 9, 7 and 12 years respectively, underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation for junctional ectopic tachycardia, after having failed antiarrhythmic drug therapy. The entire His bundle was plotted out and marked, using the Localisa navigation system. The arrhythmia was readily and repeatedly inducible using intravenous isoprenaline infusion and the site of earliest retrograde conduction during tachycardia could be assessed. Ablations were performed in sinus rhythm, empirically targeting the site of earliest retrograde conduction during tachycardia.

RESULTS

This approach was successful in abolishing tachyarrhythmia in the first two patients, in whom the successful ablation site was located superoparaseptally. In the third patient, junctional ectopic tachycardia was inducible, despite abolishing retrograde atrial activation, in a septal location on the tricuspid valve annulus. Further ablations in the superoparaseptal region, closer to the His bundle, were successful in rendering tachyarrhythmia noninducible. Over a median follow-up of 10 months, none of the patients has had recurrence of arrhythmia, despite discontinuing all antiarrhythmic medications.

CONCLUSIONS

Radio frequency catheter ablation of junctional ectopic tachycardia is feasible with preservation of atrioventricular conduction.

Transient complete atrioventricular block occurring 1 week after radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia

Atrioventricular (AV) block following radiofrequency (RF) ablation for the treatment of AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is a rare but serious complication of this procedure. Almost all such cases occur during or immediately after radiofrequencey (RF) energy application, followed by prompt recovery. The present report describes a 22-year-old woman with first-degree AV block on electrocardiography, who developed complete AV block 1 week after RF ablation for the treatment of the uncommon form of AVNRT (slow/slow). The patient's complete AV block persisted for another 1 week before she recovered.

Effects of slow pathway ablation on fast pathway function in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

INTRODUCTION

This study investigated whether fast pathway conduction properties are altered by slow pathway ablation in patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Forty consecutive patients who underwent successful ablation of the slow pathway were prospective subjects for the study. Isoproterenol was used to enhance conduction and to differentiate interactive mechanisms. Potential electrotonic interactions were assessed by comparing patients with and those without residual dual AV node physiology after slow pathway ablation. Paired and unpaired t-tests were used when appropriate P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In the entire study population, heart rates were not significantly different before and after slow pathway ablation (RR = 770 +/- 114 msec before and 745 +/- 99 msec after, P = 0.07). Anterograde fast pathway conduction properties were unchanged after slow pathway ablation (effective refractory period, 348 +/- 84 msec before and 336 +/- 86 msec after, P = 0.13; shortest 1:1 conduction, 410 +/- 93 msec before and 400 +/- 82 msec after, P = 0.39). Retrograde fast pathway characteristics also were similar before and after ablation. Neither anterograde nor retrograde fast pathway conduction properties during isoproterenol infusion were changed by slow pathway ablation. When the study population was further divided into patients with (n = 13) or without (n = 27) residual dual AV node physiology, no significant change was detected in fast pathway function in either group after slow pathway ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Fast pathway conduction characteristics were not affected by slow pathway ablation. In patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, observations suggest that fast and slow pathways are functionally distinct.